Welcome to the Commons, Leoboudv!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

License reviews for Jan Arkesteijn uploadsEdit

Hi, I have overwritten and redone the license review you added back in April for File:Hermann-Josef Lamberti (2014).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). The reason Flickrreview failed was because the image had been digitally changed, including the EXIF data. By overwriting with the digitally authentic original, the automatic review has now worked and I have made a recrop, keeping the colours authentic to the photographer's original choices.

As Jan Arkesteijn has been blocked for similar issues of misrepresenting original works, I suggest following a similar workflow if oddly coloured images from a different Flickr original come up. Thanks -- (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

  • I believe all Jan Arkesteijn's images were cropped but came from the same source. That is why I passed them. I'll have a brief look. Wow! Jan's user page is now blocked! I did not know this. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment:

Dear ,

Most (80+%) of Jan's images I reviewed are from librarie mollat below and usually have only 1 image in them by Jan.

  • I assume they are OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  • For this image below, it appears that Jan made the image brighter. Is that a problem...when the license is free?
  • File:Sophie Divry (2018).jpg

That is my only question. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

There are two types of misrepresentation, which has led to some photographs getting deleted and the uploader being blocked at this moment:
  1. Add false colours to original professional works based on personal tastes, which damages educational value per Scope, rather than adding any apparent value. For non-GLAM works this is probably unlikely to cause contention, but could still be debatable if a representative original is never uploaded to Commons
  2. Adding copyright statements to EXIF data which misrepresents the copyright statements at source
In the Flickr cases, reverting to the Flickr original solves any potential debate and the bot-verification provides a nice record of authenticity even if the image is then cropped.
Picking out one of the cases you list (I only looked at two), File:Nina Bouraoui (2016).jpg has a correct claim on the image page text, but the EXIF data on the file includes the statements "Online copyright statement https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/" and "Usage terms Public domain" which is clearly false and invalidates your license review. Sorry. Please handle uploads from this user with more caution than normal. -- (talk) 06:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I agree they say PD-Mark in the EXIF but they use CC BY 3.0 for the {{|Youtube}} license according to COM:WHERE LICENSE for this and many other images. I usually verify the Youtube license unless I see something supicious.

For these 2 images below, librarie mollat says the license is CC BY 3.0 in the metadata so I guess I have to file a DR on the first image you mentioned which is PD-Mark.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Manual removal of review needed categoryEdit

Hi, thanks for your reviewing of Tasnim works. Can you please manually remove the Tasnimnews review needed category when you perform your review, so that they just don't appear there. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 10:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  • I'll do my best to remember. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Should I request license reviews for extracted screenshots?Edit

I just uploaded File:Lynn Gilmartin Previews WPT Montreal at Playground Poker Club.webm and extracted 15 screenshots from it. I wonder, is a license review for the video sufficient or should I also request license reviews for all the screenshots? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  • A license review for the original view should be OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Images from lasvegasvegas.comEdit

I'm cleaning up some files from lasvegasvegas.com. What to do with File:Marty Smyth.jpg and File:LizLieu.jpg? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  •   Comment: If the original source is deleted, we can't keep the image Alexis Jazz Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red AwardEdit

  2018 Autumn Award
Thank you for your help this Autumn. We have loaded over 365 picture of Women from Nigeria as well as others. Your unwavering support and assistance when required have been invaluable. Have a great Christmas when you get there. Victuallers (talk) 11:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

image reviewEdit

Hi, would you be able to review this image for me? Regards. ArturSik (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

DaphneEdit

MUMEdit

Article on my late mum. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

A request for License ReviewEdit

Hello! Could you please perform license reviews of the files File:David Johnson at Opal Gallery March 25, 2010.jpg (slated to be on the Main page of Wikipedia shortly) and File:David Johnson at Opal Gallery March 25, 2010 (2).jpg? Thanks, and let me know if you would like me to review any files you've uploaded. --Animalparty (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! --Animalparty (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Dominee GremdaatEdit

You had reviewed File:Dominee Gremdaat in 2018 3 (cropped).jpg and other screenshots from the video, so you know the license is correct. Could you please review File:Dominee Gremdaat - SorryJohan.webm? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Alchemilla xanthochlora herbarium (02).jpgEdit

This picture has licence CC BY 4.0. Please put it back. See https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1838164229. Rasbak (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!Edit

  For helping out with User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief! I saw you already had three "Tireless contributor" barnstars, so here's a Dutch treat.   - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

PhotoEdit

Can you explain me this? Chronus (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Chronus: what is there to explain? Commons does not consider the Public Domain Mark to be a license. There have been discussions about this and the policy so far hasn't been changed. You can ask Flickr accounts that use the PDM to switch to CC0. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment: PD Mark is not considered an enforceable license on Commons and the copyright holder can remove or change the license of the image at any time and no one can use it. It is not enforceable...unless it is a US Government image since US Government images are Public Domain by US law. So, this image is not acceptable since it comes from someone's personal account. {{CC0}} or public domain dedication such as this image on flickr is OK for Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) note that PD Mark is also valid for images that are in the public domain due to age. But in any case, images with a PD-Mark need to have the corresponding PD license when uploaded to Commons like {{PD-USGov}}, {{PD-old-auto-expired}}, {{PD-Italy}}, etc. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Linking the original on DRsEdit

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russian Orthodox Church in Antwerpen (Sint-Jozefkerk).jpg

Could you please link the original on Flickr in cases like these? The "bad authors" list is an absolute mess and shouldn't, in and of itself, be considered as a reason for deletion. Thanks to Google I was able to find the source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/centralasian/7935754578/in/photostream/. This Flickr account was blacklisted because of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Office_actions/DMCA_notices&oldid=260924975#Igor_Stravinsky.2C_New_York_City_.281946.29. https://www.flickr.com/people/centralasian/ states: "The majority of the photograph in this Flickr stream are of my own 'production'. I post them here to share with the community but also to use them in my blogs, so this stream works as a storage space (these days they call it 'cloud'). At some point I began to gather here not only my own works, but also the images of other people - photographs, artworks, charts, maps, and whatnots. I try to attribute all these works as accurately as I can, but it's not always possible, unfortunately. Too many things are just 'laying there' on the web, unattributed and untitled."

The photo that was deleted here per that DR appears to have been own work. They appear to own at least a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an iPhone 4. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: The problem is when people mix their own work with clear flickrwashes (licensed freely) on their account. What can an admin or reviewer do? Thanks for the advice. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

ApprovalEdit

@Leoboudv: Please approve this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jason_Day_actor.jpg --Zabnef (talk) 20:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Deletion requestsEdit

  • I have made the corrections. Sorry.Rasbak (talk) 23:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Are you sure of this photographs taken on date?Edit

Hi, File:Hygrocybe intermedia (Pass.) Fayod 494229.jpg have Exif date 2014-09-14 but in the {{Information}} find 2014-12-20. You remember the right date? Thanks :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete PhotosEdit

Hello I asked delete five photos that myself uploaded in the category:FS D.342.2000 and a photo in the FS D.342.4000. Please Can you delete?--Marinaio56 (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I cannot since I am not an Administrator. Only an Administrator can delete images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


About the Albatros D.VII picture. I have searched and found only two pictures of the Albatros D.VII. One is already in the wikimedia commons the other was found here. https://riseofflight.com/forum/topic/33215-curiouser-and-curiouser-albatros-dvii/ Supposedly it's public domain just as the other one but since I could not upload it as such I used the flickr.

Since I thought they are from the same source and the other was in flickr and belongs to a museum I thought this one was also. I cannot find any more informations about that photo altough since it's one in a kind and the only one of the prototype looking from the front I thought it was a good idea. I apologize for any inconvenience.  --João Silva 7

Some bubble tea for you!Edit

  Thanks for doing all those license reviews! It's very appreciated! Kaldari (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

Hi. You accepted this file. The fact that the people who made the charts let their work to be PD, does that change the rights about the map behind? I mean are we not obliged to check the status of the original source when we review a DW? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 03:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I don't know. It can be if people are creating a new derivative of the original passed image and claiming it as "own work." Hope this helps, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

File:1973 Calabanga Church.jpgEdit

hi thank you, i dont know why the page are missing nor have been lost. but even though i hope dont erase the picture because in my opinion, it is the only photos i saw taken from 1973. sorry :( --ShiminUfesoj (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

here [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiminUfesoj (talk • contribs) 08:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

License review neededEdit

Hello, Leoboudv. Category:License review needed is a bit crowded; would you mind giving me a hand in emptying it? Thank you. --Chiyako92 (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I review only what or when I can Chiyako92 as I have to work too. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Image: Wojciech Sadurski.JPGEdit

Please, could You delete the first thumbnail (unsuccessful one) of the image and leave only the second one (the latest version). I want to avoid a possibility of vandalism by reverting it.
Thank You very much.

Artur Andrzej (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I cannot because I am only a reviewer....not an Administrator. Sorry, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

DeviantartEdit

@Leoboudv: Hi Leoboudv please approve this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hola_soy_german_by_glamrect.png --Xoaw (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

ImageEdit

@Leoboudv: PLease hel me the image that you approved they want to eliminate, I do not know why, please help me https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hola_soy_german_by_glamrect.png --Xoaw (talk) 02:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Flickr reviewsEdit

Hi! Often Flickr files could not be reviewed by bots because they are downscaled (not the same as cropped). They should be overwriten with the Flickr original, then they can be reviewed by bots again. I saw File:AdelaideClemens2013.jpg and File:Ital food - 01.jpg and did the re-upload.--Roy17 (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

  • I will try to remember to do this if I have the time since I also work Roy17. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

FotoEdit

Saludos!!! Me puedes verificar esta foto por favor, es de un video oficial de YouTube VERIFICADO del tipo Creative Commons. Gracias.

File:Pexels-photo-132694.jpgEdit

Sorry, Leoboudv, but your changes are totally wrong! You should have get startled with the Pixabay username. This image was copied from Pexels to Pixabay. I think you should revert your changes and do the review for the Pexels source (oh, no, you already had reviewed it). — Speravir – 18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: OK Sorry Speravir. I thought this was a MaxPixels photo where there was a Mass DR filed and most images came from Pixabay. I can revert my pass and pass this image as a pexels photo. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done The Pexels license changed only in July 2018 so its CC0. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 OK On a general note: During the MaxPixels action recently I actually thought whether we should treat Pexels similarily like Pixabay, especially with own template with LR included (the template exists: {{Pexels-Cc-zero}}), but than I saw that there are not that much images here (at least in cat. Files from Pexels; on the other hand see search results for file: pexels -hastemplate:"pexels-cc-zero") and forgot it. That the license has changed not that long ago I did not know BTW. Did you check with the Wayback Machine? — Speravir – 19:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes, these sites copy/copied from each other. For this other example the Pexels user is named Pixabay. Actually this user naming is quite good for us I think. In my opinion we should try to give the real source as far as possible for us which can be very hard, you know it yourself. BTW there is also a Pixabay user WikimediaImages, cf. at VP: Pixabay user "WikimediaImages".
Regarding your “I can try if I have the time:”What do you refer to? The template? I would do this myself, I was also partly involved in template {{Pixabay}} enhancement. But do we need it when we have the general {{LicenseReview}}? This said: I do not understand why the Pexels equivalent is not simply named {{Pexels}} (I would favor moving this to this name i.e. vice versa). — Speravir – 22:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  • I was referring to the fact that I have a job and have to work. That is all. I don't mind why the Pexels equivalent is not simply named {{Pexels}} as long as the image was really CC0 at upload because a new pexels image today is not CC0. That is why we have {{LicenseReview}} for new uploaded Pexel images. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 OK, then we leave it as it is. — Speravir – 02:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

FileEdit

File:Mohamed ElBaradei, Former Vice-President of Egypt, Nobel Peace Prize 2005, Egypt (42112286531).jpg

Is the file free? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes it is. From this Flickr license table the Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike and Public Domain Dedication licenses are free since there is NO Non-Commercial or No-Derivative restriction. Public domain Mark flickr license images like this are NOT OK since they are not legally enforceable. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
And about File:Official portrait of Petro Poroshenko.jpg. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Lil Pump authorship resolvedEdit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Pump%27s_mugshot.jpg

Are you able to review my upload now that the authorship issue has been resolved? Michael14375 (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Its Miami Dade Jail. The article context suggests this is the jail. Image reviewed. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your Flickr link?Edit

The Flickr account link on your user page doesn't go anywhere useful. --GRuban (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry to bother you,but can you help me?Edit

Seems like nobody handle this matter.

Could you possibly do me a favour? Please help reviewed the picture. Appreciate your help.

Thank you so much!! Maddie Rice (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

This imagesEdit

@Leoboudv:your approval is needed for these images File:Thelma Fardin.jpg,File:Hulk in CDMX.jpg,File:Andrés Bustamante.jpg,File:Magdalena Leonel de Cervantes.jpg,File:Cuauhtémoc Billete.jpg,File:Guaicaipuro billete.jpg,File:Luis-Doctor García.jpg,File:Christian Martinoli 2.jpg,File:Ana Serradilla.jpg,File:Cecilio Guzmán de Rojas.jpg,File:Dámaso Pérez Prado.jpg --Xoaw (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a sock that has asked for your approval before. Be extra careful when reviewing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Maybe someone should do a sockpuppet investigation then. The licenses are correct. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 
No need for checkuser
  • No need, because they pass the duck test. Blocks don't deter this user though, they will just register a new account in 2 seconds and carry on. So might as well let them keep this one so license reviewers know what they are dealing with. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv:Please I need you aprovation File:Duko.jpg,File:Duko concierto.jpg,File:Duko Freestyle.jpg--Xoaw (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv:Please--Xoaw (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

I hope you like dogs..Edit

Can you review these?

As you can see in the file history, FlickreviewR 2 confirmed these as being available with PD-mark in 2018, but the photos have been removed from Flickr since that time. I can't simply revert to that version because there was no PD-template on the page at that time. My best guess is that these dogs are now working for different agencies, or something happened to them causing them to no longer work for the DSS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Nina Cuso press photo.jpgEdit

Hi. Someone thinks this photo is a copyvio. It appears to be by Dan Lecca per http://www.theworldisagirlsrunway.com/2018/02/nyfw-2018-jxy-n-cuso-runway-show-21018.html and https://obviousmag.com/jxy-n-cuso-runway-show-fw-18-nyfw/ ; the source link is dead. It was uploaded by a enwiki-confirmed sockmaster to support en:Nina Cuso, since deleted. Was the permission you saw from Dan Lecca?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

  • It was from the Ninacuso account and the license must have been valid or I would not have passed it but I can't say if the photographer was Dan Lecca. If the source flickr account is suspicious, it may be safer to delete. (unless there are other photos from this flickr account here to show who took the photographs from this account.) I have no strong feelings here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

License ReviewEdit

Please review this images:

*File:Ángela Vázquez .png

  Done  JGHowes  talk 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Can you please review [my uploads]? I am new to uploading content, so I am a bit anxious. Still, I believe they are fine and they will pass your scrutiny.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

To reduce your work load, I am providing proof that the Twitter accounts I cited as the source in my uploads belong to the Indian government. [This], [this] and [this] can act as the proof. I would be grateful if you helped. Regards, Vaibhavafro (talk) 00:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

An administrator has just approved the uploads! I would be grateful if you could do the final license check.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

  CommentI have asked another user to look at my uploads. No need to bother you now. Relax.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

RequestEdit

Sorry to disturb you again. Can you license review my uploads in the same way in which you reviewed this image.–Vaibhavafro(Talk!) 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

  Comment:This may just be a formality; other users told me this wasn’t necessary in GODL-India uploads. Still, I would prefer to have it there to give them more credibility. I would be grateful if you did it for me-Vaibhavafro(Talk!) 09:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

  Comment:An administrator has confirmed to me that a second review is not needed in GODL-India uploads. So, I may withdraw my request. No need to bother you now. Relax.—VaibhavafroTalk 19:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, could you please review this uploads? So many days that nobody reviewed them...

Thanks for your time. Best regards!--Docosong (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! :) --Docosong (talk) 10:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ReviewEdit

Please review this files

@Leoboudv:Please respond--Roman Medellín (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: Thank you--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv:Please--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Sorry. I don't know if the photograph's copyright was really not renewed. I cannot review it. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Leoboudv/common.jsEdit

Hi Leoboudv, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Leoboudv/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 1 character 6: Label 'User' on Majora statement. - Evidence: User:Majora/LicenseReview.js
  2. ISSUE: line 1 character 29: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:Majora/LicenseReview.js

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 06:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC).

Flickr reviewEdit

Hi, I notice you reviewed the license of a picture I uploaded from Flickr. Could I get you to review several others also?

Sorry to bother you but I've been waiting to find a trusted reviewer and get this images done in case they are deleted or otherwise cannot be verified. Would you mind doing it please? ~ R.T.G 22:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done RTG Had a little bit of free time today. Best from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Great, thanks from Ireland o/ ~ R.T.G 00:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Please review this image:  . --Gindomarlo (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Please review this image: 100px.MO-Quotes (talk) 13:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Image is missing permission or license as tagged. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Thanks for reply could you please review this uploads? So many days that nobody reviewed them.

MO-Quotes (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

I didn't see any notices about free licenses on source pages. File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana Announcing maha shivaratri Day at the India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna.jpg is work of government of India, but proper license tag must be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

I make this review request because two users mistakenly marked these images as a copyright violation and later admitted their mistake (diff1 diff2)

image 1:  .

image 2:  . --Gindomarlo (talk) 04:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

  •   Done: Some 10 hours ago. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

BarnstarEdit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for your tireless efforts at License Review. JoJan (talk) 16:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Amenemhat VEdit

Happy holidays Leoboudv. I was wondering what do you think about such a thing. Best wishes, Khruner (talk) 09:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I tagged the file as a copyright violation. An uploader may not review his/her uploads and typing in a fake flickr pass is not permitted. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Just as I thought. BW Khruner (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Paul ManlyEdit

Would OTRS be a proper proof of why it is public domain?--NL19931993 (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

  • If the flickr account owner is the copyright owner, you could contact the flickr owner to ask him to change the FLICKR License from public domain mark to say cc0 OR Public Domain Dedication which is acceptable at Commons....like this flickr image is licensed. AttributioinShareAlike 2.0 Generic or CC BY SA 2.0 like this flickr image license is also OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Wrongly linkedEdit

Dear Leoboudv, You marked the image File:Lycaena li.jpg I uploaded while I had wrongly linked to the image. I corrected the link. Can you review license again? Thanks. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done: I mark so many of your images that I missed this one's source. Thanks Lymantria . Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
    No problem, You're doing a great job! The barnstar above is well deserved. Lymantria (talk) 07:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

File:DurletRomain.jpg AND OTHER REVIEWERS???Edit

Hi! How are you doing? Long time since we last talked :-) If you have time could you have a look at this file? Do you agree that it is PD? It can be freely used by everyone and no requirement to credit the author. --MGA73 (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Perhaps you could review the file? I'm no longer an admin so system will complain if I review :-D --MGA73 (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! I can see that there is a lot of file that need review. Did someone mass upload files or are there just too few reviewers? --MGA73 (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
  • There are more than 10,000+ images MGA73 and I don't have the time sadly to review them. I have a real life job. If you wish, you can apply to be a reviewer. Last week it was 9500 images. I guess there is a lack of active reviewers too. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Yeah real life takes a lot of time... I will apply so I can help a bit. --MGA73 (talk) 21:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

@Leoboudv:Please request the review and approval of this images

image 1:  

image 2: 

@Leoboudv:Please @Leoboudv:Please --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Yet another image requestEdit

Hi. If you have time, please review the following images:

Regards, You've gone incognito (talkcontribs) 13:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Some images to reviewEdit

Dear Leoboudv, I think today I will not do any uploads. Would you be so kind as to look into my uploads of Jan 29? If I have seen correctly, they have not been reviewed yet. Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

  • That's good. The images are reviewed now. On January 29, I had to do a lot of work in my real appraisal job. Best Regards, Fabian B. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done MGA73 Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! --MGA73 (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Maybe I should remove most of my last name 'except the B' above but you can get it from this image: File:Early 20th Century Micronesian Armour.jpg from my flickr account Lymantria & MGA73. I am struck by how many users I dealt with have left Commons like JurgenNL who reviewed that very rare image or Russavia or INeverCry or SterkeBak/Abigor who first gave me the license review rights. Sometimes I wonder whether you can trust anyone sadly. There are reliable trustworthy people like Gruban, Christian Ferrer or 1Veertje but then a case like INeverCry appears with all his sockpuppets. It also tells me 'not to get involved in politics' or disputes unless the case I get involved in is crystal clear like this situation Best, Fabian B from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I had to take a break. I think it is nice to not have to worry about admin stuff for a while. I think reviewers should check the license and look for obvious copyvios. Doing advanced forensic studies is not a part of a license review. The task is to make sure we check the source and the license before image is removed from the source or the license is changed. Anyone can challenge if the source really is the copyright holder but it is stupid to challenge the license once the file is reviewed. Unless ofcourse a reviewer verified a license that is not possible. For example GFDL on Flickr :-)
I hope it gets better once we get the backlogs cleared. Then we have more time to do what we like most. Perhaps we can even help the admins. I hope if they have less work they will make fewer crazy things :-D
Anyway I'm happy you are still around. --MGA73 (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks MGA73 for your message. On Commons and wikipedia, we are all volunteers and have real life jobs. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
    • So does this admin, in fact a rather low key one at commons nowadays. A very busy job indeed. But I love wikidata/commons/wikipedia(-nl) and try to add help. Lymantria (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Lokesh Kanagaraj at The ‘Zee Cine Awards’.jpg Perumalism (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Adriano Ciaffi.jpgEdit

Hi, now there's the right link. Thank you --Caulfield (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Brazil government other file type review neededEdit

Hi! I think most of the files in this category can be passed. I checked the first file File:001 - Antonio Sergio de Mattos, CNV-SP.pdf. Do you agree that it looks ok? --MGA73 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done Yes I marked that and the category looks free but I have been busy with other things. The license CC BY 4.0 was at the bottom. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment:

I reviewed this image File:001 - Arquivo CEMDP Devanir José, CNV-SP.pdf and the file you mentioned File:001 - Antonio Sergio de Mattos, CNV-SP.pdf and both times the 'Category:Brazil government other file type review needed' does not go away. Hmm! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

  • I have to review User:Quetzal1964's reviews when I have the time first. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks a lot. I did not mean that you should review them, I just wanted you to have a look before I started with them. Just ignore the ghostly category. It’s a new thing. A bot will remove the category. The bot is meant to have a check and sort the files to make it easier for reviewers. Yesterday I checked 35 Facebook images. It’s much easier when the bot find and put all images in a category so you can check a lot of similar images, yay! --MGA73 (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Working on it. Sometimes it takes looooong time to load the file. There are other categories to check so hope we get more reviewers. --MGA73 (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
I reviewed most of them. Perhaps you can check the last 4? Links did not work for me for the 3 first and I'm not sure about the last one. --MGA73 (talk) 16:05, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment: MGA73 The material don't match the uploaded stuff on Commons for the first 3 and the last one--the link doesn't work. Best not to review them. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. That is strange. You did notice that there are often more files at the source and they have numbers like 001, 002 etc.? --MGA73 (talk) 19:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes. What can we do. Its the uploader's method MGA73. Enjoy your February 29....only another 4 more years until another! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Lol yes only 4 more years ;-) Hope you enjoy your day too :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:05, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned file.

File:20200224002704!UFC 244 BMFBelt.pngRegice2020 (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Old onesEdit

Hi Fabian, Would you please have a LR-look at "old" uploads here and here? Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Speaking of old ones perhaps you would like to comment on Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Acceptance_of_files_from_external_sources_without_a_license_review and Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Apply_a_default_of_Good_Faith_for_very_old_files :-) --MGA73 (talk) 15:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Would very much appreciate license reviews for the following three files (especially the Grande picture, her current Wikipedia lede photo is awful):

DanielleTH (Say hi!) 02:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I cannot verify the image was free at upload. I will ask Christian Ferrer if he can. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Here's Google's cache of the page, if that helps. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 20:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Vijay At The Jilla 100 days celebrations event 1.jpg
File:Vijay At The Jilla 100 days celebrations event.jpg
File:Ilaiyaraaja and Vikram at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
File:Vijay at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
File:Rajinikanth and Vijay at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
File:H. Vinoth at Theeran Adhigaaram Ondru Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 13:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hi Leoboudv, as far as I can see: This is the first file from the given source. File:Consular Section Chief Mark Marrano überreicht Journalist und DDR-Bürgerrechtler Siegbert Schefke das Visum für die USA.jpg. Is it OK for commons? What you would improve? Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes. It is US State Government work. I have reviewed the image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi Leboudv. Would you please review some new pics from the some source? Thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Patricia Lacina and Axel Wintermeyer, February 2020.jpg
File:Consul General Patricia Lacina, July 2018.jpg
File:Generalkonsul Jim Herman am Internationalen Tag des Bieres, August 2017.jpg
File:Mirko Reeh, März 2019.jpg
File:Mirko Reeh und US-Generalkonsulin Patricia Lacina, 2019.jpg
File:“Building Bridges” combines traditional images of the Berlin Airlift, 2018.jpg
File:Denise Williams and Marilyn Sorensen with German artist Jasmin Siddiqui, 2018.jpg
File:“Building Bridges” combines traditional images of the Berlin Airlift, 2018.jpg
File:Jasmin Siddiqui with Mrs. Denise Williams and Mrs. Marilyn Sorensen, 2018.jpg
File:60th anniversary of American Junior Year at Heidelberg University, 2019.jpg
File:Former U.S. diplomat Peter Claussen, 2019.jpg
File:Patricia Lacina und Mitglieder der jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt, 2019.jpg
File:Patricia Lacina und Dr. Salomon Korn, 2019.jpg
File:Dr. Gerhard Wiesinger, Dirk Nowitzki, Michelle Burton, 2017.jpg
I have corrected the source. Thank you very much. Mutter Erde (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi @Leobudv can you review this [|photo], thank you Mars Bott (talk) 13:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Thanks for review my first upload picture :-) Sorry to bother you but could you review me for these two photos? File:Emma_Watson_interview_in_2017.jpg and File:Emma_Watson_in_2016.jpg Mars Bott (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done Best from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much, have a nice day! :-) Mars Bott (talk) 02:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi Leobudv, pleese review. Thank you very much. Mutter Erde (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Review FlickrEdit

@Leoboudv:Please, could you fix and approve these images ?, because the Flickr bot says it needs a human review

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Special Barnstar
... you corrected a licence mismatch / photo error I caused while transfering this image. Sorry and thank-you.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Criado-Perez#/media/Datei:Caroline_Criado-Perez_2019.jpg

Polimorph (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hi, there. I see that you are a license reviewer. Can you please review the files in this category: User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-gallery-uploaded-by/Lefcentreright? All of these files have been taken from YouTube live streams done by w:en:eNCA. They are licensed under the website's free license. You must please click on the link in the "Summary" box because, for some obscure reason, the license of the video is not visible in the archive link. Thanks in advance. Lefcentreright (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done. Next time, please give a time stamp like this uploader did here to help other reviewers find the image please. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, again. Thanks for approving the first batch, please review the next batch (I have included time stamps):
Lefcentreright (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Lincense Review RequestEdit

As, I see sir your a license reviewer making an earnest request please can you review the license for the File:Babar_Azam.png, File:Maya Ali (Pexels-Act-erst-acting-jheel-jheel-saif-ul-malook-172719).jpg and File:Karachi Zoo Visit.jpg for me quickly so that it may qualify for their respective articles.Thank You.IMuWal02(talk)

Review requestEdit

Hi! I hope you're ok. I would like to ask you if you can review the uploads of Contributions/Dru_alexandro. I don't see the permissions, but I don't have the experience to mark them correctly. Greetings. --Vareloco (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I really appreciate it, thank you very much. Now I learned how to do it. Greetings from the other end, Chile. --Vareloco (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation review requestEdit

I believe these images are copyright, but i do not have the tools to find the source.

135.180.67.193 06:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: The first 2 images are on wikipedia, not Wikicommons here. The second 2 images, I cannot say. Not enough evidence. The last image does have some camera metadata. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Schichany Landschaft.jpgEdit

Hi! I moved this file from lb.wiki to Commons. I think it would be better to have another review on the file now that I moved the file. Could you have a look? --MGA73 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done Yes. The license was CC BY SA 4.0 at time of upload MGA73. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! --MGA73 (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Sure. No problem. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Natarajan Subramaniam at the Bongu Press Meet.jpg
File:Rajinikanth Felicitates Writer Kalaignanam.jpg
File:Rajinikanth Felicitates Writer Kalaignanam 1.jpg
File:Vani Bhojan At The ‘Oh My Kadavule’ Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi there can you please review the license for File:Maulana Tariq Jamil.pngfor me quickly.Thank You

File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpgEdit

I'm reviewing Hard's uploads since I noticed that they'd uploaded a lot of images that were scaled down from the originals available on Flickr. I noticed this image, which you'd done a license review on. The source URL links to a different photo of the same person, and neither Google Image Search nor TinEye can locate the actual source, so I've tagged the image as missing a source. I'm curious what happened here. Since Flickr allows images to be replaced, it's possible the image was replaced since your review back in February. Do you remember reviewing this image in particular, and that the image on Flickr at the time was the same image as is now on Commons? Thanks! --Alex Cohn (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: Yes I did review it. The University of Navarra's images are usually OK but the closing Admin can decide here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi there can you please review the license for following files quickly: File:Abid Ali.jpg, File:Mohammad Hafeez in 2017.png, File:Azhar Ali.png, File:Shaheen Shah Afridi.png, File:Wahab Riaz.jpg, File:Shadab_Khan.png, and File:Imad_Wasim.png.jpg Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMuWal02 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

License reviewEdit

Hi, would you kindly review the licenses of the following images?:

Thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

That's alright. Thanks a lot. I've got one more if it's not a problem: File:Lady Gaga at 2019 SAG Awards.jpg. ArturSik (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Pawan at the Vada Chennai Press Meet.jpg
File:R. Parthiban at Thodari Audio Launch.jpg
File:Balaji Sakthivel At The ‘Vaanam Kottatum’ Audio Launch.jpg
File:Aadukalam Naren At The ‘Asuran’ Audio Launch.jpg
File:Samantha at 10 Enradhukulla Teaser Launch.jpg
File:R Sarathkumar at Tamil Film Industry Hunger Strike.jpg
File:Pasupathy at Anjala Audio Launch.jpg
File:Sudha Kongara Prasad at Irudhi Suttru Thanks Giving Meet.jpg
File:RK Selvamani At The Irumbuthirai Success Meet.jpg
File:SA Chandrasekhar at Kanithan Audio Launch.jpg
File:Actor Vadivelu in Eli’s “Talking Eli App” Launch Press Meet.jpg
File:Vani Bhojan at the ‘Zee Cine Awards’.jpg
File:Prabhu at Wagah Audio Launch.jpg
File:Dhanush at Mudinja Ivana Pudi Audio Launch.jpg
File:Ilaiyaraaja at Merku Thodarchi Malai Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 12:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hi there can you please review the license for File:Waseem Badami.png quickly.Thanking you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMuWal02 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Photo reviewEdit

Welcome, please check the following pictures Special:ListFiles/Bkhe97 Bkhe97 (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Rajinikanth, Dhanush and Vivek at Nerupuda Audio Launch.jpg
File:Dhanush at the ‘Asuran’ Success Meet.jpg
File:Dhanush at the Filmfare Awards South 2017 Press Meet.jpg
File:Tovino Thomas At The ‘Maari 2’ Press Meet.jpg
File:Rajinikanth at the Inauguration of MGR Statue 1.jpg
File:Agathiyan at the ‘Kennedy Club’ Audio Launch.jpg
File:Srikanth Deva at Bongu Audio Launch.jpg
File:Rangaraj Pandey at the 12th We Awards 2016.jpg
File:Director Ram at the Aruvi Movie Premiere.jpg
File:Director A Venkatesh at Sandamarutham Audio Launch.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned files.

File:Mustafa El Khani 2017.jpg
File:Lilia Al Atrash 2008.jpg
File:Monkey d Dragon.png

Bkhe97 (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

License Review RequestEdit

Hi there can you please review the license for the following files:

File:Iqrar Ul Hassan.png
File:Mehwish Hayat.png
File:Hira Mani.png
File:Asad Shafiq.png quickly.Thanking you in advance. IMuWal02 (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

  Done --Leoboudv (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hi @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned files.

File:Maysoon Abu Asaad 2015.jpg
File:Ali Kareem 2017.jpg
File:Rana Abyad 2017.jpg
File:Kinda Hanna 2013.jpg
File:Dima Kandalaft 2013.jpg
File:Wafaa Mosalaly 2015.jpg
File:Kholoud Essa 2015.jpg
File:Fayez Kazak 2015.jpg
File:Mohammad Kheir Al-Jarrah 2015.jpg
File:Maan Abdul Haq 2018.jpg
File:Racha ELtaqi 2008.jpg
File:أيمن رضا.jpg
File:Asim Hawat 2013.jpg Bkhe97 (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mertensia virginica.bbg.jpgEdit

Can you, please, verify your LR here? There are complaints concerning attribution. Ankry (talk) 19:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I verify that the image was licensed as CC BY 2.0 Generic as it is now. Ankry If the image is stolen or a flickrwash, (there is no metadata...at the flickr source) then feel free to file a DR though the uploader has no known history of copyvios, I think. I note that the source flickr account only has 72 images but then my own flickr account has only 160 images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
    • Well, I think that the Flickr license requires attribution and the required attribution never was: "Own work:User:Nafsadh" ;) I do not object the license itself nor I consider this case license laundering. I am sorry if I was not clear in my initial message. Ankry (talk) 05:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment: That's OK Ankry. Please feel free to change the attribution to Khan "Sadh" N. Mostafa to clear things up. Kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Request: License review needed, Verifying the imagesEdit

Hi Leoboudv, can you Please help me to check, reviewing and verifying this photos down below; I'm pretty sure all of this pictures is a screenshot that was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license mentioned on each of the photos summary and licensing. Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license.":

Thanks before, best regards- I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, could you please review the following images.


  • Thank you so much leoboudv

License Review RequestEdit

Hi Leoboudv, could you please review the following images.

  • Thank you leoboudv.

{{PDMark-owner}}Edit

Images with a PD-Mark license that are the flickr owners own work can be reviewed now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

FlickrEdit

Hi. FYI. --E4024 (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

  • I undid the uploader's actions but I cannot protect the image as I am not an Admin. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, requesting following images for review:
[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] , [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]
Gpkp (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. Sorry, there were few mistakes in the requests, few pre-reviewed and few repeated ones. Requesting following images for the review.
--Gpkp (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 06:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

License Review RequestEdit

Hi Leoboudv, could you please review the following images

  • Thank you so much Leoboudv.

License Review RequestEdit

Please review this images

Review RequestEdit

Hi leoboudv, please review the following images

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Thanks a lot leoboudv,your help meant a lot to me. next time i will upload all the images with time stamps. sorry for the inconvenience.

Reviewing files per userEdit

Hi! I do not know if you have noticed User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-sorted-list. It is a list of galleries of files that need a license review for example User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-gallery-uploaded-by/Kaldari. I was thinking that it could be fun to work together a few license reviewers. We pick a subpage and try to empty it. To make it easier I think we should start slow with a page of 20-50 files. Let me know what you think and if you know anyone that might find it fun to try just ping them. --MGA73 (talk) 06:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: Unfortunately, I have a full time job sadly to do a lot of reviews. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thats okay. I'm also busy and do not have time to do lots of reviews. I hope you and your friends/family are safe in this crazy time.

Review requestEdit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KhamzatChimaev(fighter).png#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D A review request is neededKent Bargo (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv,

Requesting following files for review:

Gpkp (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you very much Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 08:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:S. P. Balasubrahmanyam at the 'Gurkha' Audio Launch.jpg
File:SP Balasubrahmanyam and KJ Yesudas at Abbas Cultural’s Kalaivizha 2017 – 25 Years of Celebrating Art Event.jpg
File:SP Balasubrahmanyam Felicitates KJ Yesudas.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 09:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv,
Requesting following files for review:

--Gpkp (talk) 19:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done --Leoboudv (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:SP Balasubrahmanyam at Kanithan Audio Launch.jpg
File:SP Balasubrahmanyam at 86th Birth Anniversary of Director K Balachander.jpg
File:SP Balasubrahmanyam Felicitates KJ Yesudas-1.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi,Leoboudv could you kindly review the following images please

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, could you please review following images:

--Gpkp (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: Next time, please give a time stamp like this to locate the video frame Gpkp
  • File:Ramya Pandian.png (@ 1:23 of the source video)

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Leoboudv, Thank you for the reviews. I thought the page-navigation to locate the video frame would be easy, for reviewing. Requesting review for the following file:

--Gpkp (talk) 04:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you, Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 07:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following videos for review:

Regards, --Gpkp (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Leoboudv, Thank you for the reviews. --Gpkp (talk) 16:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

No source?Edit

In this edit you marked a file I license reviewed with no source. The source, the YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqnB76cQSd0 is still up, and still marked Creative Commons. Mistake, or am I missing something? --GRuban (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Sorry GRuban I found the source now....and passed it. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Thanks! Also thanks for tirelessly reviewing my uploads, as always. --GRuban (talk) 21:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • No problem GRuban Unfortunately the uploader above gave me 32 videos to review and most have no time stamp indicator. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Luckily it was not 32 videos at once. Whew! Next year I will have to slow down and concentrate on work GRuban sadly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
    • It was the first time, actually!. You are a gift to the Commons, Leo, and when you need to do other work, we will all feel it. --GRuban (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
      • Agree. Leoboudv, you are a gift to the Commons. By the way, my intention was not to overload, but to get my long-pending videos for review. Thank you GRuban and Leoboudv. Gpkp (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

--Gpkp (talk) 11:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Review request from LefcentrerightEdit

Hello, there. I hope you are doing well. Please review the following photos:

Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 18:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. These four also:
Regards, Lefcentreright (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done Next time, please give a time interval for the images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

I don't normally make specific requests, you're so good about getting to most of my uploads anyway, but I'm hoping to get these two officially stamped, because they were a request from the subject, whom I told to put the license statement on their web page:

They're both from the same image on http://www.elenacastedo.com/index.htm, right side of the page. Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done GRuban I've been a bit busy this last 2 days. Sorry. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 06:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done and Goodnight. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

PortraitEdit

Please review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jackson_Pollock.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Alicense-header%7D%7D --  Aurelio de Sandoval   (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Review RequestEdit

Hi, leoboudv could you please review the following image

ReviewEdit

Please review it:

ReviewEdit

Pleas review it

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 04:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Leoboudv, for the reviews. --Gpkp (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

License Review RequestEdit

Hi, leoboudv could you please review the following picture

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, --Gpkp (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Proper check?Edit

Hello, I see you checked the licences for images uploaded by Medpro, e.g. File:P16-501 titre 1 (6481841667).jpg. You validated them under the {{PD-art|PD-old-100}} licence, but I believe you are wrong because all images seem to be under {{PD-author|Medpro}} on their Flickr pages. Could you confirm wheter you made a mistake or I am wrong? Veverve (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
@Sealle: pinging you since you also checked images from this account. Veverve (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

There is no matter how the Flickr account owner licensed the images. If they are in the public domain due to age, this is what should be indicated. Sealle (talk) 04:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  Comment: I second what Sealle says. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Some of those images are pictures of 3D objects which therefore have a to be put under a licence compatible with Commons. Veverve (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
So why not giving from the very start an example matching the issue you intend to raise? Sealle (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
All those I found on Category:German bibles are, but there may be more: File:D. Abraham Calovii - Biblia illustrata Vet. Testamenti. - Tomus III., Completens Anotata - title page.jpg, File:F16-0061 (33579033356).jpg, File:F16-0089-1 (33750957600).jpg, File:F16-0103 (34426364066).jpg, File:F16-0104 (34549864485).jpg. Veverve (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
As for me, I don't feel like being holier than the pope to find here a photographer's copyright beyond COM:DM. Feel free to disagree and crop those pages out as well as to bring this to the Village pump though. Sealle (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Sealle is quite right. These are definitely old 2D 100+ year old images. If the book binds need to be cropped, then feel free to crop them out. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following files for review:

Videos:

Images:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:General Raheel Sharif.jpgEdit

Sir Please verify the license for this file as the orignal uploader made it available under wrong license but I changed the license to Attribution one. Please verify it so that it may qualify for Wikimedia commons usage.Thanking you in advance.192.142.152.79 12:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

@Leoboudv

Sir I have found the orignal link as it was first published by ISPR in 2014 at this source which was archived in 2014 according to the third Refrence of the Raheel Sharif's article and ISPR's disclaimer clearly states about cc by sa 4.0 license.Therefore, it may qualify for Wikipedia usage now. I hope you will now remove the deletion tag and verify it quickly today for Wikipedia usage.
P.S. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:General_Qamar_Javed_Bajwa.jpg if you have any concerns about source.Thank You.192.142.152.108 06:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@Leaboudv

Thank You so much sir! Have a blessed day.192.142.154.0

Review requestEdit

Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.

File:Vikram at Iru Mugan Audio Launch.jpg
File:Nivin Pauly, Sivakarthikeyan and Vikram at Iru Mugan Audio Launch.jpg
File:Vikram and Akshay Kumar Launches Big Deal TV Home Shopping Channel.jpg
File:Vikram at Iru Mugan Success Meet.jpg
File:Vikram at the ‘Kadaram Kondan’ Press Meet.jpg
File:Dhansuh at VIP 2 Success Meet.jpg
File:Lollu Sabha Manohar at English Padam Audio Launch.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Another review requestEdit

Hello, there. Please review the following images:

Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: 2 images reviewed and 1 has no source. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Reviewed attribution-gencatEdit

Thanks for review images for attribution gencat. i hope you are doing well!--Docosong (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment: No problem. But Christmas this year is hard with Covid-19 sadly in Canada. Take care. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Nari Shakti Puraskar Review RequestEdit

Hi, would you be able to review the licenses for these files?

File:Reshma nilofer naha.jpg File:Pushpa preeya.jpg File:Meenakshi pahuja.jpg

Thank you in advance, Joofjoof (talk) 09:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Request: License review, need your verification help for Creative Commons images from YoutubeEdit

Hi Leoboudv, I need your verification help for some of the images that I was uploaded on commons down below, This images is a screenshot originally uploaded on YouTube under a "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license.". But needs some verification from administrator to approve the licensing:

I would like to uploads more image in the near future, especially the one that originally uploaded on Government sites or YouTube under a CC license. Thank you so much for your help before Leoboudv!   --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I was reviewing these when I noticed you asked Leoboudv, so I'll write here so we don't clash. The Netmediatama ones are probably good, Net Mediatama is an Indonesian TV network. However I don't like File:Artika Sari Devi Kusmayadi.jpg. That's an advertisement for ... something ... tooth whitening? That's going to be owned by some kind of beauty products company. The YouTube user in that case shows no evidence of being a representative of a beauty products company, and has other videos of all sorts of different advertisements, including Burger King, Sprite, Game of Thrones... I'm going to nominate that one for deletion. Looking further. --GRuban (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Reviewed them all, I think, please ping if I missed any. Most approved, but four nominated for deletion, which is a bit high. @I Nyoman Gede Anila: I advise a bit more skepticism. If a video looks to be professionally made, for example part of an advertisement, or a movie, or a TV program, then you really should take a look and see if you can honestly believe the YouTube channel belongs to the company that made it. If not, they probably do not have the right to release it. If a video is a collation of still photos, that's probably a sign the video maker did not take the photos (otherwise they would have taken videos!) If a video says right on the page that it comes from some other source - I think you can read Bahasa Indonesia, right? - that other source probably owns the rights. --GRuban (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi @GRuban: & @Leoboudv: Thanks for your update information, now I know which content that can be uploaded on Wikimedia commons. I'm just re-uploads more images from differences sources down below (License verification needed), all screenshoot images originally uploaded on Government sites or YouTube under a CC license. GRuban Thanks a lot for your instructions, I do definitely learn so much from you!  --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

reviewEdit

please review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sathya_Sai_Baba_2013_stamp_of_India.jpg --  Aurelio de Sandoval   (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Another review requestEdit

Hello, Leoboudv. I hope that everything is well. Please review the following photos:

Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Gpkp (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done I may be less active in 2021 for your information. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  Done now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

You have a quite full and long talk page Leoboudv, maybe you should archive part of it. I wish you happy holidays! Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I will consider your suggestion. Christian Ferrer. I have to slowdown in 2021.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Deletion proposals from User:61.5.71.229Edit

  • This images down below also stealing from google, all of this images using fake license, The image has no camera metadata to establish the uplaoder's copyright as he/she has only 1 image on Commons.
  • File:Earth2009press01.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
  • File:Mpfe146.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
  • File:MissEarth2017.png(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban (with another)
  • File:Kylie Verzosa's Victory Parade.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
  • File:Celine Van Ouytsel durant l'élection Miss Belgique 2020.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by Leoboudv
  • File:Catharina Svensson, Miss Earth 2001.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - I (GRuban) think this one might be OK; it's clearly a crop, but from a personal photo, where she's standing next to someone in a plaid shirt, I don't think that was a professional photo
  • File:Nicole Faria derivate 2013 000.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban (with another)
  • File:Miss universe malaysia 2013 2013-10-23 19-09.jpeg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
  • File:Melissa Tan, Headshot.JPG(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - This one might be all right. I (GRuban) can't find it elsewhere on the Web, and the uploading user is User:Alexloganlee, who has a few other professional quality uploads of Singaporean models (Melissa Tan is Malaysian, but that's the next country over), and a person of that name is the director of a professional Singaporean modeling agency that represents those models (https://www.instagram.com/alexloganlee/) - if someone is really worried about it, we can send that Alex Logan Lee an email to confirm to OTRS, but it's at least reasonable enough that I'm not going to nominate it for deletion
  • File:Kimberley Leggett- gala night.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - this is a pose with some person, somewhat grainy, I (GRuban) can believe this is a personal photograph.
  • File:Kimberley Leggett- gala night (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
  • File:Uni1965 color.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
  • File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno 2.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - this is an image by User:Marktanoja78 as 3 images below, who is responding to a deletion nomination. Let's see how that one comes out; having one image deleted or upheld isn't proof these three are bad or good, but are reasonable indicators.
  • File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
  • File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: no metadata, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
  • File:Megan Young.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban after seeing image on another site; uploader User:Marktanoja78 says they can upload a higher resolution version of this image, which would be good evidence for deleting or keeping.
    Marktanoja78 was able to upload a higher resolution version with EXIF in response to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Megan Young.jpg, so I'm withdrawing that request. That isn't proof he's the photographer of the above three, and he says he can't prove that, but it shows good faith, and is convincing enough to me, at least, that I am not going to nominate the above three for deletion. --GRuban (talk) 13:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
  • File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413.jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - Yes, Government file, as below, License reviewed by GRuban
  • File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as below, License reviewed by GRuban
  • File:Megan Young Miss World 2013 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
  • File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
  • File:President Benigno S. Aquino III congratulates Miss World 2013 Megan Young.jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
  • File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel April 2018.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - deleted by User:Ellin Beltz
  • File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel April 2018 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - crop of the above, I'll ping Ellin Beltz
  • File:Maggie Wilson Antarctic Ice Marathon.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by Ellin Beltz
  • File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel Close Up.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - deleted by Ellin Beltz

Best again, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

  • I don't know, for who wish it feel free to nominate images for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
    • I got pinged at User_talk:61.5.71.229#Comment, but I think I should answer here, since here is where the list is, and because there is no guarantee the IP user will have the same IP when they come back, whereas they may check this talk page again. Sorry for abusing your talk page like this Leoboudv - at least I'll make a new section on it?
Anyway, IP user:
  1. Thank you for working hard to verify our image licenses!
  2. Please make your own user account, so we can communicate with you without straining poor Leoboudv, who already does more license reviews than any human can be expected to. When you do, post on my talk page, and I'll follow up with you there.
  3. As Leoboudv wrote in that comment section, we need to look at these images one at a time, or at worst one related group at a time, related by source or uploader or something. Looking at a bunch of unrelated images is not easy.
  4. General comments: many of your comments do seem correct. I'll go through them one at a time, and will eventually nominate the ones I agree with, which may be most of them, for deletion. But not quickly - I don't have as much energy as the amazing Leoboudv. I help out where I can, though, and I hope I can take this list off his shoulders.
  5. However "stealing from google" isn't really correct - Google doesn't own these images. I know, it's shorthand for "stealing images just found via Google".
  6. The ones where you write "image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE", such as File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413.jpg, are going to be the toughest ones; toughest because we may end up making the wrong decision. From reading the image descriptions, it looks like the uploader did, actually, find images that were made by Malacañang Photo Bureau, which, from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/section/briefing-room/malacanang-photo-bureau/ is a government photo bureau. For example, https://orangemagazine.ph/2013/miss-world-2013-megan-young-meets-president-noynoy-aquino/ is such a photo. But it's not quite the same photo, and the link is dead, and since it wasn't license reviewed, we can't prove it, so might end up deleting it. Unfortunately, because I do believe it was likely from a government photo like that one.
  7. So this will be slow work. But, again, thank you. --GRuban (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Gazini image nominated for deletion, thank you for pointing out the Instagram post. The other two haven't been forgotten as such, they're just a bit more complicated than they may at first glance seem. For one thing, they're from the same uploader, and the first one, File:Earth2009press01.jpg, is from a series of 20 or so, clearly from the same event. Given that, if they were snarfed from the web somewhere, it should be possible to see where they came from, and I can't quite see them; there are plenty of photos from this specific event, (for example https://www.mykiru.ph/2009/11/miss-earth-2009-press-presentation.html and https://adventuresofabeautyqueen.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/beauty-queens-earthy-18-picks-in-miss-earth-2009/ and https://normannorman.com/2009/11/06/miss-earth-2009-press-presentation/) but not this specific series, and there were clearly multiple photographers present at the event. I may end up nominating them for deletion on general principles (COM:PCP), but I'd hate to be wrong. --GRuban (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I'm not taking action or voting for/against these 3 images. Thank You anonymous IP. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Nadeem Baig Director.pngEdit

Sir Please check the license of this image as it seems to be clear copyright violation because the first thing is that YouTube's source license is YouTube CC-BY license and this file is uploaded under wrong license of CC BY SA 4.0. Although, please check the license for this file from its archived source of 2019 given on its file page for clear verification of the license.Thank You.59.103.122.87 17:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Seoul photosEdit

Hi Leoboudv! I'm looking to revamp the collage at w:Seoul and exploring the available photos. I noticed that File:Seoul cityscape banner.jpg is marked as CC-licensed with you as reviewer, but when I went to extract the larger image at Flickr, it's now all rights reserved. Is it safe to import anyways because of the license I presume it used to have? If there is any way to check license changes there, it'd also be nice to have this photo. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 08:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

  • As for this this photo, it CANNOT be used on Commons since it was never uploaded to Commons before the license change. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I confirm what said Leoboudv, the banner can be used as we have an evidence (the license review) that it was uploaded here when the license was compatible however the not cropped version can not be uploaded here. As well as the other files that have not currently a free compatible license. We tolerate sometimes to keep a file without a license review if we are sure that the license was compatible at the time of the upload, but usually we don't upload files a posteriori just if it have potentially be published one day under a free license. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
    Ah, oh well; thanks for the info! {{u|Sdkb}}talk 23:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Request for licence reviewEdit

Hello, Would you please carry out a license review for the following images?

Note that the final image has a potential copyvio due to an action performed by another user, please carry out revdel if needed. Thanks in advance! -- Ab207 (talk) 12:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

  •   Done but 2 unfree uploads by you from Youtube. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Leoboudv! -- Ab207 (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Admin noticeboardEdit

This is at COM:AN

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Mushroom Observer toolEdit

A MO this tool --Leoboudv (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status of works by US subnational governmentsEdit

See link above. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Commons:VIRIN & PD US GovernmentEdit

Virins: US Military licenses. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Mass Deletions through a VFC (Visual File Change)Edit

Go here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:VisualFileChange.js&withJS=MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js

  • Name the user's name. Click on the user's selected uploads, give the reason and click the Execute bottom button.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Raphael Figueira (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, Raphael Figueira (talk) 09:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

  •   Done...and Good Night. I work a lot in my real life. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:

Regards, --Gpkp (talk) 07:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 06:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bunyodkor Stadium.jpgEdit

 
File:Bunyodkor Stadium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:French Beach Karachi.jpgEdit

Sir can you please review the license for this image? Thank You.Wallu2 (talk) 11:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Please review it:

--Telovg (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Review requestEdit

Hi, I've heard you are a reviewer, could you please review these two files;

--Limorina (talk) 11:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

  •   Comment: I don't see a free license for any of these 2 pictures...and I don't know Turkish. I am not certain if they are free. Sorry. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)