Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rongaman!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
File:1940er Jahre Luftaufnahme Frauenkriche München nach Angriff.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 06:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:1940er Jahre Luftaufnahme Frauenkriche München.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 06:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage edit

I've deleted your userpage. You can copy another user's userpage style, but when you leave in place links like mine to speedy deletions, license reviewing, admin backlogs, etc, that you literally can't use, and a redlinked "former Commons checkusers" category that I created for myself, that starts to be a bit creepy. You edited the page before pasting and a few days later to fix the babel box, so you had several chances to remove parts of the page that inappropriately mirror mine, especially the former checkuser category. I'm asking you not to do this again as it makes me uncomfortable, and makes me wonder if you're trying to intimidate/harass me. Thanks for your understanding. INeverCry 10:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I fully respect your opinion. Sorry for any inconvenience caused! --Rongaman (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Facade de Notre Dame de Reims.png edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Facade de Notre Dame de Reims.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:ZOOM0042 Wikipedia Dom Glocken.ogg edit

Hallo Rongaman! Dein file ist wirklich besser als meine "Zufallsaufnahme". Aber was war der Grund, dass du deine Aufnahme über meine Aufnahme geschrieben hast? Du hast doch so viele Aufnahmen hoch geladen, warum hast du deine Aufnahme nicht einfach als eigenständige Aufnahme eingesetzt? *verwirrtschau* --Flo Sorg (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Grundriss der alten Frauenkirche edit

Hallo Rongaman, du hast File:Grundriss alte Frauenkirche Muenchen.png hochgeladen mit der Bildbeschreibung: "Aufgrund von Grabungsbefunden durch Walter Haas 1946 für das Diözesanmuseum in Freising rekonstruierte Grundriss des Vorgängerbaues der Frauenkirche ist hier in roter Farbe dargestellt. Der aktuelle Grundriss ist schwarz gefärbt." Kannst du dazu noch nähere Angaben machen bzw. eine Quelle angeben? Grabungsleiter war Adam Horn, und er hat seine Ergebnisse 1952 veröffentlicht. Wer ist Walter Haas? Hat er den Grundriss selber rekonstruiert uoder nach einer Rekonstruktion von Horn gezeichnet? Und wo ist die Zeichnung veröffentlicht? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 11:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hallo Bjs! Quelle der Skizze, die ich als Vorlage für meinen Entwurf verwendet habe: http://www.muenchner-dom.de/die-kathedrale/geschichte/baugeschichte.html Walter Haas: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Haas_(Bauforscher) Adam Horn war mehreren Quellen zufolge Grabungsleiter. Rongaman (talk) 14:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hallo Rongaman, danke für die Info. Da bleiben aber noch einige Fragen offen: 1946 war Walter Haas 18 Jahre alt und hatte sein Studium noch nicht begonnen. Woher hast du die Info, dass er den Grundriss 1946 rekonstruiert hat? War er an den Grabungen beteiligt? Oder war das eine spätere Rekonstruktion aufgrund der von Horn 1952/54 veröffentlichten Befunde der anb 1946 durchgeführten Grabungen? Ich frage so ausführlich, weil ich den Artikel de:Marienkapelle (München) geschrieben habe, der gerade im Review ist, und dort auch eine Frage nach der Rekosntruktion aufkam und ich dort nichts Falsches oder Unbelegtes schreiben möchte. --Bjs (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hab bei Google jetzt etwas https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/688/1/Ramisch_Fontes28.pdf gefunden. Dort steht: "der aufgrund von Grabungsbefunden durch Walter Haas für das Diözesanmuseum in Freising rekonstruierte Grundriss", aber ohne Jahreszahl. Das "durch" bezieht sich dabei m.E. eher auf das "rekonstruiert" als auf die "Grabungsbefunde". Also eher eine spätere Rekonstruktion aufgrund der Grabungen von 1946, evtl. während Haas beim BLfD war. Hast du weitere Info? --Bjs (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Bjs. Genau das war auch meine Quelle. Ich weis leider auch nicht mehr. Ich würde mich aber freuen, wenn Du bei Deiner Recherche für den Artikel auf Zusatzinfos stößt. Viel Erfolg! Rongaman (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alles klar, vielen dank, ich bleib am Ball. --Bjs (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply