Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, TouN!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Logo socofer.png edit

Copyright status: File:Logo socofer.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo socofer.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ajout noms communes cartes vignobles edit

Bonsoir TouN,
Tous mes voeux de bonheur pour cette nouvelle année.
Je me permets de vous solliciter car les précédents modificateurs des cartes en question semble inactifs depuis un moment et que vous avez dernièrement contribué sur la thématique des vignobles.
Tout d'abord File:Carte vignoble vallee de la loire.png : serait-il possible d'ajouter la commune de Montbrison au centre de la tache la plus en bas à droite de la carte ? Il s'agit de l'aire géographique des côtes-du-forez.
Et File:Vignobles rhone.png d'ajouter la commune de Saint-Étienne en haut à gauche de la carte générale et du zoom. Car il s'agit d'un chef-lieu de département comme Nîmes qui y apparait et même de plus grande importance qu'Arles ou Aubenas qui y figurent pourtant. Attention, il y a une autre carte vectorisée qui en dépend et donc il serait nécessaire de réaliser la mise à jour également : File:Vignobles rhone.svg.
Cordialement.
Nezdek (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Nezdek: , bonne année à vous aussi ! Concernant la 1e carte, elle est en PNG et il est préférable de la remplacer dans les articles concernées par celle-ci (où celle-là) où figure Montbrison. Et pour le 2e carte, même chose puis remplacer le PNG par le SVG que j'ai mis à jour. Je l'ai changé dans tous les articles wiki correspondant. TouN (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merci beaucoup pour votre retour ! Oui la svg de la vallée de la Loire est bien plus précise, quoique la synthèse de la png fait bien ressortir les cours d'eau structurant et les grandes masses. Pour la svg de la vallée du Rhône, je me permets de vous préciser que sur le zoom, le point localisant Saint-Étienne devrait être un peu plus bas, juste au niveau de Condrieu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/45.4487/4.5768). Je pense par contre que ce doit être compliqué à positionner car ça peut gêner et le tag "Loire" qui serait à déplacer. Une solution pourrait être de découper le nom en "Saint" et "Etienne" pour ne pas que ça vienne empiéter sur le fleuve. Et sur le dézoom, je pense qu'il faudrait mettre Saint-Étienne plus à droite car elle est vraiment dans l'alignement Nimes-Aubenas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=9/44.6423/4.6445). Bonne soirée ! Nezdek (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Nezdek: modif faite. TouN (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Super ! Il y a juste eu un soucis d'alignement sur de dézoom car on a l'impression qu'il est à gauche de l'axe vertical Nimes-Aubenas, mais c'est très bien. Nezdek (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Mosquée Othman Villeurbanne.jpg edit

 
File:Mosquée Othman Villeurbanne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

We need your feedback! edit

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply