Open main menu

Commons:Undeletion requests

(Redirected from Commons:UDEL)


Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.


Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.


Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch View Edit

File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png

As Natuur12 indicated on Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-01#File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png, it was well sourced.

Considering this was a rather poor speedy deletion tag by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 who doesn't understand Dutch and deletion by Jcb, I also request undeletion of everything else in the batch:

If needed, those can go through a regular DR process. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose - I rechecked several and all of them miss vital source information. E.g. PDF documents with several images in them without any source/authorship information. Jcb (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
No offense but I'm not taking your word on this kind of thing. I've been burned a few too many times on that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I left some notes behind the file names. Most files if not all files have dubious own work claims. Natuur12 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: thanks! Files like File:Emigratie vroeger en nu.jpg seem like they are strictly educational, but the quality (hand-written text, no professional-looking illustrations, as far as I can tell from the Google thumbnail) makes it unlikely to be useful. I wonder where the obvious violations for the PDF documents were taken from? I can't see those at all. Knowing that may aid in finding sources for PD-simple files. File:Aandeel lezers en niet-lezers in een week, bevolking van 13 jaar en ouder, naar enkele achtergrondkenmerken.png was not claimed as own work either, but looking anything up is troublesome for deleted files, so a DR would help. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: I left more notes. Strakhov (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: also thanks! I think it'll take one or more people who understand Dutch and Dutch culture to sort all of these out. I'm willing to go over them in a DR, I think Donald Trung also won't mind. The obvious copyvios Natuur12 identified and Homer could potentially remain deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, most files are just plain garbage and undeleting them would be a waste of resources. The files seem to be part of some middle school project. The copyright violations are low quality teaching material. The non copyright violations are CBR graphs or self created drawings. While the deletion reason for most files is faulty there's little point in undeleting them. (CBS graps exlcuded). Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: I'd be okay with undeletion of the CBS graphs and leaving everything else. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

File:JANDI DAVID (1893-1944).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sabnic Artist as stated in the file name died in 1944. Been public domain in Hungary since 2015. Abzeronow (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

  Info This is upper-left image from this site. While it is likely to be PD in Hungary, we cannot be sure as we know nothing about the painting history (if it was published first time less than 25 years ago, it may be copyrighted in EU, including Hungary). Also, we know nothing about its US copyright status.   Neutral Ankry (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Yeah, I can't find any info on that particular painting from a web search. It looks like it could have been published in the 1920s (1930s also possible). Or it could have been unpublished, which could mean some issue with publication right in the EU but now public domain in the US due to author death date. Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
  Info I am waiting for another admin opinion before final decission here. Ankry (talk) 06:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Unjustified nominations by User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2

I made some review of images recenly nominated by this user and found many that are doubtful IMO. While the most appropriate license templates might be different, they were not totally incorrect, and I found requesting OTRS permission here as an incorrect action that totally misleads uploaders.

  • Old PD book scans:
    • a 1889/1908 books by
Taras Shevchenko  (1814–1861)        
Alternative names Tarass Chevtchenko
Description Ukrainian poet and painter
Date of birth/death 9 March 1814 (25 February 1814 in Julian calendar) 10 March 1861 (26 February 1861 in Julian calendar)
Location of birth/death Moryntsi Saint Petersburg
Authority control
creator QS:P170,Q134958
  • a 1858 photo (likely from a 1858 book):
  • photos of a 1912 medal:
  • photos of a 1713 medal:
  • photos of a 1761 medal:
  • photos of a 1838 medal:
  • photos of a 1902 medal:
  • photos of a 1821 medal:
  • a non-copyrightable cover:

The photos seem to be amateur, non-professional, with EXIF. @Jcb: if you see any reasons to doubt these images to be PD, please elaborate. While some images of this uploader are clear copyvios, many of the above are not even copyrightable. IMO, the PD/copyvio ratio among deletion nominations here is too high. Ankry (talk) 11:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

You will normally see that such a file is uploaded by a user uploading e.g. 90% blatant copyright violations. (I checked some of the above, were this turned out to be the case). If a user uploads a batch of copyright violations, most admins here just flush the batch, without carefully examining file by file to see if one or two files can be saved. I think this is totally justified as pragmatic use of our limited volunteer resources. If it turns out that some can be undeleted, no problem. Jcb (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: I know that this is common practice, and my reservations concerned rather initial nominations than final deletions. But let's focus on these particular files, which IMO are either just PD (regardles of their origin) or cases where there is no clear doubts whether they are own works of the uploader. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support No evidence that these files are copyright violations. Yann (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Just curious – how may “П'ЯТА СЕСІЯ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ РАДИ. 1962. На чужині.jpg” be {{PD-UAGovDoc}}? Is Ankry serious about Ukrainian jurisdiction extending to that event? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: No idea. IMHO it does qualify for PD-Text, though. Strakhov (talk) ~
I think I found somewhere the information that it applies also to Ukrainian SSR law; but maybe indeed my mistake. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

I was recently contacted by Albinfo regarding an upload by Cunolf who is his mentee in German Wikipedia's "adopt-a-user" program. Apparently, although with a somewhat problematic upload history, Cunolf is among those affected by questionable "no permission" tagging by this user. Specifically, this is about File:14 Kundelfingerhof um 2000.png. It's apparently a self-scanned older photograph from a slightly crumpled original in an album (even the photo corners are visible). Cunolf's "own work" declaration therefore seems plausible enough for such a 2000 photograph (it's not unusual to have own older photographic prints and to scan them now) - at least plausible enough for a regular deletion request, it seems to me. Pinging Ellin Beltz who deleted that image, what do you think? Undelete it and convert to DR, would you agree? Gestumblindi (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Gestumblindi: how does this affect undeletion process of the above mentioned images? If you wish to undelete another image, create a separate request. Ankry (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: I added it here because it is another case of the nominations by User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, so I thought this is the most fitting place. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Gestumblindi: If you are not asking for undeletion nor expressing an opinion about undeletion then it is not. Ankry (talk) 08:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, personally I would undelete (and I agree with you regarding the other files), but I would like to hear Ellin Beltz' opinion first. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Gestumblindi Restored file, sent to DN per your request, please see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:14_Kundelfingerhof_um_2000.png. I did not look at any other image in this list, and have no current opinion other than I agree with Jcb as above. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Roza-Shanina profile.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Roza-Shanina profile.jpg circa 1944 photograph. Could be {{PD-Russia}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

  Support per {{PD-Russia}} (anonymous photo). Ankry (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Reposição de ficheiros de João Justiceiro (2)

Dando prosseguimento aos pedidos de reposição por partes, solicito o restauro destes arquivos, sinalizados como "violação de direitos autorais":

São mapas de minha autoria derivados de trabalhos já existentes no Commons (os originais estão na descrição). O último é um mapa retirado da web com a devida referência.

João Justiceiro (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: can you shed some --MB-one (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)light on this?

The maps come from non-free sources, e.g. here. Jcb (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: Por favor, pare de ficar distorcendo as coisas. O mapa original (do exemplo que você citou) é este, e inclusive está citado no mesmo arquivo como eu já disse ali em cima. Obviamente, para fazer o desenho tem que ter a fonte, que é esse link que você colocou. João Justiceiro (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Jmabel, você deu uma ajuda da última vez. Poderia faze-lo de novo, se possível? João Justiceiro (talk) 04:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I'm confused. None of these much resemble, which you link. For which map are you saying that is a source? I'm guessing File:Mapa da Eleição estadual em Minas Gerais em 2018 por município (2.º turno).svg since it is the only map of Minas Gerais among those listed above. Obviously, any district-by-district outline map of Minas Gerais is going to have some close resemblance, but I don't see anything to suggest that particular map was its source. Could you be more specific? The uploaded file was described as deriving from File:Brazil Minas Gerais location map.svg, which might need more explicit attribution of authorship than was given, but which is certainly free-licensed. Do you have some basis to say that in fact it derived from the file rather than the one that was attributed? - Jmabel ! talk 05:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: pinging you again, hoping to get a response. - Jmabel ! talk 23:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
It was linked in one of these files. Jcb (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support undeletion if no clear copyvio evidence concerning any of the above maps. Ankry (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Wittstock.jpg

I think Commons applies PD-Art worldwide now, correct? Abzeronow (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

  Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Image description page says this is from 2007. No information about who the painter is. Thuresson (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The painting is certainly contemporary from the 30 Years War. The style and arrangement also reminds me of Pieter Snayers, but I'm not an expert. De728631 (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose No information about author or date of first publication. ”Made in 17th century style” is not a license. Thuresson (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Good afternoon, we changed the site, now on it: CC BY-ND 4.0 Iseewb (talk) 10:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

  Info @Iseewb: Non-derivatives license is not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. However, I see another license info on the above-mentioned page. Is it your mistake or there is a non-intended license declaration there? Ankry (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Good afternoon, we changed the license to meet the requirements, we are trying to do everything so that our materials are not deleted!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iseewb (talk • contribs) 07:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support then. Ankry (talk) 07:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Treintañeras Cañeras.jpg

I own every right to use this picture as I please since it's my band lol --WikiCMDW (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose The right "to use" is not enugh to publish a photo in Wikimedia Commons nor it allows to claim autorship. Ankry (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

How can you determine who the author is? --WikiCMDW (talk) 07:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Who took the photo? That's the author. - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

File:HoM Kestutis.webp

This is the photo of the Head of EU Advisory Mission (EUAM) Ukraine posted on EUAM web-site. And this is where this photo first appeared - Please undelete it and allow using

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Euamppid (talk • contribs) 06:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose I do not see a free license there nor information that User:Euamppid is the photographer. Ankry (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Euamppid is a collective account registered on the EUAM Ukraine's PPID (Press & Public Information Department). And we are developing a Wiki page dedicated to EUAM. using photos from our web-site only. Please undelete.--Euamppid (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

First, anybody can say that; we have no evidence that any web-based action taken by this account can be considered a legal contract signed by the organization and that it would be considered such by a Ukrainian and/or US court in case of dispute.
Second, an organization cannot grant that they "personally created the entire original image". Creator is always a human, or a team of humans, not an organization. So any use of {{own}} template by this account should be considered invalid and trigger a DR. Ankry (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
@Euamppid: Please contact OTRS so they can verify you are who you say you are. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you :@Alexis Jazz: I've emailed OTRS. let's see what they say. It's the first time I'm doing this. I did create pages in the past, but the process back then was far less complicated than this time around.--Euamppid (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


this is the pmz corporations Software collection that made in 2009 in miandoab WA iran.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drpmz (talk • contribs) 11:18, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
@Modern Sciences, Billinghurst: IMO, the design of the CD cover is simple, the Windows logo is {{PD-shape}} and the rest is {{PD-text}}. Why did you suggest copyright violation here? I tend to   Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:International Robowars.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the owner of this image since I am the Events Manager of Techfest, IIT Bombay. OmJaiswal81 (talk) 11:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose Anybody can say that. @OmJaiswal81: If you cannot prove that the image is freely licensed as anonymous user, basing on publicly available info, COM:OTRS is the only way to do this. Ankry (talk) 12:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

  Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John Vignola al festival Musicultura, Macerata 2018.jpg

i can distribute the picture on the basis of an official release note for photographic material signed by the author of the pic and granting me any right, in time and place, to do so.

the note can be downloaded at a link i can provide (made unavailable for privacy matters)

--Kireru (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Kireru: Every image uploaded here must be under a free license; read COM:L for details. Fair use images, without a license granted by the exclusive copyright holder cannot be stored in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

  Not done No license. Ankry (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)



I would like to ask you for undelete File:Alcoholika_La_Christo.jpg because I am the owner of the file also I am in the picture and I have the rights for the use of the image, please do not delete this file.

Best Regards

Victor Paredes

Sixundersix (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Sixundersix: Right "to use" is not enogh. You need to be the exclusive copyright holder in order to license the photo. I see nothing about your rights on this page. Nor about free license. Ankry (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ankry:Well this is my oficial site on facebook : Im the owner of the image you can see also. Sixundersix (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

We cannot verify this on-wiki. Also, if you are not the photographer, we need an evidence that you own copyright. I suggest contact COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Schauffele Molly young.jpg

Dear Wikimedia Commons: Please note that I am the grandson of Richard Schauffele. Photos relating to Richard Schauffele are historical photos in the ownership of our family and have been published with permission by the family in the past 50 to 100 years. They are indisputably in the public realm. Sincerely, Stefan Schauffele (stefantast)--Stefantast (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Stefantast: Ownership of photos is unrelated to copyright that belongs to authors until expired or transferred in a contract. Are you the photographer as you claimed during upload? If not, who is? Unpublished photos of unknown photographers are copyrighted in US 120 years since creation. And we cannot store photos with unclear copyright status due to COM:PCP. Ankry (talk) 04:59, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Designer Phuong My.jpg

The file is Wiki Commons CC0 Waiver and can public on the sites.Fashion Asian (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Take note that the current backlog for OTRS is 179 days, OTRS depends completely on volunteers, who work as hard as they can.
"© PHUONG MY Design Company" is not a free license declaration. Ankry (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Phuong My flagship store.jpg

The photo is aFashion Asian (talk) 06:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC) usable media files to which anyone can contribute

  Oppose As above: no free license at the source page. Ankry (talk) 07:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:PHUONG MY logo.jpg

The file photo Fashion Asian (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)can use in public

  Oppose As above: no free license at the source page. Ankry (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019010910000321 regarding File:Malinda_Williams.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done @Ganímedes: Please proceed. De728631 (talk) 12:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Barehand Knitting - Bird Pinch.gif

The image file: Barehand Knitting-Bird Pinch.gif is a scan of an illustration by Elizabeth Auer who is illustrator of this this original artwork and provided it to me, Aleshanee Akin, with permission by Elizabeth Auer as of 5/10/2019 to use it for this Wikipedia page on Barehand Knitting. Feel free to cotact me at if you have any further questions.

--Aleshaneeakin (talk) 17:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 01/25/2019

Did she also suggest you that you should declare yourself as the author of the image? We need a written free license permission from the author in order to restore the image. The procedure is described in COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Egidio De Maulo.jpg

Questa tela di mio bisnonno che ho ereditato con altri lavori da Lui eseguiti, tela fu’ fatta nel 1861 e si trova anche in altri della sua citta materna Giulianova (TE)


Roberto Cani De Maulo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanrome (talk • contribs) 17:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support The painter died in 1904, clearly PD. Ankry (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Blue Ball.jpg

The image file:Blue Ball.jpg is an original photograph taken by me, Aleshanee Akin on December 14th, 2016 of a knitted object created by me, Aleshanee Akin as an example of barehand knitted artwork. For further information contact me at

--Aleshaneeakin (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019