User talk:Reda Kerbouche/Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Juma Mosues 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grave of Ekaterine Giorgis asuli Geladze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal of Church of St. David, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grave of Niko Pirosmani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 04:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of Mtatsminda Pantheon, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protal of the Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine near to Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruin in arabe finded in the National Botanical Garden of Georgia (Tbilissi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall of Narikala Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abanotubani, Tbilisi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vysokopetrovsky Monastery, Krapivenskiy Pereulok side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tips have quite some halo to it. Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 12:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic in Mtatsminda Pantheon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic in Mtatsminda Pantheon in Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Tbilisi 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metekhi church of Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments rather soft; slightly overexposed is this fixable? --Virtual-Pano 09:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC) @Virtual-Pano:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 09:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)  Support New version works for me --Virtual-Pano 13:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Support New version works for me --Virtual-Pano 13:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas, Tbilisi 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. This one works best for me from that series --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grave of Vaso Abashidze 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult background, but you made the best of it, I think --Kritzolina 07:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall of Narikala Fortress, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:09, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abanotubani, Tbilisi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 09:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC) @Steindy:  Done  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abanotubani, Tbilisi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 09:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC) @Steindy:  Done  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brigde of love in Abanotubani, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 09:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC) @Steindy:  Done  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic on the Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icon of the Resurrection of Christ. Moscow. the Red Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and very good quality for a cellphone. -- Ikan Kekek 20:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Conception of Saint Anne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not that sharp at full size on my 23.5-inch monitor, but perfectly good at full size on my 13-inch, so that's good enough. And a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 10:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 14:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bust of Joseph Stalin at Kremlin Wall Necropolis 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Bust of Joseph Stalin at Kremlin Wall Necropolis.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 12:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic on the Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but undercategorized. Please add a category for mosaics. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old inscriptions in the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window and a plaque on the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please add cats about windows and about plaques? --Poco a poco 20:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 23:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old inscriptions on the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 14:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Conception of Saint Anne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old inscriptions on the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Conception of Saint Anne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Mikhail Kalinin at Kremlin Wall Necropolis 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Conception of Saint Anne 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a slight tilt to the left, or so it seems. Otherwise good. Greetings --Dirtsc 09:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC) @Dirtsc: Corrected--Reda Kerbouche 18:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Looks better now. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the perspective should be fixed and the image should be sharper. --XRay 05:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC) @XRay: corrected--Reda Kerbouche 19:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)  Support OK. IMO a very weak promotion. The sharpness isn't the best. May be it's not sharp enough for other voters. --XRay 10:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the Church of the Theotokos of the Sign (Znamensky Monastery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window in the Old English Court in Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a more specific category or rather additional ones --Poco a poco 13:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: thank you for reviewing this. I have add one and create an other one  Support Perfect, thank you --Poco a poco 13:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Mikhail Frunze at Kremlin Wall Necropolis in Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Star of Alexander Tatarsky on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WC sign in Dubai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad - Genealogy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitol column (Timgad).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman latrinae in Timgad 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medghassen 16-11-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman latrinae in Timgad 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column of Imedghassen, Boumia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Large southern thermae (Timgad) 2022.11.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient microphone ancient Roman theater in Timgad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 12:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rest of mosaic of the Large southern thermae (Timgad).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rest of mosaic of the Large southern thermae (Timgad) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rest of mosaic of the Large southern thermae (Timgad) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in the forum of Timgad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle mentionnant des offrandes à Dieu Baal Hammon et à la grande Tanit 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romain flor relief of timgad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)  SupportChiring chandan 15:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle mentionnant des offrandes à Dieu Baal Hammon et à la grande Tanit 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle mentionnant des offrandes à Dieu Baal Hammon et à la grande Tanit 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tête d'étude (Cirta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steles Votifs dédiés au dieu Saturne (Cirta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle mentionnant des offrandes à Dieu Baal Hammon et à la grande Tanit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentI want to support, but what is the white space at the right top ? --Sebring12Hrs 14:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs  Done--Reda Kerbouche 09:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Sebring12Hrs 12:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaïque funéraire chrétienne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs more categories. --C messier 21:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC) @C messier:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 23:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapiteau Corinthien (Coudait).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Sidi Hanni Street - the republic avenue Batna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quintus Lollius Urbicus Mausoleum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 23:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quintus Lollius Urbicus Mausoleum 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quintus Lollius Urbicus Mausoleum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old colonial post office in Batna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial Front Doors in Batna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road signe to Tiddis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Verticals are not vertical in the background, but this is not important here. --Cayambe 09:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Sidi Hanni Street Batna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial Front Doors in Batna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial Front Doors in Batna 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial Front Doors in Batna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abdelhamid Ben Badis mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 18:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 10:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in the republic avenue Batna, Algeria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals need correcting, the building appears to be leaning. --BigDom 17:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)</bɾ> @BigDom:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 18:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Thanks, looks better. I'm still in two minds whether the fine detail is quite good enough for QI (for example, the detailing at the top of the facade is quite indistinct). I think I'd rather have a second opinion. --BigDom 13:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)  Support On second thoughts, I think it's good enough for QI. --BigDom 20:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial window in Batna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonial Front Doors in Batna 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman inscriptions in Timgad 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de la Favorite, Bardo, Alger3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de la Favorite, Bardo, Alger1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de la Favorite, Bardo, Alger5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Combrian 21:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de la Favorite, Bardo, Alger7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diwan, Bardo d'Alger 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de la Favorite, Bardo, Alger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:45, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:45, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I miss a cat about tiles --Poco a poco 18:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 19:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diwan, Bardo d'Alger 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here, cat missing --Poco a poco 18:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Reda Kerbouche 19:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)