User talk:Poco a poco/2013-07

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bastakia (old town in Dubai).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW R1200GS.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Almeida Garrett, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamadríade (Papio hamadryas), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is sharp, detailed, and of decent resolution. The baboon seems to have just finished a bowel movement, which may be interesting to some. --Bennett000 03:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en la calle Obispo Rey Redondo, 44, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:36, 03 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acuartelamiento del Ejército Barón de Warsage, Calatayud, España 2012-05-19, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question I think that it's QI for me: not overexposed IMO, but oversaturated?--Lmbuga 21:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Perhaps not oversaturated, perhaps too much contast. Sorry, I'm not sure--Lmbuga 21:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC) New review and QI for me. I wonder if the contrast was increased, or if the photo has been saturated--Lmbuga 10:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamadríade (Papio hamadryas), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:00, 02 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Focario de focas grises (Halichoerus grypus), Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK I suppose. --Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsia x bacillaris, Jardín Botánico de Múnich, Alemania, 2013-05-04, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See notes --Rjcastillo 22:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-24, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegiata de Santa María la Mayor, Calatayud, España, 2012-09-01, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamadríade (Papio hamadryas), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Iifar

No recuerdo nunca tener un encontronazo con un usuario como con Iifar. Para salirse con la suya, ha votado por mí, cuando yo estaba comentando, aunque vehementemente. No todo vale. El único que puede votar es el usuario que firma. Si no vota, no hay voto, especialmente cuando el párrafo está iniciado por la secuencia {{comment}}. Es una vergüenza, debería ser bloqueado. Espero su respuesta--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

He pedido que lo bloqueen--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Poco a poco. You have new messages at Lmbuga's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorio de Tenerife Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Better view of the building. No distortion of perspective (the other image has anomlies perspective). Good view of the environment of the building. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per above. --Ikar.us (talk) 09:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Also per above. --Godot13 (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Auditorio de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 02.jpg: +3 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Auditorio de Tenerife Pano.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
=>
File:Auditorio de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 02.jpg: Promoted again and remaining VI. <--
File:Auditorio de Tenerife Pano.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--

--Myrabella (talk) 18:49, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachydesmus alive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope Christian Ferrer (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tulipa 'Fancy frills' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For plant there may be four sub-scopes: Habitus, flower, leaf, seed. It would be good to add "flower" in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done thanks, Poco² 18:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Narcissus 'Red Devon' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For plant there may be four sub-scopes: Habitus, flower, leaf, seed. It would be good to add "flower" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done, thanks Poco² 18:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Serra do Pilar, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and difficult picture, but it needs a bit of noise reduction, in spite of this, QI for me--Lmbuga 00:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. -- Trace 02:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-24, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 06:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapo común (Bufo bufo), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-15, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 23:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Vila Nova de Gaia desde Jardim do Morro, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO very nice and good work but too much noise reduction, especialy in the backgroung --Christian Ferrer 05:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok now --Christian Ferrer 10:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikk Hermann, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Tillandsia meridionalis

Place images in the gallery. The Bot will place the symbol VI under your picture. You can also point the scope directly on the gallery. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rosa 'Lions Rose' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Finnish National Theatre Façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It's the best in scope but maybe it would be good to add "main façade" in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Distortion problem on top should be aligned (see note). It is possible to fix it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I uploaded a new version but I got pretty confused, the picture is IMO a good QI, are this kind of comments not more suitable at QIC? I narrowed the scope. Poco² 19:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support OK for both, scope and perspective --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose Failed criterion 3, the image is not well described topic. It is possible to fix it. Good scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

I am confused, are you really meaning criterion 3 (illustrates well) or 4 (fully described)? If you actually mean 3 I don't agree, regarding 4 I included more information Poco² 08:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

• Ok that's better. It's good to have tried. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

  Thanks Didier, for the hints via "non official" channels to achieve a better version of the file Poco² 17:38, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haworthia fasciata leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment QI or FP are not arguments for VI. The natural background is : South Africa. It lacks the flowers for this scope. But there may be a promotion if you restreins the scope to: Leaf. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

By "natural" I meant not domestic.  Scope narrowed Poco² 08:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

In botany a "natural" environment refers to the region of origin of the species.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glyptothek interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thelocactus tulensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope In this case, you have entire plant you can not put "flower", but do not forget to put the binimonal name in italics. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, Poco² 16:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orbeanthus hardyi leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torres de Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Spain), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but it would be good to add "de Tenerife" (Exterior) in scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Poco² 18:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Iifar

Ante las palabras de Mattbuck he escrito lo que pienso. He dicho que te pediría que las tradujeses, pero como he escrito tanto y sabiendo que es difícil traducirme, no me atrevo directamente a pedírtelo.

Si puedes, haz una traducción no literal. Una traducción a tu gusto. Gracias de antemano aunque no puedas. No corre prisa, para mí ninguna. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Te agradecería que colocases la traducción o el resumen de mis palabras, si pudes hacerlo, tras mis propias palabras. Gracias de nuevo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hecho, he intentado ser fiel a tu tono y redacción. La verdad es que yo no le daría más vueltas al tema y me tomaría un respiro. Saludos, Poco² 20:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Muchas gracias. Es lo que pienso hacer. Es más, si me encuentro con Iifar, no tendré ningún problema en ser cordial, incluso más cordial de lo normal... y de corazón. Tengo que admitir que me he podido pasar al no dar pie al diálogo. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tulipa 'Casablanca', flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central Tower München by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in the Botanischer Garten München-Nymphenburg, main building, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support BIS -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sedum hintonii leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Supportuseful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tillandsia meridionalis, leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Heliconius hecale

Diego there is a problem with your appointment VI Heliconius hecale. There is an error in the determination it is Heliconius ismenius.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Actually this picture is in the first page in 2 days! I made all needed changes, Poco² 16:00, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of San Felipe, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Impatiens marianae leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laufertorturm (Nürnberg) (Germany), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Jurata, Península de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-24, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Focario de focas grises (Halichoerus grypus), Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Elisabeth (Nuremberg-St. Lorenz) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 08:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Gniezno exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia fulgens flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isartor Panorama, Múnich, Alemania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

File:Monumento a la Libertad, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 04.JPG

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freedom monument (Riga) by day.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fittonia verschaffeltii leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassauer Haus, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be useful to add "exterior" to scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Done, thanks, I forgot it Poco² 05:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support VI with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

• It would be useful to add Nürnberg to the scope. Apart from me preferring this always as a hint, the name Nassauer Hof is really not globally unique. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius ismenius (Tiger Heliconia) ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teatro Guimerá Santa Cruz de Tenerife exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Joy Patmore' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius hecale (Tiger Longwing) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Apparently captive. Higher resolution than File:Heliconius hecale.JPG. Geocoded. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Alas gentlemen there are two problems for the scope. The recommendation to the common name in English between parenthesis (Tiger Longwing) and limit the scope of a "Dorsal side". The "ventral side" will be like that Labelled VI. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

  Ok, no problem,  Done Poco² 18:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support new scope. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de San Juan Bautista, Puerto de la Cruz interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Jolly Janner (talk) 03:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
100 Faces of the Tenerife Auditorium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Jolly Janner (talk) 03:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, very good composition, clear QI for me, but there are areas with little detail. In spite of them, clear QI IMO--Lmbuga 19:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eclosion of a Dryas iulia (Julia Butterfly).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Many eclosion are specific to the species. We must give the binomial name and the common name in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Poco² 21:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorio de Tenerife exterior at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de San Miguel, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Having limited worldwide geographical knowledge, I prefer to have the location in the scope (like in the filename). --Ikar.us (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

   Done Poco² 17:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

   Support It is a VI for me.--Jebulon (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Charles Hotel München exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best view. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Rupert (München) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelargonium 'Angel Eyes Randy' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parides neophilus (Red Scale) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment "Alive" is not a necessary parameter for the imago butterfly. We add only "mounted" to others. But do not forget that the butterfly has two faces :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Der Ring (Munich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sonchus hierrensis, juvenile form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose although the best technical quality, the other photographs for this plant show it in flower or fully matured. Jolly Janner (talk) 00:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

   Scope adjusted Poco² 04:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

  Scope problem, I suggest "juvenile form". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

   Fixed Poco² 17:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

  Scope too narrow for me. Sonchus hierrensis, juvenile form would be adequate. Jolly Janner (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

  Better now? Poco² 08:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All issues now resolved. Jolly Janner (talk) 16:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Imagen del LHC de la UPM

Hola.  Imagen restaurada. Queda pendiente de ponerle la licencia correspondiente. Un saludo! Alan ^(talk) 20:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Garachico, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Garachico, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Jurata, Península de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-24, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbidium Pink Ice (boat orchid) flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roques de García, Tenerife, Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laparus doris (Doris Longwing) ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Many problems with this appointment. The correct name is "Laparus doris". But it is not "Laparus doris doris". Should know the subspecies. It lacks the common name in English in brackets and this view must be added "ventral side". It would be useful to change the name in the caption to change the category and rename the file. Attention in the category there are two images (Laparus doris viridis (Staudinger, 1885).jpg and Laparus doris viridis.jpg) are good candidates as the label VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for your feedback, I didn't realize that the category Category:Laparus doris was also creted. Ok, let me summarize what your are asking for:

  Delete the current category Category:Heliconius doris and move its pictures to Category:Laparus doris

  Find out the subspecies of the my nomination and its common name and update accordingly this nomination

  Change lateral for "ventral side" (does it apply for both, lateral and bottom view?)

  The two candidates you mention are good but IMHO not at the level of this shot. The tricky part to me is to figure out the subspecies. Thanks! Poco² 09:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Do you care that your photograph. Change the name in the caption, and up there in the right category. The subspecies is Laparus doris viridis. Butterflies have two faces: ventral (closed wings) and dorsal (open wings). I agree that your image is the best. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Poco² 20:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Very good work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

• You saw the difficulty of synonyms in the life sciences. I congratulate you for your work on Laparus dory here is a distinction that you deserved. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

"too soft"

Cuando tengas tiempo, ya llevo sin entender esas palabras varios años, te agradecería que me expliques con algún ejemplo lo que significan. No es que lo hayan dicho de alguna imagen mía, es que lo leo de vez en cuando y no sé bien lo que es. Gracias. Te esperamos--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 17:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, es otra forma de decir que le falta nitidez, los motivos típicos para ello son varios, quizás porque no se le aplicado el filtro correspondiente de nitidez, o se le ha aplicado muy poco, o por motivos más cercanos a las circunstancias en las que se tomo la imagen como número f alto, distancia, etc. Abrazos! Poco² 20:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Gracias. Ahora espero aclararme con la práctica de ver esa expresión. Puede parecer increible, pero no tenía ni idea de lo que era. Las imágenes tenían defectos, pero nunca fui capaz de saber el defecto al que se refería esa expresión. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fremontodendron californicum (California flannelbush) flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment You can also point the scope directly to the Gallery. The BOT will then direct the VI icon below your picture. Look at the change in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de Nuestra Señora de las Nieves, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain; exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of la Asunción, San Sebastián de la Gomera, Canary Islands, Spain; exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Cross of Liberty

Soon you could reupload your images about Independence War Victory Column in Tallinn. There is a permission from authors. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Independence War Victory Column Kruusamägi (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kruusamägi, thanks for the note, those are great news! I've some pictures of the cross that I really enjoyed a lot, and know they can be recovered. Thanks and regards, Poco² 22:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Hongkong

Ich habe heute ein Päckchen mit Schlüsselbändern bekommen, Aufschrift "香港 Photographer" mit Logo von Hongkong und Wikiball. Die können wir dann an die Teilnehmer verteilen. Namensschildchen werde ich mir auch noch ausdenken oder kannst du die drucken? --Ralf Roleček 12:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf, gute Idee!. ich könnte es ausdrucken aber ich brauche genauere Vorgaben (zur Größe). Wie viele hast du denn bekommen? Wir sind schon über 20 Leute...Poco² 14:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Ich hab 35 Stück machen lassen, eins ist im Büro von WMDe als Belegexemplar. Das sollte reichen. Gtoße Hüllen für Namensschilder habe ich mir auch schon gesichert. Ich guck mal nach, welche Größe die haben. Jetzt hoffe ich nur noch, daß die Hongkong-Artikel nicht gerade alle vandaliert sind und dort chinesisch "Blödmann" oder sowas steht ;) --Ralf Roleček 18:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Das wäre er Entwurf. --Ralf Roleček 19:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf, ok, ich habe die Idee kapiert, aber ich werde es leider kaum schaffen. Morgen ist mein letzter Arbeitstag (werde da bis 20-21 Uhr sitzen) und Samstagvormittag fliege ich weg von zu Hause bis zum Treffen in HK, sprich, mir bleibt kaum Zeit überhaupt einzupacken, geschweige denn, personalisierte Namenschilder solcher Art für alle zu machen. Ich hatte mir etwas einfacheres vorgestellt, sorry! Poco² 20:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC) PS: ich habe in den letzten Tagen aus berüflichen Gründen kaum Zeit gehabt, in den Wikimedia Projekten zu editieren...

Ok, dann lasse ich mir was anderes einfallen. Wird schon. --Ralf Roleček 20:44, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Also, wenn es lediglich um das Ausdrucken geht, schaffe ich das, wenn dur mir die Bilder per Email bis morgen 19 Uhr zukommen lassen würdest mit Eingabe der Größe (mein Drucker zu heiße hat den Geist aufgegeben, zu selten bentutzt). Poco² 20:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich spreche WMDE an, ob sie das im Büro erledigen können. Ich muß morgen auch arbeiten, kann da nicht Bildchen basteln. Ich komme am 6. morgens in HK an, bin im Marcopolo Guesthouse. Werde dann vormittags in die Uni kommen. Unterwegs habe ich noch Fototermin in Abu Dhabi ;) --Ralf Roleček 21:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, ich sehe schon, langweilig ist dir auch nicht. Vergiss nicht in Abu Dhabi den Emirates Palace zu fotografieren. Der war beeindrucken, von außen und ihnen. Viele Grüsse und gute Reise. Ich werde mich in Doha unterhalten. Poco² 21:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Kann ich in Abu Dhabi problemlos als Transittourist den Flughafen verlassen und die Stadt erkunden? --Ralf Roleček 22:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Kann ich nicht parat beantworten. Als ich daba (4 Jahre her) kam ich nach Abu Dhabi über die Strasse aus Dubai, sorry, Poco² 07:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Falls du es noch liest... kann ich kurze Hosen anhaben in Abu Dhabi oder gehört sich das nicht? --Ralf Roleček 20:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Das ist kein Problem, und auch zu empfehlen! Poco² 21:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)