Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


May - June 2018


Contents

14 images

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Théâtre de la Mer sous la neige 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality and a very nice take. Code Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:47:26 GMT
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Crabe (ship, 1951), Sète BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. You can dramatize the upper part of the sky with Gradual Filter.--Famberhorst 05:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis juvenile in flight, Sète04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

9 images

Dear Christian,

Could you review these images below please? Note that these images are extremely high quality photos...although the uploader tends to crop the photos a bit too tight sometimes, I think.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done good images indeed, though some are a bit small in size. But don't look a gift horse in the mouth, these are very good photos. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Christian. Most photos with this quality are all copyrighted at M.O. as I've found out. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

6 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these 6 images when you can.

I have marked the images you uploaded yesterday and today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. Your images today were just marked. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

DJ Ritendra Photo

Dear Christian,

Could you let me know, why did you delete DJ Ritendra's image File:DJ Ritendra.png, just to let you know, the image is of my own work,

Krishfiji (talk) 9:45, 3 May 2018 (GMT+12).

  • Because there is an older/uncropped version available in the web [1]. As per our policy, we requires now an evidence that the copyright holder, even if it is you, release the photo under a free license. The copyright holder, even if it is you, must send a permission to OTRS where you can read how to do it. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai Général Durand - Escale à Sète 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Très joli. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peyriac-de-Mer, february 2018 (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

3 images

Dear Christian,

Please help review these images when you can.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done for these images and for the ones you just removed from this list. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry. I thought that you were very busy. So I didn't want to burden you with reviewing these 8 photos. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Andrey Rublev - Св. Троица - Google Art Project.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Andrey Rublev - Св. Троица - Google Art Project.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

6 images

18 images

Dear Christian,

If you have time, please review these images...when you are free. Most are good or great quality images.

As you can see below, many of these species are missing on Commons.

That is why, I probably have to stop. I fear I may have overwhelmed Thiotrix too. I don’t know. The problem is M.O. has so many image that people forget to upload to Commons. But then someone has to subcategorise them. And that takes...a lot more Time and I am not a taxonomist. By my calculations, I uploaded 1533 photos from M.O. and that is more than enough for me. Please help review these final images. PS: Of course I will review your uploads in license review. Have a good day Christian in France. Cheers from Metro Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

FYI, this is the only image I got freely licensed from someone at flickr from the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics:

  • File:Anette Norberg (Swedish skip-2010 Olympics).jpg
  • The Swedish women's curling team got the gold medal in the Turin 2006 and Vancouver 2010 Olympics and then in the 2018 Olympics again at South Korea under another lady. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done ok it's done, good images. I will try to help to create the categories but it will take some times. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Take whatever time you need. Its a lot of subcategories, that's for sure. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Your images were all marked. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Your images were marked today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Orangutan Kalimantan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orangutan Kalimantan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

14 images

Dear Christian,

I decided to upload several images today reluctantly. The first 7 have existing subcategories--so it was not a problem. I noticed that their subcategory have few images so I decided to upload one ow two more images for them. The last 7 images have no subcategory. I uploaded the last image since it is a beautiful and rare image. It is also the only image of this species on M.O. Also three people agree with the identification so it is likely correctly identified.

I hope you can review them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help reviewing the images and creating the subcategory. This is certainly enough for me. Most of the Galerina species were high quality photos but they were missing on Commons. I'll stop now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus michahellis juvenile in flight, Sète05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Thau, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 14:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mèze harbour cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good and nice. Nice light--Lmbuga 14:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 en France,

 

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Earth,

Félicitations, votre photo « Réserve naturelle régionale de Sainte Lucie - salins.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2018 comme image du jour du .

 

Pmau (talk) 08:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

deleted my photos

Dear Christian, you have deleted my photos on the basis that they are not my own work of which I can prove that they are. Please kindly undelete them.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmofficial (talk • contribs) 10:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Well, it seems the deletions are old and I likely deleted more than 10 000 images since this event, and I don't remember exactly why I deleted your images. But I used the rationale "copyright violation" and there is 99,99% of chances that I found prior publications in the web. Our policy requires that the prior publications must be "explicitly freely licensed", or the copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Four images

Dear Christian,

The first image below is only 2 weeks old and its already considered a great image. Since there are not many images in its category this might be a valuable addition if it can be reviewed by you. I just noticed it on M.O. The second is also a great image and there are also not many images in its category. The last two images only had one other image in its category.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

  • PS: Your two images were marked. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Good choice, a pity that the size were a bit reduced (downsampling) on the two first images but still good and valuable images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. Your images were reviewed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Could you do me a favor?

Hi Christian: I found a really old DN which received OTRS permission. Could you review and perhaps close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monachaster sanderi.jpg from over a month ago? . Thanks so much! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Peyriac-de-Mer, february 2018 (06).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peyriac-de-Mer, february 2018 (06).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Comment

Dear Christian,

I marked your single image today. As an aside, there is a single uploader (Josef Papi) who has been uploiading many quality images from M.O. for many years and yesterday he got another major one here: File:2014-08-23 Catinella olivacea (Batsch) Boud 447950.jpg Wonderful image and huge ratings at M.O.

I swear I almost fell out of my chair! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
COSCO Shengshi (ship, 2011).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

4 images

Dear Christian,

Your images were marked. If you can, please help review these images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

3 images

Dear Christian,

Please help review these images if you can.

Your images today were reviewed. Goodnight from Vancouver where its almost 3 AM. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Restore coat arms house of colonna

dear Christian Ferrer,I'll write to ask you if you could please restore the files listed below, which would be the coats of arms of a noble Roman family, and that I have been deleted for who knows what reason despite the files are pd old 70 - 100

Thank you and good day User: Lûgnûg —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.5.4.32 (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

8 images

Dear Christian,

Do you have Any problems looking at the source of these images through the Mushroom Observer template. Today, I could not see the source of these images through the M.O. template so I copied and pasted a separate external link here. I have a feeling that someone manipulated the M.O. template source url.

I hope you can review them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done yes you're right someone did something to the template, [2] I reverted and that is working well now. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thanks for your help Christian. Something was really wrong today. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cosco Shengshi (ship, 2011), Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

6 images

Dear Christian,

If you have time, please review these 6 images.

Your images were reviewed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help on the images and the category. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

14 images

File:S.M. Re Vittorio Amedeo III di Savoia.png

hi Christian Ferrer, I am writing to ask you whether it would be possible to restore these files concerning some of these portraits of an unknown artist executed between the seventeenth and eighteenth century, the artist since he died for 100 years, the most correct license included in the following files was PD-100 ,,

--Карой Глнстый (talk) 10:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

8 images

Dear Christian,

Please help review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Your images were just marked. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Thanks you Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your help. Your other images were just marked. Have a good sleep in France. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Erreur module

Bonjour Christian,

Depuis ce matin nous avons une erreur sur le template SIZE très largement répandu. voici un exemple : Augustins - La Vierge à l'enfant et le mystère de la Passion - Giovanni Batista Tinti D 1959 3.jpg. Ce n'est pas ton module que j’utilise qui est en cause car d'autre que moi on ce problème. Merci de tes lumières --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Bonjour Didier, je ne voit pas l'erreur dont tu parles, peux-tu préciser? Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Elle a été réparé tout est dans l'ordre. C'était dans un module où seul les administrateur pouvais avoir accès. Merci.

3 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Sava Krstic has some really good images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You. Yes Sava has many top quality photos. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Bourne Windmill

I felt that these photos of the Bourne Windmill would be an improvement/expansion to the page. Replacing the main photo with the color shot (Circa 1975), the 1915 advert, the 90's makeover and the 2003 demolition. As far as I know, they are common web photos and would not be copyright infringement.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real New Yorker (talk • contribs) 11:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
  • The fact that these photos would be an improvement to the Wikimedia projects, it is likely true. However photos are works of art and are protected by copyright laws. Our policies requires that the photos
"must be explicitly freely licensed, or
must be in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work."

"explicitly freely licensed" mean that the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer, gave an explicit free license. For the public domain see Help:Public domain. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Vodafone.png

Hi Chrisitan Ferrer. Was wondering if you'd take a look at this file. Seems to be the same uploader who uploaded File:Vodafone Logo Italia 2018.png. The uploader was notified of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vodafone logos, but didn't comment. Not sure if they understand that logos are not automatically released under a CC license just because they are found online. Same uploader also uploaded File:Nuovo logo wind.jpg this under a cc license as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the notification, I deleted the file and warned the user. For the second logo, it is apparently Italian, and the case is discussable, it may be below ToO, note that the license have been changed and the file nominated for deletion, therefore I removed the speedy tag. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks for checking on these Christian. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

6 images

Dear Christian,

If you can, please review these images.

Jimmie and Susanne have many high quality images too. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done I confess that when I see the author is Susanne my interest increases, and I think I will start to look at her uploads soon. Jimmie has many good images too, but a lot seems without a doubt downsampled (size often limited to 2000px in the wider size, or even less) which is not disturbing to use in our articles in the web, but it is always better to have a full resolution image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. Jimmie's images are of lower resolution but he has images of many species that Commons lacks sometimes. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Your images are marked. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)--Leoboudv (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  • As an Admin can you rename this image File:Lentinus similis (Berk. & Broome) T.W. May & A.E. Wood 510218.jpg as Panus similis? Thiotrix says it is Panus similis. My mistake. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You and sorry for the mixup. Thiotrix did come back to categorise the images I gave him on his talkpage. He is German and most Admins I ask say he is the top specialist on Commons on fungi and plant species. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saga Pearl II (ship, 1981), Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but unfortunately some parts are a bit overexposed --Michielverbeek 20:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus pallidoroseus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

9 images

File:Zoran Pavlović in Vorskla.jpg

Why you deleted my fileFile:Zoran Pavlović in Vorskla.jpg?--Magistrvp (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Our policy requires that the given license must meet specific conditions, read Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, your source say "© Vorskla Football Club Poltava. All rights reserved. Copying of materials is allowed only with open active hyperlinks....". Not only they don't allow explicitly the conditions that we need (republication, derivative work, commercial use, ect...) but they requires an active hyperlink, and this condition is not allowed by us. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:August Friedrich Albrecht Schenck - Anguish - Google Art Project.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:August Friedrich Albrecht Schenck - Anguish - Google Art Project.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

11 images

logo ACFL

bonjour Christian je viens de poster le logo de mon Aéroclub: aéroclub de figeac livernon (ACFL) present sur l'aèrodrome de Figeac Livernon . Il a été réalisé par nos soins, mais noté comme violation de copyright comment faire pour qu'il soit accepté ? merci pour votre aide PS c'est ma 1ere contribution a wikipédia :)

lcbnnr

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcbnnr (talk • contribs) 21:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Bonjour, afin d'etre sur que vous posseder bien les droits sur le logo, nous avons besoin qu'un représentant officiel de l'aéroclub, meme si c'est vous, envoie par mail une autorisation à notre système de permission OTRS, ou vous pourrez lire les instruction nécessaires. Lorsque cela sera fait alors l'image du logo sera restaurée. Notez qu'il peut y avoir un délai d'attente, le système de permission étant géré par des volontaire. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

14 images

Image Deletion: LOGO-COTT 2018.jpg

Hello, The logo I uploaded this morning was given to me by Cott Corporation with their permission to update their page. This is their new logo and it appears on their website at cott.com Please let me know if you have any questions or would like further proof of approval and permissions. Thanks! Michael Premo (iamapremo) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.171.252.93 (talk) 19:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello, yes an official representative of the Cott Corporation must send a permission by mail to our permission system, where you can read how to do it. If so the logo will be restored. Note that there may be a waiting time, the permission system being managed by volunteers. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

15 images

User:Capa23

Hi Christian Ferrer. This editor has uploaded a number of files which were subsequently deleted per COM:DR. The user then appears to have reuploaded the same files under the same name. For example, File:Vodafone.svg and File:LaLiga.svg were previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:LaLiga.svg, but the user just re-uploaded them at later dates. The user did not comment in the DRs, so it's not clear whether they disagree with the consensus or just are ignoring it. Moreover, just a quick check of some of the user's recent uploads shows that they are uploading files as "own work" (such as File:Atresplayer.png, File:Movistar Disney.png, File:LOVEStv.png) when they most likely are not. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi, I deleted the two files (+ a few others) that have been preciously deleted, and I warned the user to stop recreating deleted content. Regarding the other uploads, they are indeed not own works, but are likely mostly below the threshold of originality, I started a DR. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

17 images

7 images

Marcus Osterdahl photo deletion

I have noticed a deletion of a snap shot taken in my studio my a friend in 1990. The picture feature myself sitting at the control desk labelled - Studio ONE Fulham 1990. It appears that the snap shot has been deleted from Commons file. The photo is still available on Google.

Best regards,

Marcus

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard7492 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

I assume you talk about File:Studio ONE Fulham 1990.jpg, that can be seen here for example. A photo, as well as a music song, is a work of art protected by copyright law. In the case of a photo, the copyright holder is usually the photographer, not the subject, until proven otherwise (for example with a professional contract). As written in our policies:

 "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media
   that are explicitly freely licensed, or
   that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work."

In summary we need an evidence that the copyright holder of the photo explicitly agree with a publication here. The copyright holder can send a permission to our permission system. Or if the photo is in public domain we requires to know the exact reason for why the photo should be considered in public domain. Hope this helps. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

11 images

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Étang de Thau, Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Étang de Thau, Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

13 images

14 images

File:ALM Tableau impasses.png, File:ALM Tableau Gap taux maturite.png

Hi Christian, hy did you delete these files? They are simple tables and do not reach threshold of originality. Therefore they are not copyrightable. Chaddy (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi, the copyrightable side maybe questionable but they are also unused/uncategorised graphs of questionable notability, therefore very likely out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

13 images

Dear Christian, Please review these images when you can.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I just reviewed your images. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Lido de Thau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

9 images

vivienne hu profile pic

Hi Christian,

I'm contacting in regards to a profile pic of Vivienne Hu that was uploaded yesterday. I have permission to use the copyright image from photographer Vital Agibalow and would like to confirm with you. I can also send over a receipt of this agreement in writing if you prefer. I'm wondering if I should have included a copyrights tag to the image. The image is of Vivienne in a gray striped suit. I attempted to load the image in this conversation but unfortunately, it's blocked.

Let me know if you've received this and if I may load the image once more.

Regards,

2:55pm 31-May-2018

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Monday96 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Hello, the image is File:Viviennehuprofile.jpg, the copyright holder must send a permission for a publication here under the specific licensing conditions we require. This permission must be sent by the copyright holder to our permission system OTRS, where you can read how to do it. If so, then the image can be restored. Note that the permission system is administrated by volunteers and there may be a waiting time. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

15 final images

Template:Winter in Languedoc-Roussillon‬.

It's putting categories into a redirection... Wieralee (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Chromaticka harmonika

Hello Christian, I am sorry for making troubles - as my English is not so good and I do not orientate in here much... I added some pictures and didn´t know that there cannot be written my webpages – they were deleted. So, I removed the text (webpage) from the pictures and uploaded them without it. But it seems not to be OK again. I do not understand. What is wrong with them this time? Kate

2.6.2018, 10:11

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chromaticka harmonika (talk • contribs) 08:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Chromaticka harmonika: Hello, there are at least 4 issues with your uploads that have been deleted, you must not recreate the files. 1/ the images have already been published in a web site, your website I assume, but without a free license. 2/ the images are photomontages made with images already available in the web, therefore the copyright status is quite unclear. 3/ the images have an aspect somewhat promotional, and this is totally forbidden here 4/ Even without the 3 first issues, the images are very likely out of our project scope.

The relevant policies are com:Scope and com:Licensing. Do not re-upload these images or similar images, or you may lose you editing privileges. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Deleted content - File:Alex Pettersen.jpg

I'm not sure I understand how to update the photo on the band page for Rick Estrin & the Nightcats then. The picture for the drummer that was there is several years old. Is there another way to do this?

Onnie

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruzinbluz (talk • contribs) 14:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
  • You can not upload a photo that don't have an explicit free license. As per our policy : "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed...". A photo is a work of art protected by copyright law, and only the copyright holder can give this explicit free license. You can update the photo on the band page only if a free photo is available. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

These Three images

Dear Christian Ferrer,

I uploaded 3 final M.O. images on June 1 and asked Majora to review them but he/she seems to be away after almost 2 days. Could you review them instead? I sent a message to Majora saying I asked you to review these 3 final images of mine which brings my M.O. total to 1860 images. I have not uploaded any images since June 1. Can you help here please? --Leoboudv (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  • BTW, your images were reviewed. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Christian for your kind help. Enjoy your Sunday in beautiful France. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Lido de Thau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Símbolo da JS.jpg ‎,File:Logótico JS.png,File:Logótico JS.png

These files are public where everyone can post and delete according to JS rules these images were from there no reason to delete. Thank you that you put the pictures back Site:https://juventudesocialista.pt/estrutura/sede-virtual/ Ribeiro2002rafael (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Supression de mes logos dans ma page wikipedia

Bonjour, Qui etes vous ? Qui vous permet de supprimer mes logo sur la page de mon club ? Merci pour vos réponses ! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.92.241.136 (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Bonjour, si vous ne vous connectez pas, alors je ne sais pas qui vous etes je ne peux malheureusement pas vous réponre avec précision. Mais de toute façon je vous aurai surement répondu : pour les logos qui sont au dessus du seuil d'originalité, comme c'est surement le cas pour vous, nous recquerons qu'une permission soit envoyée par un représentant du club (meme si c'est vous) à notre système de permission. Ceci est fait afin de protéger les droits d'auteur du logo, voir aussi com:Licensing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Lido de Thau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
As this is of a flying bird, this is clearly a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 18:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

None

None of my photos are copyrighted. I own them. J-Dawg2018 (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes they are, most of the images have been published with " all right reserved" in Flickr. If the Flickr account is yours then change the license there, or send permissions to OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calvatia 617738.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Calvatia 617739.jpg

Neither of these has a source or author. Maybe you can fix them. Ww2censor (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

  • @Ww2censor: the source work for me, I don't understand, you have to click on "image number..." and the author is also there with a clear text "This image was created by user Liz Popich (Lizzie)"... I really don't understand Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) All I can see is a mushroom icon and the letter "en" inside a box, for both author and source. Have a look at what I see. Maybe you need to modify the entry as the template seems to have some info when I look at the edit view but it does not show or link to anything. Ww2censor (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Ww2censor: is your langage seeting in english? I ask because some peoples are sometimes working on the various version of the templates and they create often bugs. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Ww2censor: refrech your browser and try now. That was indeed someone who modified the templates, I reverted the edits, that should work now. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Now they look fine. I have seen this source website previously so this certainly seemed quite odd. Indeed my language is English and a refresh did nothing but you seem to have found the problem. Thanks for getting this sorted so quickly. Ww2censor (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks you too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

MushroomObserver

Salut, comment est-ce qu'il est possible d'internationaliser ces modèles pour que ça fonctionne ? Il faut passer par des sous-pages ? Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Bonjour, oui en effet il faut passer par des sous-pages. Il faudrait une sous-page/ modèle "Layout" et un ensuite un modèle (sous-page) pour chaque language. Je ne pense pas avoir la compétence pour le faire malheureusement. Mais cela pourrait etre une bonne idée. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Il semblerai que quelqu'un a commencé à travailler là-dessus, mais ce n'est pas encore effectif [3], je ferai des tests bientot. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
J'utilisais un modèle similaire pour remercier les organisateurs des courses où j'étais accrédité. Assez pratique en effet, de mémoire, c'est aussi utilisé pour les monuments historiques (où une uniformisation entre les modèles pourrait être intéressante). Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Aladdin

Hi Christian. I uploaded an image of Aladdin for it to be under "Non-free media information and use rationale", in the same manner as Jasmine, but it won't let me place the tag, saying the image is copyrighted, is there something wrong that I'm doing? Javiero Fernandez (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi Javiero, Jmabel is right [4], here on Wikimedia Commons we don't accept non-free media, this is why the images were deleted. You must upload the image directly in Wikipedia. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermione (ship, 2014), Sète 2018 04BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little egret, Lido de Thau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

10 images

5 images

Dear Christian,

Is there any chance that you could review these images here?

Thank You and Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot Christian and have a good night in France. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himantopus himantopus, Lido de Thau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 05:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

8 images

Undeletion requests for Rock Against Racism 40th anniversary flyer reverse.jpg and Rock Against Racism 40th anniversary flyer.jpg

Hi - you have deleted the above files stating that I did not provide adequate evidence of ownership such as an e-mail ownership statement or linking to an online source. I did fill in your online e-mail template, stating that i am the owner/creator of these images. I am the designer who created them. Since they are posters, it is not possible to link to an online source with credits. Other than the statement provided - using your own template! - I cannot provide another source. I have requested undeletions but following this up. Thanks.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Labrowp (talk • contribs) 18:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Hello, if the flyers have been used for the event "40th anniversary of the Rock Against Racism Northern Carnival" then a person representing the oraganization of this event must send a permission to our permission system OTRS. A publication here include the authorisation of commercial reuse, see com:Licensing. This is done in order to protect the rights of the copyright holder, even if it is you. Indeed otherwise anyone can come and say " I'm the copyright holder...", we delete daily hundreds of images uploaded by fans who says they are copyright holder. Hope this help. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

14 images

Dear Christian,

If you have time, please help review these images.

PS: Enjoy the World Cup in Russia. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Please review them only if you are free. I, too, have been busy today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done not really a football fan, I have more interest for rugby. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I am a soccer (that is what we call football in Canada and the US) fan but unfortunately the World Cup soccer times are very early in the morning for me in the Pacific Coast of North America. Thank You for your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

12 images

Dear Christian,

If you have time, please review these images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Your images were marked. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • NOTE: This link below shows MO's images from Great to Good to No Opinion. Its a large list updated to 2018.

http://mushroomobserver.org/image/index_image?by=image_quality&q=Ool3

Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done good images as usual. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for the review. I'm now taking a break from M.O. but you can look at the list to see if there are any images you wish to upload. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
I will do it but I still have Liz Popich images to upload first. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Austroboletus occidentalis Watling 878530.jpg

Dear Christian,

I have been looking for a free image of A. occidentalis and someone finally uploaded an image above on June 6, 2018. Can you 1. review the image above and 2. restore this deleted category please Category:Austroboletus occidentalis as an Admin? Hopefully the taxanomic data is still there. The image is so so...but its in focus and clear and better than nothing. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:36, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you can also review this image below since there are almost no other images in its category.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)--Leoboudv (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

  • PS: This image would be a great image to upload to Commons since there are few other images in its category
  • This link: http://mushroomobserver.org/image/index_image?by=image_quality&q=Ool3 that I mentioned is actually very powerful because I checked it and at least the first 350 pages features images rated 'Great' on MO. And each page has 18 images. And it is updated to 2018. That was how I managed to find this image on page 348 but I won't upload it although there are not many images in its category but you can if you wish. I hope...this helps. Some of the 'Great' images have been uploaded to Commons but others have been clearly missed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  •   Done I reviewed your images and restored the category. Thanks for the links I will check those pages soon. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your kind help here Christian. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Seguire publicando

No te molestes en borrar o denunciar las fotos que subo, las seguire publicando, gracias por contribuir

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteban Amatti (talk • contribs) 06:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Archive talkpage messages

Dear Christian,

Do you know how I could archive the first 60 messages on my talkpage. They are quite old and date to 2008-2011. I want to call the messages 'Archive 1.' Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Leoboudv: you'd have to create User talk:Leoboudv/Archive 1 and copypaste it, or use User:ArchiverBot or some other archiver script. I can create the archive for you if you want? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank You Alexis I will try this method now. It will explain why I have this feature on my wikipedia account but not here since I last did this in May 2014 on wikipedia. I have forgotten! I never did archive any messages on Wikicommons and so I'm stuck with messages from 2008 on my talkpage. Thank for your help. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: you seem to be making quite some typos, more than usual. Maybe because you are currently working on a device you're not used to, maybe because you're tired, maybe because you're a little tipsy, maybe some other reason. I don't know (I have some suspicions but may be wrong anyway) but I'm just saying you should get some rest if you need it. For the archive, the archive link isn't very visible so you may want to consider using {{Archive box}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • No. The REAL problem is that I have to replace my Microsoft keyboard since some of the letters are getting faded on it after almost 2 years of use. As for my talkpage, I created a second empty talkpage archive if I need to archive messages again. I don't drink so there is no chance of me getting tipsy. The only people who may be a bit tipsy are the Spanish who are [probably] crying their eyes out...wondering why Cristiano Ronaldo scored 3 goals to deny Spain a win over Portugal in a 3-3 FIFA World Cup football game. As a Canadian, I'm neutral here. Thanks for your help again Alexis . --Leoboudv (talk) 01:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: well you are used to your not-worn-out Microsoft keyboard but currently using your worn-out Microsoft keyboard, so I'd count that as a device you're not used to/comfortable with.   which was my first guess anyway!   When it comes to football, I only root for the women - Dutch you know. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • OK. Thanks for your input here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Personally, usually I archive manually the messages older than 1 week, each of my archives cover 2 months. Your messages on the mushroom pictures make my discussion page more alive, usually used mostly by various BOTs or by people who complain after the deletion, made by me, of their uploads. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

3 images

Dear Christian,

If you have time, please consider reviewing these 3 images below.

Wikicommons has no Stemonaria longa images--at all and I found these from the 'list' I mentioned above--while Wikicommons has very few images of Cronartium_quercuum

You can test the multi-lingual template. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help here. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

11 images

Dear Christian,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done I reviewed your images and made available all the 3 templates as multi-lingual. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your help here Christian. Have a good Sunday. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: One question, do you think it can be useful/interesting to have categories for the Mushroom users, example I made a test on File:Saproamanita praeclara 865693.jpg. Look at the categories at bottom you will see a red category which is automatically added Images from Mushroom Observer by Liz Popich (Lizzie). it is a just code line in the template, and if I add it to {{MushroomObserverUser}} then all the images where this template is transcluded will have a similar category according to the username. But in the extend that the categories don't still exist, the result will be 10000 files with a red link. What do you think? Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The advantage is that if we do that then once Images from Mushroom Observer by Liz Popich (Lizzie) is created, so the result is all the images by Liz that have the template will be automatically categorized without a single click. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I think that maybe this category can be avoided because there are many many photographers on MO and this would create a new problem of cataloguing all their images in a specific category. The important thing is giving them attribution for their photos...and this Commons already does. Secondly, many MO photographers don't even know their images are on Commons...due to MO's unique license. Many contributors would be angry if they saw their images here...in a single category. It might be better not to stir a hornets nest. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • With flickr the default license is ARR and the copyright owner has to deliberately change the license to a free version. This is not the case with MO since Nathan Wilson designed it to be wikipedia-friendly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

4 images

Dear Christian,

If you have some time, please review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #317

About photo of bishop Mark Davletov.

Hello!

This is Kirillaphone.

I am really owner of this photo!

http://vorkuta-eparchia.cerkov.ru/biografiya/

This is our department! http://pechora-district.cerkov.ru/pravyashhij-arxierej/&h=1024&w=723&tbnid=ankph3PJBXo0TM&tbnh=267&tbnw=189&usg=__abtUynO3kKaf6dfSDCvo5r-UsNs=&docid=_6kzBlEMC7CXEM&itg=1

And they took this photo from our site.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA_(%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2)&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%95%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA_(%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2).jpg

How can we return this photo back to the page?

Please.

Sincerely, yours Kirillaphone. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.237.123.65 (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Hello Kirillaphone, the publication of this image in the the web [5] is older than the publication here. In order to protect the rights of the copyright holder, even if it is you, we requires one of the following things : a free compatible license must be added to the website, or the copyright holder of the photo must send a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do it. Hope this help. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultan Bey (ship, 2008), Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falconia (ship, 1973), Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:ВК АСК.png

Hello. You have removed the file File: VK ASK.png from the article about a professional volleyball club from Russia. Here is the official site of the club nn-volley.ru

On the official website, you can see the logo. Please restore the file. Regards.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gollumer (talk • contribs) 13:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Hello the club must give us its approval for a publication here. For that they can put a free compatible license on their website or they can send a permission by mail to our permission system OTRS. The file can not be restored without their agreement. Sorry, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sultan Bey (ship, 2008).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

6 images

Dear Christian,

I reluctantly decided to upload these images. Four are of two species which don't exist on Commons. I hope you can review them

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. I think I marked all your images including those I missed on June 20. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright Concerns - Amla, Znode, Artifi

Hi Christian Ferrer,

You have said that the following files will be deleted because of copyright concerns:

File:Znode Admin.jpg File:Znode 2.png File:Artifi 2.png File:Amla 2.png File:Artifi Shoe 2.png File:Amla.png File:Znode.png File:Artifi Labs.png

These logos and pictures are property of Amla Commerce, the company I work for. We should be able to use these because they were created by our company. We hope that you reconsider your request because they were created by our company, and our company has given me permission to use these on the Wikipedia pages.

Also, you said that my account will be blocked because of this. Because the files are owned by the company I am employed by, my account should not be blocked.

Thanks!

Aaron

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AmlaAaron (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi you should read the links I gave to you.
Commons:Project scope:

"To be eligible for hosting on Wikimedia Commons, all files and other content must fall within the Commons scope."

If the files fall within the Commons scope, then the files have to comply with our licensing rules:
Commons:Licensing:

"Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content."

Read the both pages for more details. All files and other content that does not comply with the rules cited will be deleted, and any user who persists in uploading such content after to have been warning not to do so may be blocked. Note that all permissions must be sent to our permission system com:OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

8 images

Eliminación de fotografía y expulsión de usuario Dupy132

Junto con saludar, me he encontrado con que me has eliminado el archivo File:Comandante-en-jefe-del-ejercito-quillota.jpg fotografía que yo tome y fue facilitada al periódico "El Observador" le puedo facilitar el archivo .RAW si es necesario.

También exigire disculpas públicas por el Ban.

-Dupy132 —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.219.236.106 (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

"Wikimedia Commons solo acepta material:
al que se haya aplicado expresamente una licencia libre, o
que esté en el dominio público al menos en los Estados Unidos y en el país de origen de la obra."
la imagen fue publicada sin licencia libre en El Observador (jpg). El propietario de los derechos de autor, incluso si es usted, debe enviar el permiso a OTRS, o si no, se debe agregar una licencia libre al sitio web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

6 images

Wikidata weekly summary #318

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falconia (ship, 1973), Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Milan Bališin 19:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

16 images

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hermione (ship, 2014), Sète 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hermione (ship, 2014), Sète 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

11 images

Deletion of Tough Guys Showtime Poster

Hi Christian, I noticed that you deleted the showtime poster for the Tough Guys (2017 Film). I uploaded the photo from the archive of posters available for public release from this site, which I noted when I uploaded the poster. Can you elaborate on why the photo was deleted?

Thanks.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativity2 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, the sentence "(...) gallery of free to use photos...." is not sufficient for use, as per our policy Commons:Licensing# Acceptable licenses "simply writing that "(...)the material may be used freely by anyone" or similar isn't sufficient". Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


Hello, Thank you for clarifying! I am still new to Wikipedia so I wasn't aware of these specific guidelines. I apologize for uploading the image multiple times - I thought it had been taken down for other reasons.

8 images

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falconia (ship, 1973).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Étang du Doul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

What properties does Commons need?

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Altmühltal Apollofalter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altmühltal Apollofalter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stéphane Cardone (ship).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Christian Ferrer/Archive31".