Open main menu

Commons:Usulan pembatalan penghapusan

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 22% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

Dalam halaman ini, pengguna dapat meminta halaman atau berkas yang telah dihapus agar dipulihkan kembali. Pengguna dapat memberi komentar pada permintaan-permintaan dengan meninggalkan catatan seperti jangan dipulihkan atau batalkan penghapusan dengan menyertakan alasan.

Halaman ini bukanlah bagian dari Wikipedia. Halaman ini berisi isi dari Wikimedia Commons, sebuah repository berkas media bebas yang digunakan oleh Wikipedia dan proyek Wikimedia lain. Wikimedia Commons tidak memuat artikel ensiklopedia. Untuk meminta pembatalan penghapusan sebuah artikel atau konten lainnya yang dihapus dari Wikipedia bahasa Inggris, lihat halaman tinjauan penghapusan pada proyek tersebut.

Contents

Cari tahu mengapa sebuah berkas dihapus

Pertama, periksa log penghapusan dan cari tahu mengapa berkas itu dihapus. Gunakan pula fitur What links here untuk melihat apakah ada diskusi yang tertaut ke berkas tersebut. Jika Anda yang mengunggah berkasnya, periksa apakah ada pesan di halaman pembicaraan Anda yang menjelaskan alasan penghapusan tersebut. Kedua, baca kebijakan penghapusan, kebijakan ruang lingkup proyek, dan kebijakan lisensi untuk mengetahui mengapa berkas itu tidak diizinkan diunggah di Commons.

Jika alasan yang diberikan tidak jelas atau Anda ingin menyanggahnya, hubungi pengurus yang menghapus berkas itu untuk meminta penjelasan atau berikan bukti untuk menyanggah alasan itu. Anda juga dapat menghubungi pengurus aktif lainnya (mungkin pengurus yang dapat berbahasa asli seperti Anda)–sebagian besar mereka akan senang membantu, dan jika ada kesalahan, jelaskan situasinya.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch View Edit

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Formosa_loves_river

They're all original built upon NASA's material under public domain. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 08:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Per the points I given in this discussion--Cohaf (talk) 16:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
    • I am sorry, I still don't find your point justifiable. Wikimedia Projects are not democracy or literally a place to vote. Best. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose We are not democracy, but providing a clear proof that uploaded content is copyright-free of freely licensed is up to uploader. Per COM:PCP if doubts cannot be resolved, we cannot host the images. No direct link to a NASA source provided nor an evidence that content from sinica.edu.tw is free. "版權所有 © 2008-2019 QGIS" is not a free license declaration, but a copyright claim. Educational only use also does not mean free. Ankry (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
"資料來源:

Release of ASTER GDEM Version 2 (ASTER GDEM官網)"

"Source:

Release of ASTER GDEM Version 2 (ASTER GDEM's official website)"

--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 03:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

JPL Image Use Policy:

Unless otherwise noted, images and video on JPL public web sites (public sites ending with a jpl.nasa.gov address) may be used for any purpose without prior permission, subject to the special cases noted below. Publishers who wish to have authorization may print this page and retain it for their records; JPL does not issue image permissions on an image by image basis.

By electing to download the material from this web site the user agrees:

  • that Caltech makes no representations or warranties with respect to ownership of copyrights in the images, and does not represent others who may claim to be authors or owners of copyright of any of the images, and makes no warranties as to the quality of the images. Caltech shall not be responsible for any loss or expenses resulting from the use of the images, and you release and hold Caltech harmless from all liability arising from such use.
  • to use a credit line in connection with images. Unless otherwise noted in the caption information for an image, the credit line should be "Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech."
  • that the endorsement of any product or service by Caltech, JPL or NASA must not be claimed or implied.

I will add the text that "work based on raw black&white data Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech." upon the recovery of the deleted photos.

--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 11:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

  • @Cohaf, Yann: Should you guys have any question in regard to the copyright explanation above, please let me know. Best. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 11:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per information provided above. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 11:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
    • Nope, the above is still not enough. We don't have the original pictures the derivatives is being produced and unless we have it, we cannot know that it is from this source. The special cases also stated that there can be images on the website not covered, so we can't be sure. It's still dubious licensing. --Cohaf (talk) 11:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
      • Perhaps I am misunderstanding something. I'm observing this whole discussion on several pages, and here is how it looks to me: People are trying to find any potential way to view these files as a form of copyright violation, they do not find any reason, and after that they say "This must be an unknown unknown". Are you saying that you want to see a list of images that were used? If so this is just reasonable enough. My concern is that the "delete" side is actually not stating what is needed here, only vaguely hinting at it. @It's gonna be awesome: Could you please provide links to images that were used? ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 12:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
        • Yes @Gone Postal:. I need to see the actual files. Now they are obtained from a webpage which obviously the webpage is copyrighted. They claimed it is from NASA which in the discussion in Yann talkpage, I note that NASA have a clause that forbids commercial use without explicit permission. The commercial user needs to ask for permission each time they use the files. I supposed it is the same as per derivatives. We just can't host it here. There are a few issues: 1. The clear photo should be given. 2. The NASA clause needs to be resolved (which I offered them to host the files locally at zhwp). 3. Per COM:PCP, I am just taking due precautions. Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
          • If all the data come from NASA, then the files can be accepted, but it is not clear to me if that's really the case. All content produced by NASA is in the public domain. File:Landform of Formosa.png was reuploaded. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
            • @Yann, Cohaf: I produced the final colorful images based on a raw B&W image of ASTER GDEM linked from the educational website hosted by Academica Sinica of Taiwanese Government. Please feel free to let me if you have any question. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 13:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  • This is the raw B&W image embedded in the educational website's example, as you can see that's the northern part of Taiwan. I followed the steps taught by the website to download the complete raw B&W image of Taiwan as a whole. Afterward, I started off the work from a raw B&W image of Taiwan. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 13:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMO there are 3 separate issues: 1. the license of the source data; 2. What material was used to produce these maps? 3. Does using the data to produce a new map OK? If the data is just geographical coordinates, I am not sure there can be a copyright on them. Regards, Yann (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  1. The license of the source data:
  • Source:
Release of ASTER GDEM Version 2 (ASTER GDEM's official website)"
  1. What material was used to produce these maps?
  • A raw B&W data of ASTER GDEM
  1. Does using the data to produce a new map OK?
  • Yes, otherwise the educational website, directly operated by the highest rank of academic institution in Taiwan supported by Taiwanese Government, wouldn't teach people to produce without prior warning.
  • Per JPL Image Use Policy, it's okay to use the data to produce a new map.

--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

  • IMO you confuse several things: 1. ASTER GDEM Version 2 doesn't seem to be a free license, 2. raw data is not "black and white" as you wrote, raw data is numbers. 3. "educational website" doesn't mean that it is covered by a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Firstly,

JPL Image Use Policy:

Unless otherwise noted, images and video on JPL public web sites (public sites ending with a jpl.nasa.gov address) may be used for any purpose without prior permission, subject to the special cases noted below. Publishers who wish to have authorization may print this page and retain it for their records; JPL does not issue image permissions on an image by image basis.

By electing to download the material from this web site the user agrees:

  • that Caltech makes no representations or warranties with respect to ownership of copyrights in the images, and does not represent others who may claim to be authors or owners of copyright of any of the images, and makes no warranties as to the quality of the images. Caltech shall not be responsible for any loss or expenses resulting from the use of the images, and you release and hold Caltech harmless from all liability arising from such use.
  • to use a credit line in connection with images. Unless otherwise noted in the caption information for an image, the credit line should be "Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech."
  • that the endorsement of any product or service by Caltech, JPL or NASA must not be claimed or implied.

Secondly, I started off upon a simple non-visible black and white picture of Taiwan of ASTER GDEM.
Lastly, I would like to emphasize that I learned the abstract knowledge rather than just copied the physical proprietary objects from the educational website.

--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

ASTER GDEM does seem to have a free license -- if it's even copyrightable to begin with. It sounds like the GDEM data is the result of automated processing over the raw data[1], and it's given out freely. There does not seem to be any restrictions on what you can do with it (that was not always the case, but seems to be today). The raw data does seem to be photos taken by a NASA satellite using a Japanese instrument. I have no idea if there is any real aiming of the camera or if it just continually takes pictures. But even presuming there might have been a copyright, it would seem the data is being released freely with no restrictions, as is common with NASA efforts (even joint ones with non-PD-USGov entities). Other than pretty extreme theoretical areas, I don't see a real reason to doubt they are free. PD-USGov-NASA may be the most convenient license. I am not sure if the process used added any expression, so not sure if the license should just be that of the original, or whether the user needs to license their efforts as well. But leaning   Support on this if the only real question is the license of the ASTER data. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I appreciate your clear insight. I would say this is the point. The legitimacy of the license of the ASTER data is the thing they want to confirm. Respectfully yours. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Put it in a nutshell: I got an ASTER data. Afterward, I processed the ASTER data to make it colorful and visible using the knowledge learned from the educational website. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
版權所有 (All rights reserved);   Oppose unless It's gonna be awesome may make the website source clarify (澄清, or correct 更正) the "original source" is/to be free use. If It's gonna be awesome can really make it, please notice me, and I would appreciate that. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 03:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
"All rights reserved" says nothing about if it's free or not -- it is the same thing as a copyright notice. The owner reserves the rights, then licenses them with a free license. The copyright notice was for the U.S. and later the Universal Copyright Convention; "All rights reserved" was for the Buenos Aires Convention, so people tended to use both together and continue to do so. It does not contradict any license given for that copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • @Sanmosa: I learned the knowledge from the educational website to process the ASTER data to make it colorful and visible. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I think the files can be kept. Raw data's licence is ok and this user's calim of own work has not been refuted.--Roy17 (talk) 00:49, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

File:King Kong (illustration).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file was speedy deleted as derivative. King Kong is not in general copyrighted, if so, then the derivative can not fall under this copyright because it is simply a gorilla without originality (s. w:King_Kong#Legal_rights). However, in the deletion reasoning is the comparison to the alleged original missing, since the author claims he did not use a protected material.[2] (request by User:A1Cafel) -- User: Perhelion 20:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

  Info "Copyright (C) 1976 Dico De Laurentis Corporation. All Rights Reserved" on the image. Ankry (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Also previous undeletion discussion. Ankry (talk) 03:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  Comment Then it's time to reconsider again, because this is a false claim.
  • Reason for the first decline was mainly "out of scope": "Aside from the entirely correct reasons given above, these are also personal art from non notable artist, therefore out of scope."
    Aside the first part of (Jims/the) explanation is fully unclear or ambiguous in the context.
    Even OOS is not a speedy deletion reason, it is absolutely disputable, as he is a notable artist in well known in certain circles. Google hits for his name (in quotation marks): 19.200
  • It's a derivative? No, until there is evidence given for the imaginary original picture.
    To be more pragmatic open: The "Dico De Laurentis Corporation" can't have the copyright on all gorilla pictures on the world.
    The first movie (all his "basic ingredients", plot and characters) are public domain.[3]
    Beside: The here shown gorilla looks clear more like the old version (not DDL).
  • w:King Kong #Legal rights' judgment states this:
    "The courts ruling noted that the name, title, and character of Kong no longer signified a single source of origin so exclusive trademark rights were impossible."
    Even the trademark rights are not relevant for us.
-- User: Perhelion 09:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Nobody says that "Dico De Laurentis Corporation" owns copyright "on all gorilla pictures on the world". The clause is on this particular image. And to consider it invalid, we should have (IMO) clear information from the author why it was placed there. Maybe, it is an artistic effect, maybe it is work for hire, or maybe, the artist considered this work just a derivative of some copyrighted work so the clause was preserved. Ankry (talk) 09:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Paintings by artists who have been dead for more than 70 years

These files are all photographs of paintings by artists who have been dead for more than 70 years. They were deleted because in one person's opinion, they were probably published somewhere.

The possibilities are:

  • Never published, therefore public domain
  • First published after 12/31/2004. 70 years pma, therefore public domain (They all died 1948 or earlier)
  • First published before 3/2/1989, no notice or registration, therefore public domain
  • First published from March 2, 1989 through 2002, still under copyright

It is reasonable to ignore the very small possibility that the last case applies. The facts are exactly the same as for the file, File: Mujer con flores by Alfredo Ramos Martínez, c 1932.jpg, which was undeleted by James Woodward, and I am quoting some of his reasoning. In fact, the original deletion requests are word-for-word identical. Wmpearl (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Pinging @Taivo, Prosfilaes, Jameslwoodward: some users that were related to the deletion / undeletion of the images mentioned here.
Personally, I must say, that I generally agree with Taivo's DR closing sentence that we need some evidence that the images were not published in the specified period, i.e. taking some effort to find such publications. No evidence that such effort has been taken or even intended, especially as it is impossible to make such investigations en masse. I would support such a request only if the sentence almost no painting of these artists was published between 1989 and 2002 can be considered true. But this needs at least some query in libraries and/or among auction catalogues. Ankry (talk) 23:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
I've seen absolutely no evidence that they had no notice or registration. No one has checked the Copyright Registrations and Renewals for registrations or renewals for any of these works. I've seen no evidence that it wasn't published in some book with notice, registration and renewals if necessary, which is much harder to search for.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Although the size of the images makes it difficult to be certain in some cases, I have looked at all of them and I see no notice on any of them. Without notice, registration is irrelevant except if the copyright owner made an effort to add notice to the work.
Therefore, only the last case might apply and, as I said in the related DR, that seems unlikely -- that a work of a long dead painter would be first published during that relatively short period. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The famous photo of a naked girl having been napalmed in Vietnam also doesn't have a copyright notice on it. There is no requirement that copyright notices be watermarked into the photo or painting. Particularly if it was published in a book, books virtually always place copyright notices on the back of the title page or an extension elsewhere, both distant from the actual visual work. Even if they were placed below the photo of the painting, it still wouldn't be in the body of the painting.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my personal photo. Look for "Aymane Sennoussi"

The photo deleted is own work.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sennoussi (talk • contribs) 12:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose The previous revision of File:Aymane Sennoussi.jpg has been published before without a free lincence, so you would have to verify your authorship throught the process at COM:OTRS. As to your new selfie, usually we do not allow personal images of new users who have not made substantial contributions to any Wikimedia project. De728631 (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done: COM:OTRS verification required. ~riley (talk) 18:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Name of the file to Mysteryerik.jpg

Wondering why this was deleted, already handled all this a few years ago, trying to get back up https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mysteryerik.jpg and then added back to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_von_Markovik --BravoPUA (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  Info If this is about File:Mysteryerik.jpg, was deleted after a formal deletion request, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mysteryerik.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
The file history shows that it was undeleted once before referencing ticket:2011052810002915, but apparently it was never marked with an OTRS template after that. De728631 (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose Although the file was undeleted in the past, the ticket I mentioned above seemed to not have been a valid permission at any time. See this reply at the OTRS noticeboard. De728631 (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The 70th Anniversary of the Founding of The People's Republic of China logo .svg

Please send a copy of this svg as an attachment to techyan wmcug.org.cn for uploading locally under fair use. --TechyanTalk) 05:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

@Techyan: I have temporarily undeleted the file, so you can download it here. Please let me know when you are finished, so I can delete it again. De728631 (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
@De728631:I uploaded this file in zh.Wikipedia & en.wikipedia, please delete it. --舞月書生(JoyeZhang)👉☎️👈∮My Heart Will Go On 13:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

  Resolved
Transferred to Wikipedia for fair use. De728631 (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:inbrnaveen9.gif

File:inbrnaveen9.gif
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Inbrnaveen (talk • contribs) 06:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose Out of scope, COM:CSD#F10. Thuresson (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Commons is not a social network. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done: Not done per above. ~riley (talk) 18:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:We Shall Not Die Now Poster.jpg

File:Name of the file to FINALMAINPOSTER.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashtongleckman/sandbox

All copyrights on this photo are cleared. There's no reason for the photo to be blocked.

Undeletion requests/idWe Shall Not Die Now
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashtongleckman (talk • contribs) 18:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose As this has been published before without a free licence, we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Blitz phone picture —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.189.176.217 (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Please state the correct file name and a reason why that file should be undeleted. De728631 (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done not deleted. Ankry (talk) 14:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Vfranquesa

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: All of these pictures are Francisco Negrin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Negrin work. Vfranquesa (talk) 22:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  •   Oppose We need a permission by email coming directly from Mr Negrin. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Godspower Oparaugo.jpg

I humbly request for the the file (Godspower Oparaugo.jpg) to be undeleted. My reason is that Godspower Oparaugo is the owner of the image used with his name. The image can also be found on his Google author account, bearing the same name, here is the link to it: Godspower Oparaugo Google author page. If his image is undeleted on Wikipedia, it would aid him in completing other documentation that he would want to carry out in the future.

(Stepheniyke (talk) 22:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC))

  Oppose We need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Most often this is also not the person depicted in a photograph, but the original photographer. Just because an image shows up at Google it is not automatically free for anyone to use. De728631 (talk) 23:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

I have informed the copyright holder to write you through his own Wikipedia account, to clarify his ownership and permission to use his image. (Stepheniyke (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC))

This is my image and I permitted (Stepheniyke) to use it on Wikipedia and other platforms. Kindly restore it so that it can be used for further documentations. Regards!

(MrGodspower (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC))

Please wait for the email of permission to be processed by our team of volunteers. If your permission has been found valid, the file will be restored automatically, but this will take a few days. Please note also that in such cases we do not accept on-wiki permissions since we cannot verify your identy through your Wikimedia account. De728631 (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, I will wait. Should I forward a mail of permission to you through my email or what other ways can I forward the permission you have required? Regards!

(MrGodspower (talk) 09:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC))

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MILES MOSLEY.jpg‬

Restore the image- Miles Mosley owns this image- it was purchased with full rights, in perpetuity from Visual Thought. Please add back to miles mosley’s wikipedia page. Thank you. --TBPSB (talk) 23:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)This picture is owned by Miles Mosley. You deleted it from his wikipedia page. He has full rights to use the photo, in perpetuity, online for Wikipedia and any other public forum. Please add the photo back asap to his wikipedia. Thank you. -Miles Mosley, TBPSB Oct 21, 2019

  •   Oppose Since this image has been published before without a free licence, we need a permission coming directly from the copyright holder. Please note also that copyright is usually not held by the person depicted in the photo, but by the original photographer. If they agreed upon a written copyright transfer, we would also need to get a copy of this contract. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Note also, that a permission for use at Wikipedia only is not sufficient, since all uploads here at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose. De728631 (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

  Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:TimbreSubStation Shot.jpg

I have uploaded this image and I took the picture with my camera.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by RedDotPusher (talk • contribs) 00:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose Previously published here who took it from Facebook here who may in one way or another gotten it from Wong LP Photography. Please establish that you own the copyright through Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Sukavich Rangsitpol.jpg

It is my own work,why it was deleted?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by หิมะสีแดง (talk • contribs) 05:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
@หิมะสีแดง: It was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukavich Rangsitpol.jpg. More information is needed in order to undelete. Ankry (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Uploads by Sarahdietz

File:Baustelle Gottlob Brodbeck.jpg

--Sarahdietz (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Vogelperspektive Gottlob Brodbeck.jpg

--Sarahdietz (talk) 10:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

@Sarahdietz: This page is for requesting the restoration, or undeletion as we call it, of files that were previously deleted. Both of the files you mentioned were tagged by deletion by you as accidental uploads, so have you changed your mind and would like to have them restored? De728631 (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Huawei Nova 3 (Mainland China version).jpg, File:Huawei P30 Pro (Mainland China version).jpg and File:Huawei P30 (Mainland China version).jpg

I would like to review these images. I think these images are taken by my smartphone, but the subject is a smartphone, not a wallpaper. I hope my review is done. 我现在就上述图片发起删除重审(申诉)。我认为,这些照片是用我的手机拍的,而且其主体是智能手机,非壁纸。希望我的重审可以得到通过。--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 11:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Autrice Joanne Richoux.jpg

Hello, This image has been deleted, because it can be foung on a website : https://isere.planetekiosque.com/57-848806-5-rencontre-avec-joanne-richoux.html Nevertheless, I'm the owner of the picture, and the one who took it. The person on the image is a french author, and my partner. We took this picture and gave it to an organisation for promotional purpose (book fair) and they used it fot that matter. Still, the image is mine, and doesn't violate copyright. --Jeoffrey Cotton (talk) 13:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jeoffrey Cotton: Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions. This is standard procedure required for images that were already published without evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Godspower Oparaugo.jpg

We want to setup a page using it, kindly restore it. The image belongs to Godspower Oparaugo. Regards!

(Stepheniyke (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC))


  Not done: Procedural closure. This is already being discussed above. --De728631 (talk) 18:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mariano Lanouguere.jpg

This file was deleted due to a possible copyright violation, but the person himself that the photo depicts gave me his consent to publish it in Wikipedia.

Nate vi Britannia (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Nate vi Britannia, the person who owns the intellectual property for a creative work is normally the person who created it, in this case, the person who took the photo, and not the person who is depicted in it. The normal exception to this, would be cases where the subject of the photo had a contractual agreement with the photographer transferring ownership of the copyright. In order for the image to be suitable for Wikimedia Commons, the owner will need to release the photo under a suitable free license. They may do so by following the instructions available at COM:CONSENT. GMGtalk 15:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:York montage.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted by Hedwig in Washington, but there was no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz:   Done Next time you repair a no source file, please remove the tag; the initial tagger almost never monitor those files. Thanks for the ping!   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: people who do that (including me) get accused of "out of process tag removal" when we do that. I stay on the safe side nowadays. I already felt guilty when I removed a "no permission" tag from a file with OTRS permission. Removing a tag shouldn't be harder than adding a tag, but in practice, it is. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Hmmmm, you can always drop me a line when the need arises. It's a waste of time and manpower, but what the heck. No need for you to get into a fight over a simple thing like that. <sarcasm> Maybe we can create a form you can fill out and send it in in; three colors preferred, together with a check, copy of your passport, and the promise of your first born, of course.   </sarcasm> Anyway, offer stands - ping me if you need to. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: There's a whole bunch of unselective "no permission" coming up in the queue: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass "no permission" tagging of TwinofSedona's files. Tagging them was easy, but sadly I can't just remove all the tags with the same ease. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

  Done by Hedwig in Washington and the discussion goes OT, so closing. Ankry (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Deepak Menon Actor.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/DeepakMenonActor/photos/a.188268408396122/372308736658754/?type=3&theater

In the pic link it says Copyright free so i used the pic , if thats not acceptable as per norms you may delete the pic.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jehowahyereh (talk • contribs) 03:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Jehowahyereh: It seems that this declaration is by the subject, not by the photographer. Any evidence that the subject owns copyright to this photo? (otherwise, his declaration is void) Ankry (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

user:tadanokiuchifun

Link to my active wiki. Deleted by Achim55.--tadanokiuchifun (talk) 10:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose User pages are intended for information about contributors. Non-contributors do not need to create user pages. External links are considered advertisements, which are forbidden here. Ankry (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Tinca di Poirino in carpione.jpg

The presence of EXIF data is not obligatory in order to upload a file on Commons, so the absence of them in not valid reason for a deletion request. I declare that I am the author of the picture, which doesn't represent a copyrighted item.--Prof.lumacorno (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Prof.lumacorno: It is not. But a reasonable explanation why you upload images without EXIF data would be welcome. Ankry (talk) 14:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Author-kia-abdullah.jpg

Hi, the licensing of this image of Kia Abdullah is stated on this page on her official website: https://kiaabdullah.com/image. It is available under a CC BY 4.0 license. As such, I believe Wikimedia can use it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Slai (talk • contribs) 12:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel, Hedwig in Washington: Any comment? IMO, if syllablesofswathi.com are violating copyright, then it is not a valid reason for deletion. Ankry (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andor Ferenc David.jpg

To Whom it may concern,

I would like to request an undeletion of the file File:Andor Ferenc David.jpg, which was deleted from International Visegrad Fund Wiki article. I would like to inform you, that the picture in subject shows Mr. Andor F. David and Visegrad Fund owns the property rights over it, despite of the deletion request's argument which referred to this website: https://www.visegradfund.org/copyright-information/.

--Foldvarimatyas (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


  Not done procedural close: file is not deleted; yiou can discuss copyright issues in the DR. And this is not the right place for Wikipedia related discussions. Ankry (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Nicholas_Guilak_photo.jpg

I am an actor and am editing my own information. the photo is me. other sites use my photo because I've done over 60 films and television shows. But this is me and the photo is mine that they have taken off my imdb and personal website. Please allow to use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nicholas_Guilak_photo.jpg Thank you

nicholas guilak

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddognico (talk • contribs) 13:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
@Maddognico: Wikimedia Commons hosted photos should be freely licensed by photographers. Any evidence for this? Ankry (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:3. BERTRAND BELIN 2019.jpg

We are working with Bertrand Belin and this is a photoshoot we order for him. We have the rights to use it for promotion etc ... Does we can use it for wikipedia too ? If not, what type of photos can we use for illustration other than a picture that the artist likes and asks us to use ? Thanks a lot --Ludivine Wagram (talk) 15:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Right to use only by you or only for promotion is not enough to grant a free license, which is required here. Wikimedia Commons images must be free for any use, including commercial reuse and derivative work creation. @Ludivine Wagram: if your contract with the photographer allows theese, please provide appropriate evidence together with a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:MCL 2019.jpg

Cette photo a été correctement achetée à un photographe professionnel (Arcanes Photo à Montpellier) par le sujet de la photo, Marie-Claude Lénès. Cette photo est donc la propriété de cette dernière et elle en possède tous les droits.

Je confirme par la présente être le sujet et la titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre MCL 2019.jpg Ce document est tiré de mes archives personnelles et mis en ligne sur Wikipédia avec mon autorisation par : Sauvagine. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. 22 octobre 2019 - Marie-Claude Lénès --Sauvagine (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

@Sauvagine: Unfortunately, we cannot and may not verify your identity on-wiki. Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions to send a free license permission and/or prove your identity. Ankry (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Latest Images From Mars Orbiter.png File:Latest Intriguing Images From Mars Curiosity Rover.png File:Latest Images From The Mars Orbiter.png File:First Images of a Black Hole.png

Listed directly below are the files to "Undelete:

File:Latest Images From Mars Orbiter.png File:Latest Intriguing Images From Mars Curiosity Rover.png File:Latest Images From The Mars Orbiter.png File:First Images of a Black Hole.png

I have a kind request. Please add them to my "User Page" as "User Page Images" in Wikimedia Commons and/or Wikibooks. Let me know if you have any questions concerning the above.

Thanks again in advance,

Best regards,

Namronpb

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Namronpb (talk • contribs) 18:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose no userpage. Ankry (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:League of Legends logo 2019.png

The logo is below threshold of originality. 49.146.7.209 19:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)