Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


September - October 2017


HOST Logo png

That is my creation. From 2007. No copyright violation on using that file. Az-ya (talk) 22:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Canal of Sète at dusk cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canal of Sète at dusk cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolt Ilex (ship, 2010).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Sara Serraiocco 1.jpg

Gentile Christian Ferrer, la foto che avevo inserito sul Profilo wikipedia di Sara Serraiocco mi è stata inviata via mail direttamente da Lei, che è una mia amica. Mi ha chiesto se potevo aggiungerla al suo profilo Wikipedia perché lei non sapeva farlo. Penso avesse i diritti della foto, comunque provo ad inserire altre due foto che mi ha inviato lei libere da diritti.

Grazie

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertobigherati (talk • contribs) 16:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Hello Roberto, sadly I don't speak italian. Please read Commons:Licenze. I just deleted your two last upload, because the images can be found in the web. If you had a permission by someone then this person must send the permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Be aware that persist in uploading copyright violations may lead to a block of your account.
Traduzione di google:
Ciao Roberto, purtroppo non parlo italiano. Si prega di leggere Commons:Licenze. Ho appena cancellato i tuoi due ultimi caricamenti, perché le immagini possono essere trovate nel web. Se hai avuto un permesso da qualcuno, allora questa persona deve inviare l'autorizzazione a OTRS, dove puoi leggere come farlo. Tenere presente che persistere nel caricamento di violazioni del copyright potrebbe condurre ad un blocco del tuo account. Saluti,


Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Question...

...about the following statement:We ask that you respect the above guidelines so that we may continue to offer the web site as a free resource to the world which is located in Terms for "Free Clip Art". Based on the information provided, you can download the clip art free, OR link to the site which involves some restrictions. Remember when I asked you to double check this download for me? You said it wasn't free and deleted it, but I didn't bother to follow-up at the time. I'm wondering how I missed the non-free terms for free clip art in a public access section with free downloads or the option to link to the site. Would you be so kind as to provide the link to the terms you read that say the freely accessible downloads are not free? I don't want to make the same mistake twice. What confuses me a little are some of the online sites like Pixabay that I've joined, and they're community operated like the clip art site. Some operate like Flickr (CC licenses), others offer free public domain images with public access sections on their website like clip art. Each have different terms and I'm just trying to keep it all straight in my head. Atsme 📞 03:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

  • The issue in this web site was more the lack of explicit free license. Our licensing policy require that the medias accepted on Wikimedia Commons
are explicitly freely licensed, or
are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.

The images in this web site are indeed "not free" the way we hear it here because they are not explicitly free. And in my understanding this is also a general rule in the world of copyright, an image without license is assumed all right reserved by default. This is highlighted with your exemple Pixabay, the difference is they clearly give a license Creative Commons CC0 and so we know what to expect. Just "free" alone in a text mean nothing, if I come in a shop, I'm free to take what I want.... but likely I will have to pay, therefore "free" is always relative to other conditions that must be explicit.

So yes the upload was a copyright violation, because they never agreed with the publication of one of their images under the license cc-by-sa-4.0 as you did when you have uploaded the image here. Only the copyright holder can give agreement for such a license, example he can give such agreement by saying in the term of use "the content of this web site is published under cc-by-sa-4.0" or just below the image "this image is published under cc-by-sa-4.0" or he can send a permission to OTRS if for one reason or another he does not want to alter the license of the web site.

Read the full page at Commons:Licensing in order to understand what explicit conditions are imperatively required. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Claudio Cominardi - Photo Deleted

Hi Christian,

I noticed you've deleted the photo of Claudio Cominardi which was recently uploaded my me and linked to Claudio Cominardi's page. I can assure there's no copyright violation: I'm the real owner of the photo. Claudio asked me to upload the new one and replace the previous one. The photo you deleted is still present in the web because he used it for his personal page the website of the Italian Deputy Chamber. :-/ So, I'd like to resume your deletion...

Thanks a lot and best regards.

Aye

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aye (talk • contribs) 21:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi Aye, see com:Licensing, Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed. In case the image can be found in the web, we require a link to a legitimate publication "explicitly freely licensed", or we require that the copyright holder send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

‪File:HWH U logo trans noshadow.gif

Dear Christian Ferrer:

"File:HWH U logo trans noshadow.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images..."

    I am the staff of Hwh-Shia University of Technology. I am confused by the above message you left. I have no idea about this "HWH U logo noshadow.gif". Please send me this file and allow me to make sure this gif file has the copyright problem. Thanks for your help.

Lijen Kao —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.222.207.252 (talk) 01:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only, if 1/ they are in Public Domain for a specific reason, 2/ they are freely licensed by their owner or 3/ they are below the Commons:Threshold of originality. If your have the necessary rights to license an image of the logo, then you must send a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chemical Challenger (ship, 2015) Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chemical Challenger (ship, 2015) Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

deletion Linux-android--cyanogenmod--logo.svg

can the file be undeleted to rename? ... for some time I was not logged in and did not read the message

— Preceding unsigned comment added by KSEltar (talk • contribs) 19:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  • No it can't be undeleted, it is a copyright violation, while CyanogenMod may be an open-source operating system, their logo was (is) not free, [1]. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker

Hello, may I ask, what is CommonsDelinker and how does it works? Thank you. 118.101.200.117 04:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Hello, I think CommonsDelinker is a tool removing automatically the wikitext inside different Wikimedia projects, that match with the name of an image that have been deleted here on Wikimedia Commons. And the tool changes also the wikitext name of files, inside different Wikimedia projects, that have been renamed here In Wikimedia Commons to match the wikitext with the new name. I do not know much more. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

photos

Hello Christian,

On the page Ursula Hayden i am allowed to use those photos. Ursula's modeling photos are public. Please put them back on. Thank you.
  • Hello, no, the images are protected by copyright, read com:Licensing in order to understand the kind of content to upload here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Question on copyrights

How is a promo photo on a red carpet not considered public domain?

  • A photo, whether taken on a red carpet or not, is a work of art and is protected by copyright law, usually the copyright holder is the photographer. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:CAPTAIN BADR (ship, 1978). Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CAPTAIN BADR (ship, 1978). Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

the peninsula studios - india

Ma'am Thank you for Your email. We are unable to understand how we can be wikipedia compline since this page is for information only.And there are many similar pages.Our company logos copyright belongs to us. We can't understand how to reach your requirment since i have gone through OTRS pls help us. Thank you The Peninsula Studios

  • Not "Ma'am" but "Mr" please. If you want to send a permission to com:OTRS, then read the instructions there. If it is done then wait, if the permission is valid and if the logo in scope then the logo will be automatically restored by the OTRS team. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Hello Christian, my username is petre_lee, the photos I tried to use are the cover page of a free electronic magazine accessible to all for free. And I'm the founder of the magazine and thus I own the copyright. In this case, how can I get your permission to upload the picture?

Petre lee (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

  • @Petre lee: Hello, if you own the copyright then you must send a written permission to OTRS where you can read how to do so. If the permission is valid the image(s) will be automatically restored. Note that due to the workload the permission will be in a queue and this may take some time. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Bracco logo for IWT 2015

Is it possible to change back your edit? Because this logo (dog with dummy) was one of the official versions for cs:International Working Test 2015. This user is owner of this logo and main sponzor of this action.Strojmír (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

  • I don't know what logo you are talking about, and I don't know what edit you are talking about. But I assume the logo was above the threshold of originality, and I assume that I likely deleted it. Now the only way to restore it is the copyright holder send a permission to OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Photo upload incomplete

Dear Christian,

I tried to contribute to Sam McCready's page by uploading a photo I took personally. But the uploading is partial:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sam_McCready.jpg

Only part of the picture is displayed properly. What should I do? I can't reupload it or delete it. Please kindly advise.

Regards,

Petre lee (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Files uploaded by Fæ

Hi. Would it be appropriate to remove the speedy templates and membership in Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion per this edit? Also, your close script seems to have an url encoding problem in its handling of the æ ligature.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks you, it's done I have now removed the files from the category. I already removed the speedy templates yesterday when I restored the files. Yes indeed you're right for the url, at least the link lead to a page that contains the UDR, I will be more careful next time, thanks. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Vue aérienne du mont Saint-Michel.jpg

Hi. I don't understand your suppression of this file. It comes from https://www.flickr.com/photos/centralasian/6888112061/in/photolist-hz5Rob-hwcGVF-pyG9Zp-pyFeos-rrX5qM-QeBSoh-buFnJM and the author KENZO TRIBOUILLARD releases this photo under licence CC BY 2.0. --Salsero35 (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Two at the waterfront.jpg

Hi Christian,

I've checked with Tineye and Google Images and found nothing. May you please send me the link, where you've allegedly found my picture?--Bravo Charlie Delta (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

  • No I can't, I had one catch with google and I though to have written the address in the edit summary when I deleted it. But sadly the address was too long and it have been cut : [2] and the link don't work now. Sorry, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
And I don't understand, you said "I've checked with Tineye and Google Images", is it your own work? is it the first publication? in the extend it was upload since only a few hours, why do you checked if it was on the web? Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion requests: Глинистый сланец

hi to Mr. Christian Ferrer I write to you because I saw his internent concerns the issue of a list of files exclusively for PD license, be if interested in sending the full list of files uploaded by this user, because he must know that many deleted files were in the right license, and were on various pages of wikipedia by voice and argument, could conclude something if administrator Hedwig in Washington had been so impudent, filing the requests immediately, without even discussing them and without even analyzing files, calling them 2 idiotic requests, i would like to ask if you kindly would have the time and the desire to see these files of this user, the file is solely of portraits and antique paintings, license topic PD (70-100 etc .):

--87.5.4.75 18:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi, no, sadly, we have a huge backlog of administrative work and also I lack time to do everything I want to do. I'm not going to check or question the actions of my colleagues who do their job well in most of the time. Sorry i will probably not take care of this. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Undeletion Requests

Hello. Recently, I created a page in Wikipedia for the sports association in my college (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Atl%C3%A9tica_Acad%C3%AAmica_do_Instituto_de_Economia). Here im Brazil, this associations are run by students themselves, therefore, we create and own the images and logos from the club. I would like to know why they were deleted, since they belong to me and my peers, and I cannot violate my own copyright. Furthermore, I also uploaded some photos, shot by me, that were also deleted. I would like to know why. I have already made this questions, but they were not answered, and the images were simply deleted. The files are:

File:Super 15.png
File:DU 2015.png
File:Logo Jogos Financeiros.png
File:AAAIE campea.jpg
File:AAAIE campea 2.jpg
File:Logo1 AAAIE UFRJ.png
File:Escudo AAAIE UFRJ.png
File:Brota.png
File:Logo AAAIE UFRJ.png
File:Nove e meio.png
File:JFin 2017.png
File:Logo IE UFRJ.png
File:Morcego UFRJ.png
File:Jfin.png
File:Logo atlética.png
File:MORCEGO.jpg
File:Super15.png
File:Branco e Amarelo.png

Thanks in advance, Bernardo Piquet.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bepiquet (talk • contribs)
  • Hello, you had sent me a mail regarding the logos, and I already answered in your talk page.

Logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only, if 1/ they are in Public Domain for a specific reason, 2/ they are freely licensed by their owner or 3/ they are below the Commons:Threshold of originality. Or the copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Even if it is you the copyright holder.

If permissions are received the images will be automatically restored, though this may take some time in reason to a queued, but do not reupload those logos by yourself.

And it is also valid for all the other works (photos, graphes...) that have already been published elsewhere : we must have evidences that the works have been freely licensed by their owner, or the copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS.

There are plenty of uploaders who claim to be the authors but who are clearly not. All this is done to protect the right of the copyright holders, whatever they are. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

We are the owners of the image, opera and all the copyright of Mr. Luigi Centra with no limitations.

On behalf of your kind message, Mr. Christian Ferrer I have to say that Kitovi Entertainment SL, and the Ferraro's Family , we are the legitimate owners of the Image of Mr. Luigi Centra, all of his PAinting & Audiovisual Opera, with no limitations and worldwide, vid please www.kitovikampuni.com or www.kitovientertainment.com, or www.luigicentra.it, thank you very much please do not delete our own material.

Sincerely yours A. David Ferraro International/Lawyer/Coach/Producer/Manager

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitovi Entertainment (talk • contribs)
  • The copyrights of articles published in newspapers are owned by the newspapers, photos of those articles are derivative works, and in the extend that the articles are not yet in public domain, the newspaper have to agree with a re-pulication here by sending a permission to OTRS. It is the same thing for the photos showing paintings not yet in public domain, the authors (painters) have to send a permission to OTRS.

See also com:Licensing.

Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Images

Hello, why do you consider that the images MatildaTemaikenAngryBirds, TerenceAngryBirdsTemaiken and RedTemaiken should be erased? are images of something public. Regards, --TerenceBird5584 (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Okay, but what do you tell me about File:Ondale2.JPG is also a derivative work but does not eliminate it

  • Thank you for the notification, I nominated for deletion too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Can you delete this?

I created a category with the wrong naming structure Category:Letter boxes in Gers (department), so can you please delete it for me. I moved it to the correct name Category:Letter boxes in Gers. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Hallo?

Die beiden Logos von Alfa Romeo und Peugeot benutze ich nur für mongolischen Wikipedia. Ich habe auch die Lizenzen eingetragen, können Sie mir bitte Bescheid geben, warum wir in der mongolischen Wikipedia diese Logos nicht verwenden dürfen. MfG. Munkhzaya.E (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi Logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only, if 1/ they are in Public Domain for a specific reason or 2/ they are freely licensed by their owner or 3/ they are below the Commons:Threshold of originality or 4/ the copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so.

However such logos are allowed on the Wikipedia projects that allows fair use, example https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Alfa_Romeo.svg or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alfa_Romeo_logo.png (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline). I don't know if Mongolian Wikipedia allow the fair use, but anyway it's not me who is in charge of the Mongolian Wikipedia rules. You uploaded copyrighted logos on Wikimedia Commons and I deleted those logos. You may read com:Licensing too. Regards, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Are you making honest edits?

You flagged and deleted an image that I included on a page that belongs to a relative of mine. The same image is still being used but somehow the information is again false and it includes very strange information that can't be cited, for instance "she comes from a westernized tigrinya family". What exactly does that mean? We moved to a different country that was north of our country.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitbullhanee (talk • contribs) 16:00, 12 October 2017‎ (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

To answer your question, yes, to the best of my ability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Winter-Regnitz-Baum-PC310023-PSD.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter-Regnitz-Baum-PC310023-PSD.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of my documents

Hi, You recently deleted an image and two documents from a page I created 'Hjelset Motorfabrikk'. The items in question are in my ownership, and I own the copyright as these have been inherited by me. The documents relate to a closed down family owned company which my great grandfather started.

Can you reverse their deletion, so that I can share this interesting local history with other Wikipedia users and people interested in Norwegian maritime history?

Best regards, Marius

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Norseflyer (talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 October 2017‎ (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Hi,

The files were nominated for deletion there. No I can't reverse their deletion.

The only way to upload content that have been already published is that:

  1. it is now in public domain (help) for a specific reason, or
  2. the first publication was freely licensed by the copyright holder, please include a web link, or
  3. the copyright holder sends a pemission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Even if it you the copyright holder.

Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Regarding the copyright violations

Hello Christian, my username is Dreamer2017 and I got a notice from you saying that the photos I uploaded are deleted for the reason of copyright violations. Those pictures that I used are all open for public. You can download them all for free from the institute's website. And the institute allows to use the photos for free and distributes them for public. In this case, is it still under the copyright violations? If so, how can I get your permission to use the picture? Can you advise me how to solve this issue? Thank you in advance.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamer2017 (talk • contribs)
  • Hello, Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed, the fact that a media is available on the web is not the same thing than to be "explicitly freely licensed". If your images have explicit free licenses given in the institute's website, then instead of writing {{Own}} in the source field of your file, you must give a web link that show this license. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Christian,

I'm writing about your recent changes to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:QutIM-128px.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:QutIM.svg .

qutIM is an open source project, so you can obtain all license information directly from github repo (I added link to the "permission" section of images).

COPYING: https://github.com/euroelessar/qutim/blob/master/COPYING

Icons license in qutIM repository: https://github.com/euroelessar/qutim/blob/master/CCBYSA

Artwork: https://github.com/qutIM/artwork/tree/3e6a0877e43e97fd38e6aa50a6dcc2e88ee2b050


And again, qutIM is an open source project and license files were one-click-away in public repository entire time.

Regards,

Nico-izo (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Hello, ok fine, thanks you for the link, I removed the tags and I reviewed the files, it's ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Orthotomicus laricis (32330826995).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthotomicus laricis (32330826995).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Good morning, Christian.

I just uploaded a picture of logo because I can't find another one online and you deleted it because of copyright violation.

I have no idea how to do. So do you have any suggestions?

Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aauaq (talk • contribs)

Hello,

First, to be eligible for hosting on Wikimedia Commons, all files and other content, included logos, must fall within the Commons scope.

Secondly, logos and trademarks are accepted in Wikimedia Commons only if

  1. they are in public domain (help) for a specific reason; or
  2. they are freely licensed by their owner, in such case please include a web link; or
  3. they are below the threshold of originality; or
  4. the copyright holder sends directly a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do it. Note that even if it is you who are the copyright holder, you must send this permission.

Note also that the permissions system (OTRS) is run by volunteers and there is a queue, if your image has been deleted, and you have sent a permission (before or after deletion), do not re-upload again the erased image yourself, it's forbidden. If the permission is valid and the image meets the criteria of our project scope, then it will be automatically restored.

If the logo does not fit in the categories above, you may upload the file directly into Wikipedia under the "fair use rationale". But I'm not a specialist, you'll have to ask there. You can read en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline.

Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Burbon Russian page

Hi Christian! You have been deleted upload images but all images are the property of Wild Turkey bourbon brand, published on their own resources, site http://wildturkeybourbon.com and on Instagram channel and were used with their permission. Hope it helps to resolve this issue.

Kind regards, Olga

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Soniku.space (talk • contribs)
  • Hello, sorry but the term of use of this web site is very clear : "You may not copy, reproduce, post on any other website...".

If they agree to publish their content here under compatible licenses, then they must send permission mail to OTRS, where you can read how to do so.

Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Suppression images

Bonjour, sute à votre message d'hier, j'ai demandé aux auteurs dont j'avais utilisé les images d'envoyer un mail à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. J'avais préalablement obtenu leur accord (par mail), et les images sont souvent accessibles sur leurs sites respectifs (ou page facebook). Les demandes sont en cours.

Merci de me prévenir si il y a un problème.

cordialement,

SC

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvain cherrier (talk • contribs) 09:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Si des permissions sont reçues alors les images seront gardées, sinon les images seront probablement éffacées. Si les images sont éffacées avant que les permissions ne soient reçues, alors les images seront automatiquement restaurées à la réception des permissions. Notez que le service des permissions est géré par des volontaires, et qu'il peut y avoir une file d'attente et donc un certain délai avant qu'ne permission ne soit traitée.

Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Mkdbasket2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

User has recently uploaded more copyright violations despite a previous 2 week block from you. Can you please reblock this user to stop the continuous disruption. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done I blocked him one month. Thanks for the notification, his talk page is in my watchlist and I would have been notified of the copyright violations anyway. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded

User has re-uploaded the file under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:CCGs.jpg. The Haz talk 01:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks you for the notification, I deleted again the file and I warned the user. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Could you guys explain the rationale behind the deletion? The first one was deleted without reviewing the original comments or showing justification toward those comments. Second time I uploaded it because it wasn't properly reviewed. All images and logos are partially obscured, so why does this not work? It is a conglomerate image of my own making and as far as I can tell doesn't break any of the rules. Leitmotiv (talk) 04:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I deleted it because I think it is still a derivative work and the part of artworks depicted are not De Minimis. The fact that there is likely several other derivative works on Wikimedia Commons is not a rationale to keep an image when we are dealing with potential copyright violations. If you think the deletion was not justified you should go to Commons:Undeletion requests. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Hmmm... De Minimis - nothing in whole or part in this image is of enough substance to likely be challenged in a court of law, nor is enough information possible to replicate any of this partial imagery to reconstruct full imagery. So De Minimis seems like hyperbole. Also, I'm new to this obviously, but how is it band albums are allowed to be used in full and are not De Minimis, but a sliver of an image is not? I'm not trying to justify by comparison, I'm literally confused as to why one is acceptable but the other is not. Leitmotiv (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
If I talked about "De minimis", it's because one may think the visible areas of the copyrighted artworks may be considered De minimis, and that maybe the image could be kept for this rationale. Regarding album covers, usually there are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Uma medalha para si!

  A medalha de diligência
Puisque le Français est votre langue maternelle je m'adresse à vous en ce langage pour vous attribuer cette médaille comme reconnaissance de votre travail. En éffet vous avez verifié avec google l'originalité de 18 images dont je suis l'auteur mais dont un administrateur soupçonnait qu'elles étaient une copie et qu'il y aurait la violation de copyright, ce qui est faux. Comme ça ces images n'ont pas été effacées et continuent d'illustrer divers articles WP. João Carapeto (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Merci, je suis heureux si j'ai pu vous aider et empêcher une injustice. Thank you, I am happy if I could help you and prevent an injustice. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File deleted

Olá. Vi que deletou duas imagens que carreguei recentemente. As fotos são simplesmente imagens de capa de CDs para ilustrar o artigo referente a elas. Na Wikipédia há inúmeros artigos com esse tipo de imagem. Me explique então como eu posso inserir essas imagens sem ferir direitos autorais, pois já que elas existem em vários artigos da Wikipédia, há de ter uma possibilidade de poder inseri-las. Obrigado!! Samuca kent (talk)

File:मराठीची लाज.png

Hi kindly look into File:मराठीची लाज.png as it is used in sitenotice and causing conflict of interest as well as hate speech. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive27".