Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4 cilindros y museo BMW, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 02.JPG

File:4 cilindros y museo BMW, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 02.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2012 at 09:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info BMW Tower, commonly known as "the 4 cylinders" is the headquarters of the BMW Group, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very simple composition in my opinion, and oversharpened (not that big an issue, but easy fix). - Benh (talk) 09:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It's FP to me but it has too much CA. As per above, it is oversharpened. Please correct. --Murdockcrc (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for your reviews. Ok, you have convinced me. I have reduced sharpness by 1/3 and looked for a better CA rework (which I couldn't see at 100%) Poco a poco (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To me the jaggy lines are still there. And it still looks overall over sharpened. Not too big an issue, because hardly noticeable if viewed at as a whole, but a bit of a disappointment because it's easy fix. I don't think there are CA, but mostly artifact of the over sharpening (and since you now use LR4, you probably use the auto CA correction feature). - Benh (talk) 22:39, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you still tell me that you see jaggy lines, then I would think about looking for a new hobby Poco a poco (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please check buildings in the background, upper right part before considering so ;) - Benh (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SupportI think that this picture deserves more than only this interesting debate... It is a FP for me. No noticeable issues in my opinion, great point of view, very good light (yes !), high encyclopedical value. I don't know what kind of less "simple composition" could be expected in this case.--Jebulon (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ A good view to describe the entire subject and probably a good candidate to replace the existing VI; but I prefer this view for FP. Just my taste. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Again I'm changing my mind per Kadellar. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support I usually agree with Jee but not this time. I quite like this as I find the perspective dramatic. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; and the inclusion of the second structure with the 'BMW' logo is very wise. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Deserving to be featured , I guess. --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This view is quite impressive, aerial views are not so common. --Kadellar (talk) 19:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:43, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure I like the early afternoon lighting; looks a bit washed out to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture