Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Track on Fremington Edge.jpg

File:2014 Track on Fremington Edge.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2014 at 07:09:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Rough track through moorland from Fremington Edge towards Marrick, looking to the east
Info c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuz schnabel 07:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kreuzschnabel 07:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- A really fine composition, if you could clear some problems in the sky, its excellent for me. See my annotations.--Hubertl (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, point taken. Redone version uploaded, avoiding sky overexposure. I lessened the noise reducion now to get better detail. I think the image is much better now. --Kreuz schnabel 08:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine for me. Again, a wonderful composition!--Hubertl (talk) 09:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like you've addressed the issues Hubert raised. I really like this; it's the sort of thing I look for in my own work. You've got the contrast between the harsh landscape in the foreground, with that one stubborn tree, and the more inviting farmland in the rear. Great. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks! Walking the other direction one hour before, this place was dull and uninteresting. But weather changes quite suddenly in the Yorkshire Dales :-) and the scene presenting itself to me like this on our way back, I only had to wait a few minutes for best lighting. Cloud shadows were moving really fast. Pity I just had the zoom lens with me, no primes, let alone tripod. I surely wasn’t expecting anything like this when we started. --Kreuz schnabel 22:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jiel (talk) 21:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RobvanderWaal (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support Nice composition and light. For my personal taste the farer parts (especially the grass in the background) look too much softened to me. Probably your (selective?) NR on the sky has too much effect on the other parts of the image. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks for your review. The softness is due to the fact that the (very good but not excellent) zoom lens was the only one I had with me for this walk. The focus is on the tree, and since the lighting was changing rapidly, there was no time to check overall sharpness as carefully as I had liked to. --Kreuz schnabel 12:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 13:24, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 07:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J e e 08:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural