Commons:Requests and votes/NielsF

NielsF

I am nominating NielsF for adminship. He is a very active member of nl.wp, where he is an admin, and speaks another four languages besides (including it-3). He has shown great patience and willingness to work with the Commons community in order to improve inter-project communication, and for this reason I consider he will be a great asset to the Commons.

I accept the nomination. As a Commons admin my first interest would be in trying to improve coöperation and collaboration between nl.wikipedia and Commons. I'm not completely up to speed of Commons procedures and policies but I will of course first acquaint myself with them before using admin "powers". Speaking of these "powers", I would use them for (amongst others): streamlining the Dutch-language user interface (MediaWiki texts), which at the moment are somehow slightly different from all other Dutch-language projects (which is confusing sometimes), helping to clear the backlog of images to be deleted, and other maintenance work. NielsF 14:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support as nominator pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sanbec ✉ 12:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Communication situation with Dutch Wikipedia should be improved. However more Commons experience will be big plus. I hope, candidate knows from Dutch Wikipedia experience which actions must be avoided :-). --EugeneZelenko 14:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like to see a great deal more edits before supporting this candidate, although I'm pleased to see substantial involvement in the community. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 17:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll work on this. Not being appointed as administrator is not an extremely big deal, however I think as one I could help out on a lot of issues. NielsF 06:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good contributions here and on other wikis. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, wait a minute, only 128 edits, and not very high activity. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fred Chess 09:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support (User:Pfctdayelise nomicated the candidate but forgot the signature.)--Jusjih 15:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Siebrand 18:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) If Niels wants to go for it, I'm sure he's up to it.[reply]
Oppose I'm new here, but active on en.wikipedia, and I don't get how a user with only 127 edits can become an admin, only because he's active on another wikiproject in another language. Then, can I become an admin, because I've got nearly 5000 edits on en.wp and I'm an admin.--Shreshth91 09:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that COM:A#What_is_expected_from_an_administrator.3F explicitly states what is officially required. Individuals may of course have their own standards and expectations. pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree I agree with Bastique and Shreshth91 that 127 edits are very few edits, but in this case I believe he can make a good job and he may be a good administrator. --Prevert^(talk) 17:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]