User talk:Poco a poco/2014-02


Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Halavar 20:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Minimal tilted, can be considered neglectable in favor of the general composition with the arch. QI for me. --Cccefalon 21:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla en las cercanías de Mineral del Chico, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unusual and QI. --JLPC 09:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Constitución, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 16:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de los Azulejos, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de San Francisco, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I think it might be better without the moon. --Mattbuck 22:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stairway to heaven ? --Pleclown 12:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vista del Puerto de Victoria desde Sky100, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 10.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista del Puerto de Victoria desde Sky100, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 10.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla en las cercanías de Mineral del Chico, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Halavar 19:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de la Asunción, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Cccefalon 18:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --DXR 22:55, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercado, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Teruel desde la torre de la iglesia del Salvador, España, 2014-01-10, DD 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 20:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 68.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good, QI for me--Lmbuga 20:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta Sur, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Historia Natural, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 19:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 21:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)   Support ok, better, however I still see it little --Christian Ferrer 06:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Constitución, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 21:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla del Señor de Celontla, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. A dust spot, barely visible, I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 06:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 19:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Good picture, but dust spots (mira las notas, son poco visibles, pero hay varios. Quizás le falte un poco de corrección de perspectiva)--Lmbuga 21:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 19:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Good quality--Lmbuga 21:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Hércules, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality, but please add the geo location. --XRay 17:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  Added Poco a poco 20:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Independencia, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality, but please add the geo location. --XRay 17:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  Added Poco a poco 20:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

File:Ayuntamiento, vistas panorámicas desde Toompea, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 21.JPG is in this week in Estonian wikipedia main page as picture of the week. Thank you for nice picture! Taivo (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Taivo, thank you for your message! These are the kind od things that always motivate me :) In Estonia it was actually easy to take nice pictures, there is a lot of opportunities. Best, Poco2 19:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor Wat, Camboya, 2013-08-15, DD 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   weak pro Good quality, but the top is a little bit unsharp. IMO it's still QI. --XRay 07:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Francés de Aranda, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top blur irrelevant: good quality. --Moroder 23:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikimania 2014

Hallo Poco a poco, Du warst letztes Jahr schon auf der Wikimania, und hattest hoffentlich positive Eindrücke. Deshalb ein kurzer Hinweis: die Wikimania 2014 steht schon jetzt vor der Tür. Vielleicht hast Du ja wieder Lust hinzugehen, oder Dir fällt jemand ein, der gerne hingehen würde; oder hier liest zufällig jemand mit, der schon immer zur Wikimania wollte. Auch dieses Jahr vergeben die deutschsprachigen Wikimedia-Vereine Stipendien zur Teilnahme. Anmeldeschluss ist der 17. Februar hier ist das Anmeldeformular und mehr Details gibt es auf Wikipedia:Wikimania 2014. -- Dirk Franke (WMDE) (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2014 (UTC) (P.S.: solltest Du Dich schon beworben haben, ignoriede diesen Post.)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pitón de la India (Python molurus), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 08.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitón de la India (Python molurus), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 08.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Constitución, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The quality is very good and also backlit is intersting with light reflections on the fence. But there is a strange object (see note). What is it? --Tuxyso 08:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
To me it looked like a pigeon moving the wings. I removed it. Poco a poco 08:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
At 1/200sec? Or is it an HDR? Good quality now. --Tuxyso 08:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Are you sur that the wings of a bird are frozen at 1/200? No HDR, otherwise, as I explained you in your page, the file name would end with HDR. Poco a poco 13:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staatstheater, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Sjokolade 09:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Mayor, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in general, limited PC reasonable --DXR 13:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Principal, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. (Please add a geo location.) --XRay 07:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 08:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Gobierno, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. (Please add a geo location.) --XRay 07:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 08:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 20:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estela de Luz y Torre Mayor, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ! --JLPC 22:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 20:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 84.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment IMO the sunny parts are too bright. What do you mean?--XRay 07:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
I think that you are right.   New version Poco a poco 08:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 17:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Noraboa (felicidades)

Felicidades adelantadas. Ya solamente te quedan 100 fotos de calidad para duplicar las que yo tengo. Impresionante--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, la cuenta se sencilla, si le hubieses dedicado tú el doble de tiempo ahora tendrías más del doble que yo :)...un abrazo! Poco2 22:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panteón Inglés, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Independencia, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'm not yet convinced by the crop. There are some disturbing elements reaching into the composition (half arm, branches, shadows). Perhaps you can consider another crop? I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 07:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done, thanks, Poco a poco 21:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support It's great now. --Cccefalon 22:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo Mercado de la Victoria, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI for me--Lmbuga 11:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Principal, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI for me --Halavar 21:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morata de Jiloca, Zaragoza, 2014-01-08, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 16:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prasat Suor Prat, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 41.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 41.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercado el Parián, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 19:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paracuellos de Jiloca, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 21:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo, Ateca, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments needs cleaning --A.Savin 10:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 20:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 20:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla en las cercanías de Mineral del Chico, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 20:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Constitución, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 95.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 15:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Independencia, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. But: Please add a geo location. Thank you! --XRay 15:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I added the geodata, as I did in the former one of this subject. Does it make sense to do it for all further images in the category if the geodata is visible at category level? Poco a poco 20:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Como archivar para luego encontrar

Hola amigo: Todos los días miro la foto a ver si es la tuya y casi tengo cogido tu estilo. Quería preguntarte, tu que harás miles y miles de fotos, cómo debo hacer para encontrar una en concreto. Es que yo, que he hecho pocas, tengo que darle un repaso a mis "contribuciones" para encontrar una. Dame alguna pista por favor. Gracias. Saludos cordiales.Adolfobrigido (talk) 18:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Adolfo, hay varias formas de hacerlo. En tu caso lo más sencillo es posiblemente mirar en los subidas (en enlace a la derecha de las contribuciones). En mi caso yo también me sirvo de una categoría oculta, ésta: Category:Images by User:Poco a poco, que siempre viene bien. También tengo otras para artículos destacados, de calidad o valiosos, pero la que te enlazo contiene todas mis fotos. Aquí tienes las próximas fotos del día. Por lo que veo este mes no hay ninguna mía, en marzo y abril solo una cada mes y en mayo dos, si bien, no paro en sacar adelante muchas destacadas por acá, creo que estoy en racha. Un abrazo, Poco2 19:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hola Diego: Sigo aquí para no abrir otro hilo. Te he creado un problema y es que como siempre me atiendes tan bien, sigo dándote la lata a pesar de que seguro que estás muy ocupado. Ya dí el primer paso de crear "Category:Images by User:Adolfobrigido" y me aparece en abecedario, etc pero!! ¿Ahora qué tengo que hacer para que me aparezcan fotos?¿como categorizar las fotos si es que es necesario? ¿hay que crear sub-categoría? ¿como se hace?. Perdona Diego, te pido disculpas porque parece como si estuvieras a mi disposición. No tengas prisa en contester. Haz lo tuyo y cuando tengas un rato libre me dices algo. Muchísimas, pero que muchísimas gracias.Adolfobrigido (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hola Adolfo, no hay problema, si no tengo tiempo, te lo diría directamente. Acabo de rellenar tu categoría con 531 imágenes. Me ha costado unas 4 horas, pero ha valido la pena. ¡Qué va! han sido 2 minutos. Para ello me he servido de una herramienta que se llama Cat-a-lot, y que puedes activar en las preferencias (sección de categorías), si bien esta herramienta es bastante potente y no del todo intuitiva, por eso no te la termino de recomendar. La que sí te recomiendo es HotCat, una herramienta mucho más intuitiva y que se documenta aquí (se activa igualmente en preferencias>>herramientas). Cuando lo hagas verás aparecer al fondo de cada página de archivo una señal de "+" para incluir categorías adicionales, también puedes cambiar las existentes. Cuídate, Poco2 20:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
¡Qué susto me has dado! No sé ni que decirte. Mañana con la cabeza más despejada, que por la noche me pongo espeso, haré los deberes de aprenderme bien lo que me indicas. De Soria tenías que ser, como mi cuñado. Un super abrazo.Adolfobrigido (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camacinia gigantea macho, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 16:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. But: Please add a geo location. --XRay 16:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality again. --Cccefalon 17:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 08:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Nice! --Iifar 11:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Coloma de Andorra, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Esteve, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la Vall, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Perhaps you could crop out the light spots at the left border? --Cccefalon 08:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done, thanks, Poco a poco 11:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloj Monumental, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayon, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baphuon, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 08:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocothemis servilia hembra, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phimeanakas, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support a bit blurred on left however ok --Christian Ferrer 06:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong blue cast, IMO--Jebulon 19:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  Fixed Poco a poco 21:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I'd still say it's blue, and slightly leaning in. Mattbuck 22:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
  New version Poco a poco 20:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
ok now. --Sputniktilt 14:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Principal, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Light spots (see note) --Christian Ferrer 23:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 20:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --JLPC 17:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 160.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 17:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much magenta in the stones and CA upper left in the branches. --Cccefalon 17:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done, better? Poco a poco 20:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes and also it reflects the natural colours of Angkor better. I had the same problem with my Angkor photos. --Cccefalon 08:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molinos de Polvorín, Villafeliche, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. But: Please add the geo location. --XRay 13:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 08:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Licenza

Ciao Diego ti volevo chiedere come posso inserire nei file da me caricati una licenza custom come quella presente nelle tue foto. Grazie --Edisonblus (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Ciao Edisonblus, è facile, devi creare questa pagina con il contenuto della mia, ma adattato al tuo profilo e includere questo modello in foto così: {{User:Edisonblus/credit}} Poco2 21:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oficina del servicio postal, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 22:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Teruel desde la torre de la iglesia del Salvador, España, 2014-01-10, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 22:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercado el Parián, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The Photographer 16:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Daroca, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Principal, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. But: Please add a geo location. Thank you! --XRay 15:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I added the geodata, as I did in the former one of this subject. Does it make sense to do it for all further images in the category if the geodata is visible at category level? Poco a poco 20:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  Comment I think it makes sense. Usual an image is a member of a lot of categories. Do you look for the geo position in all categories where the images is a member? So it's better to put the geodata to the image.--XRay 08:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)    Support --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Grazie

Ciao Diego ti volevo chiedere come posso inserire nei file da me caricati una licenza custom come quella presente nelle tue foto. Grazie--Edisonblus (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Asiento de suegra (Echinocactus grusonii), Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-09-08, DD 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Asiento de suegra (Echinocactus grusonii), Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-09-08, DD 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Light not as its best, but OK for QI. --Tuxyso 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Acosta, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 11:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment there's something in the sky that should be removed IMO (see notice); also a dustspot a bit to the right. Otherwise OK. --P e z i 10:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 20:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now. --P e z i 22:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de San Francisco, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though I think that guy is giving us the evil eye. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Indeed... Poco a poco 21:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 20:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 12:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 12:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Imagen

Hola Diego. Espero que no te moleste que haya intentado retocar la imagen File:Reloj Monumental, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG. La imagen retocada la tienes aquí. Si deseas que solicite su borrado, indícamelo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 13:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Pensé que había quedado mejor--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 13:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Hola Miguel, muchas gracias por la crítica en QIC y por subir una versión mejorada. Siguiendo tus comentarios y fijándome en tu versión acabo de subir otra versión (a partir del RAW), ¿qué te parece? saludos! Poco2 14:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Acabo de promoverla. Muy buena la imagen de San Miquel de Engolasters.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Gracias Miguel, sí, la de San Miguel de Engolasters también me gusta, de hecho la he nominado a destacada hace unas horas, Poco2 22:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

FP candidates

Dear Diego,

Since you are a very frequent contributor to FP. Would you mind having a look here User:ArildV/FP candidates. Are there any of the images that are worth nominating? Regards, --ArildV (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Arild, I opted for sending you a reply via email. Please, check your inbox. Poco2 18:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloj Monumental, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --A.Savin 15:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de la Asunción, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Underexposed and   chromatic aberration points --The Photographer 16:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  New version Poco a poco 21:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Mucho mejor --The Photographer 02:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Principal, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Creo que hubiera sido buena idea incluir toda la acera. Good quality anyway. --Kadellar 02:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Acosta, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 02:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Coloma de Andorra, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 18:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Esteve, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I have three issues for me: 1. The left side is leaning inwards. 2. The cross on top of the tower has a magenta shine and 3. the branches on the left are a little bit disturbing. I proposed a crop, but as I know that it is personal taste about how much sky, I want to point out that this is only a proposal you can bypass. --Cccefalon 20:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done, I followed your advice Poco a poco 20:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
It looks great. --Cccefalon 23:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercado el Parián, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de los Hermanos, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect but ok. --Mattbuck 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla del Señor de Celontla, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That seems better. Mattbuck 00:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 44.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 48.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina de Siena, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective is rather extreme, but quality is OK. --Tuxyso 07:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloj Monumental, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI for me--Lmbuga 22:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice light and very good sharpness. --Tuxyso 07:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 20:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, The Haz talk 17:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techumbre mudéjar, Catedral, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice and good quality, very good IMO--Lmbuga 11:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I am happy you like it so much Miguel, me too, and I'd like to propose it to FP but have already 2 nominations...:) Poco a poco 13:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some artefacts from CA removal around the roof. But imho still OK. --Tuxyso 14:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Independencia, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   SupportGood. --AntanO 11:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Buena composicion y calidad. --Ivan2010 12:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice and original composition--Lmbuga 11:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panteón Inglés, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 08:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercado el Parián, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 10:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Pedro, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 08:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloj Monumental, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 08:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Coloma de Andorra, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Teruel desde la torre de la iglesia del Salvador, España, 2014-01-10, DD 78.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 22:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo Mercado de la Victoria, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Independencia, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo

Fíjate en el texto que está dentro de esta imagen. No se me había ocurrido hasta ahora encoger la imagen sólo verticalmente. Supongo que tú ya lo estarías haciendo. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, sí, la verdad es que sí, hacía algún tiempo que aplico también este tipo de correcciones, antes con Photoshop y gimp, ahora también con Lightroom 5.3 (ratio). Hasta pronto, Poco2 20:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Para agradecerte el esfuerzo. de Ivan2010

Gracias Poco a poco por tu trabajo y tu esfuerzo para con mi imagen, esperemos entonces a una tercera opinión como me explicas. Un saludo afectuoso. Ivan2010

De nada Iván, espero que la cosa salga adelante, Poco2 21:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Poco a poco, como habrás visto lo logramos, y lo digo en plural, pues el logro es de ambos, gracias nuevamente. Ahora te hago una pregunta, había pensado que quizás pudiera proponerla a candidata a: FP ¿Qué tú crees? ¿Valdría la pena? Me gustaría contar con tu consejo antes de hacerlo. Un saludo cordial. Ivan2010 04:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Iván, en mi opinión no tiene posibilidades de salir adelante. Es una imagen de calidad (a propósito, me acabo de dar cuenta que está algo torcida), pero la composición no me parece espectacular y la nitidez es aceptable pero no impresionante para compensar la falta de interés. El objecto es interesante, pero para mí tampoco extraordinario y la situación de luz no es mala, pero sí mejorable para conseguir menos sombras. Lo siento, pero EMHO no se trata de una imagen destacada. Saludos, Poco2 19:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Una vez más graciasPoco a poco, por tus consejos, tus ayudas y tus acertados comentarios, los tendré muy en cuenta para las proximas imagenes que decida subir. Solo intento llegar a ser un buen colaborador de Commons, y para ello, poder contar con apoyo como el tuyo es algo invaluable. En verdad mil gracias y mantengamos el contacto. un saludo cordial desde acá; Ivan2010 22:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de la iglesia del Salvador, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 03:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel de Engolasters, Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 19:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Dust spot in the sky (see annotation), please fix it. Otherwise nice. -- Felix Koenig 21:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Felix Koenig 21:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 16:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 146.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villafeliche, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 050.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 120.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 23:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Título de imágenes

Hola Diego: Ya ves que el aprendiz no se cansa de dar la lata. Una pregunta: ¿Se puede cambiar, y en caso positivo, facilmente el nombre de una foto?. No me refiero a la descripción. Muchas gracias. Saludos muy cordiales.Adolfobrigido (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Adolfo, sí, claro que se puede, pero para hacerlo se requiere de un permiso que sólo tienen los administradores y los que cuentan con experiencia, lo han pedido y se les ha concedido. Aquí tienes más información. Si me dices lo que quieres hacer, te puedo ayudar. Saludos, Poco2 14:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Coloma de Andorra, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --VT98Fan 21:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 155.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daroca, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 19:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 056.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo Mercado de la Victoria, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 82.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better. Mattbuck 23:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Coloma de Andorra, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

No es solución, creo

Hola Diego.

El recorte de la imagen File:Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 168.JPG empeora significativamente la imagen y no elimina el defecto que te dije (fíjate en las nuevas notas). Yo promovería la versión anterior aún sin ser mejorada, pero no promovería esta. La imagen puede ser QI ya que el defecto es menor ante el tamaño de la foto.

El halo quizás se deba a oscurecer el cielo con la herramienta pincel de ajuste. Si es así, prueba a hacerlo con filtro graduado. En todo caso, la imagen me parecía mejor antes que ahora.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 17:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, tienes razón que el resultado no es brillante, pues se pierde un trozo del corral en la parte baja derecha, que fue mi intención al hacer la foto. Por el motivo que sea la calidad de la parte derecha de la foto era bastante mala, además el halo motivado por la sobreexposición del cielo junto con el hecho de que la parte izquierda tampoco era para tirar cohetes, ha motivado que retire la candidatura, espero que no te moleste. Un abrazo, Poco2 20:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Santa María, Calamocha, Teruel, España, 2014-01-08, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 22:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 19:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación de FF.CC. de Calatayud, España, 2013-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación de FF.CC. de Delicias, Zaragoza, España, 2013-12-29, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 19:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo, Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 19:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Sacro, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Please have a look to the dust spot. --XRay 09:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  Cleaned Poco a poco 09:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support OK.--XRay 10:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 083.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta Alta, Daroca, Zaragoza, 2014-01-08, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (please remove dust spot) --P e z i 17:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done Poco a poco 19:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melocactus violaceus, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-09-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silos, Acatlán, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 10:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Pirámide de Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 10:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Iifar 14:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albarracín, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 089.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de la Reunificación, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la Vall, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good quality to me. --DAJF 17:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zebra (Equus quagga burchellii), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Órice de El Cabo (Oryx gazella), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 19:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de la Reunificación, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and high EV! --P e z i 20:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Torico, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Biologische/wissenschaftliche Namen

Hallo! Ich wollte mich doch noch kurz bei dir melden. Deinem Hinweis bezüglich der wissenschaftlichen Namen bin ich nachgegangen und hatte ja den Schluss gezogen, dass es nur die eine Art sein kann, die in der Gegend überhaupt vorkommt. Das ist zwar eher eine analytische als eine wissenschaftliche Vorgehensweise, aber immerhin. So nebenbei konnte mir mein Mitfotograf heute ohne Umschweife die Art nennen. Hätte ich ihn mal gleich gefragt ... Aber danke noch einmal für deinen Hinweis. So werde ich in Zukunft hoffentlich darauf achten, zumindest auch einmal die ganze Pflanze aufzunehmen, um eine Bestimmung zu ermöglichen. --XRay talk 15:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi XRay, das Beste ist, dass man auch noch dabei was lernt? ich verbringe häufig viel mehr Zeit bei der Suche von Tier- oder Pflanzenarten als bei der eigentlichen Entwicklung der Bilder...Poco2 21:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Poco a poco/2014-02".