Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Камениот мост во Зовиќ.jpg
File:Камениот мост во Зовиќ.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2016 at 23:25:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
- Info created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Others may have detailed criticisms, but for me, this is beautiful. Only one criticism from me: I might prefer if the tree on the left weren't cut off. But so be it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan Kekek. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 05:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The cut-off trees and building spoil it for me. Nice place, certainly, but this framing is not the best one can get. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Very lovely place but at least the right tree could have been spared a cutting, and maybe loose the person on the bridge. w.carter-Talk 08:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Kreuzschnabel and W.carter: The only way to take this image is to stand on a rock in the river and there is not much choice on the angle and the arrangement of objects. The ideal view without cropping the tree wold have been possible if the photographer was standing in the river, while it is not possible to eliminate the object to the right because it will spoil the view of the bridge. I agree about the man standing on the bridge (though it does not seem to change too much) but the other things are simply as they are. Here is a view from the bridge to the side of the river where the image was taken from.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Or perhaps turn the camera 90 degrees and take a 4:3 standing pic. Anyway, here at the FPC all photographers are asked to do the impossible such as walk on water, hover in the air or go through locked iron fences. That's standard. ;) w.carter-Talk 09:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Or choose a shorter focal length. Anyway, we judge images as they are nominated without taking the circumstances into account. Sometimes it’s just not possible to take an FP :-) --Kreuzschnabel 19:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. INeverCry 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral Just borderline on the saturation, and after all that might just be a natural event. But ... I agree with others about the cut tree. I can see that the photographer wanted to include the bend in the stream, but it didn't work. Either frame the image to include the whole tree or crop out the left third so that we would only expect to see the part of the tree that we would be seeing. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)