Spinal83

Welcome to the Commons, Spinal83!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 23:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Stadsmarkeringen Groningen

Hallo ZanderZ, tijdens mijn eerste poging "sculptures in Groningen (city)" te fotograferen, kwam ik de verwijzing naar de stadsmarkeringen voor het eerst tegen. Dat er nu opeens 4 nieuwe foto's zijn ingeleverd ondervindt ik als erg positief. Nu de overblijvende 3 (?) nog. Er blijken overigens zo verschrikkelijk veel beelden in de Groningense openbare ruimte te staan, dat ik wel enige (toevallige) hulp kan gebruiken. Denk er eens over na. Groetjes--Gerardus 17:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Sander, rondje stad zeg je. Ik was vanmiddag bij de dienst Stadsontwikkeling (Depot Gotenburgerweg) en hoorde daar, dat er in Groningen ca. 400 sculpturen zijn. Ga er maar aan staan. Ik hoorde dat er in de Zernikewijk veel grote moderne kunstobjecten zijn. Misschien is dat een aardig begin? Groetjes--Gerardus 15:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Sander. Dat is er dan weer een. Aan de foto (+ mijn kennis vanuit de auto op de A7) ziet men welke ontberingen je je hebt getroost. Het kan waarschijnlijk nog wel even duren voor er een zonniger opname gemaakt kan worden. Niettemin mooi zo.--Gerardus 16:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

De aanhouder wint!. Bedankt Sander. --Gerardus 21:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

File:GasTerra Flames logo.jpg may be deleted

GasTerra Flames logo.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("GasTerra Flames logo.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

 

HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 00:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, Spinal83. You have new messages at Mabdul#Timeline of web browsers's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, can you update and change the layout engine based background color/areas? I have no clue how to do this by hand. Flock need again more "green space above", the pocketIE shouldn't be trident based, and Mathon is out of the trident range at the moment. I moved nearly all browsers for not overlapping each other. I was thinking about the "problem with webkit" with mathon. Maybe we should start there (at this place) a second webkit area field (with of course any note). what do you think about this idea? Mabdul (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi again. Sure, I'll make the changes. Changing the backgrounds isn't hard, it just takes some time and a bit of trial-and-error. There's a bunch of numbers in the file that give the coordinates of the coloured polygon, so changing them changes the background. Starting a second Webkit would probably be the best solution. ZanderZ (talk) 08:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Opera Mini 6

After 5 should be 6 not 5 again! :) --Accurimbono (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Oops :X I'll double-check my changes next time! -- ZanderZ (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

You removed the webkit branch! can you bring it back? (I'm right at the moment in the university!) and can you (try to) conntect the IBM web explorer with mosaic since it is mosaic based? Mabdul (talk) 09:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC) The screen is really bad in the cip-pools. Never mind. Mabdul (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Did you mean that you didn't see the background or the whole thing disappeared? The backgrounds have always bothered me, they are so light that you can hardly see them sometimes. Sure, I'll connect it with mosaic (unless someone else is faster) and I'll try to add GreenBrowser and SlimBrowser too. ZanderZ (talk) 13:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gusanos.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gusanos.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gusanos.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 09:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Vanilline.svg

File:Vanilline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hooghoudt-flessen.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

subcategorie van categorie invalid SVG

Je hebt een subcategorie aangemaakt voor de categorie Invalid SVG: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Invalid_SVG. In deze subcategorie valt te lezen:
" If you use ChemDraw to make a chemical structure, reaction scheme or diagram (preferably in SVG format), then mark it with Created with ChemDraw or Chemdraw when you upload it. Doing so will automatically add it to this category."
Probleem is dat ik bezig ben de invalid chemdraw-svg's valid te maken met regex en een perlscript. Maar wanneer ik de Chemdraw-template op de pagina van de afbeeldingen plaats, worden deze automatisch geplaatst in de subcategorie waar staat dat ze ongeldig zijn. Voorbeeld:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arenium_ion_mechanism.svg Deze file is w3c-valid en toch staat hij in deze subcategorie.
Wereldburger758 (talk) 07:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Ik heb alleen de categorie aangemaakt de tekst die jij noemt is er later aan toegevoegd. Ik heb verder geen idee hoe de afbeeldingen automatisch in de foute categorie worden geplaatst. Wellicht dat User:Jynto daar wat over kan zeggen, aangezien hij die tekst heeft toegevoegd. -- Spinal83 (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

File:3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran.svg

File:3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 00:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, just want to ask a small question.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Timeline_of_web_browsers.svg

I saw this graph several days ago. And I'm empress by its format. I tried to find some software that can help me build such one, but failed.

Can I ask you which software did you use to edit it?

Thank you very much.

Jerejesse (talk) 05:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I use Notepad++ to edit it :) Software like Adobe Illustrator or Inkscape completely mess up the file, so everything is done by hand! -- Spinal83 (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Wow~ It seems like a lot of work. Thanks a lot. Jerejesse (talk) 04:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Spinal83,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Gebruik van je foto

Hoi Spinal83, Het AD gebruikt je foto van de molen op Ameland. Helaas met te weinig bronvermelding. Akoopal (talk) 12:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt voor het melden! Groet, Spinal83 (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Fryske

Coulonhuis, Leeuwarden

Beste Spinal83, In Onze taal van april 2020 staat op pagina 19 als ik me niet vergis bij het artikel 'Gaat het Fries verloren voor de wetenschap?' bijgaande foto van het Coulonhuis in Leeuwarden afgedrukt, met netjes de vermelding Foto Wikimedia ZanderZ. Mooie foto, inderdaad. Met vriendelijke groet, Vysotsky (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Bedankt voor de melding, leuk! Ik ga eens kijken of ik daar een kopie van kan krijgen :) Groet, Spinal83 (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:ElPicu Curaçao.jpg

File:ElPicu Curaçao.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marchjuly (talk) 04:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)