Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Politikaner/Archive 1

< User talk:Politikaner
Latest comment: 12 years ago by CategorizationBot in topic Tip: Categorizing images

Commonist licenses

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Dear Politikaner,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 2,300 files (started with about 1,8M files). Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}
{{self|GFDL}} and {{GFDL}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}
{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, --MGA73 (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem, feel free to change the licenses of my uploaded pictures. I agree with cc-by-sa-3.0 or whatever you like. My problem is, that I cant find license.txt in my commons-files. Where is it? I have in commonist the files: bin, build, doc, etc, image, lib, src. But there is no license.txt, so I cant change it. Can you help me? --Politikaner (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
My bad. It's called lincenses.txt and it's in the etc dir. You can find an example at Commons:Tools/Commonist/licenses.txt. Multichill (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, finally I could find it, I changed it. --Politikaner (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nice :-) And my bot should have changed the old images now. --MGA73 (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Bremer Weihnachtsmarkt

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Politikaner, diese von Dir angelegte Kategorie ist leer. Kommt da noch was oder kann die Kategorie gelöscht werden? -- Ies (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Jetzt sind Bilder drin. Dazu hätte ich aber mal eine prinzipielle Frage: so weit ich bisher in Commens mitbekommen habe, sind leere Kategorien druchaus zulässig - oder irre ich da? Und noch eine Frage: wohin kann man sich wenden, wenn man einige Helfer für Routinearbeiten braucht. Ich habe 500 Bilder in Category:Globenmuseum, Vienna hochgeladen, die entsprechenden Schilder sind mit fotografiert, sie müßten aller dings in die Bilderklärungen abgeschrieben werden. Nicht dass ich zu faul bin, aber ich habe momentan so viele Bilder zum Hochladen, dass ich dazu keine Zeit habe. --Politikaner (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Leere Kategorien sind Speicherplatz verschwendender Datenmüll, also ein typischer Fall für {{speedydelete}}. Massenhafte Änderungen, falls sie denn mit Algorithmen zu beschreiben sind, sollte man lieber Bots überlassen. Hier kannst du Dich vertrauensvoll z.B. an User:Multichill wenden. -- Ies (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Nee, es geht um eine Handarbeit. --Politikaner (talk) 19:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:World_Wind_Globe_NASA_Norwegian_Sea_1.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:World_Wind_Globe_NASA_Norwegian_Sea_1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Now there is a source. Done! --Politikaner (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

deine schmetterlingsfotos

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

hi politikaner, ich glaube du hast ein schärfe-problem mit deinen schmetterlingsfotos! vielleicht siehst du dir bevor du weitere fotos hochlädtst zuvor mal deine fotos mit 100% vergrösserung an, dann wird es dir auch auffallen! schade , denn die exemplare sind ansonsten sehr interessant. dontworry (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Ja ich weiß. Die gegebene Beleuchtung ist nicht optimal und ich habe die Fotos ziemlich stark beschneiden müssen, um die Tierchen freizustellen. , Dann muss ich wohl noch nal hingehen. Ich lade aber trotzdem alles est mal hoch. --Politikaner (talk) 08:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
ich halte das für das aufzäumen des pferdes von hinten und für (zusätzliche und unnötige) beschäftigung des servers. aber du bist sicherlich alt genug um dies auch zu wissen! ;-) dontworry (talk) 18:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0005.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just put an id on your photo description and put it in it's category (Wikiproject Lepidoptera)Is this OK.? I will work through the rest soon. Nice to have the label photos and this was the first wikipic of this species.Hope to see many more> best wishes from Ireland Robert Notafly (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Antlions

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image used [1] Here Many thanks Robert Notafly (talk) 11:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_002.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_001.JPG , File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_002.JPG , File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_003.JPG , File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_004.JPG - copyright violation, I loaded it up, I am guilty, there is no further discussion needed wether to delete or not. DELETE --Politikaner (talk) 09:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_001.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Pictures_with_cubes_20090321_001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kenmayer (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Keoln Maerz 2009 PD 20090327 011.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, da Du scheinbar Dein Fotoarchiv vom letzten Jahr entrümpelst, erinnere Dich bitte daran, wo dieser Giebel in Köln ist. Du hast es Dir ja so schon recht einfach mit den Kategorien gemacht.--Duhon (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:Cologne

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wieviel Bilder hast Du denn noch in der Rumpelkammer? Cologne hat viele Unterkategorien. Wenn Du etwas Ehrgeiz hast, befasse Dich mit den Kategorien. Sonst warte mit dem hochladen, bis Du etwas Übersicht gewonnen hast.--Duhon (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:Cologne, die Zweite

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Wieviel verwackelte Bilder durch die spiegelnden Scheiben des Stadtrundfahrtbusses kommen den noch? Hast Du Dir schon mal Gedanken wer hinter Dir aufräumt?--Duhon (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, aber dafür habe ich jetzt keine Zeit. Vielleicht ist ja ein Bild zu gebrauchen. Die Torten im Schokoladenmuseum sind doch ganz nett. Für den Rest kannt du ja eine separate Kategorie anlegen. --Politikaner (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Cologne in 120 minutes-die Kategorie hättest Du auch selbst anlegen können. Bevor mir die Idee mit den Touristenbildern durch die Busscheibe kam sind die Torten leider auf Wanderschaft gegangen. Ordne sie bitte selbst ein. Die meisten anderen Bilder bekommen wir auch noch unter. Montag ist auch noch ein Tag.--Duhon (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Torten sind erledigt. Danke fürden Rest! --Politikaner (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 12 years ago18 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Politikaner!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Erledigt. Done. --Politikaner (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0513.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0513.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--GaAs11671 19:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Hallo. Bitte sei etwas sorgfältiger bei deiner Arbeit. Du solltest wenigstens die total unscharfen Bilder aussortieren, sonst belastest du nur unnötig den Server. Auch ist die Bilderserie nur bedingt nützlich, wenn du nicht noch die richtigen Bildbeschreibungen den einzelnen Viechern zuordnest. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I don't speak german, please comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0513.JPG. --GaAs11671 18:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
I have also deleted File:Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0511.JPG and File:Naturkundliche Sammlung Übermaxx Überseemuseum Bremen 0515.JPG for the same reasons as above (out of focus, out of scope). -- Deadstar (msg) 08:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Oldtimer_auf_Airport_Bremen_Flugtag_2009_158.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Oldtimer_auf_Airport_Bremen_Flugtag_2009_158.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Copenhagen_view_from_North_port_20090818_53.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Copenhagen_view_from_North_port_20090818_53.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Quibik (talk) 12:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


New filenames for two of your pictures

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I have uploaded two of your picture File:20090817_Gudhjem33.JPG plus File:20090817_Gudhjem34.JPG and given them new filenames as "derivative work". The reason is that neither of the pictures actually show Gudhjem but buildings from the town Allinge-Sandvig. You are welcome to contact me if you have any comments. Best regards, --Hubertus (talk) 23:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Keoln_Maerz_2009_PD_20090327_106.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Keoln_Maerz_2009_PD_20090327_106.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Powers (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Keoln_Maerz_2009_PD_20090327_107.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Keoln_Maerz_2009_PD_20090327_107.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Powers (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Canadian coins

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Several images of Canadian coins have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you have uploaded one or more of the files. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Coins of Canada. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0067.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0067.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

XenonX3 (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0155.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0155.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

XenonX3 (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0159.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0159.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

XenonX3 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0214.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0214.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

XenonX3 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0321.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Naturkundliche_Sammlung_Übermaxx_Überseemuseum_Bremen_0321.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

XenonX3 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Politikaner/Archive_1&oldid=659206757"
Return to the user page of "Politikaner/Archive 1".