Vlsergey

Archives 2008 2009 2010

File:Dubai_Towers_Sun.jpg

File:Dubai_Towers_Sun.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.172.89 19:28, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Order_of_Lenin.jpg

File:Order_of_Lenin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

MAKS Airshow 2011

Hello Sergey!

I have previously uploaded 2 images by you from flickr. By now all files have been transferred. Thanks for publishing them under a free licence.

Do you have more images of MAKS 2011?

Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

• Hi. All selected images are published on flickr. In future may be more 3-5 images will be added. Usually I publish only selected images ("best" quality), but a lot of low-level quality images are "filtered out" and not published. vlsergey (talk) 10:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, that's no problem. I think everybody sorts images of poor quality out. Do you have photos of the land vehicles on the ground at MAKS 2011? Such as radar vehicles or missile vehicles? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

No, not from this year :) But there are photos from Helen Shurova at [1] at CC-BY-SA. vlsergey (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Рысачок на МАКС-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 14:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Stories Project

Здравствуйте!

В настоящее время, многие считают, что Википедия создается людьми, которым платят за то, чтобы они писали статьи. Многие не знают, что редакторы Википедии прилагают свои усилия к созданию открытой электронной энциклопедии добровольно, что никто им не платит за эту работу. Для того, чтобы ознакомить общественность с процессом создания Википедии и пригласить заинтересованных людей принимать участие в ее редактировании, Фонд Викимедия-США, вместе с Фондом Викимедия-Россия, собирает личные рассказы редакторов русскоязычной Википедии о том, что движет ими в их добровольной редакторской деятельности и о том, как Википедия повлияла на их жизнь. Сбор подобных историй в разных странах уже позволил нам открыть для мировой общественности, что Википедия создается обыкновенными людьми на добровольных началах. Мы надеемся открыть для себя и общественности личные истории редакторов Википедии в России.

Если у Вас есть интересные истории о себе и о Вашем вкладе в развитие Википедии (или если Вы знаете кого-нибудь с интересными рассказами), пожалуйста свяжитесь с Виктором Григасом:

vgrigas@wikimedia.org Обсуждение_участника:Vgrigas

Заранее благодарен, Виктор Григас

Удалите файл

Просьба удалить этот файл: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Voshod,_№78,_29.06.1971,_page_2.JPG --NDV (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Russian Air Force

Hello Vlsergey!

Thanks for your images of the "Celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Russian Air Force". It would be great if you transfer all your files from flickr to Commons. We are always glad to have images of such events. But please this category instead of the old one: Category:Celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Russian Air Force. Thanks and happy editing! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhoi Su-35 at 100 Year Anniversary Russian Air Force 2012-08-12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Author is not a wikimedian. Read QIC guidelines. - A.Savin 20:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC) It is my photo. Vlsergey 20:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC) Per A.Savin --Poco a poco 10:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Good quality. Changing directly to promotion as the previous decline was due to an incorrect fact (see author field) and not image quality issues. --King of Hearts 18:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Боты

Возник вопрос об использовании ваших ботов. Я могу запустить их на своём сервере, но хотелось бы, чтобы вы объяснили как, либо дали ссылку на мануал. — Homk (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Добрый день. Хотелось бы, если вы будете бросать ботов, то чтобы вы дали право управлять учётными записями ботов участнику DR (обс.), который согласился запускать ботов, т.е. чтобы скинули ему пароли ботов. Нирваньчик (talk) 13:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Добрый день, боты могут работать из-под произвольной учётной записи. Ссылка на исходный код ботов давалась: https://github.com/vlsergey/Secretary К сожалению, написать инструкцию займёт длительное время, т.к. ботов несколько. -- vlsergey (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Сергей, ваш бот Webcite archiver \ Secretary весьма ценная штука ! А с инструкцией он будет ещё более ценным ! Может вы закомитите в гитхаб команды как собрать и использовать бота ? Вероятно такие команды в webcite.bat :) ? --Movses (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Какая-то неприятность, м.б. из-за бота

Доброго времени суток! И меня есть в русской Вики избранная статья Крескас, Хасдай. Все было в ажуре, как вдруг разрушились сноски, стало много " Ошибка в сносках?: Неверный тег ref для сносок rivashmany не указан текст" и появилась надпись в обсуждении: "Отчёт бота WebCite Archiver. Бот WebCite Archiver просмотрел текст статьи и внёс в неё следующие изменения. 8 шаблонов Error: title= and url= must be specified. были дополнены ссылками на только что созданную архивную копию материала. Оставшиеся ссылки были пропущены по различным причинам. Далее приведена детальная информация." Я, правда, не знаю, виноват ли бот. Не посмотрите ли, пожалуйста? --Lkitrossky (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Aksel Berg envelope cropped.jpg

File:Aksel Berg envelope cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ze-dan (talk) 09:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Привет from Italy!

Привет dear Vlsergey, how are you? I made the page Виталий Воротников in Italian, but I'm not able to charge in Onorifocenze (Награды:) the file Золотая медаль ВДНХ. I saw that you put free license, I tried to put but I'm not able to see it in the page.

How can we do? can you help me? Thanks a lot for your help!

Rei Momo (talk) 22:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Удаление

Забавно ты разобрался со списком в отместку за твою же собственную ошибку в шаблоне БДСМ. Однако проблема в том, что твоё удаление может привести к далеко идущим последствиям. А именно, в статьях о футбольных клубах отныне нельзя будет размещать списки выдающихся игроков. Если раньше при первоначальном создании статей участники по собственному разумению писали краткие списки самых известных игроков, на это все закрывали глаза. На определённом этапе статья разрастается, и уже к такому разделу нужен АИ. Где брать АИ? Разумеется, в специализированной прессе - в данном случае, Placar. А твоё это удаление рушит всю систему, теперь нельзя будет размещать в статьях про ФК списки известных игроков, вне зависимости от АИ. Ты поставил все рейтинги от ведущих изданий вне закона. Грубо говоря, ты сейчас пошёл против всего проекта Футбол, где есть свои правила, и который генерирует для Википедии кучу статей. И да, мне очень жаль, что ты считаешь меня своим врагом и оппонентом.--Soul Train (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

• 1. Причём здесь БДСМ и где я там допустил ошибку? 2. Не путайте создание списка внутри статьи и создание отдельной статьи-списка. Отдельную статью на основании первоисточника нельзя. Раздел в статье на основании первоисточника -- всё-таки можно. 3. Моё удаление рушит систему списков не только футбола, но и, например, многих списков проекта "Баскетбол". Я прекрасно отдаю себе в этом отчёт, и считаю, что в конечном итоге мои действия улучшат Википедию. Хотя они и конфликты на текущем этапе, пусть даже и соответствуют правилам. 4. Своим "врагом" я согласен считать только тех участников, с кем у меня были войны правок. Обычно это в статьях на НЕАК-тематику. Вас я среди них не помню, так что извините, но Вы мне не враг. -- vlsergey (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
• Сейчас увидел твоё удаление статьи о ФК Вологда. Это же полный нонсенс. Статьи про профессиональные ФК всегда оставляются (если, конечно, речь не идёт о недостабе из двух предложений). Ты играешь с огнём в той сфере, о которой не имеешь никакого понятия.--Soul Train (talk) 18:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Annoying User, Good Content.JPG

File:Annoying User, Good Content.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Annoying User, Good Content.JPG

Hey mate, when you uploaded the above photo to Commons, you did so with CC-Zero licencing. As per the outcome of the DR, Jimmy has finally confirmed that the text is available under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 licence. Therefore, the photo would also need to be licenced under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 licence. User:Cirt has changed the licencing to CC-BY-SA-3.0, however, only the author of the photo, that means you, can make release the photo under this licence. Can you please confirm whether:

1. You are fine with licencing your photograph under CC-BY-SA-3.0, or
2. You release all rights for your photograph under CC-Zero (this does not affect the licencing of copyrighted works by Jimmy in the photograph)

Cheers russavia (talk) 17:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Just a reminder: we still appreciate your response on this. whym (talk) 14:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Новые шаблоны для медалей ВООПИиК и ВООП (просьба)

Уважаемый Vlsergey, добрый вечер! Помогите, пожалуйста, создать Шаблоны наград для двух медалей, которые удалось найти:

• Медаль ВООПИК «За заслуги в сохранении наследия Отечества»

• Медаль Всероссийского общества охраны природы «За охрану природы России» (есть варианты в ленте, ссылку указал)

Спасибо! Niklitov (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata

See d:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Buggy edits with ru:Википедия:WE-Framework. Sealle (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

File:American Legion 1794.jpg

File:American Legion 1794.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Crest on top of Cathedral of Peter and Pavel (Peterhoff).jpg

File:Crest on top of Cathedral of Peter and Pavel (Peterhoff).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Jumping Dolphin Low.jpg

File:Jumping Dolphin Low.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Jumping Dolphin.jpg

File:Jumping Dolphin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

@Vlsergey and Vlsergey-at-work: просто надо было пометить их (и надо пометить оставшиеся) как собственные работы ({{own}}), а ссылки на Фликр снести. Sealle (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

мой ник как автора там был, я уверен. Ник меня там как загружающего тоже был. Если администратор не удосужился соотнести одно с другим, а также наличие ссылок на странице, вот зачем мне это? -- VlSergey ^(трёп) 14:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

У любого активного здесь администратора комбинация ссылки (тем более неработающей) на flickr (а ещё тем более без проставленного сразу при загрузке шаблона {{flickrreview}}) и ника загружающего в поле author= – это на 99 % копивио от неопытного участника. Создавать такую ситуацию и удивляться при этом, что на неё реагируют, как на неё всегда и реагируют, учитывая COM:PCP – бесперспективно. Sealle (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Ну да, участник с 100к правок по проектам, это, конечно, неопытный участник. Хотят выплёскивать -- пусть выплёскивают. -- VlSergey ^(трёп) 10:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Male Mosque Minareth.jpg

File:Male Mosque Minareth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 07:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Ahejakova.jpg

File:Ahejakova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FlorianH76 (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)