User talk:Fæ

User page Discussion
Active discussions

At work (15439138127).jpg
I may be slow to respond to questions. Despite automatic trimming, my watchlist hovers above 900,000 items, so it really helps if you remember to {{ping}} me on discussions that are not kept on this page. Feel free to email or for LGBT+ user group discussion become a contact on Telegram or Twitter where messages are persistent, for a more reliable off-wiki discussion. Keep in mind I lose track of emails too, especially complex ones I think I'll get back to but may lose track of.

Faebot is alive in different places, not tied to any specific kit, so some tasks running on Labs have proven stability and carry on regardless of whether human me is still around. However tasks running from my local desktop may pause when my home machine is off for safety reasons. A few tasks run on a headless Raspberry Pi, which should be more resilient it can continue unattended. --Fæ (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Spring migration. Due to deciding to finally abandon Python2 based Pywikibot scripts, it may be that old housekeeping might just stop. With a focus on new projects, moving some of the older tasks to Python3 may either stay on the uncertain volunteer backlog for a very long time or will remain permanently under the watermargin. --Fæ (talk) 12:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice If you want to see Python source code that supports some of my projects, go to Github and help yourself. The code is not written with reuse in mind... --Fæ (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Notice

If you are concerned that a category gets flooded with automated uploads, check that a template like {{Disambig}}, {{Photographs}}, {{Categorise}}, {{CatDiffuse}} or {{CatCat}} has been applied before complaining. In the case of my batch upload projects, any category marked this way will not be added to new photographs. --Fæ (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Archives.png

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021

SilvertonEdit

Recatagorized all images in the Category:Silverton to Category:Silverton, New South Wales.

Thanks~Cessna_208_Caravan#/media/File:Cessna_208_Caravan_I,_Seawings_(Jet-Ops)_AN1347237.jpgEdit

It is helping young students learn that the cockpit is not really that complicated ~ and all those fancy buttons and such do have a purpose and are very easy to learn ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchellhobbs (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

ProśbaEdit

Bardzo proszę o napisanie do mnie po polsku, bo niestety, ale nie znam angielskiego i nie wiem w czym jest problem. Pozdrawiam:) Keres 40 (dyskusja) 16:01, 12 gru 2019 (CEST)

speedy....Edit

File:Cranberries; - the national cranberry magazine (1989) (20515720878).jpgEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:Cranberries; - the national cranberry magazine (1989) (20515720878).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ShakespeareFan00.

And also:

File:This terrified baby was almost the only human being left alive in Shanghai's South Station after brutal Japanese bombing HD-SN-99-02790.jpgEdit

 
File:This terrified baby was almost the only human being left alive in Shanghai's South Station after brutal Japanese bombing HD-SN-99-02790.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ eesti ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ română ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ shqip ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your fight for equal rights for everyone, I would like to give you this humble recognition. We need more people like you in commons Wilfredor (talk) 21:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

MOTD NotificationEdit
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Don't Mess with Mercury.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

RM photographsEdit

Your recent additions of FPG Royal Marines photographs have been impressive and useful. Would you add any of RM snipers on ships? I ask because there are so few images of any such snipers on commons, the only examples that I found are here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Marine_Corps_snipers and here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Navy_021209-O-0000X-002_Spanish_Sailors_aboard_the_Santa_Maria-class_Frigate_Navarra_(F-85)_man_provide_cover_for_boarding_teams,_during_a_hostile_boarding_of_the_North_Korean_vessel,_So_San.jpg Any others from the RM or any other forces would be welcome and could be useful additions to the Sniper and the Marines articles.

What do you think? --Dreddmoto (talk) 20:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Do you have any examples that have not been uploaded yet? --Fæ (talk) 18:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't have any but, I wonder if you could find any. They could be of any forces around the world, not just the RM. Thanks for the reply. --Dreddmoto (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Mural- "Past, Present, and Future" by Nancy Grieves in Gilroy, California, the "Garlic Capital of the World" LCCN2013634726.tifEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:Mural- "Past, Present, and Future" by Nancy Grieves in Gilroy, California, the "Garlic Capital of the World" LCCN2013634726.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Missvain.

And also:

File:Mural "Liquor St" on Melrose Avenue, an internationally renowned shopping, dining and entertainment destination in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013632496.tifEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:Mural "Liquor St" on Melrose Avenue, an internationally renowned shopping, dining and entertainment destination in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013632496.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Missvain.

And also:

File:Mural in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013631599.tifEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:Mural in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013631599.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Missvain.

And also:

File:Art murals on the exterior of the Fox Warfield Theatre, a 2,300 seat music venue located at 982 Market Street in San Francisco, California LCCN2013631836.tifEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:Art murals on the exterior of the Fox Warfield Theatre, a 2,300 seat music venue located at 982 Market Street in San Francisco, California LCCN2013631836.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Missvain.

And also:

Bot for statistics of scanned archival recordsEdit

Hello Fae, a few days ago, the state archive of Saarland, a federal state in Germany, uploaded around 900 historical maps (16th to 19th centuries) to Commons (see here). We would like to continue uploading scans of archival records to Commons. To be able to better check what kind of recordings are best used in wikipedia, I want to ask you, I you could write for us a bot for statistics. I saw that you wrote such bots für the German Federal Archives a few years ago (see here, especially the overwies too Wikimedia Usage, Volunteers, Most edited and Popular categories. This is exactly what we are looking for! Would it be very time-consuming for you to adapt theses bot for our archive? It would be great if you could help us! Thank you so much and with best regards from our Saarland, --LandesarchivSaarbrücken (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

  • @LandesarchivSaarbrücken: Hi, the GLAM dashboard reports have been broken for a few years I believe but were available for free for anyone that wanted to have their 'bucket category' reported on. I did repair them, then repaired them again, but unfortunately, the only thing that's guaranteed is that WMF development changes to the wiki database structure, or the denial to volunteers of the ability for long running reports to finish queries over 30 minutes, will continue breaking unpaid volunteer reports like this every year. It's discouraging, so sorry, I'm not inclined to solve this for you. I suggest you consider funding the report and paying someone with SQL & wiki experience to produce an upgraded tool that could do something similar, the original source code is available on labs, as it is for any bot task. --Fæ (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fae, thank you very much for your answer! We will see how we proceed. It's a shame that all of your work on this hasn't resulted in a permanent structural bot ... Best regards from Saarland --LandesarchivSaarbrücken (talk) 07:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

UK Legislation ProjectEdit

Hi @Fæ:,

I've noticed you've uploaded several hundred thousand files relating to UK legislation. Thanks!

I'm a practising solicitor in the UK with some reasonably good knowledge of how UK legislation works, and I'm a little concerned that the scope of the project is a bit off-base and could be much more useful if these were addressed:

  1. By uploading the PDFs of the legislation as amended, what you've actually done is uploaded a snapshot of that legislation as amended (a) up to the point in time you scraped the PDF, but (b) only so far as legislation.gov.uk had been upaded at that point. i.e. if there were pending changes at the point you scraped the PDF they wouldn't be picked up. I'm not sure that an archive of such PDFs is likely to be of much use, as in many cases it will already be considerably out of date, and in some cases they simply contain no content (e.g. where they've been repealed). Any practising lawyer or member of the public would be far better served by simply visiting legislation.gov.uk to get an up to date version, and there is little to no worth in having a snapshot. However, the Queen's/King's Printer versions (also known as the "as enacted" versions, as these are the same thing) are of value, as they are mandated legal citations (see section 19(1)(c)). Section 19(1)(b) does not apply to Acts post-1707, and section 19(1)(a) refers to legislation.gov.uk itself. They are, in essence, the version from which legislation.gov.uk is built, and are unchanging documents that should be archived. I would strongly suggest that the main file for each piece of legislation be the QP/KP version where this is available, with any files with the "qp" or "en" suffixes being removed as duplicates. I will be filling in the gaps on these over time.
  2. Secondly, the system of citations used is somewhat inaccurate when it comes to pre-1963 Acts that use the old system of citation involving the regnal year. These will need to be moved to their new locations and should not simply refer to the year and chapter. Very frustratingly, legislation.gov.uk is inaccurate in this sense.
  3. I am able to access large numbers of local Acts, the vast majority of which are not available on legislation.gov.uk. I will be periodically uploading these after running them through a trained version of Abbyy OCR reader. I've put the first batch up for the year 1990 using your system of naming, and have categorised them in UK Local Acts.

Looking foward to hearing back from you.

Theknightwho (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Fæ/Project list/UK legislation identifies some of the issues. This was a compromise project, with the limited aim of getting the content easy to use across the Wikimedia projects. Certainly, categorization, titles, identification are "weak", because the source archive is by its nature inconsistent and weak. I'm open to rethinking the workflow, but as this is already a large body of files, it would be worth carefully documenting and designing before making mass changes (which I'm unlikely to get to right now), but naturally feel free to try out obvious options.
I'm aware of the issue of versioning and even having 'blanks'. Covid19 legislation being an obvious but probably exceptional case of breathtakingly rapid amendments and potentially several versions of the same document being important as references during the pandemic timeline. Giving the reader a better navigation experience on Commons is a puzzle. I would not be in a rush to delete files, a first step might be working out a better hierarchy that would be possible to automate by bot task. There are also issues with even uploading the QP versions, which I probably need to revisit, they are definitely incomplete and tricky to do without the automation breaking (I can't remember why at this moment).
If there's a starting point, it would make sense to consider this list of recently 'slurped' documents. The task is running weekly from my old laptop and if the way that legislation.gov handles the most recent files has better options, this would be practical to improve if there are concrete suggestions as at some point I need to rewrite the slurper task to run under a more recent version of Python. --Fæ (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I would suggest at this point that it will require manual tweaking, with the focus on primary legislation (i.e. Acts) rather than secondary. The main focus for this would be to ensure that the original version of the Act as enacted is the primary file, with any amendments being separate versions. This does not lend itself to mass changes.
QP/KP versions must be the primary version, because they are the basis on which everything else is built. I am able to fill these out for a large part, and will do so over time (this requires a lot of manual work), but could you please confirm that you won't object to these being uploaded as the primary file (i.e. without the qp suffix)?
In terms of having several versions, you won't get any better result than is available at legislation.gov.uk, which already allows viewing past versions. As it is, it is likely to be highly confusing to any user because a version from a particular date is unlikely to be up to date to that date because of the delay in amendments being incorporated. There's also nothing to indicate that this is the approach taken on each file, and so I'd argue from a practising legal perspective that it's simply misleading. I have no objection to including versions amended over time in principle, but this would require a far more systematised approach that would, in essence, be a mirror of the legislation.gov.uk site without much of the functiionality.
As things stand, I don't think this is a task that particularly lends itself to automation past this point except when it comes to new legislation, so I don't think that any adaption to a scraping bot is necessary unless changes are made to how new legislation is uploaded.
(Edit) One more thing before I forget: it doesn't make much sense for me to work with newly scraped files for reorganisation, because my primary concern is with legislation uploaded from pre-1963 where the form of citation was different and they're categorised badly on legislation.gov.uk, or casess where the QP/KP version should be the primary file and not the automatically generated PDF from an arbitrary point in time. Theknightwho (talk) 21:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Ah, then it's easier. From the perspective of the upload project, those should be complete, so any categorization or even renaming would not cause any conflicts with the collection being refreshed or later uploads.
I encourage you to be bold and make some decisions, and it would be helpful if you could add some notes to the project page so that others can more easily track what's going on in the future. --Fæ (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Are you able to amend the bot to pull down the QP versions of new legislation? I appreciate these are (almost) identical to the auto-generated PDF, but it'd be good for the sake of having an accurate record. Thanks again for this, by the way - 200k+ uploads is immense. Theknightwho (talk) 23:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably, but QP uploads is a task that currently always breaks before finishing a run. I hesitate to suggest how long it might take for me to look at it because there's a lot on my backlog. --Fæ (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Advertisements in New York City

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Tokyo Big Sight (Unsplash).jpgEdit

File:Tokyo Big Sight (Unsplash).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tokyo Big Sight (Unsplash).jpg 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632793.tifEdit

Suspected copyright violation notice removed. File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632793.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Action created by Mandarax (talk · contribs · logs · block log) 21:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632793.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632793.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632793.tif De728631 (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


File tagging File:Amphibian and reptile photographs, 1965-1966 and undated (IA amphibianreptil00amer).pdfEdit

File:Amphibian and reptile photographs, 1965-1966 and undated (IA amphibianreptil00amer).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Contributers2020 (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Louise Bishop and baby Shirley Bishop - 1961 (25366810083).jpgEdit

File:Louise Bishop and baby Shirley Bishop - 1961 (25366810083).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louise Bishop and baby Shirley Bishop - 1961 (25366810083).jpg Headlock0225 (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Photographs_by_Cloyne_and_District_Historical_SocietyEdit

 

Photographs by Cloyne and District Historical Society has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Biodiversity_Heritage_Library_Museum_Victoria_collectionEdit

 

Biodiversity Heritage Library Museum Victoria collection has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

YuriNikolai (talk) 00:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Benesse House

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Naoshima, Kagawa

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632787.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632787.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632787.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632788.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632788.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632788.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632791.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632791.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632791.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632807.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632807.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632807.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632789.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632789.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632789.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632811.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632811.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632811.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632810.tifEdit

File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632810.tif (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:One of three settings in an art installation called "Traveling Man" in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632810.tif Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

 
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:HMS Northumberland MOD 45167777.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HMS Northumberland MOD 45167777.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Священный Коран Смысловой перевод на русский язык=القرآن الكريم وترجمة معانيه إلى اللغة الروسية Russian (IA Quran Rus-1436).pdfEdit

[[:File:{{{1}}}]] ([{{fullurl::File:{{{1}}}|action=edit}} edit]|[[File talk:{{{1}}}|talk]]|[{{fullurl::File:{{{1}}}|action=history}} history]|[{{fullurl:Special:Whatlinkshere/:File:{{{1}}}|limit=999}} links]|[{{fullurl::File:{{{1}}}|action=watch}} watch]|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Священный Коран Смысловой перевод на русский язык=القرآن الكريم وترجمة معانيه إلى اللغة الروسية Russian (IA Quran Rus-1436).pdf Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Fæ/UserlistEdit

Hi Fae. Your very useful Userlist has not worked since April 10th. It would be nice and useful if it is updated at least once or twice a month. Thank you so much for what you can do. Greetings. DenghiùComm (talk) 07:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Insufficient licensesEdit

Fæ Hello Fæ,

Your file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Illustrated_poultry_record_(IA_CAT31037114020).pdf and many other files related to the series are marked as wrong license. Do you have any proof that the license you mentioned is correct. I know your problem of the excessive watchlist but request to please respond in 2-3 days, or 48 to 72 hrs max, or I will start taking actions on all of your files related to the series.

Warm Regards,

Contributers2020 (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

You may want to put a case up for deletion to get the logic of it right. For this example, {{PD-UK-unknown}} seems to apply so it would not be deleted. If you think a mass license replace is obvious, then it could be a bot/work request. --Fæ (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

File:La Défense 2011-12-30 (7491436544).jpgEdit

File:La Défense 2011-12-30 (7491436544).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Défense 2011-12-30 (7491436544).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fæ&oldid=575247069"