This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Christian_Ferrer.

This is the user talk page of Christian Ferrer, where you can send messages and comments to Christian Ferrer.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.
 



Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Aresquiers - 05-2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wreck - Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File deletions edit

Hello Christian, can you close the following deletion requests?

Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, have a nice week! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for File deletion edit

Hello, This is Md.Farhan Mahmud. I'm a Wikimedia Commons user! At the beginning, I uploaded some copyrighted images or I uploaded another user's uploaded image which is out of line! I think it would be better if you delete them now!! I am really sorry for my this work. Below is their list:

Sincerely,
Farhan  «Talk» 02:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Potencial license violation edit

Hello, could you please check this user's contribution? He's masse uploading photos referring to https://www.mediathek.admin.ch/ (without direct link to each photo). License on this site not allowed a commercial use: https://www.mediathek.admin.ch/about/conditions Sumek101 (talk) 14:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deleted content edit

Hello, why did you delered this image [1] (File:Militärfahrzeuge am Simplonpass, Schweiz.jpg?

  • And this one File:Piranha IIIC - ABC Aufkl Fz - exploration ABC.jpg?

2A02:21B4:3A68:7D00:390D:F03:2FB:293 08:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:NVIDIA logo.svg edit

Hi Christian Ferrer. Can you tell whether File:NVIDIA logo.svg is the same as any of the files you deleted in August 2016 per Commons:Deletion requests/Nvidia logos or is the same as File:Nvidia image logo.svg that Magog the Ogre deleted in March 2021? -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Janvier ou septembre ? edit

Bonjour Christian. Les 7 fichiers trouvés par [2] sont datés de janvier mais les catégories pointent aussi à septembre. Pourriez-vous regarder cela et corriger la date ou catégories ? Cordialement. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Et quelques autres fichiers avec un problème similaire : [3]. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plage des 3 digues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sète depuis les 3 digues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

https://www.flickr.com/people/landrovermena/ edit

Hi. I'd like to appeal the decision to add this Flickr account to the COM:QFI list. It seems to have been the official account for Land Rover (the car company) for Middle East and North Africa. It started in 2010, and was active through 2018, and during that time uploaded something like 11,000 Creative Commons Attribution licensed images of official Land Rover Middle East and North Africa events, many with attending celebrities. So I think it's both legitimate, and valuable. Commons_talk:Questionable_Flickr_images/Archive_5#Land_Rover_MENA indicates it was added to QFI by admin User:INeverCry by your request, and he's banned now, but you seem to be an admin; would you be able to reverse the decision, please? --GRuban (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • @GRuban: Hi, that was not my request, it was a request made by @Elisfkc: , apparently I only archived the request on the talk page. Some content on the Flickr account is potentialy problematic, I'm not confident that images such as e.g. [4] or [5] have really free licenses given by Land Rover. Therefore from my point of view if a part of the stream is questionable so then this make the rest a bit questionable too. Indeed how to sort out what is credibly a work owned by the (local) Land Rover vs what is owned by Land Rover. But some other users (or administrators) may have different opinions and this question maybe deserve to be addressed with a larger audience, such as in the Village Pump/Copyright, or in the admin. noticeboard. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Yes, right, thank you, not sure why I thought you were the requester. Will do that. --GRuban (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Droits de succession edit

Bonjour, Pour cette image (Barcelona) The Lady in the Lace Shawl by Adolf Münzer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya.jpg ‎ j'ai compté 80ans à partir de la mort de auteur. Y-a-t il une nouvelle règle? Ce serait trop beau... Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

En France, c'est aussi 70 ans. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
  *ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, Christian_Ferrer *ೃ༄

Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness!
Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя!
Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur!
¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad!
Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück!
Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade!
メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます!
메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요!
मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो!
圣诞快乐,新年快乐,愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福!
عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة!
С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь!
God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka!
Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk!

Wilfredor

Wilfredor (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays and best wishes! edit

 
Happy holidays!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2024!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Happy holidays! edit

 
 
  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)    Reply

Joyeux Noël! edit

  Happy Holidays, Christian

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 10:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unsplash edit

Hi, I'm trying to understand the rule being applied with Commons:Deletion requests/File:A sunset picture in the grasslands.webp. The discussion around Unsplash's license change comes down pretty clearly on the principle that images uploaded/published on Unsplash prior to May 29, 2017, were clearly published as CC0, which is non-revokable. The licensing change was announced on June 15, 2017, put apparently rolled sometime between June 6 and June 8, 2017, so {{Unsplash}} was edited to with June 5, 2017, as the last "okay" date. The deleted image was uploaded/published to Unsplash on May 23, which would mean the CC0 image was applied. All the discussions I can find about this hold to the if published on Unsplash prior to June 5, 2017, the CC0 applies:

Has there been some additional community consideration of the proper cutoff for images from Unsplash? —Tcr25 (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi, I tried to be clear with the rationale: when it have been uploaded here (in 2021) that was from a non free source, and I paraphrased @Clindberg: in the undeletion requests page, for what I think a quite similar case. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
    • On the other hand, in the case of Unsplash (and Pixabay), it wasn't the author making the license change, it was the site changing terms -- the author was fine giving the CC0 license (which could be a different situation then even CC-BY, as they are pretty much disclaiming all copyright). On a changed Flickr license, it was the author themselves deciding to no longer distribute their image from that source given that license (which is their right per the normal CC licenses, though not really CC0). I could see making that distinction, particularly for CC0. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
      • @Clindberg: just to be clear, if I understand well you would support an undeletion (for info is was this image: [6]). If you say yes well I'm willing to follow you and to undelete it, at least the jpg version. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
        • Yes, I would support undeletion. The regular CC licenses have the statement: For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License. The CC0 license/legal code does not. I think changing the Flickr license away from CC-BY or CC-BY-SA is basically doing that (stopping distribution), and I'm not sure anyone who copies it later can be considered a Licensee. CC0 is different, and I think it's also very different when a non-author makes a site decision like that, so I would use the upload date to Unsplash/Pixabay (and not Wikimedia sites) for the validity of those. Changing away from CC0 on Flickr is a harder question. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Sorry for late. I admit that this was indeed my misconception after carefully reading the legal text of CC0 1.0 Universal. CC0 is, more precisely, a declaration rather than a license. Unlike the CC license, the waiver of CC0 will not be cancelled or terminated under section 2. Waiver, which is completely different from the corresponding text of the CC license (e.g. CC BY-SA 4.0 Section 6.c.
    Of course, Contributers2020 may be more interested in the topic of file formats, but I insist that this manual webp conversion is superfluous. In practice, this webp conversion is usually implemented by a back-end server, for example, webp file and origial jpg file. MediaWiki may offer this feature in the future. However, if @Contributers2020: feels it necessary to continue the discussion, the topic can be initiated at COM:VPT. --0x0a (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the above DR asks me to contact you before placing the new DR, so I am doing that now. Best regards, --Enyavar (talk) 10:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

wrong image edit

Hi Christian, The image of " Brotia costula" is wrong. It shows a syntype of Melania costata, which is not identical with Melania costula and even belongs to a different family, the Thiaridae. Please take it down. Melania costata Quoy & Gaimard shown here is a species of the genus Stenomelania. However, the name is invalid as it us preoccupied by Melania costata Olivier, 1894