Logo WWU edit

Sie zeigen in Ihrem Beitrag über die WWU nicht das Logo der Uni, sondern lediglich die Bildmarke aus dem Logo. Also: entweder das Logo zeigen und beschreiben oder darauf hinweisen, dass Sie lediglich einen Teil zeigen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.221.124.98 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 19. Okt. 2008 (UTC)

Passt schon, ChrisiPK war so frei... File:Logo Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster.png. Gruß --WIKImaniac 11:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Better Call Saul - Bob Odenkirk (action figure).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 17:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Cryptolocker ransomware.jpg edit

 
File:Cryptolocker ransomware.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adolf Müller edit

 
Adolf Müller has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archie02 (talk) 11:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please sign your postings edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Asked the bot owner if any problems exists with my signature. --WIKImaniac 08:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIKImaniac (talk • contribs) 08:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please sign your postings edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 08:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:1gyu111gyu1gyu11.PNG edit

Hi WIKImaniac: The file is as follows

Problema 3 Caso a)
  • tensión media = 400 V
  • Tensión eficaz = 540 V
  • IO,AVG = 2 A

Cheers. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Nat: : Thanks, I added the information to es:b:Electrónica de Potencia/Diodo de potencia/Problemas de diseño. --WIKImaniac 21:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help desk edit

Hi. Please see COM:HD#TeX and images.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Jeff G.: Thanks, you will find my answer there. --WIKImaniac 16:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

TeX equivalent of File:23dimethylhexane.png edit

Hi WIKImaniac,

Looking at your TeX replacement for the image, you have a great match for the image. However, there is a technical (factual) mistake in the image regarding the horizontal placement of the vertical-line bonds. I added annotations to the .png. Compare to File:3-etylo-3-metylopentan.svg that has these vertical-lines correct. Do you know how to fix that? DMacks (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@DMacks: Thanks for your message and your annotations. That makes sense, I fixed the TeX formula. --WIKImaniac 12:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Nice, thanks. DMacks (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. --WIKImaniac 08:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Better Call Saul - Bob Odenkirk (digital sketch).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Di (they-them) (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:3._Fußball-Liga_1997/1998 edit

 

Category:3._Fußball-Liga_1997/1998 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sandro Halank (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Marc Chagall - Birth (1911-1912).jpg edit

 
File:Marc Chagall - Birth (1911-1912).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Black Book 2005 film set - bunker.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Black Book 2005 film set - bunker.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Black Book 2005 film set - bunker.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, added missing templates. --WIKImaniac 12:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply