Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
License reviews for Jan Arkesteijn uploadsEdit
Hi, I have overwritten and redone the license review you added back in April for File:Hermann-Josef Lamberti (2014).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). The reason Flickrreview failed was because the image had been digitally changed, including the EXIF data. By overwriting with the digitally authentic original, the automatic review has now worked and I have made a recrop, keeping the colours authentic to the photographer's original choices.
As Jan Arkesteijn has been blocked for similar issues of misrepresenting original works, I suggest following a similar workflow if oddly coloured images from a different Flickr original come up. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- I believe all Jan Arkesteijn's images were cropped but came from the same source. That is why I passed them. I'll have a brief look. Wow! Jan's user page is now blocked! I did not know this. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment:
Dear Fæ,
Most (80+%) of Jan's images I reviewed are from librarie mollat below and usually have only 1 image in them by Jan.
- For this image below, it appears that Jan made the image brighter. Is that a problem...when the license is free?
- File:Sophie Divry (2018).jpg
That is my only question. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- There are two types of misrepresentation, which has led to some photographs getting deleted and the uploader being blocked at this moment:
- Add false colours to original professional works based on personal tastes, which damages educational value per Scope, rather than adding any apparent value. For non-GLAM works this is probably unlikely to cause contention, but could still be debatable if a representative original is never uploaded to Commons
- Adding copyright statements to EXIF data which misrepresents the copyright statements at source
- In the Flickr cases, reverting to the Flickr original solves any potential debate and the bot-verification provides a nice record of authenticity even if the image is then cropped.
- Picking out one of the cases you list (I only looked at two), File:Nina Bouraoui (2016).jpg has a correct claim on the image page text, but the EXIF data on the file includes the statements "Online copyright statement https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/" and "Usage terms Public domain" which is clearly false and invalidates your license review. Sorry. Please handle uploads from this user with more caution than normal. --Fæ (talk) 06:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: I agree they say PD-Mark in the EXIF but they use CC BY 3.0 for the {{|Youtube}} license according to COM:WHERE LICENSE for this and many other images. I usually verify the Youtube license unless I see something supicious.
For these 2 images below, librarie mollat says the license is CC BY 3.0 in the metadata so I guess I have to file a DR on the first image you mentioned which is PD-Mark.
Manual removal of review needed categoryEdit
Hi, thanks for your reviewing of Tasnim works. Can you please manually remove the Tasnimnews review needed category when you perform your review, so that they just don't appear there. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 10:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Should I request license reviews for extracted screenshots?Edit
I just uploaded File:Lynn Gilmartin Previews WPT Montreal at Playground Poker Club.webm and extracted 15 screenshots from it. I wonder, is a license review for the video sufficient or should I also request license reviews for all the screenshots? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Images from lasvegasvegas.comEdit
I'm cleaning up some files from lasvegasvegas.com. What to do with File:Marty Smyth.jpg and File:LizLieu.jpg? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: If the original source is deleted, we can't keep the image Alexis Jazz Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red AwardEdit
2018 Autumn Award | |
Thank you for your help this Autumn. We have loaded over 365 picture of Women from Nigeria as well as others. Your unwavering support and assistance when required have been invaluable. Have a great Christmas when you get there. Victuallers (talk) 11:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
image reviewEdit
Hi, would you be able to review this image for me? Regards. ArturSik (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
DaphneEdit
MUMEdit
Article on my late mum. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
A request for License ReviewEdit
Hello! Could you please perform license reviews of the files File:David Johnson at Opal Gallery March 25, 2010.jpg (slated to be on the Main page of Wikipedia shortly) and File:David Johnson at Opal Gallery March 25, 2010 (2).jpg? Thanks, and let me know if you would like me to review any files you've uploaded. --Animalparty (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Animalparty (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Dominee GremdaatEdit
You had reviewed File:Dominee Gremdaat in 2018 3 (cropped).jpg and other screenshots from the video, so you know the license is correct. Could you please review File:Dominee Gremdaat - SorryJohan.webm? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Done: Alexis Jazz Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Alchemilla xanthochlora herbarium (02).jpgEdit
This picture has licence CC BY 4.0. Please put it back. See https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1838164229. Rasbak (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!Edit
For helping out with User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief! I saw you already had three "Tireless contributor" barnstars, so here's a Dutch treat. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
PhotoEdit
Can you explain me this? Chronus (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Chronus: what is there to explain? Commons does not consider the Public Domain Mark to be a license. There have been discussions about this and the policy so far hasn't been changed. You can ask Flickr accounts that use the PDM to switch to CC0. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: PD Mark is not considered an enforceable license on Commons and the copyright holder can remove or change the license of the image at any time and no one can use it. It is not enforceable...unless it is a US Government image since US Government images are Public Domain by US law. So, this image is not acceptable since it comes from someone's personal account. {{CC0}} or public domain dedication such as this image on flickr is OK for Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) note that PD Mark is also valid for images that are in the public domain due to age. But in any case, images with a PD-Mark need to have the corresponding PD license when uploaded to Commons like {{PD-USGov}}, {{PD-old-auto-expired}}, {{PD-Italy}}, etc. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Linking the original on DRsEdit
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russian Orthodox Church in Antwerpen (Sint-Jozefkerk).jpg
Could you please link the original on Flickr in cases like these? The "bad authors" list is an absolute mess and shouldn't, in and of itself, be considered as a reason for deletion. Thanks to Google I was able to find the source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/centralasian/7935754578/in/photostream/. This Flickr account was blacklisted because of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Office_actions/DMCA_notices&oldid=260924975#Igor_Stravinsky.2C_New_York_City_.281946.29. https://www.flickr.com/people/centralasian/ states: "The majority of the photograph in this Flickr stream are of my own 'production'. I post them here to share with the community but also to use them in my blogs, so this stream works as a storage space (these days they call it 'cloud'). At some point I began to gather here not only my own works, but also the images of other people - photographs, artworks, charts, maps, and whatnots. I try to attribute all these works as accurately as I can, but it's not always possible, unfortunately. Too many things are just 'laying there' on the web, unattributed and untitled."
The photo that was deleted here per that DR appears to have been own work. They appear to own at least a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an iPhone 4. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
ApprovalEdit
- @Leoboudv: Please approve this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jason_Day_actor.jpg --Zabnef (talk) 20:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Zabnef: Hi Sol-lol. Not taking my advice I see. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Deletion requestsEdit
Are you sure of this photographs taken on date?Edit
Hi, File:Hygrocybe intermedia (Pass.) Fayod 494229.jpg have Exif date 2014-09-14 but in the {{Information}} find 2014-12-20. You remember the right date? Thanks :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have changed the date Threecharlie. The source said December 2014 Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete PhotosEdit
Hello I asked delete five photos that myself uploaded in the category:FS D.342.2000 and a photo in the FS D.342.4000. Please Can you delete?--Marinaio56 (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: I cannot since I am not an Administrator. Only an Administrator can delete images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
About the Albatros D.VII picture. I have searched and found only two pictures of the Albatros D.VII. One is already in the wikimedia commons the other was found here. https://riseofflight.com/forum/topic/33215-curiouser-and-curiouser-albatros-dvii/ Supposedly it's public domain just as the other one but since I could not upload it as such I used the flickr.
Since I thought they are from the same source and the other was in flickr and belongs to a museum I thought this one was also. I cannot find any more informations about that photo altough since it's one in a kind and the only one of the prototype looking from the front I thought it was a good idea. I apologize for any inconvenience. --João Silva 7
Some bubble tea for you!Edit
Thanks for doing all those license reviews! It's very appreciated! Kaldari (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
QuestionEdit
Hi. You accepted this file. The fact that the people who made the charts let their work to be PD, does that change the rights about the map behind? I mean are we not obliged to check the status of the original source when we review a DW? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 03:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
File:1973 Calabanga Church.jpgEdit
hi thank you, i dont know why the page are missing nor have been lost. but even though i hope dont erase the picture because in my opinion, it is the only photos i saw taken from 1973. sorry :( --ShiminUfesoj (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
here [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiminUfesoj (talk • contribs) 08:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
License review neededEdit
Hello, Leoboudv. Category:License review needed is a bit crowded; would you mind giving me a hand in emptying it? Thank you. --Chiyako92 (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletionEdit
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Image: Wojciech Sadurski.JPGEdit
Please, could You delete the first thumbnail (unsuccessful one) of the image and leave only the second one (the latest version). I want to avoid a possibility of vandalism by reverting it.
Thank You very much.
Artur Andrzej (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
DeviantartEdit
- @Leoboudv: Hi Leoboudv please approve this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hola_soy_german_by_glamrect.png --Xoaw (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
ImageEdit
- @Leoboudv: PLease hel me the image that you approved they want to eliminate, I do not know why, please help me https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hola_soy_german_by_glamrect.png --Xoaw (talk) 02:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Flickr reviewsEdit
Hi! Often Flickr files could not be reviewed by bots because they are downscaled (not the same as cropped). They should be overwriten with the Flickr original, then they can be reviewed by bots again. I saw File:AdelaideClemens2013.jpg and File:Ital food - 01.jpg and did the re-upload.--Roy17 (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
FotoEdit
Saludos!!! Me puedes verificar esta foto por favor, es de un video oficial de YouTube VERIFICADO del tipo Creative Commons. Gracias.
File:Pexels-photo-132694.jpgEdit
Sorry, Leoboudv, but your changes are totally wrong! You should have get startled with the Pixabay username. This image was copied from Pexels to Pixabay. I think you should revert your changes and do the review for the Pexels source (oh, no, you already had reviewed it). — Speravir – 18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: OK Sorry Speravir. I thought this was a MaxPixels photo where there was a Mass DR filed and most images came from Pixabay. I can revert my pass and pass this image as a pexels photo. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done The Pexels license changed only in July 2018 so its CC0. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- OK On a general note: During the MaxPixels action recently I actually thought whether we should treat Pexels similarily like Pixabay, especially with own template with LR included (the template exists: {{Pexels-Cc-zero}}), but than I saw that there are not that much images here (at least in cat. Files from Pexels; on the other hand see search results for file: pexels -hastemplate:"pexels-cc-zero") and forgot it. That the license has changed not that long ago I did not know BTW. Did you check with the Wayback Machine? — Speravir – 19:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: I can try if I have the time. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- PS: Speravir For this image File:Erixx Bad Harzburg Bahnhof.jpeg pexels 'took' an image from pixabay here as they note at the source That is why I hope pexels is not like maxpixels. Since its still CC0 on both the Pixabay account and Pexels archive view, its OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- {{Pixabay}} also changed their license from CC0....but only in January 2019. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, these sites copy/copied from each other. For this other example the Pexels user is named Pixabay. Actually this user naming is quite good for us I think. In my opinion we should try to give the real source as far as possible for us which can be very hard, you know it yourself. BTW there is also a Pixabay user WikimediaImages, cf. at VP: Pixabay user "WikimediaImages".
- Regarding your “I can try if I have the time:”What do you refer to? The template? I would do this myself, I was also partly involved in template {{Pixabay}} enhancement. But do we need it when we have the general {{LicenseReview}}? This said: I do not understand why the Pexels equivalent is not simply named {{Pexels}} (I would favor moving this to this name i.e. vice versa). — Speravir – 22:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- I was referring to the fact that I have a job and have to work. That is all. I don't mind why the Pexels equivalent is not simply named {{Pexels}} as long as the image was really CC0 at upload because a new pexels image today is not CC0. That is why we have {{LicenseReview}} for new uploaded Pexel images. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- OK, then we leave it as it is. — Speravir – 02:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
FileEdit
Is the file free? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it is. From this Flickr license table the Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike and Public Domain Dedication licenses are free since there is NO Non-Commercial or No-Derivative restriction. Public domain Mark flickr license images like this are NOT OK since they are not legally enforceable. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- And about File:Official portrait of Petro Poroshenko.jpg. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Lil Pump authorship resolvedEdit
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Pump%27s_mugshot.jpg
Are you able to review my upload now that the authorship issue has been resolved? Michael14375 (talk) 11:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Your Flickr link?Edit
The Flickr account link on your user page doesn't go anywhere useful. --GRuban (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you,but can you help me?Edit
Seems like nobody handle this matter.
Could you possibly do me a favour? Please help reviewed the picture. Appreciate your help.
- File:190112 Blackpink fans in Thailand.jpg
- File:190112 BLINK 'Pink Ocean' during Blackpink in Your Area tour in Thailand.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 01.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 02.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 03.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 09.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 10.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 11.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 12.jpg
- File:(190417) Blackpink World Tour in LA - FanCam 13.jpg
- File:(190417) Jennie performing "SOLO" during In Your Area tour in Los Angeles 01.jpg
- File:(190417) Jennie performing "SOLO" during In Your Area tour in Los Angeles 02.jpg
- File:(190417) Jennie performing "SOLO" during In Your Area tour in Los Angeles 03.jpg
- File:(190417) Jennie performing "SOLO" during In Your Area tour in Los Angeles 04.jpg
- File:(190417) Jennie performing "SOLO" during In Your Area tour in Los Angeles 05.jpg
Thank you so much!! Maddie Rice (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
This imagesEdit
- @Leoboudv:your approval is needed for these images File:Thelma Fardin.jpg,File:Hulk in CDMX.jpg,File:Andrés Bustamante.jpg,File:Magdalena Leonel de Cervantes.jpg,File:Cuauhtémoc Billete.jpg,File:Guaicaipuro billete.jpg,File:Luis-Doctor García.jpg,File:Christian Martinoli 2.jpg,File:Ana Serradilla.jpg,File:Cecilio Guzmán de Rojas.jpg,File:Dámaso Pérez Prado.jpg --Xoaw (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- This is a sock that has asked for your approval before. Be extra careful when reviewing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Maybe someone should do a sockpuppet investigation then. The licenses are correct. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- No need, because they pass the duck test. Blocks don't deter this user though, they will just register a new account in 2 seconds and carry on. So might as well let them keep this one so license reviewers know what they are dealing with. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv:Please I need you aprovation File:Duko.jpg,File:Duko concierto.jpg,File:Duko Freestyle.jpg--Xoaw (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
I hope you like dogs..Edit
Can you review these?
- File:Meet K-9 Tank (36168901272).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Silox (36168900062).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Olix (35940860600).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Obiwan (36168896672).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Edor (36168899132).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Cooper (35940859650).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Cobra (36168898322).jpg
- File:Meet K-9 Aris (35940858720).jpg
As you can see in the file history, FlickreviewR 2 confirmed these as being available with PD-mark in 2018, but the photos have been removed from Flickr since that time. I can't simply revert to that version because there was no PD-template on the page at that time. My best guess is that these dogs are now working for different agencies, or something happened to them causing them to no longer work for the DSS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Nina Cuso press photo.jpgEdit
Hi. Someone thinks this photo is a copyvio. It appears to be by Dan Lecca per http://www.theworldisagirlsrunway.com/2018/02/nyfw-2018-jxy-n-cuso-runway-show-21018.html and https://obviousmag.com/jxy-n-cuso-runway-show-fw-18-nyfw/ ; the source link is dead. It was uploaded by a enwiki-confirmed sockmaster to support en:Nina Cuso, since deleted. Was the permission you saw from Dan Lecca? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- It was from the Ninacuso account and the license must have been valid or I would not have passed it but I can't say if the photographer was Dan Lecca. If the source flickr account is suspicious, it may be safer to delete. (unless there are other photos from this flickr account here to show who took the photographs from this account.) I have no strong feelings here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
License ReviewEdit
Please review this images:
- File:Servando Gómez Martínez.jpg
- File:Sol-Perez.png
- File:Jhon Jairo Velásquez.png
- File:Ángela Vázquez.png
- File:Fernando-Burlando.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Master545445 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights SurveyEdit
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Leoboudv,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Can you please review [my uploads]? I am new to uploading content, so I am a bit anxious. Still, I believe they are fine and they will pass your scrutiny.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
To reduce your work load, I am providing proof that the Twitter accounts I cited as the source in my uploads belong to the Indian government. [This], [this] and [this] can act as the proof. I would be grateful if you helped. Regards, Vaibhavafro (talk) 00:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
An administrator has just approved the uploads! I would be grateful if you could do the final license check.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
CommentI have asked another user to look at my uploads. No need to bother you now. Relax.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
RequestEdit
Sorry to disturb you again. Can you license review my uploads in the same way in which you reviewed this image.–Vaibhavafro(Talk!) 09:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment:This may just be a formality; other users told me this wasn’t necessary in GODL-India uploads. Still, I would prefer to have it there to give them more credibility. I would be grateful if you did it for me-Vaibhavafro(Talk!) 09:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment:An administrator has confirmed to me that a second review is not needed in GODL-India uploads. So, I may withdraw my request. No need to bother you now. Relax.—VaibhavafroTalk 19:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Leoboudv,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, could you please review this uploads? So many days that nobody reviewed them...
- File:El president i consellers amb els membres del Consell de Garanties Estatutàries 492333412080119 02.jpg
- File:Edifici de Can Fàbregas 716250700080219.jpg
- File:Edifici de Can Fàbregas 262365813080119.jpg
- File:Guarderia de flamenc 794271613080419 02.jpg
- File:Guarderia de flamenc 785274913080419 02.jpg
- File:Mascaró proa Blanca Aurora 001A.jpg
Thanks for your time. Best regards!--Docosong (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Leoboudv,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
ReviewEdit
Please review this files
- File:Saúl Álvarez.png
- File:Julio César Chávez, Jr.png
- File:Juan Pablo Escobar.png
- File:Anwar Jibawi.png --Roman Medellín (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv:Please respond--Roman Medellín (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Done Reviewed Roman Medellín. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Thank you--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Can you approve these two files? File:Mother Angélica young.jpg File:MOther Angélica.jpg --Roman Medellín (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv:Please--Roman Medellín (talk) 16:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry. I don't know if the photograph's copyright was really not renewed. I cannot review it. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Code issues in User:Leoboudv/common.jsEdit
Hi Leoboudv, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.
Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:
- You edited User:Leoboudv/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
- Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
- To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
- ISSUE:
line 1 character 6
: Label 'User' on Majora statement. - Evidence:User:Majora/LicenseReview.js
- ISSUE:
line 1 character 29
: Missing semicolon. - Evidence:User:Majora/LicenseReview.js
Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 06:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC).
Flickr reviewEdit
Hi, I notice you reviewed the license of a picture I uploaded from Flickr. Could I get you to review several others also?
- File:Vieste at night.jpg, File:A railway bridge in Poland 349385u5h.jpg, File:New Town Market Square in Warsaw 234098098.jpg, File:Riverside bouquinistes in Paris.jpg, File:Moeraki bay 23513412.jpg, File:A Warsaw skyline at dusk 3345h5u5.jpg
Sorry to bother you but I've been waiting to find a trusted reviewer and get this images done in case they are deleted or otherwise cannot be verified. Would you mind doing it please? ~ R.T.G 22:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Please review this image: . --Gindomarlo (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Please review this image: 100px.MO-Quotes (talk) 13:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Thanks for reply could you please review this uploads? So many days that nobody reviewed them.
- File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana.jpg
- File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana Announcing maha shivaratri Day at the India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna.jpg
- File:Rt Rana famous Quote.jpg
MO-Quotes (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't see any notices about free licenses on source pages. File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana Announcing maha shivaratri Day at the India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna.jpg is work of government of India, but proper license tag must be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Thank You. I tagged no permission for 2 of the 3 images. As for this image: File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana Announcing maha shivaratri Day at the India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna.jpg, I don't know its specific license sadly. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
I make this review request because two users mistakenly marked these images as a copyright violation and later admitted their mistake (diff1 diff2)
image 2: . --Gindomarlo (talk) 04:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
BarnstarEdit
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I award you this barnstar for your tireless efforts at License Review. JoJan (talk) 16:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
Amenemhat VEdit
Happy holidays Leoboudv. I was wondering what do you think about such a thing. Best wishes, Khruner (talk) 09:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Khruner,
I tagged the file as a copyright violation. An uploader may not review his/her uploads and typing in a fake flickr pass is not permitted. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Paul ManlyEdit
Would OTRS be a proper proof of why it is public domain?--NL19931993 (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, COM:OTRS would be proper proof that it is in the public domain provided that the flickr account owner is the photographer of File:Paul Manly, MP.jpg
- If the flickr account owner is the copyright owner, you could contact the flickr owner to ask him to change the FLICKR License from public domain mark to say cc0 OR Public Domain Dedication which is acceptable at Commons....like this flickr image is licensed. AttributioinShareAlike 2.0 Generic or CC BY SA 2.0 like this flickr image license is also OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Wrongly linkedEdit
Dear Leoboudv, You marked the image File:Lycaena li.jpg I uploaded while I had wrongly linked to the image. I corrected the link. Can you review license again? Thanks. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
File:DurletRomain.jpg AND OTHER REVIEWERS???Edit
Hi! How are you doing? Long time since we last talked :-) If you have time could you have a look at this file? Do you agree that it is PD? It can be freely used by everyone and no requirement to credit the author. --MGA73 (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes it seems that way. Anither possible license is {{Copyrighted free use}} MGA73 but PD is safer. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- There are more than 10,000+ images MGA73 and I don't have the time sadly to review them. I have a real life job. If you wish, you can apply to be a reviewer. Last week it was 9500 images. I guess there is a lack of active reviewers too. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm very tired every day with my job. I try to review some reliable uploaders like GRuban , Lymantria, JoJan, 1Veertje , or ZioNicco but with 9,000-10,000 images its impossible to review the massive license review category. And I have to work. Thanks MGA73. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Josef Papi contributions --Leoboudv (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
@Leoboudv:Please request the review and approval of this images
@Leoboudv:Please @Leoboudv:Please --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Yet another image requestEdit
Hi. If you have time, please review the following images:
Regards, You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Some images to reviewEdit
Dear Leoboudv, I think today I will not do any uploads. Would you be so kind as to look into my uploads of Jan 29? If I have seen correctly, they have not been reviewed yet. Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- That's good. The images are reviewed now. On January 29, I had to do a lot of work in my real appraisal job. Best Regards, Fabian B. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks much, Fabian! Lymantria (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Can you do this one? Thanks. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Lymantria: It does not look like the same image.
- @Leoboudv: And this one too? File:Smoke Pollution.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Done MGA73 Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Maybe I should remove most of my last name 'except the B' above but you can get it from this image: File:Early 20th Century Micronesian Armour.jpg from my flickr account Lymantria & MGA73. I am struck by how many users I dealt with have left Commons like JurgenNL who reviewed that very rare image or Russavia or INeverCry or SterkeBak/Abigor who first gave me the license review rights. Sometimes I wonder whether you can trust anyone sadly. There are reliable trustworthy people like Gruban, Christian Ferrer or 1Veertje but then a case like INeverCry appears with all his sockpuppets. It also tells me 'not to get involved in politics' or disputes unless the case I get involved in is crystal clear like this situation Best, Fabian B from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I had to take a break. I think it is nice to not have to worry about admin stuff for a while. I think reviewers should check the license and look for obvious copyvios. Doing advanced forensic studies is not a part of a license review. The task is to make sure we check the source and the license before image is removed from the source or the license is changed. Anyone can challenge if the source really is the copyright holder but it is stupid to challenge the license once the file is reviewed. Unless ofcourse a reviewer verified a license that is not possible. For example GFDL on Flickr :-)
- I hope it gets better once we get the backlogs cleared. Then we have more time to do what we like most. Perhaps we can even help the admins. I hope if they have less work they will make fewer crazy things :-D
- Anyway I'm happy you are still around. --MGA73 (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Lokesh Kanagaraj at The ‘Zee Cine Awards’.jpg Perumalism (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Adriano Ciaffi.jpgEdit
Hi, now there's the right link. Thank you --Caulfield (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Brazil government other file type review neededEdit
Hi! I think most of the files in this category can be passed. I checked the first file File:001 - Antonio Sergio de Mattos, CNV-SP.pdf. Do you agree that it looks ok? --MGA73 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Done Yes I marked that and the category looks free but I have been busy with other things. The license CC BY 4.0 was at the bottom. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment:
I reviewed this image File:001 - Arquivo CEMDP Devanir José, CNV-SP.pdf and the file you mentioned File:001 - Antonio Sergio de Mattos, CNV-SP.pdf and both times the 'Category:Brazil government other file type review needed' does not go away. Hmm! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have to review User:Quetzal1964's reviews when I have the time first. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks a lot. I did not mean that you should review them, I just wanted you to have a look before I started with them. Just ignore the ghostly category. It’s a new thing. A bot will remove the category. The bot is meant to have a check and sort the files to make it easier for reviewers. Yesterday I checked 35 Facebook images. It’s much easier when the bot find and put all images in a category so you can check a lot of similar images, yay! --MGA73 (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: MGA73 The material don't match the uploaded stuff on Commons for the first 3 and the last one--the link doesn't work. Best not to review them. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned file.
File:20200224002704!UFC 244 BMFBelt.pngRegice2020 (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Old onesEdit
Hi Fabian, Would you please have a LR-look at "old" uploads here and here? Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Speaking of old ones perhaps you would like to comment on Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Acceptance_of_files_from_external_sources_without_a_license_review and Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Apply_a_default_of_Good_Faith_for_very_old_files :-) --MGA73 (talk) 15:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Would very much appreciate license reviews for the following three files (especially the Grande picture, her current Wikipedia lede photo is awful):
- File:Ariana Grande Grammys Red Carpet 2020.png
- File:200126 Dua Lipa on the 2020 Grammys Red Carpet.jpg
- File:200126 Lizzo on the 2020 Grammys Red Carpet.png
DanielleTH (Say hi!) 02:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I cannot verify the image was free at upload. I will ask Christian Ferrer if he can. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Here's Google's cache of the page, if that helps. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 20:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Vijay At The Jilla 100 days celebrations event 1.jpg
- File:Vijay At The Jilla 100 days celebrations event.jpg
- File:Ilaiyaraaja and Vikram at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
- File:Vijay at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
- File:Rajinikanth and Vijay at the Nadigar Sangam Protest.jpg
- File:H. Vinoth at Theeran Adhigaaram Ondru Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 13:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hi Leoboudv, as far as I can see: This is the first file from the given source. File:Consular Section Chief Mark Marrano überreicht Journalist und DDR-Bürgerrechtler Siegbert Schefke das Visum für die USA.jpg. Is it OK for commons? What you would improve? Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Mutter Erde,
Yes. It is US State Government work. I have reviewed the image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Leboudv. Would you please review some new pics from the some source? Thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- File:Patricia Lacina and Axel Wintermeyer, February 2020.jpg
- File:Consul General Patricia Lacina, July 2018.jpg
- File:Generalkonsul Jim Herman am Internationalen Tag des Bieres, August 2017.jpg
- File:Mirko Reeh, März 2019.jpg
- File:Mirko Reeh und US-Generalkonsulin Patricia Lacina, 2019.jpg
- File:“Building Bridges” combines traditional images of the Berlin Airlift, 2018.jpg
- File:Denise Williams and Marilyn Sorensen with German artist Jasmin Siddiqui, 2018.jpg
- File:“Building Bridges” combines traditional images of the Berlin Airlift, 2018.jpg
- File:Jasmin Siddiqui with Mrs. Denise Williams and Mrs. Marilyn Sorensen, 2018.jpg
- File:60th anniversary of American Junior Year at Heidelberg University, 2019.jpg
- File:Former U.S. diplomat Peter Claussen, 2019.jpg
- File:Patricia Lacina und Mitglieder der jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt, 2019.jpg
- File:Patricia Lacina und Dr. Salomon Korn, 2019.jpg
- File:Dr. Gerhard Wiesinger, Dirk Nowitzki, Michelle Burton, 2017.jpg
- Done: Except for this File:Patricia Lacina und Mitglieder der jüdischen Gemeinde Frankfurt, 2019.jpg. Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have corrected the source. Thank you very much. Mutter Erde (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hi @Leobudv can you review this [|photo], thank you Mars Bott (talk) 13:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Thanks for review my first upload picture :-) Sorry to bother you but could you review me for these two photos? File:Emma_Watson_interview_in_2017.jpg and File:Emma_Watson_in_2016.jpg Mars Bott (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much, have a nice day! :-) Mars Bott (talk) 02:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hi Leobudv, pleese review. Thank you very much. Mutter Erde (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Hildegard Hamm-Brücher und Generalkonsul James W. Herman 2015.jpg
- File:Generalkonsul Jim Herman und Peter Friedrich, 2015.jpg
- File:John B. Emerson, Kimberly Emerson und Ashkan Sahihi auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2015.jpg
- File:Ashkan Sahihi, Kimberly Emerson und John B. Emerson auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2015.jpg
- File:Mercedes Wild, friend of the 'Candybomber' Gail Halverson, 2015.jpg
- File:Consul General Jim Herman, his wife Leilana Herman, and Oberbürgermeister Peter Feldmann, 2015.jpg
Review FlickrEdit
@Leoboudv:Please, could you fix and approve these images ?, because the Flickr bot says it needs a human review
- [File:Mister Negative cosplay.jpg]
- [File:Vulture (Marvel Comics).jpg]
- [File:Shocker Rhino Mysterio Sandman.jpg]
- [File:Electro and the Shocker.jpg]
- [File:Rhino cosplay marvel.jpg] --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv:Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurelio de Sandoval (talk • contribs) 02:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 04:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv:Thanks for your help, now, could you review this other image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luis_Cresencio.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 03:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv:And please, could you crop the image?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 03:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!Edit
The Special Barnstar | |
... you corrected a licence mismatch / photo error I caused while transfering this image. Sorry and thank-you.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Criado-Perez#/media/Datei:Caroline_Criado-Perez_2019.jpg Polimorph (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC) |
Review requestEdit
Hi, there. I see that you are a license reviewer. Can you please review the files in this category: User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-gallery-uploaded-by/Lefcentreright? All of these files have been taken from YouTube live streams done by w:en:eNCA. They are licensed under the website's free license. You must please click on the link in the "Summary" box because, for some obscure reason, the license of the video is not visible in the archive link. Thanks in advance. Lefcentreright (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Next time, please give a time stamp like this uploader did here to help other reviewers find the image please. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, again. Thanks for approving the first batch, please review the next batch (I have included time stamps):
- Lefcentreright (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Lincense Review RequestEdit
As, I see sir your a license reviewer making an earnest request please can you review the license for the File:Babar_Azam.png, File:Maya Ali (Pexels-Act-erst-acting-jheel-jheel-saif-ul-malook-172719).jpg and File:Karachi Zoo Visit.jpg for me quickly so that it may qualify for their respective articles.Thank You.IMuWal02(talk)
Review requestEdit
Hi! I hope you're ok. I would like to ask you if you can review the uploads of Contributions/Dru_alexandro. I don't see the permissions, but I don't have the experience to mark them correctly. Greetings. --Vareloco (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: They all fail COM:WHERE LICENSE and have been reviewed as such. Goodnight from Canada. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation review requestEdit
I believe these images are copyright, but i do not have the tools to find the source.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yoel_Romero.jpg
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Robert_whittaker.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Borrachinha_galo.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rodolfo_Vieira_and_E.Zenkevich.JPG
135.180.67.193 06:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Schichany Landschaft.jpgEdit
Hi! I moved this file from lb.wiki to Commons. I think it would be better to have another review on the file now that I moved the file. Could you have a look? --MGA73 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Natarajan Subramaniam at the Bongu Press Meet.jpg
- File:Rajinikanth Felicitates Writer Kalaignanam.jpg
- File:Rajinikanth Felicitates Writer Kalaignanam 1.jpg
- File:Vani Bhojan At The ‘Oh My Kadavule’ Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 11:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done Perumalism Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hi there can you please review the license for File:Maulana Tariq Jamil.pngfor me quickly.Thank You
File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpgEdit
I'm reviewing Hard's uploads since I noticed that they'd uploaded a lot of images that were scaled down from the originals available on Flickr. I noticed this image, which you'd done a license review on. The source URL links to a different photo of the same person, and neither Google Image Search nor TinEye can locate the actual source, so I've tagged the image as missing a source. I'm curious what happened here. Since Flickr allows images to be replaced, it's possible the image was replaced since your review back in February. Do you remember reviewing this image in particular, and that the image on Flickr at the time was the same image as is now on Commons? Thanks! --Alex Cohn (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hi there can you please review the license for following files quickly: File:Abid Ali.jpg, File:Mohammad Hafeez in 2017.png, File:Azhar Ali.png, File:Shaheen Shah Afridi.png, File:Wahab Riaz.jpg, File:Shadab_Khan.png, and File:Imad_Wasim.png.jpg Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMuWal02 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
License reviewEdit
Hi, would you kindly review the licenses of the following images?:
- File:Lady Gaga A Star is Born London premiere.jpg
- File:Lady Gaga at the 2019 Golden Globe Awards.png
- File:Margaret 001.jpg
- File:Marina 2019.jpg
- File:Jacek Knap.jpg
- File:Dagmara Kazmierska.jpg
Thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- All reviewed except for this: File:Lady Gaga at the 2019 Golden Globe Awards.png which I am not comfortable reviewing. You can ask Lymantria if you wish to review it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's alright. Thanks a lot. I've got one more if it's not a problem: File:Lady Gaga at 2019 SAG Awards.jpg. ArturSik (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Pawan at the Vada Chennai Press Meet.jpg
- File:R. Parthiban at Thodari Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Balaji Sakthivel At The ‘Vaanam Kottatum’ Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Aadukalam Naren At The ‘Asuran’ Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Samantha at 10 Enradhukulla Teaser Launch.jpg
- File:R Sarathkumar at Tamil Film Industry Hunger Strike.jpg
- File:Pasupathy at Anjala Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Sudha Kongara Prasad at Irudhi Suttru Thanks Giving Meet.jpg
- File:RK Selvamani At The Irumbuthirai Success Meet.jpg
- File:SA Chandrasekhar at Kanithan Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Actor Vadivelu in Eli’s “Talking Eli App” Launch Press Meet.jpg
- File:Vani Bhojan at the ‘Zee Cine Awards’.jpg
- File:Prabhu at Wagah Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Dhanush at Mudinja Ivana Pudi Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Ilaiyaraaja at Merku Thodarchi Malai Press Meet.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 12:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hi there can you please review the license for File:Waseem Badami.png quickly.Thanking you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMuWal02 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Photo reviewEdit
Welcome, please check the following pictures Special:ListFiles/Bkhe97 Bkhe97 (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Rajinikanth, Dhanush and Vivek at Nerupuda Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Dhanush at the ‘Asuran’ Success Meet.jpg
- File:Dhanush at the Filmfare Awards South 2017 Press Meet.jpg
- File:Tovino Thomas At The ‘Maari 2’ Press Meet.jpg
- File:Rajinikanth at the Inauguration of MGR Statue 1.jpg
- File:Agathiyan at the ‘Kennedy Club’ Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Srikanth Deva at Bongu Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Rangaraj Pandey at the 12th We Awards 2016.jpg
- File:Director Ram at the Aruvi Movie Premiere.jpg
- File:Director A Venkatesh at Sandamarutham Audio Launch.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned files.
License Review RequestEdit
Hi there can you please review the license for the following files:
- File:Iqrar Ul Hassan.png
- File:Mehwish Hayat.png
- File:Hira Mani.png
- File:Asad Shafiq.png quickly.Thanking you in advance. IMuWal02 (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hi @Leoboudv: can you please review below mentioned files.
- File:Maysoon Abu Asaad 2015.jpg
- File:Ali Kareem 2017.jpg
- File:Rana Abyad 2017.jpg
- File:Kinda Hanna 2013.jpg
- File:Dima Kandalaft 2013.jpg
- File:Wafaa Mosalaly 2015.jpg
- File:Kholoud Essa 2015.jpg
- File:Fayez Kazak 2015.jpg
- File:Mohammad Kheir Al-Jarrah 2015.jpg
- File:Maan Abdul Haq 2018.jpg
- File:Racha ELtaqi 2008.jpg
- File:أيمن رضا.jpg
- File:Asim Hawat 2013.jpg Bkhe97 (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done except for 2 images. File:Mohammad Kheir Al-Jarrah 2015.jpg has no license as the 'show more' button does not appear at all. Admin Lymantria cannot verify the license either so Commons cannot keep it. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Mertensia virginica.bbg.jpgEdit
Can you, please, verify your LR here? There are complaints concerning attribution. Ankry (talk) 19:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I verify that the image was licensed as CC BY 2.0 Generic as it is now. Ankry If the image is stolen or a flickrwash, (there is no metadata...at the flickr source) then feel free to file a DR though the uploader has no known history of copyvios, I think. I note that the source flickr account only has 72 images but then my own flickr account has only 160 images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: That's OK Ankry. Please feel free to change the attribution to Khan "Sadh" N. Mostafa to clear things up. Kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Request: License review needed, Verifying the imagesEdit
Hi Leoboudv, can you Please help me to check, reviewing and verifying this photos down below; I'm pretty sure all of this pictures is a screenshot that was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license mentioned on each of the photos summary and licensing. Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license.":
Thanks before, best regards- I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Leoboudv for verifying my review requests, you're awesome!! 🤝 - I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 22:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, could you please review the following images.
- File:Ashna Zaveri at meen kuzhambum mann paanaiyum movie pressmeet.png
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much leoboudv
License Review RequestEdit
Hi Leoboudv, could you please review the following images.
- File:Remya nambeesan at Natpuna Ennanu Theriyuma Audio launch event.png
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you leoboudv.
{{PDMark-owner}}Edit
Images with a PD-Mark license that are the flickr owners own work can be reviewed now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
FlickrEdit
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, requesting following images for review:
[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] , [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]
Gpkp (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done except for File:Jasti Chelameswar.jpg whose video is not available in Canada. Please ask another reviewer or Administrator. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Leoboudv. Sorry, there were few mistakes in the requests, few pre-reviewed and few repeated ones. Requesting following images for the review.
- Thank you Leoboudv. Sorry, there were few mistakes in the requests, few pre-reviewed and few repeated ones. Requesting following images for the review.
- File:Puneeth_Rajkumar (1).jpg
- File:Jasti Chelameswar.jpg (update: I've corrected the source-video url of Youtube, in the image's description)
- File:Laila_(Indian_actress).jpg
- File:Sakshi Shivanand Image.jpg
- File:Gurukiran Image.jpg
- File:V.Ravichandran Image.jpg
- File:Supernova (CGI).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev (01).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev (02).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev (03).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev (04).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (01).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev's wife Vijayakumari (01).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev's wife Vijayakumari (02).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (02).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (03).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (04).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (05).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (06).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (07).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (08).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (09).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (10).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev with wife Vijayakumari (11).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev in group photo (01).jpg
- File:Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev in group photo (02).jpg
- Comment: Your many Sadhguru images are ALL derived from File:Vijayakumari, wife of Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev.ogv which was reviewed by Gruban....so they are passed for life. I don't review thumbnails that I can't see. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Leoboudv, regarding:File:V.Ravichandran Image.jpg, the image appears in between timeline: 20:00 and 24:29 of the source video, or please inform me if for any other reason you've not reviewed it. I am mentioning this beacuse File:Gurukiran Image.jpg is reviewed which has same copyright tags. --Gpkp (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
License Review RequestEdit
Hi Leoboudv, could you please review the following images
- File:Shalini Pandey.png
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Leoboudv.
License Review RequestEdit
Please review this images
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmed_Chawki.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmed_Chawki_2.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Alicense-header%7D%7D --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Review RequestEdit
Hi leoboudv, please review the following images
- file:Sanchita Shetty at press meet.png
- Reviewed and Goodnight. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Some uploaders give time intervals for their image like this: File:Małgorzata Ohme.JPG
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot leoboudv,your help meant a lot to me. next time i will upload all the images with time stamps. sorry for the inconvenience.
Reviewing files per userEdit
Hi! I do not know if you have noticed User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-sorted-list. It is a list of galleries of files that need a license review for example User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-gallery-uploaded-by/Kaldari. I was thinking that it could be fun to work together a few license reviewers. We pick a subpage and try to empty it. To make it easier I think we should start slow with a page of 20-50 files. Let me know what you think and if you know anyone that might find it fun to try just ping them. --MGA73 (talk) 06:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Unfortunately, I have a full time job sadly to do a lot of reviews. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi! Thats okay. I'm also busy and do not have time to do lots of reviews. I hope you and your friends/family are safe in this crazy time.
Review requestEdit
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KhamzatChimaev(fighter).png#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D A review request is neededKent Bargo (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv,
Requesting following files for review:
- File:Devi Prasad Shetty.jpg
- File:Arianna Huffington (1).jpg
- File:Bhavana (Kannada actress).jpg (@ 00.18 of source video)
- File:H. G. Dattatreya.jpg (@ 00.52 of source video)
- File:T. N. Seetharam.jpg (@ 00.46 of source video)
- File:Suchendra_Prasad.jpg (@ 03.53 of source video)
- File:Neethu (1).jpg (@ 04:32 of source video)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv,
Requesting following files for review:
- File:Pravin Godkhindi.jpg (@ 03.02 of source video)
- File:T. S. Nagabharana.jpg (@ 00.37 of source video)
- File:B. Jayashree (1).jpg (@ 02.20 of source video)
- File:B. Jayashree (2).jpg (@ 00.35 of source video)
- File:Lakshmi Chandrashekar.jpg (@ 03.07 of source video)
- File:Kishan Shrikanth.jpg (@ 01.39 of source video)
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
Review RequestEdit
Hi,Leoboudv could you kindly review the following images please
- File:Ramya Pandian.png (@ 1:23 of the source video)
- File:Mithali Raj.png (@ 0:08 of the source video)
- File:Veda Krishnamurthy.png (@ 0:08 of the source video)
- File:Manisha Yadav.png (@ 0:18 of the source video)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, could you please review following images:
- File:Chaya_Singh.jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Tara_(Kannada_actress).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Bolwar_Mahammad_Kunhi_(1).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Parents of P. Sheshadri (Indian film director).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Prakash Rai (Atithi, 2002 Kannada film).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Guru Dutt (Indian actor and director).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Sudharani (Kannada film actress).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Shanthamma_(Kannada_film_actress).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Bhavana_(Kannada_actress)_(01).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Ramakrishna_(Kannada_actor).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Group_photo_(P._Sheshadri,_V.Manohar).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:P._Sheshadri,_V.Manohar.jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:Mukhyamantri_Chandru,_(Indian_actor_and_politician).jpg (Source video frame link)
- File:P._Sheshadri_family.jpg (Source video frame link)
--Gpkp (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Next time, please give a time stamp like this to locate the video frame Gpkp
- File:Ramya Pandian.png (@ 1:23 of the source video)
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Leoboudv, Thank you for the reviews. I thought the page-navigation to locate the video frame would be easy, for reviewing. Requesting review for the following file:
- File:Mukhyamantri_Chandru,_(Indian_actor_and_politician).jpg (@17:41 of the source video)
- File:Chakravarti Sulibele.jpg (@07:28 of the source video)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following videos for review:
No source?Edit
In this edit you marked a file I license reviewed with no source. The source, the YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqnB76cQSd0 is still up, and still marked Creative Commons. Mistake, or am I missing something? --GRuban (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry GRuban I found the source now....and passed it. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- No problem GRuban Unfortunately the uploader above gave me 32 videos to review and most have no time stamp indicator. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, User:Gpkp. Once upon a time he asked me to review some of his as well. Most were good. --GRuban (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Luckily it was not 32 videos at once. Whew! Next year I will have to slow down and concentrate on work GRuban sadly. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- It was the first time, actually!. You are a gift to the Commons, Leo, and when you need to do other work, we will all feel it. --GRuban (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Michael Dapaah.jpg (@ 00.30 of the source video)
- File:V.Ravichandran.jpg (@ 24.58 of the source video)
- File:Imam-ul-Haq.jpg (@ 00.03 of the source video)
- File:Mohammad Amir (01).jpg (@ 00.48 of the source video)
- File:Babar Azam (01).jpg (@ 00.14 of the source video)
- File:Bazid Khan.jpg (@ 05.21 of the source video)
- File:David Lloyd Hemp.jpg (@ 09.00 of the source video)
Notification about possible deletionEdit
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Review request from LefcentrerightEdit
Hello, there. I hope you are doing well. Please review the following photos:
- File:Werner Horn, DA MP.png
- File:Nazley Khan Sharif, MP for the DA.png
- File:Northern Cape MEC for DSAC Bongiwe Mbinqo-Gigaba.png
- File:Narend Singh.png
Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 18:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. These four also:
- Regards, Lefcentreright (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
I don't normally make specific requests, you're so good about getting to most of my uploads anyway, but I'm hoping to get these two officially stamped, because they were a request from the subject, whom I told to put the license statement on their web page:
They're both from the same image on http://www.elenacastedo.com/index.htm, right side of the page. Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Joy Bhattacharjya (IPL 2014).jpg (@01:15 of source video)
- File:Wasim Akram (IPL 2014).jpg (@01:43 of source video)
- File:Gautam Gambhir (IPL 2014).jpg (@00:48 of source video)
- File:Manish Pandey (IPL 2014).jpg (@00:31 of source video)
- File:Morné Morkel (IPL 2014).jpg (@00:03 of source video)
- File:Umesh Yadav (IPL 2014).jpg (@01:26 of source video)
- File:Wasim Akram in a rollercoaster.jpg (@01:25 of source video)
PortraitEdit
Please review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jackson_Pollock.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Alicense-header%7D%7D -- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Leoboudv.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Jennifer_Kotwal.jpg (Thumbnail of the source video)
- File:Komal Kumar.jpg (@ 01:02 of source video )
- File:Rakshitha.jpg (Thumbnail of the source video)
- File:Aditya Singh.jpg (Thumbnail of the source video)
Review RequestEdit
Hi, leoboudv could you please review the following image
- File: Royal Enfield Meteor.png @(3:28 of the source video)
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thankyou so much leoboudv
ReviewEdit
Please review it:
- 40px
- -- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 23:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done for all but one. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
ReviewEdit
Pleas review it
- File:Interview Myke Towers.jpg
- File:Myke Towers.jpg
- File:Brendon Urie MTV 3.jpg
- File:Cornelia O Dwyer.png
- File:J-Hope on the Billboard Music Awards red carpet, 1 May 2019.jpg -- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done User Explicit tagged the last image with a change of license template. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Joy Bhattacharjya (IPL 2015).jpg (0:10 of source video)
- File:Wasim_Akram_1.jpg (0:35 of source video)
- File:Jacques_Kallis_4.jpg (0:26 of source video)
- File:Robin_Uthappa_5.jpg (0:16 of source video)
- File:Kuldeep_Yadav.jpg (0:45 of source video)
- File:Morne_Morkel_5.jpg (0:50 of source video)
- File:Sunil_Narine_(1).jpg (1:05 of source video)
- File:Andre_Russell_(1).jpg (1:09 of source video)
- File:Vijay_Dahiya.jpg (1:18 of source video)
- File:Azhar_Mahmood.jpg (1:34 of source video)
- File:Jacques_Kallis_5.jpg (2:12 of source video)
- File:Ryan_ten_Doeschate_(1).jpg (1:50 of source video)
- File:Jacques_Kallis_6.jpg (2:12 of source video)
- File:Brad_Hogg_(1).jpg (0:43 of source video)
- File:Wasim_Akram_4.jpg (1:35 of source video)
- File:Jacques_Kallis_3.jpg (0:34 of source video)
- File:Andre_Russell_(2).jpg (0:26 of source video)
- File:Andre_Russell_(3).jpg (0:42 of source video)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Jacques Kallis batting 1.jpg (0.53 of source video)
- File:Jacques Kallis batting 2.jpg (0.53 of source video)
- File:Jacques Kallis batting 3.jpg (0.56 of source video)
- File:Wasim and Shaniera Akram.jpg (0.33 of source video)
- File:Umesh Yadav, Wasim Akram.jpg (0.40 of source video)
- File:Yusuf Pathan 01.jpg (1.21 of source video)
- File:Vinay Kumar bowling.jpg (1.27 of source video)
- File:Vinay Kumar (cricketer).jpg
- File:Morne Morkel 6.jpg
- File:Wasim Akram (India Inclusion Summit 2014).jpg
License Review RequestEdit
Hi, leoboudv could you please review the following picture
- File:Aparna Balamurali.png @(0:03) of the source video.
- Done --Leoboudv (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Anant Nag 1.jpg (@0.48 of source video)
- File:Anant Nag 2.jpg (@1.17 of source video)
- File:Kodlu Ramakrishna.jpg (after 0:30 in source video)
- File:Dingri Nagaraj.jpg (after 0:55 in source video)
- File:Master Manjunath.jpg (after 0:39 in source video)
- File:Laila (Indian actress).jpg (Tumbnail of source video)
- File:Sakshi Shivanand Image.jpg (Tumbnail of source video)
Proper check?Edit
Hello, I see you checked the licences for images uploaded by Medpro, e.g. File:P16-501 titre 1 (6481841667).jpg. You validated them under the {{PD-art|PD-old-100}} licence, but I believe you are wrong because all images seem to be under {{PD-author|Medpro}} on their Flickr pages. Could you confirm wheter you made a mistake or I am wrong? Veverve (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
@Sealle: pinging you since you also checked images from this account. Veverve (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- There is no matter how the Flickr account owner licensed the images. If they are in the public domain due to age, this is what should be indicated. Sealle (talk) 04:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I second what Sealle says. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Some of those images are pictures of 3D objects which therefore have a to be put under a licence compatible with Commons. Veverve (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- So why not giving from the very start an example matching the issue you intend to raise? Sealle (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- All those I found on Category:German bibles are, but there may be more: File:D. Abraham Calovii - Biblia illustrata Vet. Testamenti. - Tomus III., Completens Anotata - title page.jpg, File:F16-0061 (33579033356).jpg, File:F16-0089-1 (33750957600).jpg, File:F16-0103 (34426364066).jpg, File:F16-0104 (34549864485).jpg. Veverve (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- So why not giving from the very start an example matching the issue you intend to raise? Sealle (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Some of those images are pictures of 3D objects which therefore have a to be put under a licence compatible with Commons. Veverve (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following files for review:
Videos:
- File:Science Copies Natures Secrets - Biomimicry (National Institute of Fundamental Studies (NIFS).ogv (full length source video)
- File:Shedding Light on Black Holes (NASA ScienceCasts).ogv (full length source video)
- File:Solving Earth’s Mysteries (NASA ScienceCasts).ogv (full length source video)
- File:New Science from Jupiter (NASA ScienceCasts).ogv (full length source video)
Images:
- File:Yalda Hakim (1).jpg (@01:47 of source video)
- File:Yalda Hakim (2).jpg (@13:55 of source video)
- File:Cassowary_(1).jpg (@0:48 of source video)
- File:Cassowary (2).jpg (@0:41 of source video)
- File:Mufti Abdul Qawi.jpg (@0:02 of source video)
File:General Raheel Sharif.jpgEdit
Sir Please verify the license for this file as the orignal uploader made it available under wrong license but I changed the license to Attribution one. Please verify it so that it may qualify for Wikimedia commons usage.Thanking you in advance.192.142.152.79 12:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sir I have found the orignal link as it was first published by ISPR in 2014 at this source which was archived in 2014 according to the third Refrence of the Raheel Sharif's article and ISPR's disclaimer clearly states about cc by sa 4.0 license.Therefore, it may qualify for Wikipedia usage now. I hope you will now remove the deletion tag and verify it quickly today for Wikipedia usage.
- P.S. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:General_Qamar_Javed_Bajwa.jpg if you have any concerns about source.Thank You.192.142.152.108 06:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank You so much sir! Have a blessed day.192.142.154.0
Review requestEdit
Hii @Leoboudv: can you pls review below mentioned file.
- File:Vikram at Iru Mugan Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Nivin Pauly, Sivakarthikeyan and Vikram at Iru Mugan Audio Launch.jpg
- File:Vikram and Akshay Kumar Launches Big Deal TV Home Shopping Channel.jpg
- File:Vikram at Iru Mugan Success Meet.jpg
- File:Vikram at the ‘Kadaram Kondan’ Press Meet.jpg
- File:Dhansuh at VIP 2 Success Meet.jpg
- File:Lollu Sabha Manohar at English Padam Audio Launch.jpg -- Perumalism (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Another review requestEdit
Hello, there. Please review the following images:
Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Reviewed attribution-gencatEdit
Thanks for review images for attribution gencat. i hope you are doing well!--Docosong (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nari Shakti Puraskar Review RequestEdit
Hi, would you be able to review the licenses for these files?
File:Reshma nilofer naha.jpg File:Pushpa preeya.jpg File:Meenakshi pahuja.jpg
Thank you in advance, Joofjoof (talk) 09:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Request: License review, need your verification help for Creative Commons images from YoutubeEdit
Hi Leoboudv, I need your verification help for some of the images that I was uploaded on commons down below, This images is a screenshot originally uploaded on YouTube under a "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license.". But needs some verification from administrator to approve the licensing:
- Artika Sari Devi Kusmayadi.jpg
- Elvira Devinamira Wirayanti Dilarang Menyanyi di Kamar Mandi.jpg
- Elvira Devinamira Wirayanti Dilarang Menyanyi di Kamar Mandi Film (2019).jpg
- Putu Ayu Saraswati.jpg
I would like to uploads more image in the near future, especially the one that originally uploaded on Government sites or YouTube under a CC license. Thank you so much for your help before Leoboudv! --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- I was reviewing these when I noticed you asked Leoboudv, so I'll write here so we don't clash. The Netmediatama ones are probably good, Net Mediatama is an Indonesian TV network. However I don't like File:Artika Sari Devi Kusmayadi.jpg. That's an advertisement for ... something ... tooth whitening? That's going to be owned by some kind of beauty products company. The YouTube user in that case shows no evidence of being a representative of a beauty products company, and has other videos of all sorts of different advertisements, including Burger King, Sprite, Game of Thrones... I'm going to nominate that one for deletion. Looking further. --GRuban (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reviewed them all, I think, please ping if I missed any. Most approved, but four nominated for deletion, which is a bit high. @I Nyoman Gede Anila: I advise a bit more skepticism. If a video looks to be professionally made, for example part of an advertisement, or a movie, or a TV program, then you really should take a look and see if you can honestly believe the YouTube channel belongs to the company that made it. If not, they probably do not have the right to release it. If a video is a collation of still photos, that's probably a sign the video maker did not take the photos (otherwise they would have taken videos!) If a video says right on the page that it comes from some other source - I think you can read Bahasa Indonesia, right? - that other source probably owns the rights. --GRuban (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @GRuban: & @Leoboudv: Thanks for your update information, now I know which content that can be uploaded on Wikimedia commons. I'm just re-uploads more images from differences sources down below (License verification needed), all screenshoot images originally uploaded on Government sites or YouTube under a CC license. GRuban Thanks a lot for your instructions, I do definitely learn so much from you! --I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reviewed them all, I think, please ping if I missed any. Most approved, but four nominated for deletion, which is a bit high. @I Nyoman Gede Anila: I advise a bit more skepticism. If a video looks to be professionally made, for example part of an advertisement, or a movie, or a TV program, then you really should take a look and see if you can honestly believe the YouTube channel belongs to the company that made it. If not, they probably do not have the right to release it. If a video is a collation of still photos, that's probably a sign the video maker did not take the photos (otherwise they would have taken videos!) If a video says right on the page that it comes from some other source - I think you can read Bahasa Indonesia, right? - that other source probably owns the rights. --GRuban (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
source: Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection official website > HERE
source: Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection official website > HERE
source: NET (Indonesian TV network) on Youtube under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
source: NET (Indonesian TV network) on Youtube under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
source: Media Nusantara Citra NEWSROOM on Youtube under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
source:Media Nusantara Citra NEWSROOM on Youtube under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
reviewEdit
please review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sathya_Sai_Baba_2013_stamp_of_India.jpg -- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Another review requestEdit
Hello, Leoboudv. I hope that everything is well. Please review the following photos:
- File:Leon Basson and Denis Joseph sworn in as MPs, 22 May 2019.png
- File:DA MPs sworn in 22 May 2019.png
Best, Lefcentreright (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Bill Gates (2020) 01.jpg
- File:Bill Gates (2020) 02.jpg
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (1).jpg (@ 0.31 secs in the source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (2).jpg (@ 0.20 secs in the source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (3).jpg (Thumbnail of source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (4).jpg
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (5).jpg (@ 0.01 secs in the source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (6).jpg (@ 0.25 secs in the source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (7).jpg (Thumbnail of source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (8).jpg (@ 0.05 secs in the source video)
- File:Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (9).jpg (Thumbnail of source video)
- File:Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.jpg (@ 0.11 secs in the source video)
Regards, Gpkp (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Done I may be less active in 2021 for your information. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- sure ok. Happy holidays Leoboudv.
By the way this file: Priyanka Gandhi Vadra (4).jpg missed review.
Gpkp (talk) 06:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- sure ok. Happy holidays Leoboudv.
- Done now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:Dea Goesti Rizkita Koswara Netmediatama.jpg(need license verification)
- File:Gracia Putri Raemawasti Mulyono.jpg(need license verification)
- File:Qory Sandioriva Netmediatama.jpg(need license verification)
- File:Alessandra Khadijah Usman Netmediatama.jpg(need license verification)
- File:Miss universe 2018 in thailand.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:Michelle Dee Michelle Marquez Dee Miss World Philippines 2019.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:บิ๊นท์Miss International 2019 2.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:Camila MGI MM Dress.png(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- Comment: Done on all but File:Michelle Dee Michelle Marquez Dee Miss World Philippines 2019.jpg. Perhaps you should ask Gruban or Admin Christian Ferrer if you are sure it is a copyright violation. It may be so but I am not certain. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, it is a copyvio, coming from Facebook, I deleted it. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- You have a quite full and long talk page Leoboudv, maybe you should archive part of it. I wish you happy holidays! Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I will consider your suggestion. Christian Ferrer. I have to slowdown in 2021.
Deletion proposals from User:61.5.71.229Edit
- This images down below also stealing from google, all of this images using fake license, The image has no camera metadata to establish the uplaoder's copyright as he/she has only 1 image on Commons.
- File:Earth2009press01.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:Mpfe146.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:MissEarth2017.png(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban (with another)
- File:Kylie Verzosa's Victory Parade.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
- File:Celine Van Ouytsel durant l'élection Miss Belgique 2020.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by Leoboudv
- File:Catharina Svensson, Miss Earth 2001.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - I (GRuban) think this one might be OK; it's clearly a crop, but from a personal photo, where she's standing next to someone in a plaid shirt, I don't think that was a professional photo
- File:Nicole Faria derivate 2013 000.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban (with another)
- File:Miss universe malaysia 2013 2013-10-23 19-09.jpeg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
- File:Melissa Tan, Headshot.JPG(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - This one might be all right. I (GRuban) can't find it elsewhere on the Web, and the uploading user is User:Alexloganlee, who has a few other professional quality uploads of Singaporean models (Melissa Tan is Malaysian, but that's the next country over), and a person of that name is the director of a professional Singaporean modeling agency that represents those models (https://www.instagram.com/alexloganlee/) - if someone is really worried about it, we can send that Alex Logan Lee an email to confirm to OTRS, but it's at least reasonable enough that I'm not going to nominate it for deletion
- File:Kimberley Leggett- gala night.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - this is a pose with some person, somewhat grainy, I (GRuban) can believe this is a personal photograph.
- File:Kimberley Leggett- gala night (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
- File:Uni1965 color.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban
- File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno 2.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - this is an image by User:Marktanoja78 as 3 images below, who is responding to a deletion nomination. Let's see how that one comes out; having one image deleted or upheld isn't proof these three are bad or good, but are reasonable indicators.
- File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
- File:Pia Alonzo Wurtzbach in Philippine Terno (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: no metadata, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as above
- File:Megan Young.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by GRuban after seeing image on another site; uploader User:Marktanoja78 says they can upload a higher resolution version of this image, which would be good evidence for deleting or keeping.
- Marktanoja78 was able to upload a higher resolution version with EXIF in response to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Megan Young.jpg, so I'm withdrawing that request. That isn't proof he's the photographer of the above three, and he says he can't prove that, but it shows good faith, and is convincing enough to me, at least, that I am not going to nominate the above three for deletion. --GRuban (talk) 13:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413.jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - Yes, Government file, as below, License reviewed by GRuban
- File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - as below, License reviewed by GRuban
- File:Megan Young Miss World 2013 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
- File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
- File:President Benigno S. Aquino III congratulates Miss World 2013 Megan Young.jpg(proposed for deletion: image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE, image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)- as below, License reviewed by GRuban
- File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel April 2018.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - deleted by User:Ellin Beltz
- File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel April 2018 (cropped).jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - crop of the above, I'll ping Ellin Beltz
- File:Maggie Wilson Antarctic Ice Marathon.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - nominated for deletion by Ellin Beltz
- File:Maggie Wilson Metro Channel Close Up.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license) - deleted by Ellin Beltz
- PS: If you have time, please take a look at this images Christian Ferrer.
Best again, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know, for who wish it feel free to nominate images for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- I got pinged at User_talk:61.5.71.229#Comment, but I think I should answer here, since here is where the list is, and because there is no guarantee the IP user will have the same IP when they come back, whereas they may check this talk page again. Sorry for abusing your talk page like this Leoboudv - at least I'll make a new section on it?
- Anyway, IP user:
- Thank you for working hard to verify our image licenses!
- Please make your own user account, so we can communicate with you without straining poor Leoboudv, who already does more license reviews than any human can be expected to. When you do, post on my talk page, and I'll follow up with you there.
- As Leoboudv wrote in that comment section, we need to look at these images one at a time, or at worst one related group at a time, related by source or uploader or something. Looking at a bunch of unrelated images is not easy.
- General comments: many of your comments do seem correct. I'll go through them one at a time, and will eventually nominate the ones I agree with, which may be most of them, for deletion. But not quickly - I don't have as much energy as the amazing Leoboudv. I help out where I can, though, and I hope I can take this list off his shoulders.
- However "stealing from google" isn't really correct - Google doesn't own these images. I know, it's shorthand for "stealing images just found via Google".
- The ones where you write "image WAS NOT EVEN FROM GOVERMENT WEBSITE, on METADATA it said from GOOGLE", such as File:Miss World 2013 Megan Young 101413.jpg, are going to be the toughest ones; toughest because we may end up making the wrong decision. From reading the image descriptions, it looks like the uploader did, actually, find images that were made by Malacañang Photo Bureau, which, from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/section/briefing-room/malacanang-photo-bureau/ is a government photo bureau. For example, https://orangemagazine.ph/2013/miss-world-2013-megan-young-meets-president-noynoy-aquino/ is such a photo. But it's not quite the same photo, and the link is dead, and since it wasn't license reviewed, we can't prove it, so might end up deleting it. Unfortunately, because I do believe it was likely from a government photo like that one.
- So this will be slow work. But, again, thank you. --GRuban (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Found the Megan Young photos on President Benigno Aquino's Facebook page! For example, that one is https://www.facebook.com/noynoyaquinoIII/photos/a.648896305143120/648896421809775 - it gives the name of a different government photographer, but it specifies that this is by a government photographer. Others can be found by navigating the < and > arrows.--GRuban (talk) 16:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gazini Ganados in Kay Fanlo's Watawat Earrings.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing, uploaded from instagram post (https://www.instagram.com/p/B5kXHdcJgd5/) and reupload by government website, it was mentioned on website (photo from Gazini Ganados IG account) photo also uploaded on instagram so many times by pageant lovers before government website release on December 6, 2019)
- File:Earth2009press01.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)
- File:Mpfe146.jpg(proposed for deletion: image stealing from google and uploaded on Commons Wikimedia using fake license)--125.164.126.110 20:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gazini image nominated for deletion, thank you for pointing out the Instagram post. The other two haven't been forgotten as such, they're just a bit more complicated than they may at first glance seem. For one thing, they're from the same uploader, and the first one, File:Earth2009press01.jpg, is from a series of 20 or so, clearly from the same event. Given that, if they were snarfed from the web somewhere, it should be possible to see where they came from, and I can't quite see them; there are plenty of photos from this specific event, (for example https://www.mykiru.ph/2009/11/miss-earth-2009-press-presentation.html and https://adventuresofabeautyqueen.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/beauty-queens-earthy-18-picks-in-miss-earth-2009/ and https://normannorman.com/2009/11/06/miss-earth-2009-press-presentation/) but not this specific series, and there were clearly multiple photographers present at the event. I may end up nominating them for deletion on general principles (COM:PCP), but I'd hate to be wrong. --GRuban (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Nadeem Baig Director.pngEdit
Sir Please check the license of this image as it seems to be clear copyright violation because the first thing is that YouTube's source license is YouTube CC-BY license and this file is uploaded under wrong license of CC BY SA 4.0. Although, please check the license for this file from its archived source of 2019 given on its file page for clear verification of the license.Thank You.59.103.122.87 17:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Seoul photosEdit
Hi Leoboudv! I'm looking to revamp the collage at w:Seoul and exploring the available photos. I noticed that File:Seoul cityscape banner.jpg is marked as CC-licensed with you as reviewer, but when I went to extract the larger image at Flickr, it's now all rights reserved. Is it safe to import anyways because of the license I presume it used to have? If there is any way to check license changes there, it'd also be nice to have this photo. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 08:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- This banner image File:Seoul cityscape banner.jpg was free and licensed as cc by 2.0 when I reviewed it in 2013. As to whether you can upload the ENTIRE CITY IMAGE image, you should ask an Admin such as Christian Ferrer
- As for this this photo, it CANNOT be used on Commons since it was never uploaded to Commons before the license change. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I confirm what said Leoboudv, the banner can be used as we have an evidence (the license review) that it was uploaded here when the license was compatible however the not cropped version can not be uploaded here. As well as the other files that have not currently a free compatible license. We tolerate sometimes to keep a file without a license review if we are sure that the license was compatible at the time of the upload, but usually we don't upload files a posteriori just if it have potentially be published one day under a free license. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Request for licence reviewEdit
Hello, Would you please carry out a license review for the following images?
- File:Actor Nithiin.png
- File:Naveen Polishetty.png
- File:Adivi Sesh.png
- File:Sri Simha.png
- File:Actor Karthikeya.png
- File:Shakalaka Shankar.png
- File:Sunil at Sakshi Awards.png
- File:Kishore Tirumala at Red opening.png
- File:Venkatesh Maha.png
- File:Actor Sree Vishnu.png
- File:Abijeet.jpg
Note that the final image has a potential copyvio due to an action performed by another user, please carry out revdel if needed. Thanks in advance! -- Ab207 (talk) 12:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Admin noticeboardEdit
This is at COM:AN
Mushroom Observer toolEdit
A MO this tool --Leoboudv (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status of works by US subnational governmentsEdit
See link above. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Commons:VIRIN & PD US GovernmentEdit
Virins: US Military licenses. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Mass Deletions through a VFC (Visual File Change)Edit
- Name the user's name. Click on the user's selected uploads, give the reason and click the Execute bottom button.
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:010121 Posse Prefeito Dario Saadi Foto Fernanda Sunega (410) (50787347773).jpg
- File:010121 Posse Prefeito Dario Saadi Foto Fernanda Sunega (421) (50788210732).jpg
- File:010121 Posse Prefeito Dario Saadi Foto Fernanda Sunega (426) (50788211457).jpg
Regards, Raphael Figueira (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done: The Commons license here is {{PDMark-owner}} for PD-Mark. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:241117 Hospital Boldrini Isenção Lixo Hospitalar Foto Carlos Bassan 005 (38622685391).jpg
- File:271118 Inauguração do Centro de Pesquisa Boldrini Foto Luiz Granzotto (98) (45354809184).jpg
- File:250818 Prefeito Jonas Donizette entrega duas Ciclovias no Jardim Nova Europa Foto Carlos Bassan 103 (30393866308).jpg
- File:170220 Apresentação da Estação do Campo Grande do BRT Foto Luiz Granzotto (7) (49548542701).jpg
- File:170220 Apresentação da Estação do Campo Grande do BRT Foto Luiz Granzotto(317) (49548040503).jpg
- File:010818 BRT Obras Trecho Vila Teixeira foto Carlos Bassan 031 (43808923261).jpg
- File:301219 BRT Avenida Ruy Rodrigues Foto Carlos Bassan (49312319243).jpg
- File:Visões da Ponte estaiada (49199393338).jpg
- File:081219 Primeira Ponte Estaiada de Campinas Foto Carlos Bassan (49206044752).jpg
Regards, Raphael Figueira (talk) 09:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Hello Leoboudv, Requesting following images for review:
- File:D. P. Singh (naturalist).jpg (@02:34 secs of source video)
- File:Roopa Iyer.jpg (@00:14 secs of source video)
- File:Harshika Poonacha.jpg (@00:15 secs of source video)
- File:Srinath (Kannada actor).jpg (@00:16 secs of source video)
Notification about possible deletionEdit
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Bunyodkor Stadium.jpgEdit
File:Bunyodkor Stadium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
File:French Beach Karachi.jpgEdit
Sir can you please review the license for this image? Thank You.Wallu2 (talk) 11:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Review requestEdit
Please review it:
- File:Artemy Lebedev 2020.png
- File:Медеткан Шеримкулов.jpg
- File:Anton Lapenko (May 2020).jpg
- File:Сява (рэпер).jpg
- File:Нурминский (Страна FM).jpg
- File:Maxim Martsinkevich 2012.jpg
- File:Ksenia Sobchak 2018.jpg
- File:Ilya Varlamov (october 2020).jpg
- File:NEXTA 2020.jpg
- File:Loc-Dog 2013.jpg
- File:Kate NV 2016.jpg
- File:Нервы (группа) 2020.jpg
- File:Виктор Логинов 2018.png
- File:Александр Дьяченко 2018.png
- File:Витас 2015.png
- File:Johnyboy 2017.jpg
- File:Masha i medvedi 2012.jpg
- File:Dmitry Gordon КРТ.png
- File:Рома Жёлудь.jpg
- File:Kreosan.png
- File:Loqiemean.png
- File:Rapper slim.jpg
- File:Ilya Maddyson.png
- File:Oxxxymiron. Reebok.png
- File:Big Baby Tape.png
- File:Max Korzh.jpg
- File:Rasa (clip).jpg
- File:Sonya Esman 2013.png
Review requestEdit
Hi, I've heard you are a reviewer, could you please review these two files;