User talk:Zinnmann/Archive 1

Image Tagging Image:Mamaia from above.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mamaia from above.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 03:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Draper-Ulysses and the Sirens.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Draper-Ulysses and the Sirens.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 212.11.21.151 10:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ames room.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Ames room.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Alex valavanis 07:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:A_Stivell_072707_Nuremberg_04.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 00:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Oops, my mistake. I've fixed it. --Zinnmann 11:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Adelshofen_Wappen.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Adelshofen_Wappen.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Landkreis ffb labels.svg

Hi Zinnman, freut mich echt dass die Grafik jemandem gefällt! Hab mich wie von Dir vorgeschlagen auch mal auf de: angemeldet, auch wenn ich die meisten Änderungen auf en: mache. (Bin mir nicht sicher wie das mit der Kommunikation hier läuft. Ist es so gedacht, das ich dir auf meiner oder auf deine talk seite antworte?) Bowzer 12:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung? Nachdem ich aber recht selten in den commons unterwegs bin, hab ich Deine Nachricht hier wenigstens gleich gesehen. :-) --Zinnmann 16:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Brewtnall_Edward_Where_next.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Brewtnall_Edward_Where_next.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 08:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Ibotenic acid.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:Ibotenic acid.png you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 10:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Scotland Map (Loch Fyne Detail) Loch Fyne.png

BotMultichillT 21:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Zinnmann, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Hedwig, vielen Dank. Ich verspreche, keinen Unsinn anzustellen :-) Beste Grüße --Zinnmann (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180913 Stuttgart-Ost, Haußmannstraße 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Stuttgart-West, Vogelsangstraße 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180925 Stuttgart, Alexanderstraße 26b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180925 Stuttgart, Alexanderstraße 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180929 Rathaus Dinkelscherben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180929 Zehntscheuer, Dinkelscherben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170820 Stuttgart - Hölzelweg 2 aufwärts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170820 Stuttgart - Am Weißenhof 8 - NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fujifilm FinePix S6500fd.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181019 Stuttgart, Haußmannstraße 133, 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181019 Stuttgart, Haußmannstraße 123, 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181019 Stuttgart, Haußmannstraße 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:58, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181023 Marbach am Neckar, Niklastorstraße 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 21:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:20180219 Stuttgart - Rotenwald 73.jpg

File:20180219 Stuttgart - Rotenwald 73.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dr.Schwarzenegger (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

File:20180219 Stuttgart - Rotenwald 73-77b.jpg

File:20180219 Stuttgart - Rotenwald 73-77b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dr.Schwarzenegger (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180927 Karlsruhe, Ostendstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190327 Stuttgart, Hasenbergstraße 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Websterdead 12:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190421 Muscari botryoides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But may be better with a little bit more DoF. --XRay 09:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190421 Neidlingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190502 Viermastbark Sea Cloud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

do not overwrite

Hi Zinnmann,
your new version of File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpg is surely an improvement. Whether it's minor or not, might be debated. However, in doubt do NOT overwrite, per our policy. Instead, upload the new/better version under a different filename. Thereafter, the using projects may decide by themselves whether to user the old or the new version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpg

File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Zinnmann,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Pass beim Computer-aided tagging tool besser auf

Du hast mit dem Computer-aided tagging tool einige Aussagen hinzugefügt, die keinen Sinn machen, da sie ganz klar nicht das Motiv(depicts (P180)) sind. Falls du es noch nicht gemacht hast, ließ dir bitte COM:DEPICTS durch.
Hier mal ein Beispiel für das Problem(Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass du alles auf Deutsch hast, es gibt nämlich auch Probleme mit mehrdeutigen Übersetzungen zusammenhängen, die hier aber wohl keine Rolle spielen):
File:Rurtalsperre Obersee Urft in September 2019 67.jpg:
water resource (Q1049799), das ist ein Konzept. Wasser wäre als Statement vielleicht möglich, sollte bei einem See aber eigentlich nicht zusätzlich nötig sein, dafür könnte man aber diskutieren.
natural landscape (Q1286517), ebenfalls ein wissenschaftliches Konzept zur Klassifizierung von Landschaften, also solches kann es nicht das Motiv sein, aber natürlich das Thema.
nature (Q7860), genau das gleiche, ein Konzept, das per Definition kein Motiv auf einem Foto sein kann.
reservoir (Q131681), Die Aussage Obersee (Q1747370) existiert bereits, daher ist die Aussage redundant.
--GPSLeo (talk) 12:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Hallo GPSLeo, danke für die Hinweise. Gerade was die Konzepte angeht, hast Du sicher recht. Besteht eine Möglichkeit, solche Tags von vornherein für das Computer-aided tagging tool zu sperren? Ich bin ja wahrscheinlich nicht der einzige Anwender, der dabei in eine Falle läuft. Was den letzten Punkt betrifft: Absolute Zustimmung. Anhand der Vorschlagsliste des Tools kann ich leider nicht sehen, welche Tags bereits vergeben sind. Dazu müsste ich das zu taggende Bild separat laden und schauen, was bereits vorhanden ist. Dann erübrigt sich aber das Tool. Viele Grüße --Zinnmann (talk) 13:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200302 Lochblech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Zinnmann,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)