Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea cinerea 2013-09-16.jpg

File:Ardea cinerea 2013-09-16.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2013 at 13:43:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 13:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great --LC-de (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice picture but denoising has been excessive. ISO isn't that high, I'm sure we can pass without noise reduction. Could you rework that please? --Kadellar (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The noise level is not so high but I uploaded the without noise reduction version, this version is not noise reduced at all. You can see the noise level. (This version is not exactly the same as current version's process, cause I don't remember the process which I did...) And I think current version is better :) --Laitche (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay I got what you want, I reworked to the without noise reduction version and new version uploaded. --Laitche (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Or you need this (Processing from RAW by Photoshop CC - Pre work version.) --Laitche (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, that's what I "need" It is far more detailed!!!! --Kadellar (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Far detailed than File:Ardea cinerea - Pak Thale.jpg. J Kadavoor J e e 08:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Ivar (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 14:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 20:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose And support alternative, its level of detail (see the feathers!!) is much higher. --Kadellar (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, after so many versions I can Support both. But see the difference between this one and the original, I knew there had to be more detail ;) Thank you and the others too for reworking. --Kadellar (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for alternative. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I uploaded new version.(Processing from RAW by Lightroom.) --Laitche (talk) 18:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support alternative. Much finer detail. Just take a look at the feathers. --Kadellar (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe you can darken the darkest parts (water) like in the other version. --Kadellar (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO the first is much better --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Feathers have no texture in the first picture. --Kadellar (talk) 11:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I like the "legs" in the first version. Feathers; I think that is noise, not textures. J Kadavoor J e e 15:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I uploaded another alternative version, please revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 14:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support For Ivar's version --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I worked for the Ivar's version and uploaded new version. (If you need to revert, please do so.) --Laitche (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reverted to Ivar's version. --Laitche (talk) 20:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks Ivar. --Laitche (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info This version is a bit noisy so I re-processed from RAW by Lightroom and then uploaded new version to the first version. --Laitche (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In this version the overexposed areas are more noticeable Poc o² 21:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 18:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

The chosen alternative is: File:Ardea cinerea 2013-09-16.jpg