Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Панорама на селото Зовиќ.jpg

File:Панорама на селото Зовиќ.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2016 at 07:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Oppose - This is a good panorama of that village and should be nominated as a Valued Image for that reason. It should also be nominated for Quality Image. But I just don't find it an interesting enough composition to support for a feature as something really special, and that's no disrespect, as it is a good picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality issues. Looks like an image with low detail (either softness due to lens quality at f/2.8, or focus issues, or atmosphere, etc) has been hugely sharpened. Aside from this, I agree with Ikan that it doesn't stand out. -- Colin (talk) 11:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At full size, looks more like a watercolour painting than a photo to me, and would be nice if that were the case, but unfortunately not. -- KTC (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. My first thought on looking at this at full size was the same painting appearance noted by KTC. INeverCry 19:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Besides the overprocessing, there’s too much sky, squeezing the village into the lower quarter of the frame. Crop suggestion added. --Kreuz schnabel
Oppose Per all the others. The oversharpening and overprocessing aside, this is an excellent, if unintended, illustration of the perils of shooting landscapes with a cloudless sky. You'd need a tighter view of all the detail on the ground, or a much more dynamic ridgeline, to get this to where it might get enough supports. More was certainly less here. Kreuzschnabel's suggsted crop is a start, but there's still the processing issues and I don't think it's enough. I wonder how this might look if shot from further downhill so the hill dominates the view plane a bit more ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]