Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Toma646!

Mluvim česky.

I understand english very bad.

Английский язык понимаю плохо. Eсли вы не владеете чешским языком скажите мне всё на русском.

Re:Kollárovci edit

Toma646, please don't revert pages of files with opened DR until an Administrator closes them; these reversions may be considered vandalism. The discussion in the DR is the right place to discuse why the files should be kept (currently, nobody were provided reason to keep the files in the DR).

Also, the account name is the same as the music band. Therefore, this may be a Single purpose account, so, I provided a correct and valid reason for the deletion (autopromotion). As I provided a valid reason for deletion, you should provide a valid reason why the files should be kept in the right place.

I'l revert your editions until an Admin closes the DR. If you revert them again, I'll consider them as vandalism and I'll report you to the Administrator's Notice Board. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:40, 25 June 2014 (UTC) {{autotranslate|1=|base=indefblockeduser}}[[Category:Commons users indefinitely blocked in September 2014|{{BASEPAGENAME}}]] [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="AR Cena" color="black"><b>INeverCry</b></font></span>]] 17:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

@INeverCry - Please unblock me. I was uploaded many needed files and i want upload new photos, i thinked, that i can upload my creations.--Toma646 (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bat is true that i have some problems with others on cswiki.--Toma646 (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
You uploaded an attack image here and then used a sockpuppet account to vandalize cs.wiki with it. You have 10 socks on cs.wiki. I have no intention of unblocking you here when you're using Commons to sock and commit vandalism on another wiki. INeverCry 18:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
@INeverCry - Yes i used it on my sandbox and on cswiki, but i thinked that i can upload this file, when here many and many other very similar files (and use it to personal attacks not was my main first reason when i uploaded it, but i haved on cswiki reason to use this file), this is my creation, creation like other paintings. And i want know, why you tolerate pictures like this, when you dont tolerate my similar picture, i thinked that it not will be vandalism, when here similar pictures. Good, i dont will uploand my paiting and will upload just photos from my mobil.--Toma646 (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
You used it on cs.wiki with a sock account as an attack/vandalism. It's the socking and use of the file that's the problem here. It's you're behavior, not necessarily the image that is unacceptable (though the low quality is a COM:SCOPE issue). Your image was crudely made, suggesting your only purpose was the cross-wiki vandalistic attack use of it. INeverCry 18:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Comment Your sockfarm on en.wiki is another serious problem. You're using Commons to advance and support your cross-wiki socking. INeverCry 18:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Please see it, i not do new socks, not on enwiki, nor on cswiki. I was blocked, because i uploaded it. In this time when i was uploaded it file, i was have big conflicts with other users on cswiki, this conflict ended long time ago. Now i not have problems on commons nor in other wikiprojects, behing 4 days it will be 2 months since my last block evasion on commons. My socking is old and outdated thing, so not reason for my longer blocking. I have some photos to uploading and you can trust me, i think that my longer blocking not will be helpful.--Toma646 (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)"Reply
Decline reason: "We don't unblock users with sockfarms. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)"Reply
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

</nowiki>

Unblocked edit

I am unblocking you here on Commons and expect you to adhere to the following (pinging INeverCry and Steinsplitter for their reference):

  1. You are to only use this account. You have provided useful uploads to Commons,[1][2][3], and we would like useful uploads to continue. But under the account Toma646 only!
  2. This was not a good idea. I understand that you thought it was ok due to files such as this, but when used for vandalism it's not ok.

Your unblock on cs.wp is going in your favour here on Commons. If they are willing to extend to you the courtesy of an unblock, then we can do the same here on Commons. Please be aware that if you sock again on Commons, or upload media for vandalism or personal attacks then you will probably be re-blocked indefinitely on Commons. Please don't let us, and yourself, down. And good luck. russavia (talk) 10:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Délka dne v ČR.jpg edit

 
File:Délka dne v ČR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Draceane talkcontrib. 14:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply