Morgner

Bildrechte

Hallo Herr Morgner!

Ich würde gerne 2 Bilder von Wil SG für den Cover einer Dolkumentations-DVD über die Stadt Wil verwenden. Ich habe versucht Sie per e-mail zu erreichen aber ich habe es nicht geschafft (wo ist ihre e-mail adresse verborgen?) ich bin unter kontakt@almas-music.ch erreichbar. Vielen Dank für die Antwort User: Diomaiuta

File names

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

In future please choose more understandable names for files then Image:Dsc00849.jpg.

EugeneZelenko 03:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that's right. Sorry, this was a mistake. Hope it's better with the new pictures.

ka-em-zwei-ein

Also descriptions of images are more than incomplete

I fighted hard to categorize all Iceland images. You have a lot of them and I think I was able to find the right places because I also visited a fair amount of Iceland. But I have to admit that your descriptions are very incomplete and for people who do not know the exact spots the images are more or less useless. Please be more verbose and descriptive. Thanks for sharing your work in the WikiMedia effort anyway. Andreas Tille 11:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Yes, you'r right. I was afraid of such comment. But I have some problems with this pictures. Even if I did the pictures by myselft, I'm often not sure enought where exectly the places were or what exactly they are showing. This means, I'm not close enought to the landscape detail to be sure, that I find the correct description. That's why I prefered to give only abstract descriptions of them to prevent going with wrong information. Maybe, it's much easier for people like you, who have a better clue of the visible objects. I'm angry about my ignorance about locations or names of what I saw and next time I do a tourney I will make better use (at least) of my GPS to give correct loacation information. The only bit I know about where the motives are, is a kind of 'between X and Y' but X and Y typical are points with about 180km to 260km distance. So I dont' know what to do. Not uploading or not describing? Not describing gives the possibility, that people who know, may add more complete and correct information about the objects. This is, why I decided to upload them without having exact information about them. Waht do you think? --ka-em-zwei-ein 22:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Well, WikiPedia is about illustrating something. If you don't know really the place which the image illustrates it is not really useful. This does not mean that you should not upload some abstract photo, but sometimes the quality of the photos would not justify uploading several versions of this abstract motiv. IMHO, quality is not about uploading many things but uploading "the best things". So if you don't know the details I would only upload an abstract photo if it is good enough to illustrate the abstract thing very good (which means better than other images in WikiPedia at least). Andreas Tille 20:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I can agree with your point of view. I believe, that team work is an important point here. I'v seriouse problems in cathegorizing my pictures. You can read a discussion about this point here on this site. The reasons for which the pictures will potentially be used, are different. If someone writes an article about landscape forms of Island (for example) he/she might not be exactly interested where a picture was made (may be), but may be happy to have lots of different pictures to choose from. Another author should be interessted on specific plants, regardless where the pictures are made and so on. Further, the decision, where a picture is to cathegorize is not easy. People recognizing very different things on the same picture but it seams, that assigning multiple cathegroies to a single file will not be honored on this place.

Wrong!!! Just add more than one category!

I'm a bit unhappy about the cathegorizing system on Wikimedia. Especially the way, who pictures can be found. One example: If I'm in search of a specific flower, should I search in all 'Plant of *' cathegories?

No, if people take care for their images they tag it with 'Plant of *' and the name of the plant and in case they don't know the name they should add Category:Unidentified plants. See the team effort above for botanical experts ...

It's nice that you did so for example for one of your images Image:Iceland_4822.JPG and I just added the 'Plants of Iceland' category. So you have a nice example in your own folder. (Nice picture BTW!)

For me it's a critical question. I'm working an article about 'Koppelgetriebe'. I'm sure, here are many pictures for this article, but how can I find them if picuters of machines, robots, devices, mechanical gadegets, .... are only cathegorized in one or two otherwise cathegories? I'm sure, here are lots of pictures showing 'Koppelgetriebe' and other mechanical systems in real life and I'm (realy!) not interested in where the pictures are made, if they only show the <thing> I need for my article. An example is Image:Zuerich_Hauptbahnhof_3374.JPG which (for me) shows an train in the main station of Zurich, but the picture is not cathegorized as 'Train', so, no one who is in search of a picutre of a train can find this picture, because he don't know, that he will find a picture of a train under 'zurich' or 'cycling'. I'm realy confused! PS: Maybe, I'm able to find out the location of the pictures from Island, because I have a GPS recording from my travel through Island. May be, I can match the times of the picture and the ones from my GPS recorder. I will do reseach in this direction. ka-em-zwei-ein 20:42, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

This would be great.

Andreas Tille 05:08, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Wallpapers and other

Hi Morgner oder hallo Morgner

Thank you for creating nice wallpapers for desktops but i think the commons are not the right place for them, because we can't use them in any Wikimedia project. ->> Image:Bildkunst 2572.jpg.

Pleas also note that english text is preferred.

Articles like Kalabrien:FotoQuerschnitt are not very usefull, and pleas choose better categories, beacuse this article is now in soooo many. So when someone wants to look for sunset he stumbles over images like this Image:Kalabrien_Ricadi_Sandwellen_2129.jpg. And Image:DSC02223.JPG in Category Plants is also nod good, because you know, that it is a cactus and better a prickly pear.

Your images are nice but your stile of providing them is painfully. So please improve it, look at the community portal, read other articles and categories.

--DustyDingo 18:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I try to change it all. Sorry. I will study the rules and adapt my documents to follow them. I had the feeling, that it's more usefull if the documents are connected.

Further I did a mistake by generating a category 'Olive', but I'm not sure how to correctly erase it now.

A question: If anything is in a subcategory, is it also in the maincategory? I couldn't find out it. This is the reason why I assigned 'plants' to the 'cactus'.

--ka-em-zwei-ein 18:54, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

• A category also can be in a category, so the best way to add an image to a category is to identify it as good as you can, for eg. a photo of a VW Typ 2 t1b. It's a car, but if you know that it is a VW you can add it to Category:VW, not to Category:Car, and if you are clever you can add it to Category:VW Typ 2, not to Category:VW. (please also note for life-forms latin names are preferred) --DustyDingo 21:03, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Hallo DustyDingo,

I can't understand the intention of what I read. My idea is, if tis is applicabel: I will delete the pages I created and insert the images in my private site. Are you (or anyone) able to recategorize the images? In this case I would simplay upload my other pictures an put them in only one category the seems to me as correct. Is this a suitable way?

--ka-em-zwei-ein 20:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)--ka-em-zwei-ein 20:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Hi, i updated the german page Commons:Erste_Schritte a few minutes ago. There you can find the information, how to do it. I really like your images :) Go on, norro 23:00, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Schön...

Schöne Bilder, die du da von Wil SG aufgenommen hast :-) --Filzstift 5 July 2005 12:20 (UTC)

Freut mich, dass es gefällt. Danke! ka-em-zwei-ein 5 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)

Hellow. My name is ユプシロン ( =Upsilon, in japanese sound). I looked Image:Iceland Plants 4830.JPG and Image:Iceland Plants 4832.JPG. I think, they are Dianthus superbus or Dianthus chinensis, or Dianthus someone. If above information be helpful for you, I feel happy. ユプシロン 09:51, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Adding; Image:Iceland Plants 4882.JPG is Columbine or Aquilegia flabellata. Image:Iceland Plants 4896.JPG may be Clematis fruit, I imagen.ユプシロン 10:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:Iceland Plant 4348.JPG

Hi,

dieses photo sieht aus wie sedum acre, was denkst du?

TeunSpaans 09:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Hallo, Ich habe keeine Ahnung, aber die Dinger sehen sehr ähnlich aus. Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die Beschreibung geändert.

--ka-em-zwei-ein 20:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Kastell

Hallo,

die Bildunterschrift im Artikel Tropea ist falsch! Es handelt sich mitnichten um ein Kastell sondern um die Wallfahrtskirche Santa Maria dell'Isola. Bitte berichtigen. Ciao, AlMare 18:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Wunderbar! Ich habe den Artikel zwar nicht angelegt, aber ich denke, dass diese Unterschrift auch von mir sein kann. Das liegt daran, dass ich von denen, die mit mir reisten, diese Auskunft erhielt. Ich bin eher ein Mensch der Augen als der Begriffe. Darum bin ich froh, das ich nun endlich weiss, was das merkwürdige Gebäude da unten tatsächlich ist. Ich hatte auch den Eindruck dass es eher etwas wallfahriges ist, als etwas trotzige, denn wie eine Trotze sieht es wirklich nicht aus.

--ka-em-zwei-ein 20:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Iceland_4722.JPG

Hallo,

bist Du Dir sicher, dass es sich bei dem Inhalt der "Beutel" um Dünger handelt? Das wäre für isländische Verhältnisse ganz schön viel auf einen Ort. Nach meiner Erfahrung wird vom Isländischen Forstverein in diesen (im Original für den Transport von Zucker gemachten) Riesentüten Rindenmulch transportiert, mit dem Waldwege angelegt werden. Hat sich denn in der Nähe (vielleicht hinter dem Photographen) ein Wäldchen befunden? viele Grüße, Torsten 19:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iceland Bridge 4404.JPG

Hallo, kannst Du bei diesem tollen Foto noch eine etwas nähere Ortsangabe ergänzen? Vielen Dank und beste Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 08:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image promotion.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iceland Bridge 4404.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

grendel|khan 13:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

File:Iceland Akureyri 4956.JPG

File:Iceland Akureyri 4956.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--JD554 (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Bestimmung von File:Iceland Plant 4334.JPG

Hallo Herr Morgner,

ich habe Ihr Bild [[:File:Iceland Plant 4334.JPG] in Category: Thymus praecox geschoben, da nach http://www.floraislands.is/plantlist.htm Thymus praecox ssp. arcticus die einzige wildwachsende Thymian-Sippe in Island ist. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Iceland Airport Keflavik 4226.JPG

File:Iceland Airport Keflavik 4226.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Iceland Reykjavik 4234.JPG

File:Iceland Reykjavik 4234.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Iceland Airport Keflavik 4223.JPG

File:Iceland Airport Keflavik 4223.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JD554 (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hi Morgner! My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy). I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your Wikimedia Commons page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book. Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your Wikimedia Commons nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication. The photo which I would use is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moos_5769.jpg Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com Bye, Edoardo Edoardo.bit (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Iceland Akureyri 4978.JPG

Eleassar (t/p) 21:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Iceland 4724.JPG

Eleassar (t/p) 21:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Iceland Akureyri 4959.JPG

File:Iceland Akureyri 4959.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wil Buchhandlung 3104.JPG

File:Wil Buchhandlung 3104.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)