Miebner

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: "No reason given" Unblock reason: "A.Savin unblocked the user. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)"Reply This template should be archived normally.	(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)
čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ suomi ∙ हिन्दी ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 day edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 day for the following reason: Vandalism.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sperre war wegen mehrfachem unberechtigten "Schnell-Löschantrag". --A.Savin 22:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am out of Commons for an indefinitve endurance, Thank you and fuck off! --Miebner (talk) 22:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, A.Savin, it took me ten years to finally get a block for at least a day in any of the wiki projects and u r the fxxxing axxhxxx who did it. Great achievement! Congratulations! --22:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Could you, please, block me indefinitely on commons? thanx. Additionatelly, please, delete Category:Pictures by User:Miebner and all references to it. --Miebner (talk) 23:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@A.Savin. Too much a coward??? I truely hate double standards!!! Please, block me indefinitely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are you waiting for? --Miebner (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@A.Savin: As this block prevents me from having access to The Wikipedia Library, please unblock. I will never ever contribute to Commons again, though. --Miebner (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisenhammer Dorfchemnitz Gesamtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Grab Ralf Alex Fichtner.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Grab Ralf Alex Fichtner.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grab Ralf Alex Fichtner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please use FoP-Germany template, not Freedom of panorama template edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. Kindly use the clearer {{FoP-Germany}} for images of copyrighted public monuments and artworks of Germany, instead of less clear {{Freedom of panorama}}. I have changed the template used in one of your image files. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic