Panoramafotos.net
_03.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
talk before Aug 15 2011 edit
important for myself edit
_03.JPG){kind=link}
Good photo! -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
_03.JPG){kind=link}
- thanks for your comment! It was a great light on that day ... just before the big rain! --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 14:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Koordinaten edit
Hallo, bei Category:Stone House, Kalksburg und Category:Volksschule Draschestraße sind dir die Koordinaten etwas durcheinander geraten. Oben rechts habe ich dir einen Link auf Google maps eingebaut, damit du die Koord leichter checken kannst. lg und danke, Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo, habe bei der Volksschule Draschegasse neue Koordinaten bestimmt, beim Steinhaus habe ich nur N und O vertauscht, da ich die Ansichten nicht zuordnen kann. Mir kommt allerdings vor, dass du Objektkoordinaten {{Object location dec}} vergeben hast (alle gleich), statt Kamerakoordinaten {{Location dec}}. Bei Kamerakoordinaten sollte auch die Blickrichtung (heading:) angegeben werden. Vielleicht in Zukunft darauf achten. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo! VIELEN DANK!!! Da werde ich künfig daruf achten (habe noch Fotos von gut 200 Objekten (etwa 600 Fotos) zum uploaden). liebe Grüße Clemens --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 09:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished edit
|
Dear Panoramafotos.net,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
|
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
|
File:Adolf-Loos-&-Peter-Altenberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bad crop edit
Hallo Clemens, du bist doch Profifotograph, aber manche deiner Fotos sind verbesserungsfähig, z.B. dieses (aber auch einige andere). Ich finde, es ist bei Objekten um die Ecke, die nicht weglaufen können, manchmal auch mehr Geduld angebracht (kollektiv), bis ein Foto gelungen ist. Man muss nicht das erstbeste nehmen und hier hochladen. Bitte versuche den Crop so zu gestalten, dass keine schwarzen Ecken bleiben, Photobearbeitung hilft, hier Himmel hinzupinseln. Nebstbei hat das Bild extrem hohes Rauschen. Und für stürzende Linien gibt es auch Lösungen, unter Windows die Freeware ShiftN zum Beispiel. Danke lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank für Deine Nachricht! Der fehelnde Himmel ist vom Zusammensetzenmehrerer Fotos. Das sind die Objekte, die man nur "mit einem Knick in der Linse" fotografieren kann :-) Alles fertig retouschieren ist dann eine Arbeit für lange Winterabende :-) ShiftN ist ern tolles Programm! Danke für die Empfehlung! Ich habe sonst mit Rectangular Panorama gearbeitet und das ist doch sehr viel Aufwand. ShiftN geht ja fast von selbst! Toll. Danke nochmal! liebe Grüße Clemens --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
|
Category:2_Einsteigtürme_(102,_103),_Kanalbrücke_Nagelberg_(Eichgraben) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Darf ich dich ... edit
… an das da erinnern? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ich danke Dir!!! Das kommt davon, wenn man die falsche Version vom Verwaltungsprogramm auf die neue Installation überspielt ... --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hey, Moment! Ist eh die richtige Version!!! Du meinst die alten Fotos ... mach ich doch, sobald ich die neuen am Server habe! --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Zwei Hinweise edit
Hallo Panoramafotos.net, zwei Hinweise möchte ich anbringen: siehe [1]:
- mehr Sorgfalt beim Kopieren der GstNr. - wenn da was vor den Ziffern steht, ist es ein Punkt, und nie ein Komma.
- Bei Kategorien zu Einzelobjekten (das sind die meisten denkmalgeschützten Objekte) ist es mE besser, direkt {{Object location}} zu verwenden, statt {{GeoGroupTemplate}}, das für viele Bilder in einer Kategorie gedacht ist, wenn dies nicht gerade Einzelobjekte sind, also über ein größeres Gebiet verstreut sind. Stell dir vor, du machst 20 Aufnahmen eines Hauses, nimmst noch dazu überall dieselbe Koordinate, statt für die einzelnen Aufnahmen die unterschiedlichen Standpunkte, und dann sorgt {{GeoGroupTemplate}} gerade mal dafür.
lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- Danke für die Hinweise! Der "." wurde duch den Import zum "," ... hab den Bug eben ausgebessert (wäre mir nie aufgefallen).
- Die {{GeoGroupTemplate}} macht schon Sinn (denke ich einmal), zumal alle Fotos direkt mit Standort und Richtung geocodiert sind. Du bekommst dann eine Überischt, aus welchen Blickrichtungen Fotos existieren ... Die renauen Koordinaten werden aber erst von dem Bot aus den EXIF-Infos "herausgekitzelt" und im Laufe von ca. 7 Tagen automatisch ergänzt. Bis es so weit ist ist die Funktion sinnlos, das stimmt! Wie siehst Du das? --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- ok, soll so sein, ich bin nicht überzeugt (v.a. weil die Objektkoordinate in der Kategorie fehlt), aber deine Argumentation hat auch was an sich. Sie sticht allerdings nur, wenn viele der Bilder Geokoordinaten haben und diese halbwegs richtig sind (dürfte bei dir der Fall sein, generell hängt das aber von den verwendeten Devices ab, nicht alle sind da so genau.) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Category:Brennerhof_in_Werfen habe ich in Category:Brennhof_in_Werfen umbenannt, siehe google und BDA. Ich denke das war ein Versehen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk)
- Super! Danke ... war ein Tippfehler ... und ist auch schon bei mir korrigiert. Die Dateinamen sind jetzt aber auch falsch :-( lassen wir das, oder soll ich sie nochmal mit richtigem Namen hochladen?
- Meine Geokoordinaten sind grob mit einem GPS-Track synchronisiert und dann händisch einzeln im GeoSetter korrigiert ... Ich hab leider noch keinen Tracker gefunden, der da so genau wäre, dass keine Nacharbeit erforderlich wäre. Ist zwar ein Haufen Arbeit, aber sieht im Ergebnis super aus! glg Clemens --Panoramafotos.net (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Mausoleum_(Mauer_cemetery) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Krim (Vienna).jpg edit
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krim (Vienna).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Krim (Vienna).jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
.jpg){kind=link}
Notification about possible deletion edit
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Laserscanner ZF-Laser.JPG edit
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Laserscanner ZF-Laser.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laserscanner ZF-Laser.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
|
|
File:Wappen at wolfsberg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion edit
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Krd 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Festival-der-Gärten-2006-Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Logo Zauner 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
