User talk:Thuresson/Archive3

Bobby Trendy

Hi - I did a screen capture from YouTube, where Bobby Trendy released a video of himself talking. If he released it into youtube and is speaking in the first person during the video - would it not be public domain? How do I indicate this? Or, do I need a personal note from Bobby Trendy to say it's ok to upload on here (which is unlikely to happen)? How else can I get a picture of him into his entry?

ESA images

Hi Thuresson,

I checked the ESA Copyright Notice. In my understanding, we are using this image for an informational purpose, respecting all the conditions imposed by ESA for public use of its images.

I have seen this same image published in several newspapers and magazines. If I am wrong, please, exply me why we cannnot use it. I am writing other related articles and would be nice to use other ESA images. But, if I cannot use them...

Happy New Year!!

CostaJES

Thank you for your message. All images you upload to WikiCommons must be available to anybody for any purpose. Any purpose includes commercial use. Since ESA do not allow any purpose, these photos are not permitted at WikiCommons. Also, ESA images are not public domain. You may read more about this at Commons:Licensing. Thuresson 19:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Aberystwyth Wales.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aberystwyth Wales.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 04:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Slythengh

Carreguei essa imagem para o Artigo da Wikipédia Portuguesa Sonserina, Mas vou pedir a Permmissão ao autor na Wikipédia

Radera bild

Hejsan, Thuresson! Jag skulle vilja ha bilden Image:Lugnet.JPG som är ett foto taget av mig och som jag lade in tidigare idag deletad. Detta eftersom den genom att visa nummerplåtar talar om vilka bilar (och därmed personer) som befann sig på den platsen vid en viss tidpunkt. Jag tänkte inte vid publiceringstillfället på att detta kan ha varit negativa för integritet etc. Ingen jag snackat med har varit säker på exakt vad regler och personuppgiftslagar tillåter i denna fråga. Det vore kanske bäst att ta bort den i alla fall, och Nicke L skvallrade om att du är administratör... (Jag försökte använda mig om en raderingsdiskussionssida jag fick tips om av en annan tidigare idag, men jag fattade ej var och hur jag skulle framföra mitt ärende där). Det vore trevligt om du kunde hjälpa mig med detta. Har förresten tänkt att bilden kan laddas upp igen efter att nummerplåtarna "blurrats" eller så i Paint. Skvattram 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

sv:Kategori:Vitryssland

May I ask you for favor? Could you please add interwikis between subcategories sv:Kategori:Vitryssland and en:Category:Belarus? I tried to do so, but in some cases upper level categories something by country lack interwikis too, so I was not able to deduce translation. Thank you! --EugeneZelenko 16:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I added a few interwikis at the English wikipedia. A few categories available at the Swedish Wikipedia had no English equivalent:

sv:Kategori:Bandy i Vitryssland ("Bandy in Belarus")

sv:Kategori:Vitryska landslag ("National sports teams of Belarus")

sv:Kategori:Vitryska musikalbum ("Music albums of Belarus")

Regards, Thuresson 00:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! As far as I know, no equivalents in Belarusian/Russian Wikipedias.

If you have free time, could you please do the same in subcategories of sv:Kategori:Vitryssar?

EugeneZelenko 16:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop

Hi Thuresson, Ive noticed you've been tracking me for a while, checking pics I uploaded, deleting the ones I wanted to keep, keeping the ones I wanted to be deleted, please let's be patient and talk about my contributionsin a civil way. Hälsningar! -- Walter Humala EmperorofWestWikipediaGodsave him! wanna Talk? 16:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Jimmy Carter official White House photo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy Carter official White House photo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |EPO| 19:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

CC it's not a license?

Look i put all the imagens under the license, you now http://www.flickr.com/, the site put all the imagens under the license CC 2.0, you cann´t remove Rodrigo.Argenton 21:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Why unfree? All the people can use all the my images, you can't explain or are you the ruler of the universe? Rodrigo.Argenton 21:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

But, the lasts images have the same license of this http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Nicole_kidman3.jpg

Sorry for my english, Rodrigo.Argenton 23:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

London Wasps

Hi Thuresson and thank you for your message. Of course I know that the logo is copyrighted but how can you explain to me that the logo is in use for personal use ( eg look at --->). You know my goal is to illustrate for the best in the following article [1] in the French-speaking wikipedia. Tell us what we have to insert in the description in order to use a logo for some reason.Thanks in advance and regards.Neizham - ^{waiting for your reply with great interest!} 11:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

All images on WikiCommons must be licensed by the copyright owner under a free license. Other images are deleted. Thuresson 21:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

About Image:Pref.jpg

Sorry. This image was wrongly tagged. See new tag. Anyhow, many images I uploaded (included this one) I restored and digitalized for free by request of some non-profitable associations and groups, so I think I may present myself as the author. The texts I wrote in Portuguese are clear about this point. Good day. --Praxides 12:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

If you claim that a photo is public domain because the photographer has been dead for 70 years, you must show who the photographer was and some kind of source as evidence. Thuresson 21:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello

I've seen that you blocked yesterday a copyvio specialist, a french guy Stef48. He is also playing on french WP... I just have to inform you that his new account on commons is Lawrence78 and he's now planning to upload all his friends pictures... Clem23 20:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC) Like this one Image:Stefen23.jpg.

Hi, thanks for your message and letting me know about Stef48's new user name. As I am writing this, User:Yann is deleting all uploads from "Lawrence78". Thuresson 20:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:DfiLogo.jpg (Reply)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DfiLogo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 14:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Jeg fikk tillatelse per mail til å laste opp dette bildet av DFIs leder, beklager at responsen kom litt sent

English: I got permission to upload this image on commons by DFI's leader, sorry for late response

Dvyjones 15:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Banknotes

• You have contacted me about the images after proposing them for deletion. This is rather discourteous, and unhelpful; a polite message 48 hours before that would have been better. However, I do not dispute the issues, but I would like further information; therefore, a reply would be appreciated.

1: You complain that neither the engraver nor the Central Banks have released the bills/notes under GFDL.

Perhaps so, but these notes are no longer legal tender in their countries, having been replaced by the euro. The former notes cannot be exchanged except under strict conditions. I am not trying to mitigate the breach of use of any image, but I do not expect that the use of a former currency constitutes a breach of GFDL.

Also, I am creating the image myself, and therefore as creator of the image I am making them available under GFDL. I notice that some self-scanned images are not permitted. Does this apply to 'everyday items' (as per English Wiki)??

If there remain questions about the validity of scanned banknote images, can you direct me to discussion pages about banknotes/copyright issues involving banknotes in other countries, so I can learn from this experience??

2: If the images remain copyrighted, I am prepared to write to, and ask the banks for permission to reproduce these images.

In this case, are you prepared to accept the written consent?? I am not sure how you can verify the copyright and reproduction status of notes, except through other public media, such as official web-sites. It would take some time to contact institutions individually; does Commons have resources to do that?? Some other Wiki projects do this.

3: I notice that some of the issues are already available from flickr.com/ . Commons already allows the upload of flickr images.

If I upload my images to flickr, does this mean they will be allowed to remain??

Meanwhile, I would appreciate if you could withdraw the deletion request for 48 hours, to allow me to undertake further research.

I hope you will reply soon. (RM21 21:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC))

Thank you for your message. A large number of images of bills from different countries have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests. I suggest you leave any comments you might have there. I dispute that you own the copyright have permission to publish the images in question and I claim that the fact that these bills are not legal tender is irrelevant. It would be very helpful if you had the opportunity to contact the banks and ask their permission for unrestricted reproduction (free use by anybody for any purpose). Thuresson 22:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Nevertheless, I would still like to know whether any images on flickr are acceptable for use on Commons, or only on the same terms as above. (RM21 16:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC))

All images on WikiCommons must be made available by the copyright owner for free use by anybody. Some images at Flickr meet those requirements, some do not not. Some of these images can be seen at Category:Flickr. Thuresson 16:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jordan pics

I noticed you reviewed the original MJ pic I found. Would you mind looking these over? We're going to submtting MJ for FA over on Wikipedia soon and I'd like to make sure what ever pics we decide to use in the article are properly checked and approved by then. The new ones are all the ones of him on the golf course. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 08:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

All reviewed, all passed. Good luck with the FA nomination. Thuresson 12:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Quadzilla99 05:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion requests/Image:Hungarians atop stalin boots 1956.jpg

Hello Thuresson, Please consider reinstating the image as the source page[2] states that the images are in the public domain:

"* Note: AHF believes that all pictures shown below are in the public domain, if there are any issues please contact us to discuss." (top left column, third paragraph)

The copyright statement at the bottom of the page is thus clearly for the webpage itself and not the images which are intended for commemorating the 1956 Hungarian Revolution (and they even link to the Wikipedia article!) Thanks in advance. Istvan 00:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for undeleting the image. Please note that the user requesting deletion is an SPA. Central European topics are full of such mischief. Istvan 04:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Hungarian revolution picture

Hello Thuresson, I just noticed that the picture File:Hungarians atop stalin boots 1956.jpg was deleted because of copyright issues. I'm afraid there was a misunderstanding, which I would have clarified if I had known about the debate in time. It is the website of the American Hungarian Federation which is copyrighted, not the images in their 1956 gallery. Indeed, this very issue came up back in October as we were readying the 1956 article for main page status, and after some debates with the Commons, we contacted some people from the American Hungarian Federation directly and got a very clear answer that all the pictures we uploaded are public domain and we have complete permission to use them. I realize it's too late to save the Stalin-boots picture, but I wanted to tell you anyway in case there is ever any debate about our other 1956 revolution photos. K. Lastochka 00:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Konstiga svg:er

Hejsan! Jag har försökt att ladda upp ett svg-filer jag skapat, men misslyckats totalt, de ser helt enkelt inte ut som de gör på min dator, du kan gärna få radera alla mina bidrag hittills, eftersom ett par nu är dubbletter. Kanske har du ett tips hur jag kan veta hur mina svg-filer kommer att se ut? För de ser alltså inte ut som de gör om jag kollar på dem som ligger på daotnr via Firefox, som efter jag har laddat upp dem... /Moberg 18:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

User:slady

I notice this user has been replacing raster images with svg and then trying to delete the original and change the license to his "copyright". I also see that you have commented on several of these cases. I agree with you. Is there any rule against what this user is doing? -Indolences 23:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Heavenlybombay.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Heavenlybombay.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 03:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Marblebilder

Hej,

jag har svårt att förstå vad problemet med Marblebilderna är och vad jag ska göra åt det...

Hälsningar Linus Brännström / Corpsette

Du skriver att bilderna är "public domain" men jag hittade dem på en webbplats där det verkar det som om bilderna skyddas av upphovsrätt. Om det tydligt på http://hem.bredband.net/b507942/pressphoto.html skulle framgå att bilderna är "public domain" skulle saken komma i ett annat läge. Thuresson 19:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Okej, men om jag ändrar på sidan då, eftersom jag driver den, så att de får användas då är det okej? Hm. Vilken licenshistoria ska man ange om bilderna får användas i samband med texter om Marble? Och hur gör man det.

Ändra i såfall på sidan så att det framgår vilka villkor som gäller för att andra ska få använda bilderna. Alla bilder på WikiCommons måste fotografen tillåta att de används av vem som helst till precis vad som helst. Det finns en vida spridd serie av licenser där fotografen tillåter olika mycket, "Creative Commons" och du kan läsa mer om dessa licenser på creativecommons.org. Thuresson 07:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Twowells

Hej Thuresson, skulle du vid tillfälle vilja gå genom User:Twowells (troligen sv:User:Tallium) bidrag och göra en ordentlig utrensning? Jag skulle till exempel tro att ungefär alla bilder i Hyllievång utom Image:Hyllie vattentorn, sommar.jpg är uppenbara copyvios och kan raderas med en gång. //Knuckles 20:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Putty.png

I did it. Look: Author jic --Jic 17:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The computer program "Putty" is not licensed as GPL. Thuresson 18:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

HEY

Don´t delete the flags that I Upload it´s not fair Sign--Dace96 18:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)--Dace96 18:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)--Dace96 18:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)--Dace96 18:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)--Dace96 18:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Pd: Don´t invent excuses for deleting my images

A question

1. Can I (the author of the photo) change the licence from cc-by-sa-2.5 to cc-by-2.5 and vice versa? I would appreciate your honest answer. --213.199.192.60 00:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

That is a very good question. I'm afraid I can't answer that but I suggest that you leave your question at Commons:Village pump. Thuresson 00:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. --213.199.192.60 00:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

2. Can I remove all my photo uploads and leave the Commons forever? Please respond. This is the last question for you. Thanks. --213.199.192.60 00:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you take a look at Commons:Deletion requests. At that page you can start a new discussion and ask for your own photos to be deleted. Just give the file names of your photos and explain why you want to have them deleted. Regards, Thuresson 00:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Hej Thuresson

Jag fick ditt namn av Nicke L och undrar om du kunde hjälpa mig med ett problem. Jag frågade och fick tillstånd av fotografen att använda hans bild på valbo kyrka. Så jag ladde ner den på commons men nu har de plockat bort bilden. Jag måste ha gjort något fel när jag lade in den. Eftersom min engelska är inte den bästa undrar jag om du ville hjälpa mig att lägga in den igen?

Jag skickar med min fråga och hans svar. Tur att jag inte hade städat mailen på ett tag. Fotografen Kjell Kron finns på mailen: Kjell.Kroon@svenskakyrkan.se om det är några problem.

Hej kjell Jag heter Cxxxxx och jag undrar om jag får använda din bild på Valbo kyrka. Jag har skrivit en liten artikel om kyrkan på Wikipedia , det är ett uppslagsverk på nätet där vem som helst får skriva och rätta saker. Det skulle vara kul om jag kunde ha en bild också. MVH Cxxxxxx Valbo.

Hej Cxxxxxx Självklart får du använda bilden och om möjlighet ges så ange gärna fotografen. Ha det gott och lycka till // Kjell

Hoppas att du kan hjälpa mig och sorry att jag har tagit bort mitt namn. På nätet är jag Cejang. Om du inte kan/lust/tid/ork hjälpa till kan du skicka min förfrågan vidare? Det vore bra om du kunde svara mig på den svenska Wikipedian. Commons och jag är inte vidare kompisar. Cejang 07:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Hej igen bilden hette Valbo kyrka.jpg. Cejang 07:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Welsh Conservative Party

Hi Thuresson

Could you help me determin what is the correct information to supply to the Welsh Conservative Party logo? It'll be exactly the same licensing states as the Conservative Party (UK). I'm afraid I'm a beginner and unsure what to do. tks Normalmouth 21:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks ever so much. I've done as you suggested.Normalmouth 22:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Missing source information

this images ere scans of my self please dont delete them--Goku 11:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio tag on Image:Frankfurtnight.JPG

Hi Thuresson, I've seen that you tagged the Image:Frankfurtnight.JPG for speedy deletion due to missing author credit. I'm not the uploader; but when I came across today morning I also noticed the missing name. I followed the existing link to the article about Frankfurt on :en that contains this image and from there to the real image description page where the author is named. As I hadn't the time (and nerve) to complete all the missing description data, I only added a link to the original description page ([3]). With the data contained therein the description on Commons should be completed and everything would be fine IMHO. -- Túrelio 20:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. Still, the license requires that the author is credited. This photo can be deleted from English Wikipedia at any time and then the author's name would be gone. Thuresson 20:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I've completed the description. Take a look please if it's o.k. for such a transferred image. But there is another real problem, the original image was licensed under cc-by-sa-2.5, not GDFL. -- Túrelio 20:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thuresson,
after DragonFire1024 corrected the license type, IMHO everything is o.k. If you agree, could you then remove the speedy tag. Thank you. -- Túrelio 20:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

RE Frankfurt

It was licensed until it was removed. The Image is on Wikipedia and is licensed the same way...so how is it not free? DragonFire1024 20:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Please add the name of the photographer to the image description page. The GFDL license requires that he or she is credited. Thuresson 20:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah yes...sorry...I just realized I forgot to add it...Done now. DragonFire1024 20:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I should have done it myself, instead of bothering others with it. Thuresson 20:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

No Problem...its ok...I had had it in there when I uploaded it, but must have accidently erased it when I added the License bar. DragonFire1024 20:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

DragonFire1024, this image was originally licensed under cc-by-sa-2.5 not GFDL. -- Túrelio 20:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't know where I messed this up. DragonFire1024 20:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

gfdlness of Image:20070219 1118236758001.jpg

Please read my comment on Image:20070219 1118236758001.jpg. thanks. Bawolff 22:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

==About Image Tagging Image:Escudo Cartagena.png==

Hi Thuresson, I have noticed that you have put no source tag on this page. Consecuently, I revised it and I put the new information, but I don't know if I have accomplished these changes correctly. Could you inform me if I have made right the page ? Trasamundo 22:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Trasamundo

Image:Naghsh-e Jahan Square Isfahan.JPG

Hi,

Regarding Image:Naghsh-e Jahan Square Isfahan.JPG (and others that you tagged) , I have the authors Permission to use his photos please give me your email so that I can forward his email to you.

Regards, -Marmoulak 08:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hercules-Kermanshah.jpg - Missing source-indications

Hi Thuersson, it seems that missing source-indications are being named for your proposal of erasing this picture from Wiki-Commons. I guess that only the person actually having uploaded the picture will be able to give you this kind of information. However, this picture only shows a "common cultural good", exposed in "free landscape", that could be photographed and uploaded in Wiki almost by anyone. So I don't really see your point there. But, since you brought up the issue, please tell me, how to get and supply for the missing information you need. With regards, J Safa 10:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Why are photos still tagged.

Hi,

I have written permissions for most of the tagged photos. Could you please remove the tags for the following photos whose permissions I have already sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Image:Yazd_Iran.jpg Image:Minarets_Qom.jpg Image:Naghsh-e_Jahan_Square_Isfahan.JPG Image:Sheikh_Lotfallah_Esfahan.JPG Image:Khaju Bridge Esfahan.jpg Image:Khaju Bridge Iran.jpg Image:Sio Se Pol.jpg Image:Naghshi_Jahan_Isfahan.jpg Image:Sareban_Minaret_Isfahan.jpg Image:Khaju_Bridge_Iran.jpg Image:Khaju_Bridge_Esfahan.jpg Image:Shah_m.jpg Image:Persepolis_Carvings.jpg Image:Friday_Mosque_Yazd.jpg

By the way is there any non-commercial license that is compatible with commons. thanks - Marmoulak 08:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

My Images

Hi Thuresson,

I'm the creator of the images I use, but each time I try to use it's deleted... Why?... it's explainned in the image information that I'm the creator of that image, so I can't I use it?... help me please, I need to use my own images...

[Usuário:Silent ]

Silent Note

All images on WikiCommons should be useful for the Wikimedia projects. The Portuguese Wikipedia decided that there was no need for an article about "Silent Note" (pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Silent Note). Thuresson 18:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Review

Could you please review this picture? But please, leave the license on the permission field (if possible do not put the license outside the box). Dantadd✉ 21:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

All done. Thuresson 21:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Dantadd✉ 21:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging: Image:Ho Chi Minh 1954.JPG

Hello Thuresson!

I found this picture in the Hungarian Wikipédia [4] with the folloving license :

The picture was made 1954 in Vietnam, author unknown. The vietnamese copyright duration is 50 years, this picture was copyrighted until 2004.
(In hungarian: A kép 1954-ben készült Vietnamban, fényképésze ismeretlen, így a vietnami szerzői jog értelmében 50 éven át, 2004-ig állt jogvédelem alatt.)

You can deletete picture, if this license isn't effective.

Beroesz

Image Tagging Image:Vickers IWW.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vickers IWW.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 09:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Canon T90 front detail.jpg

I have forwarded the permission emails I received to the otrs queue and in addition asked the photographer to send a permission email himself, if he can. Any chance that the image can be removed from speedy-able for a reasonable length of time to get that process completed?

(btw, I think that only allowing a week for an image that's been here from a long time and uploaded by someone who's a commons admin is a bit short - I don't log into commons every week, and it'd be quite easy to miss such a notice).

Thanks, Morven 21:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Bobbejaan(land) images

Hello Thuresson. Here an update and question about all these images you want to delete: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&wikilang=en&order=-img_timestamp&img_user_text=Peeper&max=25&ofs=0&max=50 All images are taken/placed or uploaded under authority / by order by the license holder. We "Bobbejaan Records" deceided to place some images from the official Bobbejaan Schoepen Archive on Wikipedia. Not in every case the photographer is known. Mostly it was someone of the family who took the picture, or someone else in order of us: we are always license holder. I left a possibility for verification behind each photograph: info at bobbejaan dot be. Also I contacted permissions commons at wikimedia for verification. On the gallery (link above), there are photographs marked as "orphan", which is strange for images with undiscussible authorship. Peeper 22:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy delete

On the Feist image. I gotta say, I was frustrated to realize that (1) there was no way for me to use the photo in Wikipedia and (2) no way to re-name or delete the photo...unless I'm wrong? --Padraic 22:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I notice you uploaded the larger version of the file; this makes sense, but what should I do in the future if I want to use a cropped version? --Padraic 22:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't realize your version was cropped until now. On the image description page, you can click on "Rev" to the left of upload date and your user name. This will instantly revert the image to "your" version. Thuresson 22:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Fritz Kuhn.jpg

Thank you for your advise because of the missing permission of this image. I added following information about permission: Permission= Picture was uploaded with permission of Foto Fritz Kuhn / his office under CC-by-sa/2.0 copy has been sent by Marianne Tritz to permissions-de@wikimedia.org . I hope you can remove the reminder for speedy deletion. --Eaaumi 11:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:KMGs04.jpg

Hi Thuresson,

In fact I should have put them in this Category : Category:Images by the Belgian Senate

The texte wich allows is below the images of these categories, and also at the bottom of the images on http://www.senat.be (only in French or Dutch).

Regards

Vberger 16:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I can't find any evidence that thep hotographer has released this photo as GFDL. Could you point me in the right direction? Thuresson 11:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello Thur.

Is it me or can't they read? The source is http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afbeelding:812_1093512768.jpg. greetz. Edwinb 11:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Keeping of Image:Richard Réti.jpg

Hi! Why do you keep the Image:Richard Réti.jpg if it was created in 1922 in Germany, it is still copyrighted if the author did not die in the next 15 years. If it is unknown we apply the 100 years rule, don't we? BTW: The image ist stil tagged with {{Delete}}. --ALE! ¿…? 15:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Iran_flag_with_emblem_1964-1979.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iran_flag_with_emblem_1964-1979.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 16:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Re. Image:Apple Claes Oldenburg.JPG

Please don't delete templates without a reason or a discussion. This image was kept, after a debate, under the FOP provision. Other images by the some author were deleted because FOP was not in the books in the countries where they are on display. If you don't understand what templates mean, before acting just ask: we shall be delighted to inform you about rules. Thank you in advance. --User:G.dallorto 13:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Your offer of introducing me to templates is hilarious. There is no need for disclaimers such as Template:FOP when there is Commons:General disclaimer. I don't have to discuss before I remove the template if I see it. Thuresson 16:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

SVG

Hej Thuresson!

Har du bra koll på SVG? Jag har nu försökt i en dryg timme att försöka få ett diagram som jag sparat som SVG att se vettigt ut efter att jag laddat upp det här. Tyvärr blir det kattskit hela tiden. Jag har försökt spara diagrammet med både CorelDraw och OpenOffice Draw. Mina fråga är, tror du det beror på att CorelDraw & OpenOffice inte kan skapa vettigt SVG-filen (m.a.o. det kan vara lönt att prova något annat program), eller är det MediaWikis rendering som inte fungerar. Har ungefär samma erfarenhet från förra gången jag försökte ladda upp en SVG.

mvh Gunnar Larsson 21:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Jag har inga tekniska problem med att se diagrammet utan att jag satt in det på Wikipedia:Sandlådan. Det enda jag kan anmärka på är att det kan vara svårt att läsa texten. Tyvärr har jag aldrig själv slagit mig på något så avancerat som SVG. Thuresson 21:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Coat of arms of Helsingborg, Sweden.png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Coat of arms of Helsingborg, Sweden.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Lokal_Profil 10:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Tack för meddelandet, jag ska ta och ordna en upphovsrättsligt godtagbar version vid tillfälle. Thuresson 13:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Jag vet att Image:Coat of arms of Helsingborg, Sweden new.png finns men jag är inte säker på hur mycket friare den är. Den verkar synnerligen identisk med den version som kommunen använder just nu. /Lokal_Profil 17:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Appro på vapensköldar så svarade jag på din fråga/kommentar om Svenska kyrkans vapen på min diskussionssida. /Lokal_Profil 08:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Har även märkt Image:Coat of arms of Båstad, Sweden.jpg /Lokal_Profil 20:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Coat of Arms

Om jag inte har förstått det hela fel så går Coat of arms under någon sorts officiell licens och är inte upphovsrättsskyddat enl. svensk lag. Stämmer detta inte?

Jag syftar på din påpekning av Image:Jönköping.png.Kristofer2 14:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Blasoneringen (dvs. den heraldiska beskrivningen av vapnet) är fri. Vart vapen som är en tolkning av blasoneringen är däremot upphovsrättsskyddat av den som skapar vapnet. En egengjord fri tolkning av blasoneringen är därför fri att användas här men den officiella versionen som används av kommunen är det inte. /Lokal_Profil 16:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Why you delete the Trouble images!!!!

Hey you, that Trouble images are in the english wikimedia commons, you fool gringo, so first delete them in the english stuff. Whats the problem!!??

---

Hamletquiron 18:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Thats the problem, you cant think... so, you going to undo your edition or "quedarte en tu machote"???

---

Hamletquiron 18:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

And who are you? Thuresson 18:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiCommons is a repository for photos and images that have a "free license", such as public domain, GFDL, Creative Commons or a similar license. The album covers you uploaded do not have a free license. At English Wikipedia they are used under the fair use provision in US copyright law, see en:Image:Trouble - Manic Frustration.jpg. Since WikiCommns do not allow fair use images, these images were deleted. Thuresson 20:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Macmillan.jpg and Image:James Callaghan.jpg

Hello. I don't understand why you have deleted these two images, they are simply copies of those that are available at the English Wikipedia. Ivan Volodin 08:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It's nice. You've been faster to delete the images than to explain why you did it. Ivan Volodin 17:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I kindly ask you to consider this part of Commons:Licensing: "The following restrictions must not apply to the image or other media file: [...] Use under fair use restrictions". Regards, Thuresson 17:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Bistrot : help wanted

Hello,

Thanks for your message. i have left a message on User talk:Lia papillons.

best regards

Romary 18:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Enrico Ciccone

Mon anglais n’est pas bon. J’ai été chercher une licence pour ma photo Celle-ci : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Enrico_ciccone.jpg Image:Enrico ciccone.jpg Faudra vérifier si cela est correct.

L’autre ne sera pas accepté.Image:Enrico ciccone1990.jpg

J’ai utilisé traduction Babel fish

My English is not good. I was to seek a licence for my photograph This one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Enrico_ciccone.jpg Image:Enrico ciccone.jpg Will be necessary to check if that is correct.

The other will not be accepted. Image:Enrico ciccone1990.jpg

I used translation Babel fish

Lia papillons 00:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Dino bilder

Gigantosaurus
Teckning av ArthurWeasley

Hej, jag undrar om jag får ta din expertis i anspråk. Jag har ett problem som jag undrar om du ville hjälpa mig med. Jag har roat mig den senaste dagen med att lägga in bilder på svenska wikipedia. Bland annat bilder på dinosaursar. Det finns en mängd fina bilder som en commons användare som heter User:ArthurWeasley har gjort. Men det står på dem att man ska sätta honom konstär eller något liknade. Så min fråga är: räcker det med att jag sätter in bilden och de klickar på den och får upp bilden historik eller ska jag sätta User:ArthurWeasley under bilden och göra en länk till hans sida på commons. Det vore synd att inte använda de fina dinobilderna bara för att jag inte vet hur man gör. Mvh Cejang 15:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Att kreditera fotografen eller konstnären när man använder dennes verk är både artigt och, enligt licensen, nödvändigt. Jag försöker själv göra det även om jag slarvar ibland. Om du vill använda någon dinosaurieteckning i en artikel kan du göra som jag gjort bredvid. Jag nöjer mig med att skriva ut namnet, jag sätter inte ut länkar till någons användarsida. Thuresson 19:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Tack så mycket för svaret. Cejang 20:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

This admin not right

"Deleted. Not used in any Wikimedia projects outside user pages."

but user pages is part of wikipedia. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 89.178.240.40 (talk • contribs)

You think? Userspace is the least important part, and since it is frowned upon to edit others userpages there is a good reason one should not meddle with such things. There was clear consensus for deletion. Your vote does not count as it was too late. Lcarsdata 07:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Poirot

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Edgar Allan Poe/User:Poirot, in case you weren't aware of this already. Cheers, Lupo 19:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Change of license

Hi Thuresson, The license on that image friom Flickr that you reviewed has changed since that date. What should we do ? I let you check it. Fabienkhan 14:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I responded to this at User talk:Jeff G.. Thuresson 20:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Swedish pic

Hi could you please take a look at Image:096 vy över området l.jpg. Since it was used in sv:Lundautställningen 1907 I'm guessing it's old enough to go under PD-Sweden-photo but without having looked at the image or the info it had before it was deleted it's hard to say. /Lokal_Profil 22:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Tack /Lokal_Profil 22:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kmhofbauer.jpg

This image was got from the German Wikipedia as you can see there in the article Klemens Maria Hofbauer and uploadad from German Commons: Bild:Kmhofbauer.jpg. The photograf is Mozog it is a his own photo put in the GDFL. Thanks. Pelagio de Asturias 01:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Looks like a post stamp to me. Who is the designer? Thuresson 07:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thora Birch (crop).jpg

Hi, thanks for adding the license, I can't believe I forgot that ˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

re: OTRS pending

Hey,

The ticket is waiting for a suitable translator, which I failed to follow up on, I'm afraid. I have sent out some emails so I hope I can get the translation and resolve this ticket soon. Please feel free to bug me in two weeks if there's still no action about this. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:International Monetary Fund

Image deletion warning

Category:International Monetary Fund has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Gustav VH 22:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lyndon B. Johnson taking the oath of office, November 1963.jpg

People on the en.wiki keep uploading other versions of the photo that aren't as dark as the one you loaded. I keep nominating the others for deletion, but I'm also loading those images to the one you loaded as a compromise. I think the one loaded today is a pretty clean version. Evrik 18:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This guy, User:Dalmoal, is still uploading fair use image (from his own website) to Commons, even after your advertizement. 201.0.68.102 14:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Halle Berry ComicCon podium.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Halle Berry ComicCon podium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Länsvapen

Kommer länsvapnena (t.ex. (Image:Stockholms läns vapen före 1968.png) från samma källa som Lunds stadsvapen.png eller från någon annan stans? /Lokal_Profil 18:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Från någon annanstans. Thuresson 01:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, det skulle vara bra om du angav varifrån på bildsidorna. Om du har kombinerat ihop olika PD bilder så ange vilka alternativt var du hittat dem. /Lokal_Profil 01:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

demis.nl

Hi, sorry for the delay in answering about Sweden maps. I did not know about demis.nl, but it is very unclear to me how I am supposed to obtain the map. Should I use their software and then take screenshots? Or is there a way to request some maps from them? What I need is a reasonably detailed map of the area between Kiruna and Storuman, and I couldn't find anything satisfactory so far. Thanks for your help. --Nattfodd 07:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. You can go to www.demis.nl and zoom in and out on the map until you find a map you think is useful and then take a screenshot. If you need larger maps you can combine several screenshots by using a image processor like GIMP, Paintshop etc. It is my understanding that maps from the web interface are not protected by copyright. See Image:Map of Öresund between Denmark and Sweden - no text.png for an example. Thuresson 22:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Announcements

Hej Thuresson. Jag lägger till Commons:Announcements på folk diskussionssidor, men jag hittade ingen bra plats på din. Du kanske vill ha den på din användarsida? Jag lägger den här så länge.

Commons maintenance announcements [+/−]

More translations are needed for:

• Commons:Project scope (Sept 2008)
• Commons:Fan art (April 2009)
• Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator#User interface texts (August 2009)
• Commons:File renaming (October 2009)
• Commons:Nudity

---

Backlogs:

as of 18 February 2010

• Old deletion requests are still opened.
• Many files moved to Commons requiring review.
• Too many unprocessed files without source.
• Many files are OTRS pending for too long.
• There are 128 requested merges.
• The Vandalismpatrol has over 1190238 unpatrolled anonymous edits.

. / Fred J 16:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nikolai_Bobrikov_1839-1904.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Nikolai_Bobrikov_1839-1904.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zache 00:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Sven_Duva.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Sven_Duva.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

This is obviously a mistake on your part. This is by the Finnish artist Albert Edelfeldt and the image description page is quite clear about that. Thuresson 14:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Svenska/Swedish Polling Templates

Hi. Would you please take a look at Category talk:Polling templates#Credits? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Way back, you deleted this image that I'd uploaded - probably because I couldn't specify the origins correctly. Anyhow, now someone else on Wikipedia has the necessary information (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Scooter_Libby.jpg). Would you care the reinstall the picture, as I believe it carries the high-resolution data. --Lipothymia 01:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Images deleted 2005 can not be undeleted. The photo is available on WikiCommons at Image:Scooter Libby.jpg. Thuresson 03:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Torsten_Jovinge_Kvarteret_Bergsund_1931.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Torsten_Jovinge_Kvarteret_Bergsund_1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 16:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Mlblogo.jpg

Hey I uploaded this image from an imaged that I pulled from wikipedia. For some reason the image that appears in an english article will not appear in a spanish one that i'm trying to edit. Although the image is protected by copyrights from mlb it falls under wikipedia's fair use policy because:

1. It's essentially represents the company in an educational way.
2. The image is highly representative of said company.
3. It is a low res production so it can't possibly be used for piracy.
4. The logo is not used in such a way that a reader would be confused into believing that the article is written or authorized by the owner of the logo.
5. It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.

Can you please undelete it?Jkmerc (talk) 08:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)