Commons:Undeletion requests


Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
العربية • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎magyar • ‎日本語 • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Commons deletion (policy)


Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.


Current requests

Watch Edit

File:1911 Planul Urbanistic General al Capitalei.PNG and File:Planul Urbanistic al orașului București din 1911.PNG

The map is from year 1911 and the author is represented by the Romanian Army's Geographical Service.

The source from which the images were extracted: Sfințescu, Cincinat I.; Studiu asupra Planului General de Sistematizare al Capitalei; Tipografia Jockey-Club; București; România, 1919

I believe that the license may be revised per {{PD-RO-exempt}}. The image's information must be uptaded too, and if the photo will be recovered I will make it.--Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

What line in {{PD-RO-exempt}} do you believe covers maps? Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Look in the lower left corner of the map, where it says "EDIȚIA OFICIALĂ" (means "official edition"). I think in this case (but I am not sure) that the map is assimilated with an published official document. --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The list of documents excluded from copyright protection in {{PD-RO-exempt}} does not include maps. The template does not say "official documents" but instead "official texts" which implies limitation to prose. Эlcobbola talk 19:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Otherwise, since the author is a "legal entity" as the Romanian Army's Geographical Service, the license could be revised per {{PD-Romania}} - "It is another kind of work, the author is a legal entity („persoană juridică” - not a person) and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication" (and the publication had occurred in 1902). --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The legal entity approach with {{PD-Romania}} may have some merit; however, I am unable to find support in Romanian Copyright Law. Chapter V covers "Duration of Copyright Protection" and says nothing about 50 years for legal entities. Also, searching the document for "50" (i.e., to find references to 50 years after publication) yields no support either. Could it be this is the repealed article 29 in Chapter V? Otherwise, could you please find the chapter, article and section for the copyright duration of works by legal entities? I may just be missing it, but, if not, the template appears incorrect. Эlcobbola talk 14:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
It looks like that part is from Article 7 of the Decree No. 321 of 1956. That was probably eliminated in 1996 with the new law, but since the new law appears to not be retroactive, corporate works from before 1946 may be fine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, look at Decree 321/1956, Art. 7, last sentence (explanation here on page 125, the fourth paragraph). --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC) P.S. The template must be completed: "....and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (only if it was before March 14, 1946)"

File:Nagaland map.png Own work

File:Nagaland map.png should be undeleted. I can confirm that I made the map using government of india website by using inkscape tool. i have not voilated any cc laws. i have released the map in common domain. --Wikigringo (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Does {{EdictGov-India}} extend to maps on a website? From the text in the template I'd think that only official edicts published in certain gazettes and the like are exempt from copyright in India. Any other governmental work is still copyrighted and non-free. De728631 (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are multiple versions here. One map was uploaded in 2006 by Shizhao. In 2008, Wikigringo uploaded an entirely different map over the 2006 version, but reverted himself 6 minutes later. The 2006 "original" was then there until it was deleted 5 September 2015. For which version are you requesting restoration? Also, what is the "government of india website" you used? Эlcobbola talk 19:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
I think Wikigringo's version was then uploaded to File:Nagalandmap.png, which is still there. Out of curiosity though, what was the basis of deleting a file for "no source" after it was uploaded for nine years? Was it a valid tag to add? Shizhao is a longtime admin here, if I'm not mistaken. Carl Lindberg (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikigringo said above "I can confirm that I made the map," which suggests we are talking about his short-lived version, not the Shizhao version. However, regarding the Shizhao version, @Ellin Beltz: tagged it as no source, which seems technically appropriate as there was no reference to the underlying map's source. (The file is not old enough to fall under COM:GRANDFATHER.) That said, I'm inclined to  Support the Shizhao version, as the underlying map appears to be File:India-locator-map-blank.svg. Эlcobbola talk 14:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Nagalandmap.png has source and is in use, the original layer of File:Nagaland map.png has no source and is not old enough to grandfather. I have no objections to restoring the file as long as a source can be agreed upon. Also, we have several other maps of the area, see Category:Maps of Nagaland. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I think what happened here is that Wikigringo got the deletion notice for File:Nagaland map.png, saw it had been deleted, and mistakenly believed the notice referred to File:Nagalandmap.png. That would explain the bizarre rationale ("I can confirm that I made the map") about a file made by Shizhao. @Shizhao: could you confirm the source of the file? Is it File:India-locator-map-blank.svg or something else? Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Correct; Wikigringo's version is still around, so the initial undeletion reason above was just a misunderstanding. I'm just wondering about Shizhao's version. If that said "own work", then it does not need a source -- that is the sourcing claim. If we are wondering about the source of data, that is an inappropriate use of a speedy delete tag, which is for copyright reasons only. I can't see the original though, so it may be obvious the underlying map was copied from somewhere else. That user is a long-time admin on Commons and I think meta, and usually knows what he's doing. Granted, it was uploaded a long time ago, and mistakes were easier to make then. Was the page text changed at all during the short-lived Wikigringo version? Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Gutscheinpony Superhelden-und-Boesewichte Infografik.jpg

Hallo zusammen,

meine Infografik wurde aufgrund möglicher Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht. Sie wurde durch mich im Rahmen meiner Arbeit bei Gutscheinpony erstellt und darf unter der Creative Commons Lizenz (3.0) verwendet werden. Die Einstellungen dazu habe ich leider nicht beim editieren finden können (ich bin ganz neu hier - offensichtlich).

Ich denke, dass die Infografik einen deutlichen Mehrwert für die User und Userinnen darstellt, weil es sonst nur Infografiken gibt, die ausschließlich Marvel ODER DC thematisieren. In meiner Infografik hingegen werden beide Universen verglichen.

Ich freue mich, wenn die Löschung wieder aufgehoben werden könnte bzw. ich die Möglichkeit bekommen würde, die Grafik noch einmal mit den geltenden Lizenzbestimmungen hochzuladen.

Liebe Grüße

--Aileen MD (talk) 08:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Files uploaded by ElisaQualizza

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Now i have all permission and also Lucio collovigh the copyright holder agree for permission , now please Undeletion the files because does not exist the copyright violation ElisaQualizza (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

provide the otrs ticket number please Ezarateesteban 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Barto920203

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Dicen que las imágenes de estos billetes son propiedad intelectual del Banco de la República, sin embargo, aún se mantienen las imágenes de los demás billetes intactas y solo han eliminado las imágenes que yo he tomado. Por favor restaurar y aclarar la razón de borrar mis imágenes y mantener las demás si se supone que son iguales. [[Usuario:Barto920203|Barto]] (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

 Oppose You do not address the issues raised in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Barto920203. If you have found other images that you believe do not belong on Wikicommons you can initiate a deletion request or report the files to an administrator. Thuresson (talk) 04:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Hongci Xiao at Central Park, New York in 2008.jpg

The copy right issue was resolved via email. Please recover the picture for me. Thank you. I appreciate it! Jdxzhu (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Icecat1-300x300.svg

@Jcb: it looks from the name, context, and Yandex search results that it was a copy of this file: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git/tree/artwork/Icecat1-300x300.svg (found through https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/) --AVRS (talk) 08:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The file was uploaded here on October 13, 2011. The oldest entry in the revision log is from September 11, 2014. Thuresson (talk) 10:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

As for “the only "IceCat" from author asrafil” the nominator could find (uploaded to Commons and to openclipart.org on the same day, 7 Sep 2010), there are https://openclipart.org/detail/81889/icacatbox and https://openclipart.org/detail/81877/free-magazine-3d which include the IceCat logo, both published there by asrafil on 23 Aug 2010. openclipart.org says all clipart there is public domain. --AVRS (talk) 12:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

 Support The IceCat logo was designed and copyrighted by "the Hitflip team". Their images are licensed under GNU GPL, GNU Free Documentation License and the Free Art License. "asrafil" can not relicense the logo as public domain. Source here. Thuresson (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

File:RatBaiting2.jpg

Hello, please reverse delete this file. It is not copyright protected. thank you. I have this image in my personal collection. Thanks IQ125 (talk) 22:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

"In order to make sure that the claimed copyright status is accurate, the file description page needs to mention not only who generated the file/ image but where the file in question came from. This is known as its "source" and it allows others to verify that the licensing is correct and the file meets the licensing criteria to be used by anyone, for any purpose, even commercially.", see Commons:Essential information. Your personal collection is not a resource that others can use to verify the status. Thuresson (talk) 23:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
No problem, reverse the image deletion and I will put the original source at that point. Thanks IQ125 (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Swing macht plattfuesse.jpg

The picture is just that of a newspaper's headline and has no threshold of originality. It only consists of text in a simple typeface, so it is not an object of copyright in respect to US or to German law.--User:Engelbaet 05:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Plakat Zoo Wuppertal.jpg, File:Witzzeichnung.jpg, File:Ludwig Koob, Selbstporträt.jpg

Not "Copyright violation"! The uploader (User:Kaleiko) is the son of the author, Ludwig Koob (1909-1993). He has inherited the right of use and is the copyright holder. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Holger, please provide an OTRS ticket number. User: Perhelion 21:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Countries believe in astrology.PNG

This has nothing to do with national laws or religious culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKS471883 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

From Commons:Deletion requests/File:Countries believe in astrology.PNG. Please clarify why this file should be undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Debugging in Visual Studio.png

The info about this image clearly references Microsoft. There are lots of screenshots from Microsoft products on the internet, including this site. This image is a teaching aid and should not warrant a deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedavegray (talk • contribs) 11:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Logoo BAP RAA.jpg

Logotipo de la Biblioteca y archivo de propaganda

Estoy autorizado por el propietario de la Biblioteca y Archivo de Prppaganda Ramon Adell Argiles para utilizar este logotipo

--Antoniodejuana (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced, untitled request from the top of the page

My file was deleted. And Its public. Is the new coat of arms of colima. Official. The New versión. I dont know was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clq2016 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:RalphFlanders1910.jpg

The subject file was deleted while I was away on an extended wilderness trip. The issue was the copyright provenance, which didn't fit the standard templates. I received a hard copy of the photograph to upload from a living descendant of the person depicted. The photograph was used at the masthead of a byline in Machine magazine ca. 1910, of which the subject, Ralph E. Flanders, was an editor. Therefore, it was first published before 1923. Additionally, the anonymous staff photographer from the time may be presumed to be dead for 70 years. HopsonRoad (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Louis XV Presentation Sword.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The copyright violation they point to is our website. This photograph was taken by M.S. Rau Antiques, we own the sword, and the sword is out of copyright. By posting the photograph here, we are relinquishing copyright. Rauantiques (talk) 13:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Xerxessenior

These files have been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Xerxessenior:

The nominator said the first two images "have two different cameras". Today, most people have a cell phone, which typically has a camera, and a digital camera. It's not a surprise to have two different cameras at all. Nevertheless, this user has uploaded some of his files locally on Persian and German Wikipedias. Take a look at the metadata of the following files:

Nokia E72-1: fa:File:Hashiyeneshinan Frankfurt.jpg and fa:File:Gushtkub 1.jpg

Pentax Optio M10: fa:File:Darolfonun WikiFa 1.jpg, fa:File:Mobile Foghetakhassos 1 1.jpg, fa:File:Sarv-Harzevil-GLB-2012.jpg, and de:Datei:Chemical warfare warningboard iran.jpg

The last file is uploaded on the German Wikipedia. If you look at his SUL, you will see that he has 93 contributions on German Wikipedia and can speak German fluently. fa:File:Hashiyeneshinan Frankfurt.jpg shows some homeless people in Frankfurt, so I can personally believe that this user lives in Germany and File:Aldi empty leer.jpg and File:Zip trafic 1.jpg are his own work.

File:Shaban Jafari Tudehiha.jpg is clearly a scrap of an old Iranian newspaper so we can make sure that the image has been published before (i.e., not been in a private collection). Article 16 of the Iranian copyright law (the 3rd item in {{PD-Iran}}) stipulates that all photographic works fall into public domain after 30 years of publication date. The image is about the w:1953 Iranian coup d'état.

File:Shaban Jafari Kotak.jpg: I talked with the user on Persian Wikipedia about this image, which is also about the 1953 Iranian coup. He claims that this image has been taken from an old Iranian magazine published in 1953. He currently cannot prove his claim because the magazine belonged to one of his former friends. I do believe his honesty and integrity based on our mutual cooperation on Persian Wikipedia.

The decision about the last image is up to you but I think the first three images can be restored safely. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File:MacGyver the Lizard.jpg Undelete Request

  • The image is my original work, created from a photograph that I took, and I have released it under the appropriated licensing for wiki commons.
I had originally uploaded the image not to commons, but just permitting usage on a single Wikipedia page, which is likely why this was flagged as possible copyright. Since that original upload, however, I have released it under creative commons and then uploaded it to wiki commons. Todeyius (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:1707 EP Cover by IIndMan (2013).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: this cover was designed by the artist himself and has no relations to any copyright as it is him in the picture and everything edited by him in 2013 for his EP 1707 Esmcontributors (talk) 06:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:IIndman - La Bella Vita - EP Cover.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The cover for this artwork was illustrated by Cherie Cordeir and IIndman which is the main artist of this project. It does not violate any copyright license for wikicommons. Esmcontributors (talk) 07:08, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ростислав Кравець виступ.jpg

Фото сделано на сьезде адвокатов в 2015 году, оно расположено в открытом профиле Ростислава Кравца и добавлено сюда с его разрешения. --Ukraine vl (talk) 07:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

This photo taken in the Convention of the lawyers in 2015, it is located in an open profile Rostislav Kravets and added here with his permission . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukraine vl (talk • contribs) 07:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:BFAD logo.png Undelete request

Для страницы о фонде https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80:%D0%90%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0 мы использовали официальный логотип нашего фонда "Арифметика добра", специально разработанный для нашего фонда сторонним дизайнером. Просим восстановить удаленный файл.


We downloaded our own logo desined for our Charity fund Arifmetika dobra by our desiner for Fund's page https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80:%D0%90%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0 Our logo BFAD logo.png was deleted. We proove no Copyright violation/ Please undelete it.

A dobra (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Anna

SOLICITUD DE ACEPTACIÓN DEL ARCHIVO 60_ret.jpg ‎(295 × 289 píxeles; tamaño de archivo: 14 KB; tipo MIME: image/jpeg); SEGÚN CREATIVE COMMONS

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Según las condiciones estipuladas, establecidas en la misma página wikipedia Eres libre: para compartir – para copiar, distribuir y transmitir el trabajo para remezclar – para adaptar el trabajo Bajo las siguientes condiciones: atribución – Debes atribuir el trabajo de la manera especificada por el autor o persona que lo haya licenciado (pero no de manera que sugiera que estas personas te respaldan o respaldan el uso que hagas del trabajo). compartir similar – En caso de alterar, transformar o ampliar este trabajo, deberá distribuir el trabajo resultante sólo bajo la misma licencia o una similar.

13:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Litodav (talk • contribs) 13:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


Read in another language