User talk:XRay/Archive/2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 18:14, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

WLM Uploads

Hi,

Please only use the WLM-UK upload wizard for pictures of listed buildings, not anything else. If you want to upload a more general picture like File:Braunton (Devon, UK), Memorial Garden -- 2013 -- 8.jpg please use the normal UploadWizard..--Nilfanion (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Buldern in Buldern, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Bug problem in the choice of scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 Done fixed, sorry --XRay ^talk 19:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnstaple (Devon, UK), Clock Tower -- 2013 -- 0986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2012 -- 7770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2012 -- 7812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, St.-Barbara-Bildstock -- 2013 -- 00130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (Halterner Straße) -- 2013 -- 0178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2011 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok, nice --Christian Ferrer 06:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Cathedral Church of Saint Peter -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Dramatic composition QI imo despite some OE, CA and unsharp areas. Why f 3,5? --Moroder 15:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment No tripod and - sorry - automatic mode for a short shutter speed and low ISO. --XRay 16:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark, Brücke am Herzteich -- 2011 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 08:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wegkreuz (Coesfelder Straße) -- 2012 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now. --Cayambe 08:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Wegkreuz (nahe St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle) -- 2012 -- 4111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Fire Station -- 2013 -- 00156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:05, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2012 -- 7806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. I like the focussing on the pony itself. --Dirtsc 16:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Objektiv-Defekt?

IHallo XRay! Ich habe auf QIC ja vermutet, dass ein Objektiv von dir möglicherweise einen Defekt hat. Wenn ich mir die Qualität deiner anderen 600D-Bilder anschaue bestätigt mich das immer mehr in meiner Auffassung. Hast du File:Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Damien Hirst's Verity -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, das wirklich überall SEHR scharf ist, mit einem anderen Objektiv gemacht als File:Braunton (Devon, UK), St Brannock's Church -- 2013 -- 1.jpg?. Die Brennweite 18mm vs. 10mm könnte ja darauf hindeuten. Klar UWW-Objektive haben natürlich immer eine gewisse Randunschärfe, aber bei dem von mir bemangelten Bild fand ich diese schon sehr ungewöhnlich ausgeprägt. Grüße und frohes weiteres Uploaden :) --Tuxyso (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
P.S.: Im Wildpark-Dülmen war ich auch mal. Hat mir dort sehr gut gefallen.

Hallo! Deinem Tipp - vielen Dank! - bin ich bereits nachgegangen. Das Objektiv ist bereits auf dem Weg in die Reparatur. Ob's wirklich defekt ist, weiß ich nicht. In Tests schneidet es auch nicht immer wirklich gut ab. Schauen wir mal, was dabei herauskommt. Ärgerlich ist nur, dass manche Fotogelegenheit (vorerst) nicht wiederkommt. --XRay ^talk 04:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadow is a little distracting but still QI. --Lewis Hulbert 12:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Rödder, Mäusescheune -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, though it is somewhat soft, particularly on the right side and corners. I'd suggest f/8 with this lens and such subjects. Good composition and lighting. --Smial 07:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Land's End (Cornwall, UK), Coast Path -- 2013 -- 1064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), Elizabeth Tower, -Big Ben- -- 2010 -- 1979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Damien Hirst's Verity -- 2013 -- 5.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Damien Hirst's Verity -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Fine composition. --Tuxyso 21:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus Osthoff -- 2012 -- 2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus Osthoff -- 2012 -- 7754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Nonnenturm -- 2012 -- 4152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittow (Rügen), Gebäude der Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Putgarten -- 2009 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now! QI --Poco a poco 17:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2012 -- 7831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support --Holleday 20:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden, Wasserschloss Senden -- 2013 -- 00455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's the building, not the image, that's crooked. --Bahnfrend 13:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Brannock's church, Braunton, North Devon, UK (view from south east).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Would you, please, add "SW (or SE...) view" to the scope as we usually do here ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 17:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 Done hopefully ;-)/thanks for your advice --XRay ^talk 17:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 Support Gret image. Best in scope. Useful in Wikipedia (I'm gonna add this image to Polish Wikipedia page of Braunton). All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 10:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Bildstock -Heilige Barbara- -- 2013 -- 3082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2012 -- 9196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Ich danke dir! --XRay ^talk 15:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Number of QI

Hi! You can nominate a bit more than a pair of images at once in QIC, but take into account that it's people like you who will review them, so it's not so polite to nominate ten at once if you are not going to review other people's pictures. For example, Poco a Poco usually nominates a lot for a day but it's ok because he reviews at least one image for each one he has nominated. I haven't checked if you review or not, but if you don't want to make any review yet, try to be patient and nominate "slowly". You will also remember better how to improve your pictures if there are issues. I hope I'm making myself understood, I don't want to sound rude. We have to keep a balance between nominations and reviews, and we can't give all the work to the rest of users. Kind regards, --Kadellar (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm going to review images. Now there are only 2 or 3 that I've reviewed yet. I'd like to check the reviews of other people to give the images reviewed by me the same quality. So my reviews will come. Hopefully me answer will be satisfied. And your sound isn't rude. It's good to give an advice. Please have understanding for my initial reluctance. --XRay ^talk 17:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nonnenturm in Dülmen (view from north west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good image. But please add English description. Then all criteria will be met. Halavar (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 Done I've just added an english description. Thanks for your advice. --XRay ^talk 15:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Wassermühle an der Stever -- 2013 -- 2864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, very nice -- Spurzem 19:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seppenrade, Wegkreuz auf dem Kirchplatz -- 2013 -- 2842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden, Bildstock an der Hiddingseler Straße -- 2013 -- 00458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 20:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Oberbaumbrücke -- 2011 -- 2282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Hackesche Höfe -- 2011 -- 2438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Oberbaumbrücke -- 2011 -- 2770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnstaple (Devon, UK), Queen Anne's Walk -- 2013 -- 0994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Countryside Centre -- 2013 -- 00192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Braunton & District Museum -- 2013 -- 00191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Old Railway Station, Station House -- 2013 -- 00190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Black Horse Inn -- 2013 -- 00169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Black Horse Inn -- 2013 -- 00169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Capstone Hill -- 2013 -- 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 1785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (Mauritiusstraße-Kettbach) -- 2013 -- 00081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Capstone Hill -- 2013 -- 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 1785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfsburg, Volkswagenwerk -- 2009 -- 0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, by the way do you know of mask sharpening? --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your advice. (The unsharpening is done by mask. ;-) )--XRay 04:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden, Gruftkapelle Freiherr Droste zu Senden -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfsburg, Volkswagenwerk -- 2009 -- 0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, by the way do you know of mask sharpening? --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your advice. (The unsharpening is done by mask. ;-) )--XRay 04:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Mühlenhof-Freilichtmuseum -- 2013 -- 2931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Bahnfrend 08:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Mühlenhof-Freilichtmuseum, Gräftenhof -- 2013 -- 2961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 08:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (Mauritiusstraße-Kettbach) -- 2013 -- 00081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Burgplatz mit St.-Mauritius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Burgplatz mit St.-Mauritius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Karthaus, Kriegerdenkmal -- 2013 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 09:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Black Horse Inn -- 2013 -- 00169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Capstone Hill -- 2013 -- 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 1785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfsburg, Volkswagenwerk -- 2009 -- 0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, by the way do you know of mask sharpening? --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your advice. (The unsharpening is done by mask. ;-) )--XRay 04:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (Mauritiusstraße-Kettbach) -- 2013 -- 00081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Burgplatz mit St.-Mauritius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear XRay! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos time to time accumulates on this page... --Bff (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Pancratius in Buldern, Dülmen, Germany (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Good quality. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good color, but abnormal perspective,Easy to fix. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Done Hopefully this version/perspective of the image looks more naturally. (I do.)--XRay ^talk 16:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Siebenteufelsturm -- 2013 -- 3180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2013 -- 2066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 11:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Münsterstraße, Arkaden -- 2012 -- 7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Parish Hall -- 2013 -- 00228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two dust spots (see note). Have you got an idea why the sharpness at the right side of the building is remarkable worse than on the other areas (still OK)? f13 should not be the problem. I would slightly denoise the sky / apply selective sharpening. If you have space at the bottom, I would prefer a wider crop to have a nice diagonal line starting from the edge of the foot-walk at the bottom right. --Tuxyso 06:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. I think it's all done.--XRay 11:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Looks much better now. --Tuxyso 11:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), St Brannock's Church -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Memorial -- 2013 -- 00227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but please remove the dust spot (see note). --Tuxyso 06:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Dust spot removed.--XRay 12:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC) IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 09:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

WLM 2013

Danke, ich gebe die Glückwünsche gern zurück und freue mich, dass du unsere Farben beim internationalen Wettbewerb vertrittst. Viel Glück dabei! LG
Watzmann ^Talk 16:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol (UK), Brunel's ss Great Britain -- 2013 -- 1606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:19, 23 October 2013 (UTC)  CommentPlease categorize also with respect to the cat. --NorbertNagel 17:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol (UK), Planetarium -- 2013 -- 1645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WestLotto -- 2013 -- 1-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. --Mattbuck 23:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, despite the person cut in two on the left. --Myrabella 07:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC) I've removed the half person on the left.--XRay 08:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 07:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clovelly indeed. Mattbuck 06:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Cathedral Church of Saint Peter -- 2013 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Land's End (Cornwall, UK), Coast Path -- 2013 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Cathedral Church of Saint Peter -- 2013 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Olaf Kosinsky 15:56, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Clock Tower -- 2013 -- 1395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), Horse Guards -- 2010 -- 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 14:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC) FYI: I just removed the needless upscaling.--XRay 17:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Quay -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots need fixing, and also rather dull, please add contrast. Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Done More contrast and removed dust spots.--XRay 07:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 19:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Land's End (Cornwall, UK) -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Land's End (Cornwall, UK), Coast Path near Sennen Cove -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your QIHelper edit

Hey XRay! Sorry, I had to revert this edit. You'll have to clear your cache in order to get the update QIHelper. Otherwise you'll remove the new architecture cats from some images. --Dschwen (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, next edit is wrong too. I will revert it.--XRay ^talk 17:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Check en:Wikipedia:Bypass_your_cache. --Dschwen (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), Horse Guards -- 2010 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Life Guards, in real. Good QI.--Jebulon 16:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), War memorial -- 2010 -- 1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Promenade -- 2013 -- 1.jpg

Hi! I uploaded last version, Please revert, if it's not ok with you. --Ivar (talk) 17:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

It's OK. Thank you!--XRay ^talk 17:58, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Looks like you cache was still not purged. Try loading this link (it is the script). And see if you see the /Subject/Architecture entries in the list at the top of the script. If not you are not getting the most up-to-date version. --Dschwen (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Brandenburger Tor -- 2008 -- 0153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:St. Austell (Cornwall, UK), Eden Project -- 2013 -- 5.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Austell (Cornwall, UK), Eden Project -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exeter (Devon, UK), Quay -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Insufficient quality. Description --Moroder 21:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Please tell me why it is insufficient.--XRay 06:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Comment It's QI for e with a detailed English description --Moroder 17:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your advice. English description added (and back to "nomination").--XRay 18:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Fernsehturm am Alexanderplatz -- 2011 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 08:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), Horse Guards -- 2010 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Blues and Royals, in fact.--Jebulon 20:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 4697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandkörbe -- 2005 -- 1454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Berlin, Kuppel des Reichstaggebäudes -- 2008 -- 3.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Kuppel des Reichstaggebäudes -- 2008 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 19:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London (UK), Telefonzelle -- 2010 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Promenade -- 2013 -- 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Promenade -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Recklinghausen, Willy-Brandt-Park, Aktion -Recklinghausen leuchtet- -- 2013 -- 1.jpg

File:Recklinghausen, Willy-Brandt-Park, Aktion -Recklinghausen leuchtet- -- 2013 -- 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Smial (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Recklinghausen, Willy-Brandt-Park, Aktion -Recklinghausen leuchtet- -- 2013 -- 1.jpg

File:Recklinghausen, Willy-Brandt-Park, Aktion -Recklinghausen leuchtet- -- 2013 -- 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Schloss -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now -> QI! --Cccefalon 18:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:St. Austell (Cornwall, UK), Eden Project -- 2013 -- 4.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Austell (Cornwall, UK), Eden Project -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port d'Andratx (Mallorca, Spain), Street light -- 2009 -- 1550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Jüdischer Friedhof, Eingangstor -- 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Schierke) -- 2008 -- 2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Schierke) -- 2008 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- (Wilfried Koch) -- 2013 -- 5001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 11:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Empfangsgebäude des Bahnhofs -- 2013 -- 5004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle -- 2013 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 11:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle -- 2013 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 11:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port d'Andratx (Mallorca, Spain), Harbour -- 2009 -- 1540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Palma de Mallorca, Kathedrale La Seu -- 2009 -- 3.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma de Mallorca, Kathedrale La Seu -- 2009 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 10:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK), Harbour -- 2013 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure this is QI, but not sure I can articulate exactly why. Perhaps someone else could comment. Mattbuck 21:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment upper part of wall looks like pincushion distortion to me --P e z i 20:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment It's looks round and it is round in reality. So the image has no pincushion distortion. --XRay 12:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment if you say it's real I have to believe - BUT: At least there is a perspective distortion 'cause I don't believe that the poles of the handlebar are not standing upright :-) --P e z i 00:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)  Done A new cutting and perspective correction. I think it's good now.--XRay 11:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)  Support think it's OK now. --P e z i 20:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:München, Frauenkirche -- 2011 -- 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! München, Frauenkirche -- 2011 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin, Brandenburger Tor -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Main subject is ok --Christian Ferrer 11:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine of Saint Barbara in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, Germany (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial of the old Jewish Cemetery in Dülmen, Germany (front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Should the scope, refer to a single category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks. Now it's only one category.--XRay ^talk 11:46, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Please Add to the image description in English and geolocation - we required them in Valued Images. Halavar (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for your advice. I've just added the english description.--XRay ^talk 18:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Image must be geocoded. It's criterium no. 5 in Commons:Valued image criteria Halavar (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Halavar is right, the geocoding is necessary --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm really sorry. The EXIF information contained the geocoding, but I forgot the template. Now I added the geocoding as template.--XRay ^talk 17:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 5132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 5125 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 5154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, Bürogebäude -- 2013 -- 5148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. --Tuxyso 06:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! München, Rathaus -- 2011 -- 1262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi XRay, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, DRK, Zentrum für Transfusionsmedizin -- 2013 -- 5135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Tor am Park Sentmaring -- 2013 -- 5158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And by the way: much better than the version with the biker. --Cccefalon 09:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Wernigerode) -- 2008 -- 1-2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Wernigerode) -- 2008 -- 1-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Motorcycle (black and white) -- 2013 -- 3560 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 20:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Rome (Italy), Metro at Basilica San Paolo train station -- 2013 -- 8.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Metro at Basilica San Paolo train station -- 2013 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Wernigerode) -- 2008 -- 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harz, Brockenbahn (bei Wernigerode) -- 2008 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you reduce someof the brightest highlights, then it would be QI --EpsilonEridani 11:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)  Done I've reduced the brighest lights as much as possible.--XRay 06:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC) QI Good quality. Just as a proposal, cropping the right side such that the back of the car vanishes, may improve the photo even more --EpsilonEridani 12:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your advice. I've cropped the right side.--XRay 14:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Via del Teatro di Marcello -- 2013 -- 3468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Piazza della Fontanella di Borghese -- 2013 -- 3771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Motorcycles -- 2013 -- 4425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Categorizing Rome pictures

I'm delighted, XRay ;) --Lalupa (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Pharmacy -- 2013 -- 3519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Bicycle -- 2013 -- 4368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EpsilonEridani 20:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Rome (Italy), Metro at Termini Station -- 2013 -- 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Metro at Termini Station -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Padlock at Ponte Palatino -- 2013 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recklinghausen, Willy-Brandt-Park -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. I think channel overexposure is forgivable here. --Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gate to the Jewish Cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (view from outside).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful Halavar (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, Coesfelder Straße, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful good quality picture. (I simplified the scope because " cultural monument of Dülmen (no. 3)" can be avoided here imo : it's already mentioned in the decription of the file. Feel free to change.) --JLPC (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

HDRI

Hallo XRay! Kann es sein, dass beim Upload der neuen Version etwas schiefgelaufen ist? Trotz Cache-Purge etc. sehe ich bei deinem (wirklich tollen) File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg zwei völlig identische Versionen. Die Bilder unterscheiden sich nicht voneinander. Kannst du das noch mal kontrollieren? --Tuxyso (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

'tschuldigung. Da ist wohl irgendetwas falsch gelaufen. Das richtige Bild habe ich gerade hochgeladen.--XRay ^talk 18:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe es auf QIC schon "promoted". Vielleicht denkst du mal über eine FP-Kandidatur nach. Ich finde das Bild wirklich klasse. Allerdings eine Warnung vorweg (musste ich selbst schon mehrfach erfahren): Nachaufnahmen und dann auch noch HDRI sind nicht immer beliebt. Ich würde es auf jeden Fall unterstützen. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Bei FP-Nominierungen habe ich gerade erst angefangen, vor allem, um das Prozedere kennenzulernen. Aber mehr als eine Ablehnung kann es nicht werden. Nebenbei: HDRI mag ich nur zur Verbesserung der Lichter, die extremen Effekte nutze ich selten, da sie doch zu unnatürlich wirken. --XRay ^talk 18:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Mein erstes FP war auch ein HDR, nämlich File:Ruhrtalbruecke-Sonnenuntergang.jpg. Es wurde recht leidenschaftlich diskutiert, aber im Ergebnis hat sich doch eine große Mehrheit für das Bild gefunden. Bei solchen Motiven hast du kaum eine andere Chance als auf Belichtungsreihen zurückzugreifen. Und wie du schon schreibst: Versuch macht klug. Manchmal sind die Voten auf FPC unberechenbar. Ich finde du hast HDRI auf deinem Bild sehr schön und sinnvoll eingesetzt. Welche Software bzw. Softwarekombination nutzt du? Ich habe mit Photomatix (Merge to 32 Bit HDR) und Lightroom gute Erfahrungen gemacht. Das eigentliche Tonemapping erfolgt in Lightroom, Photomatix liefert mir nur ein 32 bittiges TIF zurück. Bei der Methode ist es nur etwas ärgerlich, dass man die Geisterbilder nicht manuell markieren kann. Ansonsten nutze ich meist HDR Fusion, das ist nicht so extrem wie Tonemapping mit Detail Enhancer. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich nutze Luminance, exportiere 16-Bit-TIFF-Bilder in möglichst passendem Tone-Mapping und mache den Rest mit Lightroom. Einzelne Korrekturen werden dann ggf. mit Photoshop Elements gemacht. Der Weg ist also ähnlich. --XRay ^talk 18:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rügen, Beach at Sellin -- 2009 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and great composition. --Cccefalon 16:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, but you can try manually masking of ghosts in your HDRI programm to correct the artefacts from the light traces of the cars. --Tuxyso 18:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your advice. I've removed the artifacts.--XRay 18:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Very nice now. --Tuxyso 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear XRay/Archive, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 22:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Fiat -- 2013 -- 3524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Cccefalon 10:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), street light -- 2013 -- 3484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: Kategorien

Hm… Wahrscheinlich bist du richtig; ich war nicht so sicher wenn ich diese Kategorien hinzugefügt habe. Vielen Dank für erinnern mich daran und auch für nehmen teil an Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! (Und Endschulding für mein schlechtes Deutsch; viel hab' ich schon vergessen.) odder (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Haus Osthoff -- 2012 -- 2-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Haus Osthoff -- 2012 -- 2-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave stones on the Jewish Cemetery in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice imo + useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, in the summer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine at the Hiddingseler Straße in Senden (Westphalia), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (view from street side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : sorry for my English but instead of "Stock image" I'd write "Shrine". Correct if I'm wrong, the picture is, of course, OK. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 23:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment I chose another description. --XRay ^talk 04:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pub "Black Horse Inn" in Braunton, Devon, England.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 23:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 1525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Motorcycle -- 2013 -- 3560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich (Schweiz), Ufer des Limmat -- 2011 -- 1390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Motorcycles (black and white) -- 2013 -- 4425 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And I like the compo where an inclining car glass was rectilined to overdominate the inclining walls. Well done! --Cccefalon 09:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013(2)-Tel Aviv-Hassan Bek Mosque 01.jpg

Hi XRay-

I have added an alternate image to my FP nomination. When you have a moment please have a look. Thanks in advance.-Godot13 (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Greenwich (Rhode Island, USA), Hydrant -- 2006 -- 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Funny --Poco a poco 13:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich (Schweiz), Ufer des Limmat -- 2011 -- 1407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted to the right --A.Savin 15:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I've adjusted the image. (It's sometimes really difficult.)--XRay 09:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC) OK for QI. --A.Savin 14:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recklinghausen, Kanzlei Grollmann -- 2013 -- 4890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 20:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warwick (Rhode Island, USA), Ford GT -- 2006 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Greenwich (Rhode Island, USA), Hydrant -- 2006 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heringsdorf, Usedom, Tretboote am Strand -- 2010 -- 2619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterterzen (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 3990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment overexposed sky. --Iifar 08:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I've reduced the light in the sky. I do not think the sky is overexposed. --XRay 14:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC)  Support I reviewed the new version and I think it is suitable for QI promotion and it is also a valuable photo for wikipedia encyclopedial entry. Personally, I had cropped out the car in the foreground, but it is not really an issue. --Cccefalon 10:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

Hallo XRay, etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Deine Preisträgerfotos sind... Platz 4 Platz 30 Platz 51 Platz 54 Platz 68

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder? Einen besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir, Anika (talk) 08:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Braunton & District Museum in Braunton, Devon, England (view from street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Countryside Centre in Braunton, Devon, England (view from street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Florstein 08:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 6139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, 'The Beatles' -- 2012 -- 5102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich (Schweiz), Bürkliplatz -- 2011 -- 1422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Moroder 15:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Goslar, Rammelsberg Bergbaumuseum -- 2008 -- 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goslar, Rammelsberg Bergbaumuseum -- 2008 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs an English description, I'm a bit unhappy with the crop on the left (cut vehicle) --Moroder 02:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I've added the english description. I wish I can change the crop on the left. If I cut the vehicle, the building lost too much. If I wish to see the whole vehicle, I have to take a new picture - so it's not an option.--XRay 13:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. I don't want to force you to an other take --Moroder 15:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2003 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 09:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 11:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Venetian -- 2012 -- 6331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Shop, South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 4845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Provincetown (Massachusetts, USA), ehemaliger Kai -- 2006 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition --Moroder 07:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heringsdorf, Seebrücke -- 2010 -- 2608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Sign -- 2012 -- 4937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Münster, WestLotto -- 2013 -- 1-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, WestLotto -- 2013 -- 1-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen-, Austin-Healey Sprite -- 2004 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße), BMW -- 2011 -- 0893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warwick (Rhode Island, USA), Hot rod -- 2006 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Florstein 17:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gruftkapelle "Freiherr Droste zu Senden", Category:Schloss Senden, Senden (Westfalen), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (view from street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goods Shep of the former Category:Braunton railway station, Museum of British Surfing (view from street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße), Wiesmann Roadster -- 2011 -- 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard -- 2012 -- 5100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Santa Monica Beach, Will Rogers Monument -- 2012 -- 5306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Provincetown (Massachusetts, USA), Fischerhütte -- 2006 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarragona, Skulptur -Castellers- -- 2006 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Attention, the artists are about to tumble - the pyramid is already leaning to the left side ... --Cccefalon 20:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Phew. Just in time, and all stabilized. --XRay 06:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Yes it's rectilinear now. But at the same time you increased blue saturation and it results in an unfortunate halo between sculpture and sky. Can you get rid of that, please? --Cccefalon 05:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed It's difficult because the halos exist at the origin. I optimized lights and blue saturation. Hopefully it's good now.--XRay 07:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)  Support I experienced same problems recently. LR cannot fix it, it's possible with PS tone-mapping. Knowing the limitations of software and given light, I am in favour to say it's good for QI but I know, that it is disputable. --Cccefalon 11:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-) -- 2008 -- 0614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade (an den Aaseewiesen) -- 2007 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade (an den Aaseewiesen) -- 2007 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarragona, Skulptur -Castellers- -- 2006 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Attention, the artists are about to tumble - the pyramid is already leaning to the left side ... --Cccefalon 20:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Phew. Just in time, and all stabilized. --XRay 06:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Yes it's rectilinear now. But at the same time you increased blue saturation and it results in an unfortunate halo between sculpture and sky. Can you get rid of that, please? --Cccefalon 05:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed It's difficult because the halos exist at the origin. I optimized lights and blue saturation. Hopefully it's good now.--XRay 07:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)  Support I experienced same problems recently. LR cannot fix it, it's possible with PS tone-mapping. Knowing the limitations of software and given light, I am in favour to say it's good for QI but I know, that it is disputable. --Cccefalon 11:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swinemünde (Polen), Hafen -- 2010 -- 2523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good for QI after removal of one bird spot and a white spot in the sky. I will make an annotation. --Cccefalon 11:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Bird and small cloud removed. But I think birds in the sky are usual. ;-) --XRay 07:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. It's good practice to clone out birds when they produce a blurry spot. I would not complain of clear bird silhouettes. --Cccefalon 12:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße) -- 2011 -- 1001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flugplatz Borkenberge, Oldtimertreffen -- 2007 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 12:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-) -- 2008 -- 0623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pawtucket (Rhode Island, USA), Slater Mill at Blackstone River -- 2006 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Posterisation in the sky imo : can you correct it ? --JLPC 17:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed I fixed it as much as possible.--XRay 10:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Better on the right than on the left but enough for QI imo.--JLPC 16:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alter Jüdischer Friedhof, Gedenkstein -- 2011 -- 1901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-) -- 2008 -- 0612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not entirely sold on the composition, but ok. --Mattbuck 10:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Oldtimertreffen -- 2007 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again, not brilliant composition but ok. --Mattbuck 10:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear XRay/Archive, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture in Haltern am See of Varus "Der gescheiterte Varus" at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fire station in Braunton, Devon, England.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 15:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yosemite National Park (California, USA), Yosemite Valley -- 2012 -- 4700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Oldtimertreffen -- 2007 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade (an den Aaseewiesen) -- 2004 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktplatz, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5362-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in spite of noise in the sky. --Poco a poco 15:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade 2004 -- 2004 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-), Wiesmann GT -- 2008 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lots of CA. Mattbuck 10:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed CAs removed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 16:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 17:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Greenwich (Rhode Island, USA), Hydrant -- 2006 -- 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warwick (Rhode Island, USA) -- 2006 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I am not fully convinced but imho nonetheless QI. The cactus in the front in comletely in shadow. There is some noise on the sky. Can you reduce it? When I was at this place I could not make photos due to a strong thunderstorm :( --Tuxyso 18:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed I've noise reduced and the shadows are (a little bit) brighter. (No Thunderstorms at the day the photos were taken - but really hot for germans. We just stopped for a few minutes.)--XRay 07:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet Telgenkamp) -- 2005 -- 1508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Parkleuchten

Kennst du Parkleuchten im Grugapark der Stadt Essen? Das wäre sicher etwas für dich, wenn ich mir so deine letzten Nominierungen anschaue. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Nein, kannte ich bisher nicht. Danke für den Tipp! Den Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord hatte ich schon auf meiner (echt langen) Liste. Die Erfahrung (mit der Foto-AG) in Recklinghausen (RE leuchtet) war gut, aber zu viele Leute. Das ist gut für die Veranstaltung, stört aber doch beim Fotografieren.--XRay ^talk 15:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Bei den Parkleuchten wird es insbesondere am Wochenende auch voll. Aber der Park ist sehr groß, so dass man sich eigentlich nicht stört. Der Landschaftspark Nord ist auch nett, ja. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

"Nett" ;-) . So ist es. Schöne Bilder, aber doch hausbacken. Aber trotz alledem bieten sich überall schöne Möglichkeiten.--XRay ^talk 16:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnitz (Usedom), Ölförderpumpe -- 2010 -- 2673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 15:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Kreuzigungsgruppe auf dem Friedhof -- 2013 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little bit of oe, just ok --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade 2004 -- 2004 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Cactus / Thunderstorm

Falls es dich interessiert und du einen Eindruck bekommen möchtest wie es bei mir bei den Kakteen im Joshua Tree Park aussah:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vvh58qerkyri7hn/YCyG8nj1v5

Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Das schien mir wenig ideal gewesen zu sein. Aber wie es so oft bei Fotogelegenheiten im Urlaub ist: Man muss die Gelegenheit so nehmen wie sie ist. Da haben die Leute, die öfters eine Chance haben, deutlich bessere Bedingungen.--XRay ^talk 09:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/GiuseppeVerdi.jpg‎

Hello,

I changed the scope, and added "photograph". Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Propithecus deckenii Quality Image

Hi XRay, thanks for your valuable feedback on File:Propithecus deckenii - Tsingy.jpg, I made a second attempt with File:Propithecus deckenii - profile - Tsingy.jpg, please take a look :). Thank you very much. Fguerraz (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Cable Car -- 2012 -- 4180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Harsh light, sharpness at the edges not really good. But imho barely OK for QI. --Tuxyso 08:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks! I optimized the lightning.--XRay 11:52, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Wernigerode, Brockenbahn -- 2005 -- 3.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode, Brockenbahn -- 2005 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me.--Jebulon 23:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktplatz, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amboy (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Tuxyso 07:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade 2004 -- 2004 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK> --Mattbuck 00:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Arkaden an der Münsterstraße, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 4733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would slightly increase brightness (+0.3) and use medium contrast in LR. Nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 09:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for your advice! The image is now brighter and more contrast.--XRay 09:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC) A remarkable improvement. --Tuxyso 10:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Arkaden an der Münsterstraße, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs on the white door at the very right. Otherwise OK. --Tuxyso 09:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry, I forgot to remove CAs.--XRay 09:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Better, but (sorry) there is a tiny perspective problem (verticals) at the very right. Easily to fix. --Tuxyso 11:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed ... now fixed. I forgot lens correction. Sorry.--XRay 12:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Great! --Stepro 03:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA), Beach -- 2012 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you brighten it a bit up? Poco a poco 13:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's now brighter.--XRay 07:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but needs more specific cats Poco a poco 13:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. I optimized the cats.--XRay 07:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Rödder, St.-Michael-Kapelle -- 2012 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Oldtimertreffen -- 2007 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 12:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Cable Car -- 2012 -- 4245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives : left and right are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 06:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. I've corrected the image.--XRay 07:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC) You uploaded a biggest file and now I've just seen CA in top left and right --Christian Ferrer 13:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for your advice. I've corrected the image (again).--XRay 08:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 1-4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 1-4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seebrücke Heringsdorf (Usedom, Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

• I don't think it is necessary or useful to specify "view from north west", unless another view would look really different. Yann (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
  • There's a building at the end of the pier. So the view from sea side or from south east differ to the north east view.--XRay ^talk 10:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Would you nominate another image for another view of the same subject? If the view from this side is representating of the whole subject, then one scope is enough. Yann (talk) 13:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
      • If the scope is right without specifying the viewing direction, then I'll change it. My only problem is that there may be someone else saying the viewing direction is neccessary - as some nominations before. ... I remove the viewing direction.--XRay ^talk 15:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)  Support For me, all criteria met. Halavar (talk) 23:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ips-nscf-2013-immers-3686.jpg

Please tell me more details. Where is it unsharp? How must I set the camera to show 3/4 top view (!) without perspective problems? What elements of the live reporting shoot are disturbing? Next year I will make a better shot keeping the advice in memory. Thank you. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

I've uploaded an image with perspective correction. The other crop reduced to disturbing elements, but it's not the best way. It is certainly advantageous to take some things before shooting from the field of view. And IMO a smaller aperture (for example f/11) would be better.--XRay ^talk 16:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

This perspective you made — it is impossible in real world. This is why my question stays, how must I set the camera to show 3/4 top view (!) without perspective problems? Where have I to put the camera to show both side view and top view? Thanks. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

IMO the edges are upright and so the image will show this. If you don't agree the review, please feel free and put your picture to discussion. So other can give their opinion.--XRay ^talk 08:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

To make the edges upright, we need to shoot from the side and to set the camera to the middle level of the computer case. This does not allow to show the top side of the case. But the aim was, to show both the top and the sides of the case. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Dietmar, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station in Haltern am See at night, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

• I don't think it is necessary or useful to specify "front view", unless you think that there also should be a "back view".
  • Most of the images show the front view, that's right. The back view is interesting too. So IMO it ist not necessary to specify "front view", but usefull.--XRay ^talk 10:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
    • If the view from this side is representating of the whole subject, then one scope is enough. Yann (talk) 13:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Scope correct --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amboy (California, USA), Hist. Route 66 -- 2012 -- 5705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The overall quality is ok, but could you please try to remove the magenta CA? --Cccefalon 08:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)  Fixed I don't know why CAs appear. Sorry. Now it's done.--XRay 09:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --Cccefalon 09:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland, Feld -- 2012 -- 7430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support though I had preferred a little tighter crop on the left side to avoid the two disturbing shadows in the field and also to give a higher importance to the tractor --Cccefalon 07:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Center for Transfusion medicine of the German Red Cross, Münster (Westphalia) at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is a description, not a scope. A valuable scope might be "Center for Transfusion medicine of the German Red Cross". Please create a category. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done Hopyfully it's better now. I do not know which part might be unnecessary.--XRay ^talk 11:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
    • I changed it to what I think it is valuable scope. Revert if you don't like. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
      • Thanks for your proposed scope. I've classified all the relevant images into the category.--XRay ^talk 16:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Now all criteria met. Halavar (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)