Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Solymári!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Lebegő karos címer.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lebegő karos címer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Colleagues! I scanned this image myself from the local newspaper (Solymári Hírmondó, 1991. january), this was a part of the headline of the newspaper in that year. I offered to my colleagues in the Hungarian Wikipedia to delete this image, if anyone of them find it problematic [no one replied], and according to this, I offer you as well to delete it, if you find any legal problem with it. But if your decision will be a deletion, please let me know, how can I use the image of this crest, if I would like to publish it on Wikipedia? This crest has no appearance on the internet, since the author had withdrawn his offer (to the municipality of Solymár, Hungary) to use this crest in cca. 1992 or 1993, and we don't have any physical object, that bears the image of this crest on itself. So please let me know, how I can show the image of this crest (which is a small part, but concrete part of the history of my municipality) on the Hungarian Wikipedia, if the scanned copy of the head of our local newspaper is banned to republish. Sincerely: Solymári (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, as far as I understood, this is not an official coat of arms of an Hungarian city. This means the copyright stays by its creator an you cannot publish on commons or anwhere else, unless you have th authority by the author. You may try to contact him and ask him if he is willing to publish the image under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is rcommanded here). If he agrees h had to send an mailtothe commons support-team as documented under Commons:OTRS. Once the mail has been sent, you better replace the problm tag with {{OTRS pending}} which will prevent deletion for 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 18:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks in advance. I'll contact the author within several days and I hope the best. Regards: Solymári (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Szabó Balázs Solymári Magazin 2013 dec p10.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Szabó Balázs Solymári Magazin 2013 dec p10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 05:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kategórizálás edit

Szia! Személyeknél ne csak a településre kategorizálj. Category:Tamás Varga, Category:Dénes Gulyás Üdv. Tambo (talk) 08:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Szia! Ugyanez vonatkozik erre is:
 
. A kategória: Zita Gereben, és angolul ki kell(ene) tölteni. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

medence edit

  medence
Kedves Solymári!

Érdeklődni szeretnék, hogy az alábbi képet hogy sikerült megörökíteni? A medence magánterületen van, a kép pedig egyértelműen belülről készült.

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%B6r%C3%B6kk%C3%BAt-forr%C3%A1s_(Solym%C3%A1r)#/media/File:060122_T%C3%B6r%C3%B6kk%C3%BAt_28.jpg Pbencsi (talk) 11:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kedves Pbencsi!

Itt válaszolok, mert úgy látom, hogy nem él a vitalapja. Ez egy több mint tíz évvel ezelőtti kép, úgyhogy nem emlékszem 100 %-os pontossággal, hogyan készült, de biztos vagyok benne, hogy nem hatoltam be a készítéséhez elkerített magánterületre. Legfeljebb talán az történhetett, hogy átemeltem a fényképezőgépet a kerítésen, de fotózni a vízmosás területéről fotóztam. A forrásból elfolyó víz útját követtem, amikor felfedeztem és lefényképeztem az objektumot. Most ebben a havas időjárásban biztosan nem fogok felmenni és ellenőrizni, hogy mik most ott a jelenlegi terep- és kerítésviszonyok, de 2006 januárjában semmi sem utalt arra, hogy a kép elkészítésével birtokháborítást követtem volna el. De ha sérelmesnek érzi a képet, kérem, kezdeményezze a törlését a commonson, nem fogok szót emelni miatta.

[Ui.: A serleget minek köszönhetem?]

Üdvözlettel: Solymári (talk) 13:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ezt a beszelgetest most talaltam meg, nem igazan hasznalom a wikipediat, ugyhogy a serleget sem ertem, lehet hogy valahol ranyomtam? A kep annak idejen azert keltette fel az erdeklodesem, mert olvastam, hogy jart kint regesz csapat, illetve tudom, hogy volt epitesi munka is a teruleten; azt hittem, hogy esetleg bejottek megszemlelni a medencet, ami csupan erdekesseg gyanant merult fel bennem, nem teteleztem fel birtokhaboritast es ha bejottek volna, sem csinaltam volna belole problemat. Ha erdekel valakit a medence, helytorteneti vagy epitomernoki szempontbol, szivesen megmutatom belulrol. Ezen a cimen vagyok elerheto: penzes.bendeguz@gmail.com Ha wikipedian ir, lehet, hogy megint csak 3 ev mulva jut eszembe megnezni. Pbencsi (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Painting of Gyula Medgyessy Kovács on an open air exhibition Balatonfüred.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Oltárkép részlete a Zugligeti Szent Család plébániatemplomban 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also:

--Regasterios (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Szia! Az a baj a képekkel, hogy csak a szabadban található műalkotásokról készült képek tehetők közzé a szerző engedélye nélkül, a beltérieket ábrázolók nem. Zselléri Imre 1959-ben halt meg, így csak 2030-tól használhatók szabadon az utóbbiak. --Regasterios (talk) 15:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Regasterios: Szia! Ez esetben mi mást tehetnék, tudomásul veszem, ha törlésre kerülnek a képek. Üdv: Solymári (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

--Regasterios (talk) 06:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Same situation, as with the Zsellér pictures, I’ve nothing to add. If they are problematic, delete them. Regards: Solymári (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Regasterios: Szia! Nem tudok erre mit mondani. Amikor ezeket a képeket feltöltöttem, tudtommal még nem estek semmilyen korlátozás alá. Ha a jelenlegi szabályozás nem engedi meg ilyen információs táblák fotóinak közzétételét, az egyrészt rendkívül szomorú és sajnálatos, másrészt az adminok tegyék bátran, ami ez esetben a dolguk. Üdv: Solymári (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I've nothing to say about this. When I uploaded these pictures, at that time they were not subject to any restrictions (to the best of my knowledge). If the current legislation does not allow the posting of photos on such information boards, it is on the one hand reasonably sad and regrettable, but on the other hand the admins should have the courage to do, what they must do in this case. Solymári (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Lighthouse Brátán Vera 2007.jpg edit

 
File:Lighthouse Brátán Vera 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   18:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:120708 Festmény az alsóörsi vasútállomáson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nincs itt mit diskutálni, úgyis törölve lesz. Nem közterületen van, hanem a MÁV magánterületén, nyilvánvaló volt, hogy előbb-utóbb valaki kiszúrja; én vagyok a barom, hogy minek fecséreltem az időmet egy ilyen képnek a feltöltésével. További szép nyarat mindenkinek. Solymári (talk) 21:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ne haragudj meg, hogy törlésre jelöltem. Csak azért szúrtam ki, mert néhány napja én is Alsóörsön jártam. Ha mondjuk a külső homlokzaton lenne látható a mű, beleférne, de így sajnos nem. --Regasterios (talk) 10:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Solymári!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

-- ato (talk) 19:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply