Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Podlesok86!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anefo duplicates edit

Hi, thanks for uploading the tank images. However the ones from Anefo will (or should) be uploaded here already. We have a large quantity of Anefo content (10s of thousands), although there's still work needed on categorising it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I noticed this and stopped any further uploads. Podlesok86 (talk) 01:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Beaufighter Mark VI image problem edit

Image "Een Bristol Beaufighter Mk. VI, uitgerust met een torpedo, in de start (2157-066-001)" you uploaded matches one in IWM Collection which describes it as a Beaufighter Mark X (serial LZ114) https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205127134

I suspect its more likely the Dutch MoD is wrong than the IWM. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, will revise with the IWM description in parenthesis below. Podlesok86 (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Categorization edit

Hi, please note that the category systems at both Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are hierarchical, rather than via simple keywords, for example see guidance at Categories. Also please note that while you are welcome to create new categories, each must have at least one parent category, so that it can be found by browsing the hierarchy structure, eg using tools such as Cat-a-lot and Hotcat. I have made relevant amendments to various Fokker files and categories, including some that you have kindly uploaded or contributed to. Thank you for your attention.PeterWD (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Noted. Podlesok86 (talk) 05:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Het Britse hulpvliegkampschip HMS Pretoria Castle werd alleen gebruikt voor training (2158 042214).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Het Britse hulpvliegkampschip HMS Pretoria Castle werd alleen gebruikt voor training (2158 042214).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Avensa was de eerste maatschappij in Latijns-Amerika met een Fairchild F-27 (2161 026998).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Avensa was de eerste maatschappij in Latijns-Amerika met een Fairchild F-27 (2161 026998).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Manewry na poligonie wojskowym w Skierniewicach (51-43-25).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loafiewa (talk) 01:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

OVERCAT edit

Hi, thanks for the German railway photos from ETH.

For categorization, it's not necessary to add all the cats. If something is in Category:Electric locomotives of Germany then it's already implictly a member of Category:Electric locomotives too. Same as for a German loco class, if that whole class are electrics. These are categories (which have implied supercat relations), not tags (which don't).

This causes a lot of confusion on MediaWiki projects. The cats should be removed if they're completely implied by the subcat. So all German locos are locos. But it's not always so clear: the definition of cat members isn't always clear cut. Also some categories act as navigation lists, and it's unhelpful to have things missing from them, so we might leave them in such a cat. Members of Diesel-hydraulic locos might still be listed under Diesel locos, otherwise someone looking for them in that big and obvious list wouldn't find them unless they already knew what transmission type to look under! That sort of thing makes navigation very hard. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, so what is the hierarchy of categorization that I should be used? In the example of the locomotives, if I find a category for the specific vehicle class, I can omit the electric and German loco categories? Podlesok86 (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Generally the goal is to put them in the single most-specific category that describes them, for each "dimension". So this could be Category:DB Class 120 and also Category:Trains at Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof, for the "what" and "where" dimensions. The loco category then implies that they're electric. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok, noted. Podlesok86 (talk) 23:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

More Chinese railway photos? edit

Lets make a more Chinese railway photos? 37.248.177.242 12:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:S-75 Dvina (SA-2 Guideline SAM) Transporter Vehicle Captured by the IDF, Yom Kippur War 13 October 1973.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:S-75 Dvina (SA-2 Guideline SAM) Transporter Vehicle Captured by the IDF, Yom Kippur War 13 October 1973.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply