Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Qahramani44!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked edit

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I'm curious, how exactly was I edit warring (I didn't cross the edit-warring threshold, even by the standards of Discretionary Sanctions), and more importantly, where did I get a warning? You seemed to have blocked me out of nowhere, and I would like some clarification on the grounds it was done on. Qahramani44 (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)"Reply
Decline reason: "The purpose of warning is to ensure the user is aware of polices and expectations. As @Magog the Ogre: even noted in the block rationale, you have indeed referenced edit warring and, of course, have been previously warned about edit warring. That you needed yet another warning on this particular page to understand that edit warring is unacceptable, your implicit premise, is disingenuous wikilawyering. There is no "edit-warring threshold" here and, to the extent you reference a propriety en.wiki rule, the reference both further evidences your knowledge of edit warring and suggests the repeated behaviour of two reversions (e.g., for File:Republic of mahabad and iranian azerbaijan 1945 1946.png: [1][2]; for File:Iranian-languages-map.jpg: [3][4]; etc.) is gaming a (nonexistent) threshold ("borderlining") instead of considering the spirit of the prohibition or the appropriateness of your actions. One notes, tellingly, that, as of your block, reversions comprised 32 percent (!!!) of your undeleted Commons edits. You have not even once sought to engage in a talk page conversion. COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer here. Эlcobbola talk 15:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)"Reply
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

File:Turkmen Sahra.png edit

 
File:Turkmen Sahra.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beshogur (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Traktor-bachegan.jpg edit

 
File:Traktor-bachegan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CuriousGolden (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply