Comment Also used on the official Nobel foundation announcement: [1]Pruneautalk 2009-10-06 08:18 (UTC)
Request I am ready to support but I have just a tiny remark: the geolocalised data point to an outside place (the street along the university in ACME mapper satellite view). Might this be amended?--Myrabella (talk) 11:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I took this picture at the new Campus Westend, a few blocks northeast of the old campus. The geolocalised data point to the old campus. --Gerbil (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, this specimen is clearly different, yet it is the same species. Do you know what are the differences between these subpecies? Does the subpecies depend on the location? Yann (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The problem of subspecies is little consensus on their side. For the butterflies is quite codified, for spider is to be more difficult because it ay fewer specialists. I know one but for now it is on a mission in Central Africa, even for a few weeks. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks. I hadn't seen this as it's a set. Unfortunately, it's not correctly identified, not Nephila pilipes. How do we deselect VI? This is not MVR. Charles (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment@Yann: . As I said above, the (existing VI) image that you prefer is not correctly identified. It is not Nephila pilipes. Charles (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The question is more difficult than I thought. Our specialist says that we can not determine the question saw the two images that I gave him. It is possible that this is the same species with a subadult. the epigynous are not visible in the photographs. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You could change existing VI to reflect this opinion, though I am surprised by it, looking at the markings. I can't see how they would change. Also, as there were a number of similar specimens being photographed, perhaps it is unlikely that they were all sub-adults? An aberration of some sort is possible I suppose if there isn't a known sub-species that fits the images. Charles (talk) 00:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I abandoned spider photographs. The recognitions are very difficult, and often requires use of dissection to have certainty for the subspecies.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]