Xyzzy n
No problem. Yonatan talk 05:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I added the license, an oversight on my part. Though I am not sure I get what you are saying on how it doesn't specify the author, it most certainly does. A mcmurray 12:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- I kinda figured, but thought I better clarify just in case. Thanks for letting me know about the tags. When I upload, a lot of times there is a lot of copy and paste going on, so I screw up occassionally, when I get time I will go through my uploads to make sure I have licensed them appropriately. Thanks again. A mcmurray 04:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
No. But the uploader selected that license, see [1]. I didn't feel right deleting for no license when it was removed by someone else (a non admin) [2]. So I simply restored the license. If you want to request deletion since they may not have permission to post the material from the website or for another reason, that would be fine, but a no license deletion didn't make sense to me. MECU≈talk 12:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Buddha_Rennenkampf.jpg&oldid=2605991){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Buddha_Rennenkampf.jpg&oldid=3884471){kind=link}
Your objection edit
The picture from which the thing started was quite alike: a meeting of arcigay where a poster by arcigay was visibile, and it was speedily deleted without even letting me know about. There should be one rule only for everything. Do you agree? --G.dallorto 14:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree: non-Italian posters should go in a separate space. I already separated them. --G.dallorto 14:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I again agree with you: so I created a separate request, so that the thing be more regular. About the fact that one image "poses no problem", this is your opinion, but it is welcome to me: finding out which images including posters do not pose problems is a thing I am personally interested in discovering, actually. --G.dallorto 15:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)