User talk:Moroder/Archives 2014-3

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mascaron de fontaine France Antibes 4 juillet 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water fountain in Antibes France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please remove dust spot (see notice). --P e z i 23:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Negresco in Nizza by night 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Anton Abt Grundschule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a very little step right, maybe ? (the crop of the school is a bit tight at left), but nice image with an otherwise impressive composition.--Jebulon 10:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review, it's the only shot I have --Moroder 18:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Negresco in Nizza stained glass 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Absinthe museum in Antibes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Negresco in Nizza 4th floor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Dr. Wolfgang Moroder,

I am using the image you supplied to wikipedia for a background image for a facebook group. We are medical students who are interested in pursuing Ob/Gyn (Student Association of Ob/Gyn) at a school in Florida, and we are using the facebook group to organize events for the upcoming year. Thank you so much for the picture. https://www.facebook.com/groups/549831301790263/members/

If this is a representation you do not want, please let me know.

Thank you.

-Debra

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola grande di San Rocco verso Rio de San Pantalon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Negresco in Nizza stained glass window in the main hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise, but ok overall --Poco a poco 11:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Negresco Nymphes playing the flute by François Boucher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Though I think, that the upper part could have been better with a polarisation filter. --Cccefalon 08:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Blöd, it was in my backpack, didn't think of it. Thanks for the hint!--Moroder 06:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia arco della facciata allegorie e angeli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. The sky is a bit noisy--Lmbuga 15:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angelo con elefante a Venezia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta rinascimentale a Salò.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good picture, but right vertical lines are tilted CW--Lmbuga 10:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 17:44, 13 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antony church in Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to right side (leaning in).--XRay 06:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC) Comment I don't see any problem with the vertical lines. Can you please put a note? Thanks--Moroder 17:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)  Comment I've puted a note to the image.--XRay 05:16, 13 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 17:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Good. Thank you. :-) --XRay 09:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angelo con elefante a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica San Marco Statua di San Marco con leone e cupola.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I have using your photo...

Hi, Mr Moroder! Good to know you here. I would like to inform you that I have used your photo about the beggar infront of church as my attachment to my sharing in FB. Thanks for the nice photo and your generosity in allowing me to use it. Thank you and God bless!

[[:{{{1}}}]] has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--179.53.184.76 21:16, 21 July

[[:{{{1}}}]]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as [[:{{{1}}}]]. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--179.53.184.76 21:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column and lion of San Mark on Piazzetta San Marco Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The lion of San Mark on Piazzetta San Marco Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

photo

Hey, I would like to use your photo in an article about Giorgio Moroder in an online student magazine (non-profit) Kontrast. The photo I am talking about is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Giorgio_Moroder.jpg

Would be grateful for an answer. Thanks, Wojciech Szczerek

• It's my pleasure if I can be helpful. Best regards

--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta del Carmine Salo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Turm in Kastelruth Eingang und Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Turm in Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Namenliste.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Namenliste.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Weltkrieg 1914-1918.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Weltkrieg 1914-1918.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas octopetala Dantersasc habitat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Weltkrieg 1914-1918.jpg

File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Weltkrieg 1914-1918.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Namenliste.jpg

File:Zur Ehre der toten und lebenden Krieger von St Ulrich Namenliste.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta dell'orologio Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

Servus Moroder,

was ist das Problem bei den nominations? Ich weiß, ich hab im Moment einige in der Warteschlange, aber Hinweise auf eine Maximalzahl an Nominierungen habe ich in den guidelines nicht gefunden. LG --P e z i (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

• Hallo Pezi! Ich hab schon lange nicht mehr dort nominiert. Meinst du ein technisches Problem? Da fragst du lieber Archeodontosaurus oder wie er heist. LG --31.188.150.94 15:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Laut [1] hast du meine nominations reverted. (Account gehackt?) LG --P e z i (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Oh Gott, ich habs jetzt gesehen, war auch nicht eingeloggt, muss jetzt nachsehen vielleicht habe ich es unversehentlich aus meinem iPad gemacht, hoffe es war kein Hacker. Lass mich mal kontrollieren --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Danke, passt wieder. Hoffe mit deinem account ist alles OK. Alles Gute und Liebe Grüße, --P e z i (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helianthemum nummularium Dantersasc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Ducale Venezia Doge Palast balaustra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice, but it needs perspective correction IMO. I'm not sure it's possible--Lmbuga 18:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 22:48, 25 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Gardena Mountain Run 2014 start in Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Gardena Mountain Run 2014 winner Kosgei Isaac Toroitich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eritrichium nanum Dantersasc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 23:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas octopetala Dantersasc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be another crop would be better. --XRay 07:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Use of image in a textbook

Hi, this is just to let you know that we have used your ultrasound scan image in a textbook being published in Spain. We have credited the image to you in the acknowledgements. Many thanks!

--Botb75 (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Ciao

Mi hai bocciato la foto che vedi a destra scrivendo "Insufficient quality. Distracting BG". Potresti essere più preciso? CHe intendi con "Insufficient quality"? Che ha rumore? poca nitidezza,troppo o troppo poco esposta? e cosa sarabbe "Distracting BG"? Scusa ma sto cercando di imparare dai miei errori ed una spiegazione mi aiuterebbe. Gute Abend. --LivioAndronico talk 18:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, Insufficient quality é il testo di default della bocciatura. Nel tuo caso é l'inquadratura che non va bene perché il background (scusa per l'acronimo BG) disturba molto l'oggetto della immagine. Forse potevi ottenere una inquadratura con sfondo cielo spostandoti a dx? Grazie per avermi scritto e buon lavoro!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Lo sai? Hai proprio ragione,l'occhio del professionista si vede,l'ho notato solo adesso! Grazie per le spiegazioni,molto gentile. --LivioAndronico talk 10:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolomites Val Gardena from Mont de Seura Mont de Seuc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 16:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judgment of Salomon Doges palace Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piz Boè Lec Dlace Pas dl Lech Dlace detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross Streda de Pozes Val de Pozes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Famberhorst 17:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross streda de Pozes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Navajo Generating Station from the south image use

Hello Wolfgang Moroder — 

Thank you for allowing your photograph to be used by others. As requested in the user rights "Feel free to use my photos, but please mention me as the author and send me a message." This message is to notify you that Modern Times Magazine has chosen to use your image of the "Navajo Generating Station from the south" in a article on our website (moderntimesmagazine.com). Here is a link to the article, http://www.moderntimesmagazine.com/page16/Arizona_NGS_140806/Arizona_NGS_140806.php Your image was used on the home page http://www.moderntimesmagazine.com/ and in the sidebar.

Thank you again for allowing your image to have free use.

Morganna Guzzon Creative Director Modern Times Magazine (480)269-3689 mguzzon@moderntimesmagazine.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of the Doges Palace Venice Renaissance windows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Marco vista dal cortile del Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adam and Eve on Doges Palace in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontego del megio Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlas2 Giusto Le Court Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze wells and Western face courtyard of Doges palace Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze well south in the courtyard of Doges palace Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze well in the courtyard of Doges palace Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background is in focus, well is not. Sorry, because otherwise this would be a gread shot! --Uoaei1 15:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC) I uploaded a new version. In the following shot the AF of the lens didn't betray me. Thanks for the review! --Moroder 06:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)  Support Ok now. --Uoaei1 20:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Simone piccolo Venice Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Felice sulla Strada nuova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but it is yet tilted cw. --Cccefalon 08:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 11:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschötz winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Photo of Jonah exiting the fish

Wolfgang, Thanks for uploading the photo of Jonah exiting the fish while praying. I am the preacher for the North View Church of Christ in Columbia, TN and this graphic will serve a great purpose. I included it in our bulletin and on a powerpoint slide, but I have done as you asked and I gave you credit by copying the info from Wikimedia Commons at the bottom of the picture. Thanks again. Blessings, Jeremy T. Butt jeremytbutt@gmail.com

• I am very happy to be helpful in your projects. Cheers W--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fondaco dei Turchi e Museo di Storia naturale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlas3 Giusto Le Court Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Livioandronico2013 13:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Marco dal cortile del Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I especially like the lady next to the well taking a photo --Uoaei1 20:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze well in the courtyard of Doges palace Venice North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugger Unterum Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio de San Zan Degola Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Livioandronico2013 20:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Labia in Venice western facade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 11:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pescaria Rialto Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauernhaus Troger Gulln Feldthurns Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolomites Val Gardena from Mont de Seura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caryatids rue Rivoli Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, also the reflection of the sky in window. --Livioandronico2013 17:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I have used your photo to create a header for my blog about my Utah pioneer ancestor: benjaminlynnclapp.wordpress.com. Thank you for sharing!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bern capital of Swizerland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of the children of Charles VIII Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although I'm not really convinced about the crop --Poco a poco 08:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Le Zitelle

Dear Wolfgang Modorer,

Thanks for the beautiful photograph of Le Zitelle. I would say it was rather difficult to take, as the facade is facing north. I slightly straightened it up as you can see on my website: http://isis-architectuur.nl/2014/essay/zitelle.html

kind regards,

Brigitte van Bakel

• Thanks, but you misspelled my name--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Negresco Hotel in Nizza at night, view from SE, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Hi, Wolfgang ! Would you, please add "View from...(N, S, E or W)" or "main facade" to the scope as we usually do here in VIC ? Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the hint. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 20:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita muscaria Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, centered composition a bit boring. --Tuxyso 21:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mascaron 16 Place Vendôme Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre Place du Carroussel in Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Statue Jeunesse Palais de Chaillot Paris.jpg

File:Statue Jeunesse Palais de Chaillot Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

• I knew you wouldn't miss it but I tried ,-) (Too bad not to show the foto I worked a lot on it - well it's a one day fly). Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Moufle Place Vendôme, Paris. Mascaron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Hi, Wolfgang Moroder ! Would you, please add "View from...(N, S, E or W)" or "main facade" to the scope as we usually do here in VIC ? Thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 07:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Hi, thanks for the review. IMO the geographical indication of the view makes sense for a building but not for a sculpture were it is obvious that it is seen from up front. Maybe there are some other opinions about that issue. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your help Livio, but the location of the view is not compulsory here for "details" such as small coats of arms, spandrels, mascarons, signs, etc.- Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of the children of Charles VIII Tours 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Jeunesse Palais de Chaillot Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:14, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caryatids in Paris, 49 rue de Rivoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your photograph

Wolfgang, many thanks for putting up this photograph on Wikimedia Commons: Mosaic of the translation of the body of Saint Mark on San Alipio facade door of the Saint Mark's Basilica in Venice.

I have used this stunning photograph as an illustration on two pages on the website of Aberdeen Bach Choir, which is performing a concert called A Renaissance Venetian Christmas on 7 December 2014, and have included an attribution on each page: http://www.aberdeenbachchoir.org.uk/NextPerformance.shtml (this is a temporary page and will be replaced after the performance) and a more permanent page, which will remain after the performance as a record: http://www.aberdeenbachchoir.org.uk/December2014/December2014.shtml

Ian Downie Webmaster, Aberdeen Bach Choir Aberdeen, Scotland

• Thanks for the "stunning" ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlknecht statue of Corneille at the Graslin Opera Nantes .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abend in den Dolomiten Leopold Günther-Schwerin oR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 16:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire from Notre Dame de Cunault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

ultrasound of baby with Down syndrome

Dear Dr Moroder, Thank you for sharing this beautiful picture. I would like to use it for my public presentation on Down syndrome to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Kiwanis group in Malaysia.

Sincerely yours,

Yong Junina

• You are very welcome --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

using your Photo

Dear Mr. Moroder,

my name is Sarah Dannhauer. I am a student of conservation at the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna. Currently I am writing my diploma about a rocking horse from Vienna. Is it possible for me to use your Photo for academic reasons in my diploma?

Thank you very much.

Kind regards,

Sarah Dannhauer

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coal mine Montjean sur Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua cortile Palazzo Ducale a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Mauves on the Loire river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coal mine Montjean sur Loire detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice motif. Right side is leaning in (I used the window as reference). Will be QI after correction. --Cccefalon 19:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint. Cheers --Moroder 15:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. Dieses Gemäuer schaut einen aus bösen Augen an .... --Cccefalon 17:23, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Corneille

Corneille et non Molière

Bonjour Wolfgang,

il s'agit bien de Corneille à gauche et Molière à droite, contrairement à ce qu'indique la page wikipédia (que je vais corriger). Par contre, tu as téléchargé deux photos de Corneille et aucune de Molière... En espérant que tu as apprécié ta visite estivale de Nantes avec toutes ses oeuvres d'art contemporain. Au plaisir !

Selbymay (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame des Tuffeaux, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coal mine Tranchée, view from NE with river Loire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eve by Antonio Rizzo Cortile dei Senatori Venice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tours Cathedral facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Angers on the Maine river from the castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and IMO very impressive --DKrieger 20:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platzer Alm Hütte Grödner Dolomiten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platzer Alm Hütte Steinhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PJDespa 20:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlknecht statue of Molière at the Graslin Opera Nantes 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre Dame des Tuffeaux Chênehutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platzer Alm Hütte Grödner Dolomiten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Graslin et Théâtre Graslin a Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Varades on the river Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, nice light situation--Ggrexy 08:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tours Cathedral main facade from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Saumur and castle on the Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 14:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Place Graslin with fountain and Théâtre Graslin, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : It would be useful to add "NW (or SE) view" to the scope, as we usually do here. (I don't know this place but it must be possible to take a picture of the theatre and fountain from a different point of view...). Friendly.--JLPC (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Done thanks--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support : OK now ; useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Pont de Varades" bridge seen from Saint-Florent-le-Vieil (SW).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Trèves sur Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove the black bird spot, see note. --Cccefalon 18:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Sorlok a Quimiac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbatiale de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil, view from the Loire (East).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahlknecht statue of Molière at the Graslin Opera Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silberdistel Carlina acaulis Barbian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

usage of the grand canal Photo

Hello Sir,

I would like to ask permission to use your photo on my blog www.outoftownblog.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc naturel régional de Brière hungry geese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Florent-le-Vieil du vélo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont dal ega, cresta de Longiarü Pizes de Puez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curnacin Jëuf de Cir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Hubertl 20:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sas dla Porta y Jëuf dla Porta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota te Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlernhexe auf Mont dal Ega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)