Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


May - June 2017


Contents

Droits d'images

Bonjour, Mr Christian Ferrer, j'ai beau rajouter quelques images et logos sur Wikipédia avec leur SOURCES et malgré ça vous ne faites que les enlever, alors je voudrais savoir Que faire et Ne pas faire pour pouvoir rajouter des images sur Wikipédia sans avoir à me faire Réprimander !

Ce serait bien si vous voudriez bien me répondre sur ma page Wikipédia !

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LeGuyanaisPure (talk • contribs) 18:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

LeGuyanaisPure (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

  • @LeGuyanaisPure: Bonjour, le problème c'est que les sources que vous fournissez ne sont pas libre de droits, je vous invite à lire ceci.
    Vous ne pouvez télécharger ici que les oeuvres dont vous etes le propriétaire des droits d'auteur, ou les oeuvres qui ont été publiées par leur auteurs (ou ayants droit) avec des licenses compatibles, ou les oeuvres qui sont dans le domaine public pour une raison précise. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of my work.

I have permission through the MOL Liga and it's member clubs to use their logos, photos and information on Wikipedia. Could you stop randomly marking everything for deletion. Breakfastclub92 (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

  • In order to protect the rights of the copyright holders, the permissions must be sent to OTRS, and if these permissions are ok then the images will be restored. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

About some file deletion

Hi

I'm writing because I'm the administrator of webpage of Journal Ingeniería e Investigación of Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Our journal have licence creative comons 4.0 in all its content. We are trying to create a journal wikipedia page to talk about its history, but when we try to upload the cover of our publications those are deleted. We want to know if is possible upload this files without problem or if you consider that unacceptable.

Thanks

best regards

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Revii bog (talk • contribs) 03:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, where is the webpage? In cases of work already published, "the cover of your publications", and in order to protect the rights of the copyright owner(s), we requires a link to a web site that has a compatible license and that is legitimate to give this license, or that the copyright holder, even if it is you, send a permission to OTRS. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the delay but my internet connection was down. Firstly you must not recreate content previously deleted. Secondly the links, provided just above by you, lead to pages that are not freely licensed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quartier de la Pointe Courte, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Etab (ship, 1966).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Question

Hi Christian, I was wondering how I could imply in the permission section that the depicted photo in this file goes under PD-Iran. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Mbazri: But to respond to your question, you can simply add this kind of thing <br> Artwork depicted in the photo:{{PD-Iran}} just after {{Khamenei}} in the file page. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Sète cf11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Creating new page

I wanted to create a new page of a professional football player, so I did so using evidence for every single piece of information, until a moderator acted in an inappropiate way, his name is Marawa1943, I wanted to report him because it was unfair, I worked really hard with the page, I would be really pleased if your create the page for me and I continue editing it, it's called: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dani_Ojeda_Saranova

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lugicr94 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

photos supprimées

Bonjour

Je ne parle pas anglais

I don't speak english

Bonjour les photos suivantes que vous avez supprimées sont des photos personnelles prises avec mon appareil de photos

je ne vois pas ce qui vous a autorisé à les supprimer

D'autres photos sont des documents d'archives de plus de 30 ans introuvables !

Je suis découragé d'avoir voulu contribuer à enrichir Wikipédia

Cordialement

Berja

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BERJA (talk • contribs) 12:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Bonjour, vos photos ont été supprimées car elles ont déjà été publiées, exemple de ce que l'on pouvait lire en bas des photos : "Photo Ciné Son / Labo Pichonnier. Reveues "antennes" n°101.."
    Pour tous travaux ayant déjà été publié, et ce dans le but de protéger les droits des auteurs, nous requerons que cette publication ait été faites sous une license compatible, ou que l'ayant droit envoit une permission à OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Moin,
das Hochladen des DUV-Logos geschah mit Einverständnis der DUV. Siehe die Korrespondenz. Eine Rückfrage bei mir hätte Dein Problem schnell gelöst.

Die Leerzeilen sind dem ausdrücklichen Wunsch des Athleten geschuldet, der seinen Namen bei uns nicht veröffentlicht sehen möchte.

Grüße A

Am 08.05.2017 um 14:55 schrieb R :

Hallo A ,

ich hab' die Daten nachgetragen und bin noch dabei die Podestplätze zu ergänzen.

Das Logo hab' ich bei WikiCommons unter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ hochgeladen und in die entsprechenden Wiki-Artikel eingebunden:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Ultramarathon-Vereinigung https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Meisterschaften_der_DUV (noch in Bearbeitung) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traillauf#Veranstaltungen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/6-Stunden-Lauf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-Stunden-Lauf

Dann stieß ich noch auf fehlende Einträge. Für den 3. Platz liegen keine Daten vor, es geht weiter bei Platz 4 und weitere Plätze sind nicht nachsortiert. Fehlen die Daten oder wurde jemand nachträglich disqualifiziert? http://statistik.d-u-v.org/getresultevent.php?event=2122 dito 2. Platz http://statistik.d-u-v.org/getresultevent.php?event=2140

Die Leerzeilen fielen mir noch bei weiteren Wettkämpfen auf, die ich hier nicht weiter aufführe.

Viele Grüße

R

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Mai 2017 um 17:37 Uhr Von: "A " <an @d-u-v.org> An: "R " @web.de> Betreff: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Anfrage DUV Statistik - R Hallo R ,

1986 gab es keine echten dt. 100 Km Meisterschaften. Ausgerichtet wurde ein 100 Km Lauf in Rodenbach, der den Beinamen "inoffizielle deutsche 100 km-Meisterstaft" trug. Es war deren die 3. Die jeweiligen Ausgaben 1984 und 1985 trugen ebenfalls den Beinamen, als 1. und 2.

Die Veranstaltung, ihr Organisationsteam und allen voran Harry Arndt haben mit ihrer Professionalität dazu beigetragen, dass der DLV dann 1987 die ersten echten dt. Meisterschaften ausgetragen hat. Da uns die Anerkennung des Ultramarathonsports durch den DLV am Herzen lag und liegt, beginnen wir mit der Zählung auch 1987.

Unsere Logos findest du in unseren FAQ's: http://statistik.d-u-v.org/faq.php#Banner

Viele Grüße A


Am 03.05.2017 um 00:25 schrieb R :

Hallo A ,

schon erledigt.

Bleibt noch die Frage nach der 1986er 100km Straßenlauf-DM der DUV.

Und was auch noch chic wäre, wäre ein Logo der DUV und/oder von DUV-Veranstaltungen in Wiki Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite Bilder beleben die Artikel. Aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen kann man nicht einfach etwa ein Screenprint dort hochladen. Beispiele: File:IAAF logo.svg, File:European Athletic Association Logo.svg oder File:BLV-Logo.svg

Viele Grüße

R

--56frosch (talk) 13:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Sorry I don't understand anything because I do not speak this language. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Aber in dieser Sprache einen Beitrag löschen lassen zu wollen, das geht. Merwürdig.
But you proposed to delete a file from a language you don't understand. Strange. Look for a translator. That's the correspondence with the owner (German Ultrarunners Association - DUV) of the logo telling from where to upload it. Please draw back the deletion request. Thanks --56frosch (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
  • No, it's not strange. I think the logo may be above the threshold of originality, therefore, if so, it is protected by the copyright law. And, if I missed nothing, the source you gave to us has not a free license. The source has to have a free license legitimately granted by the owner, or the owner has to send a permission at OTRS where you can read on how to do so. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Buèges cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Sète cf13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quartier de la Pointe Courte, Sète cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Lublé

Bonjour La photo de la gare du Tanchet que vous avez supprimé est une archive personnelle agée de plus de 50 ans et non commercialisée. Il est dommage d'en priver les lecteurs, il n'existe bien sur pas de version numérique de cette photo

Cordialement, Berja BERJA (talk) 13:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Non, l'auteur de la photo est décédé mais il me l'a léguée.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BERJA (talk • contribs) 13:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Premièrement meme si c'est en effet très dommage, certaines images sont destinés à ne jamais pouvoir être téléchargées ici, en tout cas pas dans un avenir proche, pas tant qu'elle ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Deuxièmement nos règles sont très strictes, et nous n'acceptons seulement les fichiers qui sont libre de droit, ou qui ont été légitimement publiés avec des licenses compatibles par leur ayants droits, ou dont une permission a été envoyé à OTRS. Il y a tellement de gens de mauvaises fois qui violent le droit d'auteur, que c'est très dur voire impossible derrière un écran de savoir qui est de bonne foi ou non. C'est pour cela, pour protéger les droits d'auteur, que nous requerrons des preuves.
    Si vous avez une preuve que vous êtes titulaire des droits d'auteur (par exemple si vous les avez hérité), alors envoyez une copie de cette preuve à OTRS avec un lien vers votre page de discussion, si la preuve est jugée suffisante alors la ou les images seront restaurées. Cela dit, si vous estimez que je suis un peu trop pointilleux, c'est surement parfois le cas, vous pouvez demander une restauration en essayant d'expliquer le plus clairement possible votre situation, et vous aurez ainsi le point de vue d'un ou d'autres administrateurs.
    Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Buèges cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Suppression de File:Nextcloud-Login.png

Bonjour Christian

Vous m'avez informé que File:Nextcloud-Login.png est considérée comme violant le droit d'auteur en indiquant : Le fichier que vous avez ajouté va bientôt être supprimé. Si vous pensez qu'il ne constitue pas une violation du droit d'auteur, vous pouvez l'expliquer sur la page de description de l'image.

Quand je vais sur la page de description de l'image, on me dit que celle ci n'existe pas et que c'est celle d'un fichier qui a été supprimé par vous.

Cette image est une capture d'écran pour réaliser le manuel utilisateur de Nextcloud, un logiciel Libre sous licence AGPLv3 et je croyais que ce type d'image était autorisé. Merci de me le confirmer.

Pour info, il y avait une autre remarque de Yann qui indiquait que je devait transmettre l'autorisation de l'auteur de l'image (c'est un collègue qui a réalisé CETTE capture d'écran mais je peux tout à fait la refaire et en prendre le crédit sachant que c'es0 0tmoi qui ai réalisé toutes les autres captures écran du manuel utilisateur que je souhaite partager sur wikibooks)

que me conseillez vous de faire :

  • recréer une nouvelle capture d'écran avec un autre nom et laisser tomber ce fichier
  • demander la réactivation de ce fichier et en endosser la parternité.

Merci d'avance

Dominique Hébert

Dhebert (talk) 07:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Bonjour, non vous ne devez pas recréer cette image, que ce soit sous le meme nom ou sous un nom différent, et surtout pas en endosser la paternité. Cette capture d'écran viole les droits d'auteur qui appartiennent à Nextcloud. Ils sont les seuls à pouvoir donner une autorisation pour cette image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour Christian,

J'ai posé la question à Nextcloud et voici leur réponse (avec permissions-fr@wikimedia.org en copie)

Dominique Hebert, Wikimedians,

You have every right to use our screenshots however you like. The screenshots from our repo: https://github.com/nextcloud/screenshots are under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0. If you make screenshots yourselves - well, they're yours, your choice.

Hope this answers any questions or concerns about it!

Greetings,

Jos Poortvliet (jos@nextcloud.com) - Marketing and Communications

oOo - Nextcloud - A safe home for all your data

T: +49 171 121 7528 - E: jos@nextcloud.com - W: https://nextcloud.com

Nextcloud GmbH - Kronenstrasse 22A, 70173 Stuttgart, Germany

Qui dois je mettre comme auteur des images (screenshot) que je vais enregistrer dans wikimedia ?

--Dhebert (talk) 11:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

  • En fait j'ai restoré l'image, car il semble ce soit un logiciel libre, File:Nextcloud-Login.png, j'ai changé l'auteur ainsi que la license, cela devrait etre ok. Si jamais vous télécharger des copie d'écran depuis un lien comme celui ci-dessus, indiquez ce lien dans la section "source". Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Buèges cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Julia L.S (ship, 1980), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Un bien curieuse histoire

ici

Tout ce passe comme si ce nouveau contributeur avait voulu se distribuer des prix. En Juin 2016 je n'ai pas trouvé sa nomination il semble qu'il n'était encore inscrit. Bref je n'y comprend rien... as tu une idée? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Didier, regarde sa page de discussion, il a créé des nominations, déjà directement promus, je pense qu'il a copié des parties de texte (inclus ta signature et celle de celui qui a cloturé la page) d'une nomination déjà existante, il a ensuite taguer ses propres images. J'ai rectifié les choses et lui ai mis un avertissement. Nous verrons la suite. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
C'est une première. Merci pour ton travail. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Winter-Regnitz-Bruderwald PC310003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter-Regnitz-Bruderwald PC310003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quai Aspirant Herber, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Buèges cf06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Repeated warnings that i'm violating copyright

Hi I sent you an email earlier regarding your warning that i'm in violation of copyright. I did not know that widely distributed printed materials such as album covers are not "free." Once album covers, magazine covers, videos are globally distributed are they not "free." Who would need to give their permission to reuse these items. Also, my photographers have given their permission, twice. Once via your template emailed to permissions and also thought the portal on the permissions page. No one ever received a acknowledgment of those permissions, neither me or the photographers. What do I have to do to do the right thing. I'm certainly not trying to violate anyone here, but merely trying to support the pages I'm editing.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheryl Fullerton (talk • contribs) 05:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I already answered to the mail in your talk page, yes indeed it's not because a thing was globally distributed that it become "free". If valid permissions were already sent to OTRS, the right thing to do is to add {{OTRS pending}} in the image files affected by these permissions. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Christian does OTRS have the same email address as permissions, permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? I cannot find an email address for OTRS?

Also, the press released photos are in Craig Chaquico's private collection, they are not taken from the internet, book, or publication. They are actual photos that are in his possession. What do we do in a case like this?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheryl Fullerton (talk • contribs) 17:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Cheryl Fullerton: Yes, it's the same address, OTRS is the "Open-source Ticket Request System, and the main purpose of this system is to verify and archive licensing permissions.". And yes, when you upload a photo owned by someone else, if the permission is not available on the web, exemple if this photo has not been published anywhere, then the copyright holder has also to send a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But of course Craig Chaquico can send a valid permission only in case he is the copyright holder. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Ernst-Alt-Kunstforum St Walfridus Hanweiler.jpg

Hi Christian,

I just wanted to find out why you marked the photo as possible copyright violation. I am the photographer of the picture, the building belongs my mother in law, there are no people visible on the picture, and I'm happy to have other people freely using this photo. Maybe you an give me a hint what prevents the photo to qualify for Wikipedia commons, as I'm new to Wikipedia commons.

Thanks a lot & kind regards,

Andreas --Andreas.hilmer (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi, it have been deleted because it have been previously published there with a copyright notice. "© 2017 Ernst-Alt-Kunstforum". In order to protect the rights of the owners of already published photos, we require that the first publication be legitimately licensed with a compatible license, or we require that the copyright holder send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Bronco the Beagle translation

I did a google translate translation for Bronco the Beagle. Feel free to check it and correct it if needed.PumpkinSky talk 01:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stolt Ilex (ship, 2010), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quai d'Alger, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

My flower

I doubt it's the software that's the problem. It's far more likely the fact that I'm new to processing digital images. Should we just use the original photo unprocessed? or take the original photo and maybe just turn on "fix CA" and "auto fixes"? Let's chat here for a bit instead of making a super long thread at the QIC page. I truly appreciate all your help and kindness. PumpkinSky talk 13:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I've started over from the original on both flower photos. It was turning on "auto tone" that was making them too bright. I've deleted all intermediate versions. All I've done this time is turn on "remove chromatic aberration" and make the flower's center clearer. Let me know what you think. PumpkinSky talk 21:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I think that is better now, "to edit" more or less an image is not really an issue in the extend that the edition is an improvment. I am a bit busy in real life now but we will resume this conversation. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GNV ATLAS (ship, 1990), Sète cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Buèges cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Peter and Paul Fortress 03 (partial).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Peter and Paul Fortress 03 (partial).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Kindness Barnstar

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Christian Ferrer, you have been very kind and helpful in showing how the QI process works and in getting photos promoted (I'm nowhere near the FP level yet as you know). I know I have a lot to learn about photos. I do truly appreciate all your help. Bronco the Beagle and I thank you very much. PumpkinSky talk 22:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks you very much, I am the happiest if I could help you in any way, and I will help you again if I can. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Morrão, no Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia crop 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morrão, no Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia crop 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: solicitud de elimnacion de archivo

Hola Cristian, he recibido un mensaje sobre la solicitud de eliminación de un archivo. Sin embargo, no se de que archivo se trata ni las razones para su eliminación.

Agradezco su aclaración.

Dumer

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dumerpedraza (talk • contribs) 16:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

copyright violation

Hi, ther is no copyright violation done from our side i think there had been a mistake on behalf of the other user while uploading the poster. i hv told the other user to remove the copyright tag from the poster he has uploaded.so that it will be free of public use and can be used in wiki too.as its my last warning and its been few days our team is trying to upload the poster.could you help us in uploading it? Vinnybellack (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi there are maybe a few ways to upload this poster on Wikimedia Commons and maybe one way to upload this poster on Wikipedia:
On Wikipedia you can upload a poster under fair use, like this poster. But I am not competent, ask there;
On Wikimedia Commons you can only upload the contents of which you have the copyright, or which has been freely authorized by the owners of the copyright, or that is in public domain. For a work that has already been published, example a poster, the owner of the copyright, even if it is you, must send a permission to OTRS where you can read on how to do so. This is done in order to protect the rights of the owners. Or an evidence that the poster was made with a compatible license must be available in a web site that has the lawful right to do so, example the web site of the production company.
But if you upload again posters or other potential copyright violations without the necessary evidences (see OTRS), you take the risk that your account is blocked from editing. I hope this helps you. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

My pictures uploaded

All pictures are my property and are being given free for use by anyone via Wikipedia. There are no copyright violations involved. If you require the exif information this would be very time consuming in some cases? Begaoz (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC) 24 May 2017

  • The images deleted have been deleted because there are prior publications on the web, now every body can come and say "All pictures are my property". In order to protect the rights of the copyright owner(s), the copyright owners must send permissions to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Or a source, exemple a web site, with a compatible license that has a legitimate right to give this license, must be provided. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète harbour from the lighthouse, cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Sète cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Not sure what happened...

...thinking maybe I forgot to do something...please see my FP nom: [1] - it's not showing up in the voter list. Thanks in advance....Atsme 📞 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

@Atsme: You didn't add it to the list of nominations. You have to do that manually. I did it for you. See this. PumpkinSky talk 22:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, PumpkinSky - it completely slipped my mind. I best go see if I can still smell peanut butter.   Atsme 📞 02:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Euro Coin

Hi,do you know if is possible upload pics of euro coins? Thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 15:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi, our policies stipulates that the common sides of euro coins are not allowed here. But the copyright of the national side of the coin depend on the corresponding national legislation, you should be able find more precisions for each countries there but as far I see there are almost infos for the former currencies... so I don't know... . Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Free content

Can I ask, why Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content? Thank you!. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 175.140.89.134 (talk) 05:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Photoshop request

See File:Anas platyrhynchos (Mallard) female swimming 2.jpg both the current Lightroom version and the original. There is plenty of room to crop on the right but she was barely in the frame when I took the photo and no room to extend the left. I think extending the left is possible in Photoshop though, but I only have Lightroom. Could you do this for me in PS? I understand if you are not able. You may need to grab the original and/or extend the right. FYI: it is also currently at QIC under May 29. Thank for your consideration. PumpkinSky talk 23:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Ok, it's done. I added space at left and I left space to the right because there is no need to make a crop too tight. However, in my point of view it can not be a quality image because the head is out of focus. For animal photography it is very important to put the head (specially the eyes) in focus. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Thank you very much, both the PS work and the review. I do truly appreciate it.PumpkinSky talk 09:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
@PumpkinSky: Hope my version is not too dark, if so, you can ask me for further corrections. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
W.carter agreed with you about the head. See her comment. It starts with "Ah, so close". PumpkinSky talk 13:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I see, I uploaded a version with a bit more light/expo. It does not change the fact that the head is out of focus, but it is better now I think. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Can't do much with poor focus. Just a little more DOF would have done it. Yes, I like the lighter version better. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 17:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Suha Queen II (ship, 1975), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Egretta garzetta, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Images erased

Hello, I am Thunder 03, I wanted to replace that images, you don't have to erase them.

Why did you do it? It was not a violation.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thunder 03 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes there was copyright violations. The copyrights belong very likely to the editors, exemple the copyright of Starfire belongs to DC Comics. In any case these images are not free of right, and can be found in the Web too. See com:Licensing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва – очакваме те!

 
„Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва!

Здравей, Christian Ferrer/Archive25

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)

УОЗдрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Content on Carre page

You deleted the content on Carre page based on the claim that copyrights were in breach. I have to notify you that content used on the page does not belong to the site which is claimed to be a copyright owner. The content belongs to my personal archive as I am the founding member of the band so pictures belong to me and all the written material belongs to the creator of the page. Metalrus.ru is using this content with our permission, reposting them from Carre fan site : https://vk.com/club62668645. please make sure content is returned or not being deleted in the future. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.68.91.74 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Though I don't know who you are, I think I remember the image. If you are the copyright owner of a work already published, and if this publication does not have an adequate license, see com:Licensing, then you must follow the instructions written at com:OTRS and to send a permission. Otherwise, as the image is available in the web, the image will be very likely deleted again. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Request

Christian: I was wondering if you could focus stack the six images here for me: User:PumpkinSky/Uploads/2017#Studies_with_exposure_delay_and_single_point_focus_-_tree_rings_from_main_trunk I have Lightroom but not Photoshop. If this is too much to ask, that's okay, I understand. Best wishes. PumpkinSky talk 10:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

  • @PumpkinSky: I'm not familiar with focus stack, I made an attempt with your images but I'm not happy with the result (there are burned overexposed areas in my result while your images are not?!?) therefore I did not uploaded it. And I can't spend too much more time on it because I'm a bit busy. I'm pretty sure you can ask in Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop. Sorry not to be able to help you more. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
    • That's ok. Thank you for trying and the new link. PumpkinSky talk 11:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Uploaded Images of our company

Dear Mr. Ferrer,

Good day!

I would like to request a permit to upload some images that represent our company such as logo and etc., I have noticed that every time I upload an image that are coming from our website It will disregarded, However I am that one who in charge of the online marketing of our company (Manila Shipmanagement & Manning, Inc.) www.manship.com.

I hope that you consider my request. Thank you very much!

Best Regards,

Felix

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Felixonpedia (talk • contribs) 05:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
  • @Felixonpedia: Hello, there are several issues with your uploads:
First, the media(s) you want to upload here must fall within the Commons scope, one of your uploads was deleted for being out of our project scope, see the relevant discussion
Secondly, you must read com:Licensing and only upload content following our rules. For example, regarding the content already published we often need a permission from the copyright holder even if it is you, this permission must be sent to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so.
Firdly, if you disagree with a deletion rationale, you must not reupload/recreate the content, this is prohibited and may result in the block of your account. Because 1/if a valid permission is received then the file will be restored by us 2/if you have solved the problems that led to the deletion of a file, or if you think that the deletion was unwarranted, then the proper way is to make a request at Commons:Undeletion requests
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Saludos Christian

He recibido una notificación de eliminación de una imagen por copyright, la imagen fue provista por la persona a la que le dediqué el artículo, el Sr. Juan Ramón Gómez Díaz. Quisiera saber el por qué la eliminaste. Gracias.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Geki03 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Podemos encontrar una o más publicaciones anteriores en la web, por ejemplo : [2], el propietario del copyright de la foto debe estar de acuerdo con una publicación aquí con nuestras licencias. En el caso de una publicación sin licencia apropiada, es necesario identificar el propietario del copyright y el propietario del copyright debe enviar una autorización para OTRS. Si el permiso es válido imagen será restaurada. Atentamente, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Pictures

I am the person in the picture and own all rights to it. I'm the one who uploaded it. Chopperrose (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

  • One image was deleted because it can be found in the web, [3], in such cases and in order to protect the rights of the copyright holder we require that the first publication of the image be explicitly free licensed, or the copyright holder have to send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. The other image is not yet deleted but is indeed nominated for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chopperrose where you can submit arguments for or against suppressing, this image has "FBMD" in the metadata and this mean that the image come from Facebook, and the same rule as above applies, the first publication must be free, or we must have evidence that you are indeed the copyright holder. Another point is that the image must fall within the Commons scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Today's deletion of my files https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Steinschreiber

--Steinschreiber (talk) 16:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Hello Christian, it seems I missed a deadline for entering my reasons why there is *no* need to delete this photos. Here is my reasoning for keeping this photos: (Could you undo the deletions? If not, what is missing in the following reasoning? (Sorry for the inconvenience: I had no internet access during the voting period.)

keep:

This discussion is *not* about if all photos of cigarette packs are allowed on wikimedia commons, but if *these* carefully chosen photos are allowed on wikimedia commons. It is important to mention that all these photos show on purpose the rear side of cigarette packs. *These* rear sides don't have any parts designed by the tobacco company which have a threshold of originality given.

Reasoning:

Regarding Product Packaging https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging there are only some very limited exception which allows the uploading: OK There are a some very limited exceptions: 1. Packaging which carries a printed design which is so insignificant as to be incidental. Such packaging can be treated in the same way as a Utility objects. See Commons:De minimis. 2. Packaging which carries only a printed design which is so simple as to be ineligible for copyright protection.

These exceptions listed above apply to these photos due to the following reasons:

Each photo consists of three parts:

1) tax stamp (in the right upper corner): The tax stamp design is *not* owned by the tobacco company, but is owned by the Federal Republic of Germany. see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabaksteuer_(Deutschland) Therefor the tobacco company cannot have any rights on the tax stamp design.

2) health warning (picture and the text below the picture, covering 65% of the rear side): The health warnings / health warnings design is *not* owned by the tobacco company, but is owned by the European Union / Federal Republic of Germany. The tobacco company *cannot* chooses which health warning it wants to print, but this is regulated by law (see: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tabakerzg/__6.html Gesetz über Tabakerzeugnisse und verwandte Erzeugnisse (Tabakerzeugnisgesetz - TabakerzG) § 6 Warnhinweise und Verpackung)

3) Area above the health warning not covered by tax stamp (i.e. upper right corner): According to German law (Verordnung über Tabakerzeugnisse und verwandte Erzeugnisse (Tabakerzeugnisverordnung - TabakerzV) § 14 Kombinierte Text-Bild-Warnhinweise bei Zigaretten, Tabak zum Selbstdrehen und Wasserpfeifentabak) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tabakerzv/__14.html ) it is *not* allowed to place any brand names or logos above the health warning. The area contains only text and is below the threshold of originality and therefor is allowed to be shown on wikimedia commons according to the exceptions listed above (insignificant or simple design only)(erreicht keine Schöpfungshöhe).

Regards, --Steinschreiber (talk) 16:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

  • @Steinschreiber: Hello, first I reverted your edits in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Steinschreiber because the discussion is closed and it is now an archive, we can discuss, of course, but not in this archive. Secondly regarding the deletion rationale, this is about the photos in the middle of each cigarette packs. These photos are about 1/3 of each packs, are in the middle of the images and are fully in focus, therefore I think they can not in any way be considered as De minimis, nor they are in Public Domain. Thus I disagree with an undeletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. I've understood that your concern is about the copyright of the photos of the health warning, which are about 1/3 of each pack. The following links are all from the official web site of the European Union (http://europa.eu):

The COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE 2014/109/EU of 10 October 2014 amending Annex II to Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the library of picture warnings to be used on tobacco products defines and lists the actual health warnings (including the photos) http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir_del/2014/109/oj (or http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32014L0109 ) , i.e. the copyright for the photos is with the EU. You can see the photos of the health warning at the bottom of this web page.

(background info only: The web page is the annex for Article 10 Combined health warnings for tobacco products for smoking of DIRECTIVE 2014/40/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/40/oj (or http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014L0040 ) )

The laws including the photos are the content of the official EU web site EUR-lex http://eur-lex.europa.eu . This website allows the reuse of its content, i.e. the photos could be shown for commercial or non-commercial purposes:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/legal-notice/legal-notice.html Copyright notice © European Union, 1998-2017 Except where otherwise stated, reuse of the EUR-Lex data for commercial or non-commercial purposes is authorised provided the source is acknowledged ('© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/, 1998-2017'). The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011.

Therefore I think the cigarette packs containing these photos could be shown on wikimedia commons.

Regards, --Steinschreiber (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rock and Cytisus scoparius flowers, Rosis cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rock and Cytisus scoparius flowers, Rosis cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

I've added a response to your point regarding the health warning photos on cigarette packs

Please see the 2nd bullet point above, Regards --Steinschreiber (talk) 10:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Coast Guard Lifesaving Station photos

Hi- I was wondering if you could give me your feedback on these photos:

The first one was taken on a completely overcast day just before rain started, so the lighting on the front wall is more consistent, but the roof is much darker. The second one was taken on a partly cloudy day (the very next day) so the front wall lighting varies, but the roof is brighter and closer to what it really looks like. I've thought of going in the evening for another round of photos. This place is just over the sand dune from the ocean, so it gets very bright here unless there's lots of clouds. These were taken with my polarizing filter to cut the bright sun some. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 02:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi, I agree, the light in File:Little Island Lifesaving Station LR.jpg allow to highlight the house in a better way. Both are good quality images. And you should return there when the sun is low, mornig or evening, it depends on the orientation of the facade, and even if the sky is a bit cloudy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks for looking at them. I'll check the weather report and decide when to try for a better one. Hopefully I can go between Tuesday and Sunday this week. PumpkinSky talk 09:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Special:Diff/248513741/248515432

Hi Christian, I hope you are well. Considering the man specifically asks to be responded to in French, while it's not an absolute necessity to comply, it might appear a little mean-spirited if you, as a Frenchman, write the closing message in English. Storkk (talk) 19:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Figure toi que j'ai hésité :( et j'ai choisi l'anglais pour favoriser la compréhension du plus grand nombre... principalement car j'ai jugé que ton message était suffisement explicite pour la compréhension du demandeur. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@Storkk: j'ai rajouté quelque mots en français [4] Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I knew it wasn't your intention, I just thought it might look to the user like you were going out of your way not to comply. Thanks for leaving a translation, and in any case, have a lovely evening! Storkk (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

File deletion

Dear My. Ferrer,

I am authorized by the S E A Holdings Limited to create a draft page for them and upload their company logo (Seagroup_logo.gif). I have sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org using the Wikimedia OTRS release generator. What else can I do to prove I am authorized to use the image? How do I complete the process of donating copyrighted materials? Thank you!

(05:30, 21 June 2017)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiecpy (talk • contribs) 05:58, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
If valid permission(s) have been sent to OTRS, then the image(s) will be restored. There is nothing more to do. Note that OTRS volunters have a lot of work and this may take some time before your mail will be checked. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. So even if the images are deleted right now, they can be restored after OTRS release, is that right?

Yes, if the OTRS team receives valid permissions then the deleted images are automatically restored. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

May I re upload the deleted images now? Can I just add {{OTRS pending}} before the image posting code while the images are waiting for the OTRS release?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiecpy (talk • contribs) 01:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
No, the OTRS team will restore the images if necessary. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi,

Even after repeated requests to not delete my logo, wikimedia hasn't paid heed to my tickets. The BSB Logo is my very own creation and I have proof for it. Should I send the PSD file where I created it? We are trying to get the supporters club running and repeatedly the logo is being taken down. This is very disappointing that a creator has to go through copyright violation accusations for his own work.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji 3003 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, you may read com:Licensing and Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks, the deleted logo is above the threshold of originality therefore we require an evidence the copyright holder agree with such a publication here, this is done in order to protect the rights of the copyright holder, see OTRS. If you already send a permission, the OTRS volunteers have a lot of work and this may take some time before the permission be checked. But if a valid permission is received then the image will be automatically restored. You may also read Commons:Project scope "To be eligible for hosting on Wikimedia Commons, all files and other content must fall within the Commons scope. Anything uploaded here which falls outside this scope will be deleted." Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

What's the current status of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_uploaded_by_Steinschreiber

Hi Christian, thanks for your help about the 4 photos of the rear-side of the cigarette packs at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_uploaded_by_Steinschreiber Did I get it right, that your statement And in this decision we can read at the article 6 (2)b "the obligation not to distort the original meaning or message of the documents", and it looks great to no derivative restriction. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC) is a vote for undelete? a) If yes, would this be the final decision (i.e. undelete) unless someone else opposes it? b) Or do I have to deliver more reasons to undelete this photos? (if yes, is there a deadline?) Regards, --Steinschreiber (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • @Steinschreiber: Hi, no I'm afraid you misunderstood my comment, here on Wikimedia Commons "Publication of derivative work must be allowed", I don't think it is compatible with "the obligation not to distort the original meaning or message of the documents". My comment was just a comment, not a vote, but not really in favor of an undeletion. As long as the request has not been closed by an administrator, not me because I opened it, you can deliver more reasons to undelete this photos if you want. The deadline will be when the request will be closed. So if you have something to say I suggest you do it there as soon as possible, because the discussion is open since several days and it can be closed at any time. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  • @Christian Ferrer:Thanks for this info. I've added some new information. If you cannot give a positive vote based on these new infos, I would like to involve a german (native) speaking admin (because some laws are in german only.)

--Steinschreiber (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I tend to agree and voted, but nothing prevent you to involve a german (native) speaking admin if you want. But be aware that the votes are not sacred, and if the situation looks unclear for the closing administrator then he/she will have to apply the Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Images of Blade of Honor casts

You say that those images were possibly copyrighted. According to their Kickstarter and Indiegogo pages, it says we canuse any contents onany social sites. Also, I was told I could use it. So how do I provide proof or can I provide their individual links to those photos? Asialuang71 6/23/2017Asialuang71 (talk) 16:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • I doubt the deleted images have been licensed with compatible licenses by their copyright owners, example the kickstarter page have no such licenses nor I think the builder(s) of this webpage own the copyrights for each photos, in order to see what kind of content is allowed here see com:Licensing, but yes if you upload an image that have been licensed with such licenses you must provides the links to the web page that contains the former (source) images with the compatible licenses, or you must identify the copyright holder of each images and they must send permissions by mail to com:OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Modèle "specimen"

Bonjour. J'ai vu que vous utilisiez un modèle "specimen" pour vos photographies présentant une espèce particulière d'insecte, par exemple. Ma question est : utilisez-vous un assistant d'importation spécifique ou copiez-vous votre code manuellement ? Je serais très intéressée par un modèle de ce genre mais souhaiterais, dans l'idéal, pouvoir le renseigner dès l'importation ! Bien à vous. --MirandaAdramin (talk) 20:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour, vous pouvez utiliser l'ancien assistant d'importation qui autorise la mise forme, vous avez juste à remplacer le modèle information fournit automatiquement par le modèle qui vous intéresse. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Petrozavodsk State University and File:Weasels team logo.jpg

Hi, Christian! This File:Weasels team logo.jpg was created by the uploader Gunners 27.

Evgeniy Korolevskiy (Gunners 27) is my student in Petrozavodsk State University. And his work in Wikipedia is a part of the education process. See short note about it in outreach report (not finished yet).

Evgeniy Korolevskiy is the author of this logo. Do we need to provide OTRS for this logo in order to restore it? -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 05:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Hi Andrew, yes indeed, for such logo above the ToO, specially when it can be found elsewhere (exemple), we require evidences the copyright holder agree with the licensing here. A permission have to be sent to OTRS. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

First Ladies of Pakistan

Mr. Ferrer, I want clarification regarding the deletion of my uploaded files on the page of First Ladies of Pakistan, you can't just delete anything which doesn't provide copyright information, those images were under free domain, you should ask people before deleting them out of just intuition. Bhagwanwas (talk) 05:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Please give me your inputs and I will proceed accordingly which can include the re-uploading of those picture too. Bhagwanwas (talk) 05:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive25".