Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpen Gelbling, Colias phicomone, Arnica montana 1.JPG
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2010 at 10:01:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Böhringer (talk) 10:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Question A really nice picture at an exciting moment! But why it is so dark? The corp could be a bit wider that the flower isn't cut off! The spider is a crab spider but I don't know which... Besten Gruß mathias K 11:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Info The spider is a Xysticus kochi l.g. --Böhringer (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Quite dark (as I remember, the butterfly's colour is heller). 1/500s, f/11 at noon in the alps in the end of july ? You must've been deep in a forest ! Anyway : bravo ! Trace (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Request please correct your histogram. It is simply to dark. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- weiss nicht wie man das macht --Böhringer (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- I have brightened it. Re-do or revert if not what is wanted - MPF (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- weiss nicht wie man das macht --Böhringer (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Documented wild origin. Agree it would be a bit better brightened slightly, that'll be easy to do. - MPF (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too dark, and part of the flower is cropped out. Jafeluv (talk) 16:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thank you, Böhringer and MPF, the file is now ok. This is wonderful. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support after the improvment by User:MPF. bg mathias K 10:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- now Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support ianaré (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Too soft, especially the crab spider which is out of focus. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. Also I find the denoising too visible in the background (unless I'm mistaken). --Eusebius (talk) 16:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Way too soft. Having more than one subject does not add value in this case. The butterfly is poorly angled. -- Ram-Man 12:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods