Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Thesurvived99!

-- 20:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Thesurvived99!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum - Feuer Lilie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Holleday 18:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidee - Phalaenopsis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great image, some reviewers wouldn't like it because of the noise. I'd love to have a more detailed and English description and geotagging added --Moroder 21:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
added a English description --Thesurvived99 13:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Reply

Template edit

Das Template in die Kategorie einfügen mach ich zwar auch, aber wichtiger wäre es, das bei den einzelnen Bildern zu machen, weil die leider nicht automatisch erfasst werden. Nur als Info, um Eppan kümmere ich mich gleich. Grüße, --Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

QIC edit

Hallo Thesurvived99,

bitte in Zukunft darauf achten. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Danke, hab mich schon gefragt wiso's nicht funktioniert. --Thesurvived99 (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron 'Lady Annet de Trafford' - Rhododondron Blüte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The focus is on the stamens, does not cover the entire flower... but this is ok. to me. --Cayambe 21:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello INeverCry! Thanks for giving me the autopatrol rights. --Thesurvived99 (talk) 22:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

camera location vs object location edit

Hey, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du gerne in Kategorien die "falsche" Positionsvorlage verwendet hast: Location dec wird für die Position der Kamera bei der Aufnahme des Fotos verwendet, Object location dagegen vermerkt die Position des abgebildeten Objekts. Naja, das ist jetzt kein Grund hinterherzuräumen, bei den meisten Denkmälern ist es auch eher egal, weil bei einem Haus, das nur aus maximal 50 m Entfernung sinnvoll fotografiert werden kann, das jetzt wirklich irrelevant ist. Wenn man aber eine Burg von der anderen Talseite aus knippst oder einen Berg aus 5 km Luftlinie, wird die Unterscheidung schon relevant. Bei einzelnen Fotos mit unserem Template kannst du dir die Mühe übrigens sparen (falls du irgendwo die Vorlage gesetzt hast), da trägt der Bot automatisch die Objektposition ein [1]. Grüße, --Mai-Sachme (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Thesurvived99,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your QI candidates edit

Hallo, I feel a bit sorry having declined your pictures on QIC because i think they are good but they need some modifications and than I could convert the decline in a discuss or even could try to promote tem. Have a nice day!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Bilder 1, 2, 3 edit

Hallo Bergfreund, ich habe deine Edits bemerkt und das ganze sehr genau nachgeprüft (Google Earth in der 3D-Ansicht oder dieses beschriftete Bild oder diese Website zum Erzeugen von beschrifteten Alpenpanoramas von einem beliebigen Punkt aus): Ich hatte die Hochwilde schon korrekt markiert. Dieser winzige Spitz, den du für die Hochwilde gehalten hast, ist vermutlich (viel weiter hinten in den ötztalern) die Kreuzspitze oder etwas in deren Umgebung. Grüße, --Plentn (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Plentn, sorry hab etwas zu voreilig deine Markirungen verändert. Hast Recht dass sich die Hochwilde an der Stelle befindet, wobei anzumerken währe, dass man nur die Spitze sieht und der Rest von einer namenlosen (hab zumindest in keiner Karte einen gefunden) ca. 2700 m hohen Bergkuppe verdeckt wird. Zudem ist auf diesem Bild von der Hochwilde gar nichts zu sehen, da sie von Wolken sogut wie ganz verdeckt wird. Gruß --Thesurvived99 (talk) 12:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, ja das stimmt, das ist gut beobachtet. Das sind zwei Berge hinter einander. Etwas blöd: ein weißer Berg im Vordergrund (keine karte verzeichnet einen Namen) vor einem weißen Berg im Hintergrund, im Hochsommer würde man das wahrscheinlich besser sehen. Guter Hinweis auf das Bild, wo die Hochwilde versteckt ist, das bessere ich gleich aus. --Plentn (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Thesurvived99,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Thesurvived99,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mutspitze im Frühling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze edit

 

Hallo Thesurvived99,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen edit

 

Hallo Thesurvived99,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Destructive categorizing edit

Your single file categories for buildings in Bozen are totally destructive for wikipedians who look for typical illustrations for articles on general themes.

Anybody who wants to describe general architectural phenomena needs a screening of all historical buildings ab an interesting town.

Please collect all the files (NOT the single file categories), unless there are more than two or three pictures of one bulding, in categories for all houses of a street.--Ulamm (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso! edit

English | Italiano | +/−


Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:St.-Anna-Weg 16, Eppan (süd).JPG edit

 
File:St.-Anna-Weg 16, Eppan (süd).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anoneagle01 (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:St.-Anna-Weg 16, Eppan (süd) (2).JPG edit

 
File:St.-Anna-Weg 16, Eppan (süd) (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anoneagle01 (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fehler Baudenkmalfotos edit

Hallo Thesurvived99, wollte nachfragen ob du die Baudenkmalfotos von St.-Anna-Weg 16, Eppan "(süd)" und "(süd) (2)" entfernen könntest. Der Grund dafür ist das es sich nicht um die Hausnummer 16 handelt, sondorn 14A und zum zweiten St.-Anna-Weg 14A nicht dem Denkmalschutz entspricht. Da die zwei Bilder in Verbindung mit "Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Eppan an der Weinstraße" stehen, wäre es angebracht sie zu entfernen und nur "St.-Anna-Weg 16 (südwest)" bestehen zu lassen. Lg Anoneagle01 (talk) 00:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply