LicenseReview edit

Hi Taivo, can you please review the {{CC BY 4.0}} licence for Jacques Delors (1993).jpg? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sooviavaldus piltide kustutamiseks edit

Faile see ja see soovitakse kustutada. Fotograaf on kustutamisega nõus. Neid pilte artiklites ei kasutata (inimesest pole vikiartikleid). Kruusamägi (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg edit

It's exactly like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu incident newspaper.jpg: A Japanese camera around 2010 had only bad captured that old 1915's photo in the page of Kimura Moritake's book, published for the first time in 1994. Can you delete it as Japanese copyvio (published before 1 January 1957, photographed before 1 January 1947)? Thank you. Nanafuji (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. Sankebetsu incident photo had double copyright: of depicted object (old photo, copyright expired due to age) and of modern photographer (no permission – that was reason for deletion). Yamamoto Heikichi photo has only single copyright: of depicted object (expired due to age). No copyright of modern photographer is here, because photographer did not do any creative work. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
But it's also very bad as photo, since it was captured from that book opened as seen very better in the first version of the upload: the same for "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg". It's better to find the same photo exposed at Tomamae Bear Museum. Can you delete it? Nanafuji (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I can, but I do not delete it. At first better version of the same photo must be uploaded. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, you can already delete it. It's not very important and there isn't already when Heikichi Yamamoto's Japanese wikipedia page was created: this is the full camera of that book. Can you do also "Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg" since is very bad and incomplete in the camera? Nanafuji (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Of course I can, but I already said, that I do not delete them. And bad quality is not a reason for speedy deletion anyway. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You can do it for "copyvio". Nanafuji (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's not. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've added "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Now you can delete "Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as "duplicate" (I can't add the tag since you've protected it), and it's not necessary a redirect to the new one. Nanafuji (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. Please do not write to my talkpage more. The files can stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is the correct reason for speedy deletion: "Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
They are not exact duplicates. For example, colors are different. Crop is different as well, you can see whole rifle on old version, but not whole rifle on new version. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, they're exactly duplicates. In my version, I've only removed the part with the unnecessary Japanese description, as well unnecessary parts of the book's page. The photo of Yamamoto is the same. Then, can you do what I've asked you, so it's closed? Or in alternative unblock the page so I can tagged a request? Nanafuji (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
FYI I also refused to delete these files, as they are not exact or smaller duplicates. Yann (talk) 20:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've finally founded a very proper photo from this site. Please, can you upload it as "File:Heikichi Yamamoto.jpg", and delete or redirect "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg" and "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg"? Thank you. 95.236.238.19 09:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. Yes, I can do that, but I do not want to do that. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Then can you only upload it, and left the other two? 82.60.173.59 10:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I can do that, but I do not want to do that either. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's very better if you upload it as a new version for "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg", so we can left "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as the full version. Please, do it so it's definitely closed. Thank you. 79.20.12.122 09:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 edit

Hi Tavio,

Recently it came to my attention that one of their sock, Special:Contributions/KamUTsingRM 3320, has been uploading a lot of incorrectly named or categorized files. (see Category:Photos by Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 pending rename for files in question) Considering the scale of the clean-up required, their behaviors are disruptive. I noticed your comments on Category:Sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 to not block them. Should such exempt stand? There is a discussion on village pump. (Commons:Village pump#Problematic file names and irrelevant categorization by sockpuppet group) I would love to hear your opinion. Mys_721tx (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, in my opinion the exempt should stand. I do not know, why the names are incorrect, but I do not understand Chinese at all. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you please explain the reason for why the exemption should be held, as suggested that the spp group's behaviour are disruptive? The naming of many files they uploaded are nonsensical, with examples of a giant text in the image saying it's station A, while the file name and categorisation by the spp group suggests otherwise. It is to such a large scale that clearly constitutes disruption, and the misnaming of files and miscategorisation happens in the English language, so not understanding the Chinese language isn't really a valid reason to not investigate further. Do please prove your point on why an exemption is granted for such disruption, on what policy basis was the exemption granted initially, or otherwise how it does not constitute disruption at all. LuciferianThomas 17:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have not seen any disruption from the user. Yes, there are almost thousand files in the category, but I am not convinced, that the files really need renaming, and I am not convinced, that this constitutes a systematic disruption. I have worked with uploads of the user in the past and generally the uploads were enough good. Commons community discussed the user 4 years ago here and decided to make such exemption for him. No policy exists, because there is no other such user and it's pointless to make a policy for one user only. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am also not convinced by your "not convinced" as you have still been unable to give an actual reason as to how the issues that I point out that the files are incorrectly named, apart from your vague "do not know" and "am not convinced".
This is just a short list of a few that I found. Do you really need a comprehensive compiled list of hundreds of files to be "convinced" that it is systematic disruption? LuciferianThomas 07:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Check image edit

@Taivo:Hi Taivo ,please check and review this File:Hypothesized biological mechanisms underlying the role of exercise-induced IL-6 in primary and secondary cancer prevention.jpg (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Hi, please check and review (File:The model depicts a mechanistic linkage between muscle activation by WB-EMS-mediated resistance exercise and cancer cell death in advanced cancer disease.jpg) (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for revdel edit

Hello, would you mind just revdelling the old revision of File:Премиерот Ковачевски во работна посета на Самитот на ЕУ - Западен Балкан, во Брисел -14.12.2023- (53397186881).jpg? It has a copyrighted logo, also look at this DR. Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

Sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


RZuo (talk) 10:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas,está foto debería quedarse (keep) o remover (deleted)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kahtlasi faile edit

See näeb vägagi välja kui potentsiaalne autoriõiguste rikkumine. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Need failid on ka nagu vähe kahtlased. Kruusamägi (talk) 01:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ayuda en UDR (Undeletion Request) edit

@Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el Commons:Undeletion Request (en la parte de "File:Tarjeta electoral Partido Regional Progresistas Merideños Independientes.jpg") esta en el Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}}/{{PD-textlogo}}) porque ese logo es un partido político regional en Venezuela (en la parte Commons:Undeletion requests) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas con respecto a "License says, that "Intellectual products generated under an employment relationship in the public sector" are ineligible for copyright. Is the political party part of public sector?", te voy a responder, si forma parte de un partido político del sector público AbchyZa22 (talk) 11:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el Undeletion Request (en la parte "File:Logo Alcaldía Municipio Blvno Angostura (2021-2025).jpg") esta en el Dominio Público (PD-VenezuelaGov) AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
You uploaded the photo with incorrect license PD-textlogo. Now please create an undeletion request in COM:UDEL and say, that the correct license is PD-VenezuelaGov. Now you see, how important is uploading files with correct license. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Thank you, but i tagged (PD-textlogo) a mistake (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor en el COM:UDEL (en la parte "File:Logo Alcaldía Municipio Blvno Angostura (2021-2025).jpg") esta foto debería ser restaurada (support) o no restaurar (oppose)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Olha Ginsburg and Category:Olha Ginzburg. edit

Hi. please combine the stories of Category:Olha Ginsburg and Category:Olha Ginzburg and leave the first title. Thanks. Бучач-Львів (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems like   Done. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This Deletion Request edit

Dear Taivo,

Can you please reconsider the above DR and replace the old low resolution image which I took and replace it with this much higher resolution image--from the same museum--here of the same object. Then you can delete my original image as I suggested.

I believe that WikiCommons should have the highest resolution image possible and the image I took in 2008 is low quality and replacable. The key thing is the iamge is replacable. Why would wikipedia use a poor quality image when there is a better quality replacement which is the point of my DR above?

I had asked Gbawden this on his talkpage but he has been away. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please replace yourself 5 remaining uses in another projects. After that I can delete the file. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

You deleted Category:Amanda Maria. Your deletion log entry says (content was: "{{speedydelete|empty}}".

I just added Category:Amanda Maria to File:Amanda Maria.jpg. That image was uploaded 2 months ago. So... the category is no longer empty.

I see that the two remaining images from the uploader say "Own". Cameras have had self-timers for decades now. So, FWIW, I find that "Own" credible. Geo Swan (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Taastamist edit

Arusaamatul põhjusel on kustutatud File:Valisluureamet-logo-color-est RGB.png. Riigiameti logona ei allu see autoriõiguslikele piirangutele. Palun taasta. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Põhjus on täiesti arusaadav: litsentsi polnud. Taastasin ja lisasin litsentsi. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:why "uploader's request, incorrect license."?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

GokuJuan edit

Hi Taivo, I'm sorry to bother you and communicate with you in these circumstances, but the user insists on insulting me even when blocked, this time he has done it in English, so there is no need to translate or explain what is happening... Taichi (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. One month block without talkpage access. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

LicenseReview 2 edit

Hi Taivo, can you please review the {{CC BY 4.0}} licence for John Bruton (2002).jpg? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 11:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done on the same day. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Aspergillus caatingaensis.jpg edit

Thanks for applying the block to User:Pupusareawesome. However, I think you may have deleted File:Aspergillus caatingaensis.jpg by mistake. I think this is the file where I added source details earlier today. The source page says the research paper was released as CC-BY 4.0. If this page wasn't edited by me today, can you please check my deleted edits? I definitely added source details to one of the user's uploads that were probably deleted in the same batch. From Hill To Shore (talk) 12:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@From Hill To Shore: I am ready to restore the file, but I did not find evidence, that the source (Wikidata item Q98778929) is published under suitable license. Source site https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wfbi/sim/2020/00000095/00000001/art00003;jsessionid=lrh58f3e3rl.x-ic-live-02 said "Content available via Ingenta Connect is available for download only." Taivo (talk) 12:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I didn't realise the Wikidata DOI link pointed to a different version. The Science Direct version at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061620300129 says it is CC-BY 4.0 just under the author names. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done. I restored the image due to successful license review. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! This media is in Pubilc Domain, as mentioned in the metadata: insignia + PD-BrazilGov. Could you please revert the nomination for deletion, please. SSoster (WMB) (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. No, I do not do that, and in my opinion the PD-BrazilGov license is wrong. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Charles Aidman.jpg edit

Hello Taivo, could you check this image please?, this is a screenshot from the TV series en:The Fugitive (1963 TV series) which is still copyrighted. Byejai (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I nominated the image for regular deletion. Please explain there, what do you know about the photo. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I closed the request. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas en el COM:UD#File:Concejo Municipal Municipio Motatán (2021-2025) Trujillo.jpg esta foto debería ser restaurada (support) o oponerse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Check image edit

@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen (File:The effects of exercise on pro-inflammatory cytokines.png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 08:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio José Antonio Páez Estado Apure.png (Notas:Según el sitio web dice: contenido de la comunidad está disponible bajo CC-BY-SA a menos que se indique lo contrario.)
AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

unfair blocking edit

I did not tell any lies about the user taichi, both in Wikipedia and in commons he has deleted my contributions and at the request that they block me for no reason and you listened to him, you should not allow yourself to be manipulated by someone like that, you should have your own opinion of things with facts and be more objective because you fell into their trap and blocked me for 1 month GokuJuan (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I reblocked GokuJuan for a month for intimidating Taichi. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Restaurar edit

@Taivo:Buenas está foto COM:UD#File:Tarjeta_Elctoral_de_Convergencia.jpg debería ser restaurada o oponerse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Yesterday I opposed the idea to restore the logo. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas,esta foto COM:UD#File:Tarjeton Electoral.jpeg debería ser restaurada (support) o oponerse (oppose)? AbchyZa22 (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Crocus City Hall1.png edit

Hi Taivo, would you please look at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#File:Crocus_City_Hall1.png. I believe that such a widespread blatant copyright violation is contrary to the goals of the Commons. Thanks, Quick1984 (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Deleted on the same day. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please, discuss your decision to remove an image when the vote was 1 - 1. edit

How come you decided to remove an image, against policy, simply because of even further prejudice? Instead of voting yourself, which shows that you have no proper explanation. On this 1 Anyone else that has true guts can come and chime in. Radlrb (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pathetic that you remove actual artwork. More like, blatant sadness and pity that you are so hollow-minded, to not only remove something personal, but then insult it. Radlrb (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. I do not want to discuss blatant nonsense. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I saw you declined my request to delete the images of the supposed "Ethiopian crosses" edit

Could you maybe merge them with the Syriac cross or rename them to "West Syriac" or "Assyrian" cross? They aren't Ethiopian anyways. MotorolaBoy (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. I am not specialist of crosses, despite my name. I do not want to rename the file, because I am not sure, which kind of cross is it. Per COM:INUSE the file cannot be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I really don't know how I could convince you. Maybe if I brought a primary source about the style of a west Syriac cross? And I neither know where nor how to. I just dislike it being named that as it's historically inaccurate and that symbol historically represented the Assyrian (Oriental Orthodox Christian) rite west of the Euphrates, whereas something resembling File:Eastern Syriac Cross.svg was used to the east. An actual Ethiopian cross would be File:Krest Lalibeli.png, which is used on the EN Wikipedia EOTC page. MotorolaBoy (talk) 10:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am not the only person who can rename files. You need any file renamer here. Please open COM:RENAME about how to rename files and the page consists link to all file movers (currently 1635). Taivo (talk) 10:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Will do! MotorolaBoy (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Special:Diff/864545167 edit

Hi Taivo, in my view this image is both ineligible for copyright and too old for copyright. The PNG version should be restored. --Leyo 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done. But I do not think so. Not made of simple geometrical figures. It can be too old for copyright protection, but for that either anonymous work or author's death more than 70 years ago must be proven. Of course you can make an undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category Estonians edit

Hi, what do you think about this, is that a proper categorization? Thanks --A.Savin 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

, No, I reverted the edit. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo:Buenas, esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (kept)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bongo Cat Redraw.png edit

This 2020 discussion was closed as keep with a rationale from you that CC-BY-SA license is valid, because it has OTRS license.

I can't access the OTRS file - can I double-check with you that the original artist @strayrogue gave approval for GiraffeWorld to make a "close redraw" COM:DERIV drawing based on the original work, in that OTRS statement? Or was the OTRS just GiraffeWorld saying that they were releasing their own drawing under that licence?

(I'm surprised that the original artist didn't just release their own drawing as CC-BY, if they were happy for someone to basically trace it and take the author credit, so I'm wondering if something got missed here.) Belbury (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Actually I do not know. I am not OTRS/VRT member and have never been. I simply assumed, that if the file has the permission, then it is valid. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Check image 2 edit

@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio José Antonio Páez Estado Apure.png (Notas:Según el sitio web dice: contenido de la comunidad está disponible bajo CC-BY-SA a menos que se indique lo contrario.) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Sorry, I was yesterday very busy. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Ok,gracias y una cosa chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio Rio Negro Estado Amazonas.jpg
AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo:Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen File:Bandera Municipio Urdaneta Estado Bolivariano de Miranda (2023).jpg
AbchyZa22 (talk) 05:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Opinión edit

@Taivo: Buenas,dime una opinión con respecto a este Commons:Village pump/Copyright#PD-Venezuela and older works?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for lifting unblock conditions edit

Hello,

Over a year ago (on April 12, 2023), you forbade me to ping anyone or mention Wiktionary, as you wrote on my talkpage. Now that one year has passed, can you please lift those two conditions? You said I could make that request after one year, which has already passed.

And by the way, when it comes to your English, you really should note that:

  • 1. The following question of mine
    Why exactly is "soliciting proxy edits on [my] behalf" (for any project for which I'm blocked) considered disruptive? See, the reason I did that in the past was to try to ensure that I wouldn't feel the temptation to evade a block. So if block evasion is disruptive, why would soliciting proxy edits on another WMF wiki be equally disruptive?? I do not plan to do that again, but I'd love to know why something done to prevent one's potential block-evasion is "disruption".
    should have been answered with (at the very least) the reply
    Asking others to edit a wiki, where you are blocked, is prohibited as abusing multiple accounts.
  • 2. You wrote here that "Ya" – such word is not in my dictionary and even by context I do not understand, what it means.
    What dictionary were you even using? Seriously - why can you not use English Wiktionary to decipher that word?? Because that is what I would have done in your case.
  • 3. If you have reason to think or suspect that a Commons user is a monolingual English speaker, it might be best to have other people (I suggest fluent English speakers like Yann) to give them unblock-conditions in the future.

Lastly, two final questions:

  • 2. What, in your opinion, would be the best way for me to appeal my TPA being revoked on a different WMF project? In a related issue, I still do not know how I can possibly ask Surjection a question without him reverting it as "long-term cross-wiki pestering".

Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. OK.
  2. en:Johannes Silvet, "Inglise-eesti sõnaraamat", 5th edition. 2 volumes, circa 80 000 words. Publisher Valgus. 1st volume Tallinn 1991, ISBN 5–440–01310–5, 2nd volume Tallinn 1992, ISBN 5–440–01311–3.
  3. Maybe, but you understood me enough well anyway.
  4. I have no opinion on this question.
  5. I thought, that such blocks should be appealed in Meta, but I could not find a proper place there. You can search yourself as well. The problem is in Wiktionary, which has own administrators and procedures, so normally requests must be made in Wiktionary user talkpage, but as your talkpage access is removed, it seems to me, that there's nothing you can do. You do not know, how to ask Surjection a question – I do not know that either. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Personally, if I were you, I would ask Surjection something like this:
    "Hello, do you think there's any way that Shāntián Tàiláng can send you a message (or ask you a question), without him pestering you? I am worried that he won't be able to communicate with you at all, if you keep reverting his messages. One day, he might genuinely need your input on a topic. So how would you want him to communicate with you, if that were the case?" Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do not ask that due to two reasons: at first I am not worried at all and at second I am not interested in it. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kustutamise ränka tööd edit

Palun kustuta: File:Viimsi Artiumi pidulik avamine 19. augustil 2022.jpg & File:Klindi servalt Viimsi Artiumi katuseterrasile viivad sillad.jpg. Fotograaf keeldus loa andmisest. Kruusamägi (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo: Buenas,está foto deberia quedarse (kept) o borrarse (deleted)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply