User talk:Spurzem/Archive 17

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Potentinus (Wehr), view from the nave to the altars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zoo Neuwied Seehund (2006-08-11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Other versions on the description page is broken btw) --D-Kuru 23:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grüner Leguan im Zoo Neuwied, Kopf (2013-04-16 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 507 - Bj. 1958 - 17.07.2005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 12:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Begrüßung am Zoo Neuwied (2013-04-16 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Copyvio? --Kallerna 05:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC) @Kallerna: Again, please check if the image is really a copyvio instead of assuming it. There is no need when the case is clear like here or on public permanent information boards. --PantheraLeo1359531 06:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red BMW 507, front and left side, at oldtimer rally 2000 km durch Deutschland in 2005.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, but I also think it's best in the scope of photos of the front and left side of that model in any color, so would you consider also nominating in that scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R69 S, Bj. 1963 am 10.06.2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW R 69 with side car in motion, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope and used. Nice shot. --pandakekok9 08:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bentley Le Mans 4,5 Litre Special, Bj. 1935, 4398 cm³, 130 PS (2007-07-22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinzeugtopf, blau (2020-04-27 Sp A2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinzeug vor dem Brand - Töpferei Girmscheid (2019-03-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting motif. --Palauenc05 05:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grenzhausen Stoneware before firing in the pottery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronester Kaffeebecher, Indisch Blau (2020-04-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Liebfrauen - Portal li Ecclesia, Petrus, Adam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Liebfrauen - Portal re.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari Dino 166 F2 in 1969 at Nürburgring, Schwalbenschwanz, driver Derek Bell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Sure, why not? Like you basically said, it could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallet-Lok 11sm, rear (2015-09-25 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Basaltkreuz Kettiger Str. (2014-09-11 6976).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mindelheim, St. Stephan, Seitenaltar (2017-08-01 Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 904 as ZDF camera car at the 1000 km in 1966 at Nürburgring in the "carousel".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferrari Porsche 908/3 Spyder driven by Joseph Siffert at Nürburgring in the Südkehre 1970.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nave and choir of St. Irminen (Trier).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tympanum at the Church of Our Lady (Trier) - Portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stutues of Ecclesia, Saint Peter and Adam at the Church of Our Lady (Trier) - Portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Smaller in the frame at review size than its nearest competitor but IMO the best in scope. Its nearest competitor is blurry and looks discolored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Our Lady (Trier) - Portal: Eve, Saint John and synagogue allegory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. I suppose as a character, that would be "synagogue allegory"? What do others think? Eva is Eve in English. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brohltalbahn, BÜ Niederzissen 2015-10-04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallet-Lok 11sm (2015-10-04 4301 b) im Brohltal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze statue “Prophet” by Hildegard Bienen in front of the Maria Laach abbey church, view from the northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Why isn't the cropped version, File:Maria Laach, Prophet, Hildegard Bienen 1971 (2017-06-06 Sp) .JPG, better in scope for a VI? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I would have been surprised if not any question would have come. The answer is easy: The other picture - by the way, not a cropped version, but a different one - is not so good photographically. I already had the intention to get it deleted in order to have not two almost identical photos in the Commons. -- Spurzem (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree that it's not as good a photograph as this one, but the question is whether it covers the scope better. I think that depends on how important the clarity of the background is in the scope. Are you thinking of the scope as really encompassing only the sculpture, with the background just there as needed? Also, I sort of gather that you don't like discussions, unless I'm misunderstanding you. I do like discussions, and I feel like discussing things and generally coming to an agreement improves this project (though it doesn't improve it nearly as much as content providers like you do, and I hope you know that's a sincere remark - we bicker entirely too much and should agree to agree or disagree more often). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Of course we can discuss everything, but sometimes we must not. The scope is: "... in front of the abbey church". That's why I chose this picture. But I can also withdraw it. For I like the other much less. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per your argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I agree! Very good and useful! -- Dn@lor_01 (talk) 12:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Pius V in Germany on the altar of the Bad Wörishofen monastery church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Very good! Used and useful! -- Dn@lor_01 (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach - Paradies, Grüne Männer 2017-06-06 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zilleskapelle, südwest (2019-03-20 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - St. Justina, Orgel (2012-07-12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, St. Justina - Deckengemälde Kneipp (2012-07-18 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, St. Justina - Gemälde Hl. Dreifaltigkeit (2012-07-19 5307 Sp b).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 09:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Beautiful, really good work. -- Ikan Kekek 10:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach - Pietà, 15. Jh. (2019-01-19 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 05:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kloster - Darstellung Jesu im Tempel (2012-07-16 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 21:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kloster - Erzengel Michael (2010-07-16 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Perfect! --Dnalor 01 21:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Klosterkirche, Gitter (2012-07-10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Wonderful view! --Dnalor 01 21:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC) This is good picture, but first chromatic aberrations needs to be fixed in the top part of the picture --Jakubhal 22:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)  Done I did not check the eight years old foto before nominating. -- Spurzem 22:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Ok, thank you. Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Castorbrunnen (2020-05-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:44, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Klosterkirche, Seitenaltar rechts.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bembel, 0,5 l (2020-05-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

QIC Antworten

• 
• 

Hallo Lothar,

ich antworte dir hier, denn ich bin mag auf der QIC-Seite weder nicht direkt auf das Bild bezogene Diskussionen noch ausufernde Diskussionen.

Allgemein hat wohl jeder seine eigenen Qualitätsanforderungen an QI-Bilder. Für mich persönlich steht die technische Qualität stets im Vordergrund. Natürlich sollte die Komposition keine groben Schnitzer aufweisen, aber ob langweilig oder eng beschnitten (oder auch besonders gut) ist mir relativ egal, das bewerte ich bei den Exzellenz-Kandidaten. Ähnliches gilt für die Lichtsituation: Für mich muss nicht immer die perfekte Lichtsituation vorliegen, sondern wenn schwierige oder ungünstige Situation noch (vergleichsweise) gut umgesetzt wurden, spricht für mich nichts gegen das QI-Level. Letzteres gilt für das Foto mit den Schatten: Natürlich sind sie ein Stück weit störend, aber sie erlauben trotzdem einem vernünftigen Blick auf das Hauptmotiv und sowohl das Gebäude als auch die Schatten sehe ich (für die Lichtsituation) als sehr gut belichtet an – nichtsdestotrotz wäre ein bewölktes Wetter ohne Schatten die optimale Wahl gewesen. Aber das hat man nicht immer in der Hand und das Foto ist brauchbar für Wikipedia, also (da technisch gut, mal abgesehen von den verschwommenen Randbereichen, die für mich noch tolerabel sind) für mich auch ein QI. Das ist aus meiner Sicht auch die Betrachtungsweise der meisten Fotografen auf der Seite.

Ob du dich mit dem Pixelzählen bei QIC noch beschäftigen möchtest, kannst du gerade in deinem Alter gut alleine entscheiden. Ich bin aber lang genug dabei um zu wissen, dass das Vogelbild auch vor 10 Jahren den Qualitätsansprüchen bei Weitem nicht gerecht geworden wäre. Selbstredend hätte ich auch gerne eine Fotoausrüstung im Wert von 10.000 € und kann mir das aufgrund meines jungen Alters kaum erlauben – das muss man aber auch nicht. Wer aber den Anspruch hat, Qualitätsbilder anzufertigen, der muss eben auch etwas Geld in eine vernünftige Ausrüstung investieren. Und wer lieber 200 € ausgibt für eine Kamera mit schlechtem Sensor, statt 500 € (und das reicht heutzutage allemal; mittlerweile genügen teilweise ja auch schon Handys (was auch immer man davon halten möchte, da hab ich auch meine eigene Ansicht zu)) für eine “bessere” Digital-/Bridge-/Spiegelreflexkamera, der muss aus meiner Sicht auch einsehen, dass er zwar schöne, für Wikipedia brauchbare Fotos, aber eben keine Qualitätsbilder machen kann.

Soweit meine Sicht der Dinge; dass du eine andere haben magst, ist ja völlig in Ordnung – nur überdramatisieren hilft da auch nicht weiter. Ich beurteile bei den QIC immer auch die Bild- und Lichtgestaltung, nur (wie gesagt) mit unterschiedlichen Gewichtungen in Relation zur Bildqualität. Beste Grüße --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 10:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo kaʁstn, danke für Deine eingehende Antwort. Allerdings werden sich unsere Standpunkte bezüglich der genannten Beispiele nicht annähern. Das Foto mit den Schatten ist für mich ein kaum vorzeigbares Knipsbild: Fotoapparat ans Auge gehalten, abgedrückt und nachher geschaut, was dabei herauskam. Ich würde so etwas nicht für eine Auszeichnung nominieren. Mag sein, dass das Gebäude architektonisch außerordentlich interessant ist, dann wäre es vielleicht etwas für die „Valued images“, aber auch da wäre ich nicht begeistert und würde schauen, ob es in den Commons nichts Besseres gibt. Das Foto von dem Vogel hingegen ist ausgesprochen schön: gutes Licht, ansprechende natürliche Farben, gute Bildkomposition, ausreichende Schärfe. Dass nicht paar kB mehr herausgekommen bzw. übrig sind, hängt vermutlich damit zusammen, dass das Bild aus relativ großer Entfernung aufgenommen und trotz 215 mm Brennweite zugeschnitten wurde, um das Tierchen nicht allzu klein zu zeigen. Aber wie gesagt: Die Standpunkte und die Geschmäcker sind verschieden, ist vielleicht sogar gut. ;-) Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 11:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Natürlich, unterschiedliche Sichtweisen sind immer gut – was wäre das Leben sonst langweilig. Annäherung war auch nicht meine Intention, vielmehr ein Verständnis für meinen Standpunkt zu vermitteln bzw. diesen überhaupt zu beschreiben. Ich schaue mir übrigens nie die Bildgrößen an, ob MB/KB – zur Bewertung betrachte ich Bilder ausschließlich in Bildschirm- und primär in Vollbildgröße. Grüße --kaʁstn 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich mal einmischen darf... Ich empfinde den Vogel auch eher als QI als das Gebäude. Bei Konzerten, Sport oder Wildtieren ist es nicht immer (eigentlich nie) möglich, ideale Bedingungen zu schaffen. Daß es in Stockholm im April um halb 5 lange Schatten gibt, ist klar. Das wäre aber vermeidbar, die cyan CA im Baum ebenfalls. Solange Menschen bewerten, wird es immer unterschiedliche Ansichten geben und in gewissen Grenzen ist das auch gut so. --Ralf Roletschek 20:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für das schöne Feedback [1][2]! Als Wikipedia-Fotograf gibt es ja nicht viele Möglichkeiten, Kommentare zu seinen Fotos zu erhalten, um so erfreulicher und motivierender empfand ich das :) Musste ich kurz mal loswerden. --kaʁstn 16:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Freut mich, dass Du das sagst. Aber wenn sich Bilder deutlich von den allzu oft hochgejubelten Knipsbildchen abheben, sollte man dazu gelegentlich auch paar anerkennende Worte verlieren. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Castorstatue vor Stiftskirche (2020-05-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 11:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ in the parish church St. Justina (Bad Wörishofen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Haus Zum Gugger (2012-07-19 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.Categorisation should be more extensive. --Ermell 21:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceiling fresco Adoration of the Holy Trinity in the parish church St. Justina (Bad Wörishofen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sebastian Kneipp, detail of the ceiling fresco Adoration of the Holy Trinity in the parish church St. Justina (Bad Wörishofen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

VW Beetle colour

Hello!

I know this is a really long shot, but I saw your photo of a Classic Beetle, which is the main picture of the car's article here on Wikipedia and I was wondering if you are the owner of the car or if you know the owner, because I bought a Bug myself and I fell in love with that colour. I've been trying to reproduce it with little to no succes. So I was wondering if there's any way to get to know the colour code used for that car. Again, I know it's a long shot and sorry to bother you with this, but it does worth a try for me. :)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/VW_1302_%282013-09-15_2307_Spu%29.JPG/1280px-VW_1302_%282013-09-15_2307_Spu%29.JPG --MediKron (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, I will try to meet the owner. Kind regards -- Spurzem (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@MediKron: This morning I got the following answer: Die Farbe ist ein Originallack von VW aus dem Jahr 1969/1970 von Volkswagen, hier Taubenblau. Der code ist meiner Ansicht nach 606 E8C. Ein guter Lackierer findet die Farbe in den Listen der Hersteller, hier Classiclisten der Farbhersteller. Auf jeden Fall TAUBENBLAU. – I hope that I could help you. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 08:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Burghaus, Nordost (2020-5-18 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Burghaus, Südost 2 (2020-05-18 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis-Karden, Korbisch Nordwest 2 (2020-05-18 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Helikopter Hughes 500, Weinberg (2020-05-18 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-08-28 BUGA (Sp) 031 Salonorchester MüK.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support faultless (as known by your other pictures) --Wikisympathisant 17:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-08-28 BUGA (Sp) 015 Salonorchester MüK, Sax, Tromp, Posaune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support faultless (as known by your other pictures) --Wikisympathisant 17:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 9-11 (2020-05-25 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Buchsbaum an St. Castor (2020-05-25 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Castorbrunnen (2020-05-27 b2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 19:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 9-11, Rückseite (2020-05-27 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot to the right from the cross on top of lower tower. Also some CAs on the edge between tower and forest. Please fix --Jakubhal 16:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)  Done Hallo Jakubhal, thank you, I didn't see it. Please look now. -- Spurzem 18:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 4 (2020-05-25 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Stiftsschule - Detail Ostseite (2020-05-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Zehnthaus (2020-05-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Castorstatue - Detail (2020-05-29 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but CAs on the shadow edges on the figure. Please fix. Check also top-right corner. That needs to be cropped out. --Jakubhal 11:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)  Done. Thank you, Jakubhal. Please look now. -- Spurzem 14:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 17, Nasenschild Stiftstor (2020-02-07 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Rote Rosen - am Turm St. Castor (2020-05-25 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 10, Gaststätte, 16. Jh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 27 (2020-06-02 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 31 (2020-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Upper floor of Stiftsschule Karden (collegiate school), view from east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. First floor (for Americans, second floor) and attic, though, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Korbisch in Karden, view from northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castor-Brunnen (Karden), overall view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxus baccata in Treis-Karden, natural monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Castor-Straße, Karden, house number 23 from 1587, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, We would also like to see the face in VI Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 23 (2019-10-26 Sp b).JPG --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Castor-Straße, Karden, house number 23, view from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Castor (Karden) interior: pipe organ by Stumm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Castor (Karden) interior: Madonna from the 16th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Castor (Karden) interior: nave and choir (architecture).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabant 601 - GTI-Logo ein Gag - (2007-06-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Treis-Karden: Wayside cross from 1637.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. You'd know better than I: Is that definitely 1637 and not 1632? To my eyes, it looks like a letter Z and might be a 2, but the angular style looks more like a 7 with a line under it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Difficult to say. Please look here in the official list of Rhineland-Palatinate. However, it is not impossible that errors will also occur in it. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Let's keep the date as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old restaurant in St.-Castor-Straße, Karden, number 10.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NSU Rennmax from 1954.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NSU Sportmax from 1956 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: high altar and side altars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kastorbrunnen in Koblenz, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Guzzi PE, Fg.-Nr. SP7032, li. (2007-06-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views of Treis-Karden from Kompuskopf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of Moto Guzzi PE, left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of Moto Guzzi PE, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)