Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Michieldumon!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MichielDMN!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Opera10.10.png edit

 
File:Opera10.10.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Justass (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Firefox3.5.5.PNG edit

 
File:Firefox3.5.5.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

OSX (talkcontributions) 13:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Seamonkey.png edit

 
File:Seamonkey.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

OSX (talkcontributions) 13:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:.com logo.png edit

Hi, please don't nominate a {{PD-textlogo}} for speedy deletion. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I tought the logo of Verisign was not purely textual. I am wrong? If so, than I'm sorry. --MichielDMN (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Nederlands is geen enkel probleem. Commons is niet strikt alleen maar Engelstalig, er wordt hier gecommuniceerd in allerlei talen. Een logo dat uit een klein beetje tekst en een paar simpele geometrische vormen bestaat, wordt op Commons beschouwd als te simpel voor copyright. Je bent niet de enige die dit niet wist, hier lopen dagelijks mensen tegenaan. Een interessante pagina om eens te lezen in dat kader is Commons:Threshold of originality. Hier staan wat voorbeelden op van logo's die te simpel zijn gebleken voor copyright. Zo heeft Best Western tot drie maal toe tevergeefs geprobeerd het copyright te registreren van dit logo. Jcb (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dag Jcb. Ik hoopte dat ik intussen al door had wanneer iets origineel is en wanneer niet, maar blijkbaar is dat niet zo. In die zin heel fijn dat je me er op wijst. En verrassend van dat logo dat het niet origineel genoeg is! Goed om te weten, waarvoor dank. Vriendelijke groet, --MichielDMN (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Logo SKEPP edit

Dear,

I am the designer of this logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Macetaria#File:SKEPP_vzw_logo.svg I can prove this with design screenshots, a blogpost and mails from SKEPP directors.

Macetaria (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Macetaria, I will answer in Dutch, because I suppose you speak it as well as I do - if not, I will translate the rest of my answer. Ik wil gerust geloven dat u het logo heeft gemaakt, maar officiële logo's kunnen slechts op Wikimedia Commons worden overgezet na een officiële aanvraag (zie Commons:OTRS). Ik ben zelf niet zo thuis in de bewuste procedure, maar dit is volgens mij bedoeld om te verhinderen dat iemand zomaar komt beweren dat hij/zij de maker is van een afbeelding terwijl dat niet zo is. Als de echte rechthebbende dan een klacht indient, dan heeft Wikimedia behalve een schriftelijke leugen geen poot om op te staan. Ik geloof het dus, maar daar gaat het niet om. Hopelijk kun je er begrip voor opbrengen. Doe gerust een aanvraag via OTRS, de afbeelding in kwestie kan het artikel op Wikipedia alleen maar ten goede komen. M.v.g., --MichielDMN (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Één.svg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Één.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 02:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see someone else has removed the nomination because it has the license for basic geometric forms. So I suppose nothing has to be done anymore, isn't it? --MichielDMN (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vascer (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio edit

Hallo Michiel DMN deze en deze ook dan? Bedoel je dat alle afbeeldingen van De Zevende Dag hieronder vallen? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Beste Lotje, ik ben ook geen expert als het over auteursrecht gaat, maar iets zegt me dat hier iets niet klopt. Het Vlaams Belang heeft die stukjes op z'n YouTube-kanaal gezet, waar blijkbaar een gunstige licentie geldt waardoor stills op Wikimedia kunnen worden overgenomen. Mijn verwijderverzoek werd trouwens daarom ook ongedaan gemaakt, zag ik. Het zou me echter niet verbazen dat de VRT de échte rechten hierop bezit en dat de bewuste partij dus niet zomaar dingen op YouTube mag zetten onder de relatief ruime licentie zoals dat nu is gebeurd. Ik zal dat even nagaan bij de VRT, denk ik. Als het oké is voor hen, dan is er uiteraard geen probleem met deze afbeeldingen. Integendeel, dan is 't een meerwaarde. M.v.g., MichielDMN (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
ik denk dat MichielDMN de correcte weg bewandelt. Ik denk dat de video in elk geval in aanmerking komt voor verwijdering, zie de gebruiksvoorwaarden van de VRT. Vysotsky (talk) 07:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ik ga het melden bij de VRT. Zij weten allicht beter wat ze ermee moeten doen. M.v.g., MichielDMN (talk) 07:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Dank. Zou je ook expliciet willen vragen of deze twee stills zijn toegestaan? Ik heb een emailadres voor je, indien gewenst. Vysotsky (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
En misschien is het handig om het Speedy request om te zetten in een regular Deletion request, met de opmerking over de correspondentie met de VRT? Vysotsky (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
(na bwc) Dat zou inderdaad handig zijn, ik heb nu enkel het hallo-adres. Best per mail (via de mailfunctie hier) naar mij sturen dan. MichielDMN (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Als het echt over copyvio gaat, is een snelle procedure beter, zou ik denken. Het kan later nog altijd teruggehaald worden, heb ik al gemerkt. De mods weten beter wat ze hiermee moeten doen dan ik. MichielDMN (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dewinter edit

Ìt may seem odd that I uploaded this video after you proposed a speedy deletion of a still. That's because it took video2commons 14 hours to upload it (so I started the process before the request.) I will of course delete this video file if the speedy deletion request is granted. Vysotsky (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Verwijdering category edit

Hallo MichielDMN, zonet de Category:Concertgebouw (Brugge) verwijderd... Of zie ik daar iets over het hoofd? :-) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dag Lotje. Wat bedoel je? Die categorie bestaat toch? MichielDMN (talk) 19:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply