User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive54

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Chem Sim 2001 in topic Deletion requests


March - April 2022

File deletions

Another stolen [1] picture from the same site [2] again 174.196.194.92 03:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Most likely [3] stolen [4] [5] [6] 174.196.204.193 15:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Probably [7] stolen [8] 174.196.198.234 21:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I have found some files to get deleted:

Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Nice, thanks for your help! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, here I have some more files to get deleted:

Thanks, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey Christian, could you delete this file? I have replaced it with a newer version to fix some SVG issues, but I have uploaded it under a different file name. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello Christian, here I have a list of files to get deleted:

Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, here are some files to get deleted.

Thanks for your help! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, could you please take a look at these deletion requests and delete the files?

Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Great, thanks for your help! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

A question

Hi, Christian. Thanks for closing the discussion. According to this discussion, I can upload Category:Kamil Özdemir Tolon|Kamil Tolon's portrait as a free file instead of fair use? Am I right? Thanks in advance. --Kadı (talk) 07:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

  • Copyright on old photos is sometimes a difficult subject. At first view if the other images meet the same criterion then that should be OK. But honestly if I asked and followed the opinion of Carl this is because I'm not sure of anything here. So, yes a priori, but I'm not categorical. Sorry for not being able to help more. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
    Merci pour votre réponse. :) Kadı (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

 
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File: Pont de Caylus.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #510

Wikidata weekly summary #511

Copyright status: File:Sarax tiomanensis (10.5852-ejt.2021.772.1505) Figure 126.png

Copyright status: File:Sarax tiomanensis (10.5852-ejt.2021.772.1505) Figure 126.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sarax tiomanensis (10.5852-ejt.2021.772.1505) Figure 126.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Struktur P4 Gas.svg

Hi Christian, the DR concerns three files (see proposal by DMacks to which I agree). What do you think? --Leyo 09:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #512

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Méditerranée depuis le Lazaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #513

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontignan Plage - March 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dikes in Frontignan BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dikes in Frontignan Plage - March 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Voting on my nominations at FPC

I propose to highlight your voting pattern, but wish to give you a chance to explain yourself first. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

  • My understanding of the english langage don't allow me to understand literally what you wrote above but I think I understand the overall meaning. You are not happy because I oppose some of your nominations at FPC, and you would want to get on me some pressure in the purpose that I don't, do you? That is failed. One thing is true, I am not retaining (and not going to retain) myself to votes "oppose" on your nominations, each time I oppose a reason is given though apprently you don't really care about those reasons. Your abbility to yourself not retaining yours "oppose" votes made me think that you were someone able to accept criticism yourself, apparently I was wrong. And this fact highlight more things about you than about me. If you want to highlight this thing even more that will be your choice, as you want. If you don't want opposition(s) on your nominations, I suggest you to restrict you to post your images where votes of other humans aren't required. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #514

What to do with such a recidivist?

It's the third time we need to flag a copyright violation on Pascal.mussard's discussion page, about a french singer that seems to be part of his family (same name : Mussard). What's next?

El Comandante (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Well, he's still active on the French Wikipedia, so he can come back here to upload another picture of his son... El Comandante (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

OpenRefine and SDC updates: user survey and monthly office hours

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about the Structured Data on Commons (SDC) features that are currently developed for OpenRefine.

Short survey for SDC features in OpenRefine

 

OpenRefine is running a short survey to learn about user needs and expectations for its new SDC features. If you upload files to Wikimedia Commons and/or edit structured data there, please help by filling in this survey!

Monthly OpenRefine and Wikimedia office hours

OpenRefine's community meetup of February 22 was very well attended. You can see its recording, slides and notes here. The team now hosts monthly, informal office hours for Wikimedians (online, via Zoom). Upcoming office hours are:

The Zoom link of the next office hour will be posted on OpenRefine's info page on Wikimedia Commons. Please drop by and say hi!

All the best! SFauconnier (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #515

Wikidata weekly summary #516

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
IMO like this not a QI. Please improve white balance, too much blue now --Michielverbeek 06:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
  Done thanks you, I uploaded a warmer version, is it enough? Christian Ferrer 10:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
For me warm enough for QI --Michielverbeek 20:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

FP?

Hello Christian,

IMHO this photo which you recently have nominated as a QI would be an interesting FP canidate, too. I guess some people may oppose because of “noise”; I would not (IMHO a little bit of noise is much better than a big stew of mush caused by excessive noise reduction ;–). And other people may oppose due to the “ghosts” (blurry people), so I do not know if the photo will pass. But nevertheless you should try it: the light is so beautiful …

Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Christian, yes, these photos are really beautiful, too. You have made a whole lot of excellent photos during that event. I am looking forward for the FP candidates ;–). All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 F.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Beautiful image. --N. Johannes 18:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 D.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice light but I'd reduce the noise a bit --Poco a poco 19:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  Done thanks you. --Christian Ferrer 21:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
  Support An improvement, thank you --Poco a poco 10:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escale à Sète 2022 G.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hey Christian, could you please take a look at the following deletion requests:

Thanks in advance, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Have a nice weekend! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive54".