User talk:Moroder/Archives 2013-1

you've got a new message

here Penyulap ☏ 10:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Three saints Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi viere depënt Apostul Andrea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 12:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel Group from Sellajoch Fassa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo. Some noise in the blue sky (easily fixable via masked sharpening and slight NR), sharpness in 100% is not optimal (but in relation to the distance still OK for QI). --Tuxyso 09:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC) OK to me. Mattbuck 16:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fabrick in Blumau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampele Hof Sankt Michael Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but please, get rid of the minor dust spot --Poco a poco 15:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Done U must have a dustfinder, what is the name of the brand? Thanks for the review --Moroder 16:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansitz Lafay in Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lafay-Hof Kastelruth Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nude by Johann Dominik Mahlknecht - Museum Ferdinandeum-back-bg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steger Brücke über den Eisack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberwirt in Atzwang Gesamtansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi

Buongiorno, Moroder. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Friend, unfortunately I live quite far from Rome in the North of Italy and I rarely have a chance to visit Rome so I can't promis you anything. And indeed I do not know sombody to send there. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mareufer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 18:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old house in Urtijei 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peza Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

D800 lenses

Hi! I recently got a D800E. As you have a D800; can you tell me what lenses you use, and if you're happy with them? Thanks in advance. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Congratulation and welcome to the club! I use the 24-70 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 by Nikon. The 70-200 is rather heavvy therefor I use it less then needed. Best regards and hope to see you often on QI and why not on FP. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

I have the 70-200/2.8; I'm still hesitating about the 24-70/2.8. Thanks! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 21:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Cara Marie, what made you decide to buy the E version of the D800? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

The promise of extra sharpness :) From what I can see at this point the camera doesn't seem very much affected by moiré, see for instance File:Grande Galerie Louvre by Thomas Allom full.jpg. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschötzer Kapelle über St. Ulrich in Gröden im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 08:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 sunrise view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramica sassolungo 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain chapel of Holy Cross on Raschötz in winter .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 sunrise view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Jastrow 12:31, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschötzerbahn aus St. Ulrich Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 16:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint with child Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 21:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barocque statue In Santa Maria della Salute Venice .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but Moroder, is it possible to have a slightly wider crop on both sides? --Kadellar 22:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Info I uploaded a version with a wider crop but it has disturbing elements I don't like. You can see it under other version. I wonder if you like it? -- 06:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC) The sides are disturbing, indeed. I think the best solution would be a crop on the edges of the red fabric and the white wall, so they don't appear "for a few pixels". It'd be wider than this version but it wouldn't have disturbing elements. What do you think? --Kadellar 16:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)  Done --Moroder 00:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks for reworking. --Kadellar 20:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryce Canyon USA october 2012 e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryce Canyon USA october 2012 d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 18:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryce Canyon USA october 2012 c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --Ximeg 14:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bridge in Venice by Calatrava.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 sunrise view thumb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and useful - beautiful --Herzi Pinki 18:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 sunrise view 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done --Rjcastillo 18:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black Mountain in Utah 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a little brighter, a little more contrast and sharpness. file updated ... ;) --Aleks G 23:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert in Utah by Wolfgang Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --JLPC 23:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert of Arizona 2012 by Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Canyon Colorado river by Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert in Utah by Wolfgang Moroder 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thank you for the fetus video!

Planning to use this video in an upcoming web article. Excellent work!

Thank you, it's a pleasure. Please let me know where --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terpsichore Mahlknecht Museum Ferdinandeum Innsbruck 2012 var.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 03:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained Glass windows in the Saint Antony church of Urtijëi, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained Glass windows in the Saint Antony church of Urtijëi has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelangelo Unterberger on the Museum Ferdinandeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't really like the crop - the door's inclusion feels messy. Mattbuck 04:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Done You are right. I felt unhappy with the crop myself, thanks for the tip --Moroder 09:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Yeah, that's a bit better. It's one of those situations where nothing will ever be quite right. Mattbuck 20:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Nicolaus-Unterberger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Siegesdenkmal Bozen east.JPG

And also:

• File:Siegesdenkmal Bozen south.jpg
• File:Siegesdenkmal Bozen west.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Railwaystation in Bolzano Bozen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Use of NT image

Dear Dr Moroder

I wrote an article, and used your image:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Nuchal_translucency_Dr._Wolfgang_Moroder.jpg

I hope you approve, and if not I will be happy to remove it. The article can be found at:

http://markswaterhouse.hubpages.com/hub/yournuchaltranslucencyscan

Thank you

Kind Regards Mark Waterhouse

It's a pleasure that my image can be useful to your website. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Hilf Kirche in Seis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert in Utah by Wolfgang Moroder 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 22:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grohman peak eastern face 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice QI. -- Godot13 20:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piz Sella und Langkofel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Flugzeuge

Hallo, immerhin hast du eines meine Bilder schonmal negativ bewertet weil eine Stromleitung zu sehen war, und eine andere Kameraposition war nicht möglich. Man hätte den Kondezstreifen wegmachen können, aber ich bin kein freund von Bildbearbeitung. Beste Grüße von Pustertal nach Gröden!--Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Guten Morgen, ich auch nicht aber Stromleitungen mitten im Bild sind schon was anderes... Du solltest aber die Diskussion belassen oder durchstreichen (Wikiregeln). Danke für die Bewertung! Liebe Grüße und Gut Bild ... --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Mir sind die Wikiregeln bekannt, kannst die ja wiederherstellen, dan scheints halt bei der QL-Benachrichtigung auf. Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hab schon gemacht. Diskussion kan ja jeder sehen :)--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, kein Problem. Gruss aus Venedig (bin 2 Tage in der Wo hier) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Revenge Review eines QI-Kandidaten von mir / Konstruktive Anmerkung zu deinem FP-Kandidaten

Hallo Moroder! Ich habe dein Review meines QI-Kandidaten kommentiert: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:85mm-1.8-AF-D.jpg. Ich persönlich fand es schon sehr auffällig, dass nach meiner negativen Bewertungen deines FP-Kandidaten direkt zwei negative Revenge-Bewertungen (deine einzigen vom 23.01.) auf meine Bilder gefolgt sind. Ich finde, dass man freundlich, ermutigend und konstruktiv miteinander umgehen sollte.

Nun zum konstruktiven Teil: Wir hatten ja bereits schon mal eine Diskussion um ein unscharfes Bild von dir (es war glaube ich ein Haus in den Bergen). Ich verstehe nicht, warum die Bilder deiner D800 (zudem mit dem tollen Objektiv und bei 1/800 sec) z.T. so unscharf werden. Ich selbst hatte mal das große Vergnügen mir eine D800 zu fotografieren und konnte z.B. bei diesem Bild keinerlei Unschärfe erkennen. Ist denn wirklich gewährleistet, dass mit deiner Kamera-Objektiv-Kombination alles in Ordnung ist? Vielleicht eine Dejustrierung etc.?= --Tuxyso (talk) 23:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Eine solche neg FP Bewertung wirft den Kandidaten in den Eimer. War deshalb wütend und möchte mich dafür entschuldigen. Gut Bild! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Erst mal ziehe ich den Hut, vor deiner Cou­ra­ge, einen Fehler zuzugeben (das findet man sehr sehr selten auf WP / COM). Ich möchte dem hinzufügen, dass ich mit meiner negativen Bewertung besser einige Zeit hätte warten sollen, da Bewertungen, gerade bei FP-Kandidaten eine gewisse Voreingenommenheit produzieren. Ich musste das z.B. bei meinem (zum Glück erfolgreichen) FP-Kandidaten Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Ruhrtalbruecke-Sonnenuntergang.jpg selbst erfahren. Zunächst NUR positive bis euphorische Bewertungen, dann die erste negative Bewertung und darauffolgende eine ganze Latte negativer Bewertungen. BTW: wenn dir das Bild gefällt, freue ich mich natürlich über eine Stimme bei dem POY-Wettbewerb. Kandidieren auch Bilder von dir?

Noch mal zu deiner Kamera / dem Objektiv: Kannst du dir die Unschärfe denn erklären? In der Theorie dürfte es an deiner Top-Kamerahardware ja eigentlich nicht liegen, zudem die Shooting-Parameter eigentlich ausschließen, dass der Fehler hinter der Kamera liegt. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Ja ich war wütend aus dem Grund den du gerade hier nennst und meine Reaktion war sicher falsch. Nun zur Sache: ich finde das Bild ist nicht besonders unscharf. Auf jedem Fall wurde die Aufnahme vom Sessellift aus gemacht und das 24-70 Objektiv hat kein VR, wahrscheinlich liegts an dem. Grüße aus Gröden --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischburg detail with S Christina Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maalik Rinne Langkofel Eck 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryce Canyon USA october 2012 Wolfgang Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAter dolorosa dlieja da Sacun detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschötzer Kapelle über St. Ulrich in Gröden im Winter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice. Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria di Nazareth Venice, night view 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments isturbing in the sky--Steinsplitter 15:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Question What disturbs you in the sky? --Moroder 17:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC) see image notes--Steinsplitter 19:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Hob as in Osttirol koane Fliega? ;-) --Moroder 20:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Steinsplitter 07:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert in Utah by Wolfgang Moroder 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need white balance, the left side of the picture is more blurred than the right --The Photographer 20:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Done Corrected the WB, thanks for the tip --Moroder 23:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sëlva with Stevia in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade of Chiesa dei Frari in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with a bit of sharpening to remove perspective blur at the top, but ok. --Mattbuck 05:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Foto Ortisei

Salve, ho condiviso la sua foto in un gruppo facebook su Ortisei. Questo è il link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10200360580034521&set=oa.10151957273667923&type=1&theater

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Night view of the facade of the church Santa Maria di Nazareth in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 sunrise view with tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

12+3 weeks?

What do you mean here by "12+3 weeks"? 15 weeks? If so, why not just say "15 weeks"? I don't get it... - dcljr (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, it means 12 weeks+3days. Scuse me, where did you find it? I'll correct it --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Fetal movements 3D Ultrasound Dr. Wolfgang Moroder.theora.ogv#Summary. Also, "16+2" is used in the description at File:Banana sign 16+2 weeks Dr. W. Moroder.jpg#Summary (of course, the file name can stay the way it is). Thanks. - dcljr (talk) 04:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Altarpieces painted by Melchior Paul von Deschwanden.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Altarpieces painted by Melchior Paul von Deschwanden.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-Godot13 (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The Stained glass windows of the Saint Antony church in Urtijëi.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The Stained glass windows of the Saint Antony church in Urtijëi.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Crisp detail, defines the category. It seems that the top of each window is obstructed by something on the outside. Regardless, nice presentation. -- Godot13 (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

• It is the shadow of the prospicient roof, thanks for the review --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support : Good set. --JLPC (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

=> Promoted. -- Godot13 (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley Arizona october 2012 Rock wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA/overexposure at top. Perhaps crop off the sky? Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Done ul new cropped version.thks --Moroder 17:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Better, but there's a bad crop bottom left. Mattbuck 11:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC) fixed--Moroder 17:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 08:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Otto Moroder Mayrhofen.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Otto Moroder Mayrhofen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Ehrenhöfer at train station Bozen steam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Franz Xaver Kirchebner.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Franz Xaver Kirchebner.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Stained glass Windows in the Parish Church of Urtijëi.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass Windows in the Parish Church of Urtijëi.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucifix Otto Moroder.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

This is one of the images forming part of the Valued image set: Allegories of steam and electricity by Franz Ehrenhöfer on Wikimedia Commons. The image set has been assessed under the valued image set criteria and is considered the most valued set on Commons within the scope: Allegories of steam and electricity by Franz Ehrenhöfer You can see its nomination at Commons:Valued image candidates/Allegories of steam and electricity by Franz Ehrenhöfer.

• Great sets! Godot13 (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosary Madonna bozzetto Rudolf Moroder.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucifix Otto Moroder detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Ehrenhöfer at train station Bozen electricity.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not entirely convinced, although I can't find anything which is actually wrong with it, it just seems somehow off. Mattbuck 12:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Question Do you want it sharpened? --Moroder 20:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me. It reminds Metropolis. These are the same dates.--Archaeodontosaurus 18:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Presepemuseogardena.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostburg Südseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 14:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi viere depënt 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Karneid with view of the city Bolzano not retouched.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but you could increase black value / micro contrast and sharpen a bit more. Photo looks a bit washed out. --Tuxyso 14:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 18:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Du...

...schuldest mir eine Halbe Forst-Bier wegen diesem hier ;-)
Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi vieresc depënc sant cun fust liber y ciapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 00:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Using your photos

Just letting you know that I am creating an English version of Rudolph Moroder, and I am using one of your photos as an illustration. Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

It's a grat pleasure and I thank you on behalf of the Moroder Family --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Resciesa lueses ciampinoi 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 05:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciampinoi 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --High Contrast 00:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannes der Täufer Mariahilfkirche Seis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja Urtijëi viere depënt San Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight anticlockwise tilt. Mattbuck 00:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint Better. Mattbuck 10:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob und Valentin in Tschöfas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent picture. --NormanB 21:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäuskirche in Tanürz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock Albions Ostseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Arcalino 09:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock Albions Westseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

use of image

Dear Wolfgang,

I would like to ask you permission to use your image (with credits) in a sociological essay on Venice that I am writing. The essay will be pulished in a social science academic journal.

let me know,

best

Andrea Lorenzet

I'm very leased if you use my image, but please let me know which one. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Tommele Albeins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Maria Einsiedeln .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality.--ArildV 08:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Maria Einsiedeln Bildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischgl Albions.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schreiber Hof Lajen Kruzifix.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main entrans Saint Nicholas Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frescos of Saint Lawrenceand Saint Stephen by Joseph Arnold.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penn Haus Albions.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coronation of Mary Krönung Mariens by Arnold Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerome and Ambrose by Arnold in Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but I think there is a difference in sharpness of left/right which is not explainable from parameters and shooting position. The right side is remarkable sharper than the left side. I pointed out similiar problem on other photos of you. Probably it could be a good idea to check if the 24-70 is somehow maladjusted, e.g. in a laboratory-like setting. --Tuxyso 10:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review and the suggestion--Moroder 12:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairhofer Lajen im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maurer Haus Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairhofer Lajen window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glasfenster Kirche Sankt Vigil Kastelruth .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob und Valentin in Tschöfas Pforte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Peter bei Lajen aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordansicht Zentrum Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Westeingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--Godot13 01:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäuskirche in Tanürz Haupteingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zehenter Hof Lajen Gitterfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenhaus Lajen Südseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgin Mary carved by Giacobe Mussner (1866-1932).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brilliant quality --Arcalino 20:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Lajen Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great image. Can you fix the perspective on the left border?--Godot13 00:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review and the hint, must be better now --Moroder 08:09, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Perfect --Godot13 17:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Südseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fix the two (dust) spots in the sky, upper left.-- Godot13 00:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Done I killed three of the beasts...--Moroder 12:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) You are the spot-slayer...--Godot13 17:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar Vergin Mary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefanus hoher Rat in Jerusalem von Josef Arnold Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13ma stazion dla creusch de Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 21:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mair Hof Lajen Südseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Innenansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Hilf Kirche in Seis portal .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 16:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Lajen Gesamtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --Julian Herzog 10:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zehenter Hof und Hohenhaus Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenhaus Hof Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Heuschupfe

Hallo, deinen Kommtar bezüglich meines Bildes (bei der QL Bewerbung) kann ich nicht Nachollziehen. Geolokalisierung ist kein Kriterium für QL-Bilder, dessweiteren finde ich spigelt das Foto recht realitätsnah die Hütten. Eine Belichtungskorrektur finde ich nicht zwingend notwendig.--Steinsplitter (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, ich hab ja dein Bild nicht abgelehnt! Ich hab nur kommentiert. Klar ist geoloc. nicht notwendig aber es wäre angenehm, wenn man wüsste wo die Aufnahme gemacht wurde. Was die Belichtung angeht habe ich nur bemerkt, dass die Scheune und die Bäume etwas dunkel wirken und ein aufhellen imho das Bild gebessert hätte. Gruß --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

ah, okay. Besten Dank für deine Bemühungen! Ist wirklich sher nett uns sehr zuvorkommend von dir dass du das Bild überarbeitet hast. Du bisch af dem Gebiet eibn a Experte :-), fi des beneid i di a. Viele Graiße und Danke--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Du hast ne E-Mail von mir Erhalten, LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Der gute Samariter Josef Arnold Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresko des Josef Arnold Pfarrkirche Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bidstock und Häuserpartie in Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality und sehr schönes Motiv. --NorbertNagel 20:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Hilf Kirche in Seis window.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 23:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob und Valentin in Tschöfas Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchväter des Josef Arnold in Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Albions Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With the perspective correction, the spire has lost all sharpness. Mattbuck 01:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)  Done All?sharpness; c'mon! I sharpened a bit --Moroder 12:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Now there's sharpening haloes. Mattbuck 15:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)  redone I corrected the perspective narrowing at the bottom instead of widening the top. Must be better now!?--Moroder 10:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Always narrow, never widen. Mattbuck 22:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Good hint, thanks--Moroder 23:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob und Valentin in Tschöfas Messnerhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laurentius und die Armen Römischer Statthalter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 07:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Christopher Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frühmesser Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 21:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schreiber Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 21:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkapelle Winter 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice!--ArildV 22:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiing on the Seiser Alm winter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 19:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zehenter Hof Lajen portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments high quality.--ArildV 09:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish Church of Breno (BS).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Cecilia by Arnold in Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Ehrenhöfer at train station Bozen door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Colour and sharpness are (no sun, 1/40 sec, and 36 MPx) close to perfect; it might be interesting to try the same picture with a flash, and exactly facing the centre of the door (seems about 15 cm to the left). I added to the description; not everybods known that F.E. was a sculptor. -- Aisano 19:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks --Moroder 21:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

keine Idee

Hallo Moroder, (Zitat: Noch nicht, die Bäume und das Haus stehen immer noch schief --Moroder ) , ich habe keien Idee wie ich das noch korrihieren soll, das Haus sowie der Baum ist gerade (siehe Bildnotzizen), es sieht auf den ersten blick etwas scief aus, liegt aber am schneehügel imho? perspectivenkoorektur nach rechts oder links oder wei möchtest du? Griaße noch Greidn --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkapelle Winter Nordseite 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Marienkapelle Winter 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Hilf Kirche in Seis station 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a blank line between nominations --The Photographer 20:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Comment It's the "nominator" but surely I will check the next time that a empty line is inserted --Moroder 10:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Info Yes, I think so. In another context, The image contrast is harsh --The Photographer 13:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Lighted up darker tones. Thanks --Moroder 07:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Backofen Mair Hof Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkapelle Seiser Alm Zallinger winter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good qualitiy -- Arcalino 20:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martyrdom of Saint Lawrence and Saint Stephen Lajon by Joseph Arnold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zehenter Hof Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgel Stiftskirche Gries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischbachl Seiseralm Südtirol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofer House Albions south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:48, 08 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairhofer Lajen Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 22:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Verwendung eines Photos für Corporate Identity

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder,

Auf der Suche nach dem Photo einer schönen Berglandschaft bin ich auf ihr Photo der Regensburgerhütte gestossen. Ich gestalte nämlich gerade die Corporate Identity (allumfassender grafischer Auftritt)von "Viktor Kofler Speck" und benötige dazu Bildmaterial.

Nun wollte ich Sie um Ihr Einverständnis bitten um das Bild verwenden zu können. Ich sende Ihnen auch gerne konkrete Anwendungen wo das Bild verwendet wird.

Vielen Dank, Philip SGH Philip, es freut mich ,daß Sie mein Foto verwenden können. Die Bedingugen dafür sind, daß Sie mich mit "Foto Wolfgang Moroder" zitieren. Mit freundlichen Grüßen und gute Arbeit. Wolfgang Moroder

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antony church in Breno (BS).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best light, but nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 09:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Martiner Villa Rudolfine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Christian Ferrer 10:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acrobatic exercises in La Jolla.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (there's a name for this specific rope exercise, can't remember it). --Jastrow 21:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment I guess it is funambulism. Thanks --Moroder 16:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC) en:Slacklining is the word I was looking for. Jastrow 09:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Maria Einsiedeln Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontals should be horizontal. Mattbuck 15:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment They can't be in the picture if they are not in reality (see here) --Moroder 19:07, 1 March 2013 (UTC) I see. There is some haloing around the pinnacle, and I'd also like a bit cropped off the bottom. Mattbuck 23:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)  Done changed inferior crop. Is the halo relevant? It's really almost ivisible at normal size. Thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Sure, why not. Mattbuck 23:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Aperture f/16

Hi dear colleague,

thank you very much for your appreciation, I'm flattered by your question. In fact, you gave me the idea of nominating a set of windows in FP with your beautiful set nominated in january. Let's talk about technique (but I must warn you that I'm an autodidact, so I may be fooling myself :) : for this kind of pics, I work in A or M mode mostly with a tripod (if possible). At this narrow aperture of f/16 with the zoom I use (50-200mm), the whole picture is pretty sharp. A wider aperture may give a shorter DoF, especially when the window is not straight to the camera. For this last set of stained glass windows, I took 3 pictures of each (low part, middle part & high part) and merge them in post-processing before correcting the perspective. Hoping I did answer to your question. Best regards and congratulations to you as well !

--Selbymay (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of the Our Lady church of Lajen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mater dolorosa bozzetto Josef Moroder Lusenberg detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela Resciesa dedite nueva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairhofer Lajen im Winter Süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side of the building looks a bit curved but it seems to be like that --Poco a poco 13:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Yes, a 16th century building, thks --Moroder 13:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodcarved polichromed figurine from Gröden rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Ostseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --ArildV 10:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiseralm und Langkofelgruppe im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --ArildV 10:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
External view of the Cathedral of Brescia (old and new duomo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Hi Wolfgang. I think that Cathedral of Brescia, exterior should be a better formulated scope.--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I think so. Good photography. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
• Sorry, I changed cat. You are pretty right, it's both the old and the new duomo. Thanks for appreciating my pic.
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of Saint Peter in Lajen, external view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I fail to see the building at the position indicated. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschutscher in Lajen Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise I think. Mattbuck 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Yeah, I fixed it taking the window (only new structure) as reference. Thanks --Moroder 13:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Yeah, OK. Mattbuck 09:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe mir erlaubt, Ihr Photo der hl. Caecilia zu verwenden.

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder!

Ich habe mir erlaubt, Ihr Photo der hl. Caecilia zu verwenden. Da Sie darum ersuchen, moechte ich Sie hiermit davon verstaendigen. Ich verwende es fuer einen (spielerischen) Blog, den ich vor kurzem begonnen habe, weil es, so glaube ich, das Wesen meines fiktiven Schreibers recht gut wiedergibt. Hier ist die URL: www.angerersarchiv.wordpress.com. Wenn Sie whaben, lassen Sie es mich bitte wissen.

Herzlichen Dank!

Dr. Thomas Lederer thmlederer@gmail.com

VI Scope wording

Just a quick note to let you know that some on the VI page think that the scope for a few of your nominations are too long. I would be happy to adjust the scope a bit, but don't want to do that without letting you know/checking first. --Godot13 (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Since I'm not very familiar with the scope wording and, to tell you the truth, also with the real meaning, I'm glad if you give mi some advice and go ahead with the correction. I wonder what you think of Ikar.us's notes? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

That should be the perfect scope display : [[:category:Castle Karneid, South Tyrol| Castle Karneid, South Tyrol]], exterior . We have friends very directive. Perhaps too. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, haha...--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Frescos of Josef Arnold the elder in the Saint Lawrence church of Lajen.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Frescos of Josef Arnold the elder in the Saint Lawrence church of Lajen.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Ostansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthaus Krone Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amargosa Opera House in Death Valley at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kofler in Lajen Ried Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female saint with crown Val Gardena barocque.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 11:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innervogelweider Hof in Ried Lajen Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --JLPC 17:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mater dolorosa Maquette Josef Moroder Lusenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Selbymay 10:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John Evangelist with eagle Mahlknecht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untertschutscher Hof in Ried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiseralm Langkofelgruppe und Roßzähne im Winter .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted anticlockwise a few degrees. Mattbuck 10:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Done Corrected, thanks for the hint--Moroder 18:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Better. But there's a dust spot, and I'd also suggest sharpening. Mattbuck 11:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 07:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 11:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Genealogie & Fotos

Gratulation zu den hochwertigen Fotos. Ich würde Sie gerne kontaktieren. Ich kenne schon länger Ihre Seite http://lusenberg.com/, da ich selbst Genealogie betreibe. Leider habe ich keine E-Mail als Kontaktadresse gefunden. Würden Sie mir bitte eine E-Mail an meine Adresse auf der Seite http://crgen.tirolensis.info/ senden? Danke. Meine WikiCommons Fotos: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/ChrisCrea

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renaissance Portal Palazzo Giordani Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiing on the Seiser Alm Rosszähne winter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innervogelweider Hof in Ried Lajen Ostseite Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:49, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Furcela Pordoi .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plattkofel from West in winter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but left third of the photo is slightly unsharper than the rest. --Tuxyso 16:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberbuchfelder Hof in Ried Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Plattkofel_from_West_in_winter_2013.jpg

Das Foto File:Plattkofel_from_West_in_winter_2013.jpg ist knackscharf; Verraten Sie mir, mit welchem Objektiv Sie es geschossen haben?
Gruß
Norbert Nagel

Du, das freut mich, daß du das sagst. Der Tuxyso meckert immer über die Schärfe meiner Objektive (auch bei diesem Foto hat er was zu bemängeln). Ich fotografiere fast ausschliesslich mit dem 24-70 Nikkor 2.8. Gruß --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Hab mir jetzt auch die D800 gekauft. Viele Leute, die bei QI aktiv sind, meinen, die nominierten Fotos müssten in voller Auflösung betrachtet immer ganz scharf sein, egal ob 2 Megapixel oder 36 Megapixel. Das ist aus meiner Sicht völliger Quatsch, ich bin aber jetzt dazu übergegangen, viele meiner Bilder vor der Nominierung soweit herunter zu skalieren, dass sie in voller Auflösung betrachtet noch möglichst scharf erscheinen. Das erhöht die Promotionswahrscheinlichkeit deutlich. Gruß Norbert -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Wellcome to the club! Völlig quatsch, ja. Bedenke doch wofür du arbeitest. Für WP oder für die, oft dummen Leute (S. hier) die deine Bilder begutachten. Es is das Ziel von C0mmons (es steht auch in den Richtlinien), so gute wie mögliche Bilder zu haben. Das Herunterskalieren, das Schärfen kann doch jeder mit seinem Rechner nachmachen. Es ist wichtig, daß gute Dateien auf Commons vorhanden sind. Deshalb lade deine Datei so groß wie möglich, ich wiegere mich auch, die Dateien nachzuschärfen, das kann jeder Idiot und dann ist sie ruiniert. Ich fotografierea auch fast immer mit Stativ (auch in hellichter Sonne), du wirst sehen es lohnt sich. Ich wünsche dir viel Spaß und du wirst es genießen.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaslunette Rochuskapelle Fonteklaus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 22:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Rochus Altar Fonteklaus Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansitz Lusenegg Lajen NWSeite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgin Mary John Evangelist and John Baptist Freins Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 18:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villanders from east 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plastercast maguette for saint by Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather high noise in the background. Mattbuck 11:26, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed --Moroder 13:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Can you do it without the colour banding? Mattbuck 20:54, 19 March 2013 Oops  Done thanks to Graphic Lab/Photography workshop --Moroder 12:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC) (UTC) Still some banding, but minor. Mattbuck 12:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fischbachl Seiseralm Südtirol.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fischbachl Seiseralm Südtirol.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Schnee Rabans Sankt Peter Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster in Lajen .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in Freins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins Kreuzwegstationen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins antependium.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins tabernakel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 13:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasser Haus Ried Lajen Ostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 Dust spots - I added a note. Please remove. Apart from that - very good quality --NorbertNagel 11:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed, thanks for the hint and the review --Moroder 12:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 19:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prantschur Sankt Peter bei Lajen Futterhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 Dust spots - I added a note. Please remove. Apart from that, OK. --NorbertNagel 11:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks a lot --Moroder 14:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 19:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterfinser Hof Lajen Ried Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterbuchfelder in Ried Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof is quite dark, but IMHO nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 13:47, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James and Saint Valentine church in Tschövas Lajen exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is really too much. A scope is not a descriptin of the image. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
• What scope do you suggest? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Saints Jakob and Valentine church, Tschöfas Lajen, exterior and facade. For instance. I agree with Ikar and B.P.--Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

 Info Changed scope wording--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support with new scope--Godot13 (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle Karneid, South Tyrol, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• Same problem with wordy scope. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now per Ikar.us. I made a proposal recently, but it was just belittled.  B.p. 21:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Changed scope wording--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm afraid the scope is not properly linked to the category, in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
  • IMO the link is good, but the scope still not canonical. We used to refine it when reviewing, as long as the content didn't change, didn't we? --Ikar.us (talk) 23:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
    •  Renamed scope --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support now. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Info Filed a bug report to GoogleMaps for orthopraphic errors in the undulated terrain. --Ikar.us (talk) 19:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Now--Godot13 (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of the pulpit at the Saint John the Baptist church in Freins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpit at the Saint John the Baptist church in Freins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 10:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpit at the Saint John the Baptist church in Freins 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in Freins from above.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality and composition.--ArildV 10:50, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Statues of the four Evangelists by Johann Dominik Mahlknecht.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Statues of the four Evangelists by Johann Dominik Mahlknecht.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochuskapelle Fonteklaus in Lajen 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch chapel at Fonteklaus Lajen fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Rochus Kapelle Fonteklaus Lajen Innenraum Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins Innenraum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins Suedseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Johannes der Täufer in Freins Eingang zum Turm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch chapel at Fonteklaus Lajen overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch chapel at Fonteklaus Lajen entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch chapel at Fonteklaus Lajen door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch chapel at Fonteklaus Lajen front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church Villanders and village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrast could be higher, but ok --Poco a poco 19:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Done + contrast , thanks for the review --Moroder 12:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church Freins Lajen Madonna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit blurred in the bottom., but QI --Rjcastillo 20:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villanders in South Tyrol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's ok for me --Nino Verde 14:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)