Open main menu

Achived contributions: User talk:Ellywa/archive (mainly copyvio warnings etc)

Contents

GeheugensteuntjesEdit

WelkomberichtenEdit


Ha die Elly,
Welkom op de Commons, leuk he hoe je elkaar overal tegenkomt.. Ik hoop dat je hier veel plezier mag hebben. :) GerardM 11:48, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)


  • 10-oct-04, 10:00 - Bedankt Elly, voor je welkomst groet op de Engelse Wiki.

Ik ben nieuw hier, en 'k heb geen clue hoe je te bereiken, met all die fancy mogelijkheden;-) Op je Dutch adres zag ik geen button om meteen te 'chatten'- hoewel de pagina zei dat je online bent. Dus bij deze: 't beste en succes met je werk (wat is acoustician?-) en hobby's. Ik las dat painting er één van is: vind ik ook fijn, kijk eens naar de 'bamboe' (chinese brush painting) op mijn homepage http://home.iae.nl/users/benschop Ciao, Nico


Hi Elly, op Commons:Project plan stond bij jouw naam een opmerking die verwees naar een opmerking van mij. Omdat ik mijn opmerking over gebruik vanaf nl: heb weggehaald, ben ik zo vrij geweest die van jou ook te verwijderen. Heeel erg brutaal natuurlijk om een stuk van jouw tekst te verwijderen, ik erken mijn schuld. ;-) TeunSpaans 13:59, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Elly blocked Wolley on NL without reasonEdit

Fyi: I just blocked Wolley on NL wikipedia for 1 week, because he kept coming back to the article Mashhad again and again, although I translated his text in Dutch. We could not keep the picture though, because of the notice copyvio on commons. Elly 13:48, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

That you have translated my text, ist no reason to block my ID on NL. I have corrected you several times about your wrong CRV-hint. Wolley 16:39, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Hortus leidenEdit

Hi Elly,

ik zag op http://www.hortus.leidenuniv.nl/index.php3?m=87&c=109 dat er op 19 januari een winterworkshop botanisch tekenen begon, en moest direct aan je tekeningen hier denken.

TeunSpaans 09:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Hoi Elly,
Wat je zegt over rust herken ik wel. Wanneer ik wandel, is dat vaak in gezelschap van mijn vrouw en een of meer van onze kinderen. De tijd om een plantje te fotograferen gunnen ze me met pleizer, maar om een onbekende plant goed te determineren is meer tijd nodig, en dan wordt het snel te lang. Overigens heb ik een van je tekeningen nuttig kunnen gebruiken : nl:Wahlenbergia. TeunSpaans 09:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

geblokeerdEdit

ik kan nergens terug vinden hoelang ik nog geblokeerd blijf? kan je dat eens in de kroeg smijten op de vlaamse Wiki? Carolus 09:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hoi, op nl.wp ben je geblokkeerd tot 12 oktober 2006. De Vlaamse wiki (vls.wp) kent geen gebruiker met de naam Carolus, dus ik kan niet voor je nakijken tot wanneer je daar geblokkeerd bent. Groet, Siebrand 16:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Hoi Siebrand, bedankt voor het antwoorden... ik "kom" hier niet bepaald dagelijks. Elly 20:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Picture about MickeyEdit

Hi. First, I happen to be of the female persuasion. This being said, I do apologize for the lack of notice. As you can check after my contributions, I always warn users as a rule when their pictures are nominated for deletion. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Gelukt!?!Edit

Blijkbaar, gezien de tekst die je net op je gebruikerspagina zet. Super, te gek! Kijk even naar Commonist op Commons:Tools voor een handig uploadprogramma. Siebrand 19:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Nederlandse bewindsliedenEdit


You are welcomeEdit

You are welcome. I shall keep spoiling it whenever I find an image that I deem questionable. This is wikipedia, not Flickr. On flickr they don't care about copyright issues. If you think it is annoying that some people care about them, please use flickr instead. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 16:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion warningEdit

Image:Linzensoep.gifEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Linzensoep.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Image:IMG_2182_Mural_by_Anton_Refregier_Rincon_Center_San_Francisco.JPGEdit

Image deletion warning Image:IMG_2182_Mural_by_Anton_Refregier_Rincon_Center_San_Francisco.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mangostar (talk) 00:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Question about imagesEdit

 
Not my worst effort translating a png into svg....

Did you draw the original for Image:Malva sylvestris ellywa.png? -- carol (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, of course. What is the reason of your question? Elly (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I liked the images of the line drawings of the plants you uploaded and was interested to know if you were the artist. -- carol (talk) 10:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you :-). Elly (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:Shop with many women and shopping carts.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Shop with many women and shopping carts.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Kimse (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

hotcatEdit

als je hotcat aanzet op het uploadformulier ook heel makkelijk categorieën kan toevoegen. Aanzetten gaat makkelijk:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences -> gadgets -> Tools for categories -> Hot Cat: easily add / remove / change a category on a media file, with name suggestion

(notification)Edit

User_talk:Simon#plant_picture click (there is still no reasonnable notification system, is there?) – Simon / ?! 08:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Frame met balhoofdEdit

Hoi Ellywa, ik hoop dat je het niet erg vindt mij schrijven in het Engels hier: I like the photo that is up on the en:Headset (bicycle part) article, but that date in the corner is bothering me. Would you mind if I cropped the picture a bit? ----keithonearth talk 21, December, 2008

Hi Kethon, of course you may change the picture, improve it (or spoil it ;-) ); thats the fun of GFDL or CC-BY-SA. I am glad you like it (just yesterday I gave away this old bycicle to someone). Regards, Elly (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I just wanted to ask.--Keithonearth (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Please link imagesEdit

Foto minister RouvoetEdit

Beste Elly,
Ik wil eigenlijk niet aan jouw werk zitten. Daarom wil ik je vragen, of je de foto van Rouvoet die jij geplaatst hebt, zou willen vervangen voor een nieuwer exemplaar. De huidige officiële foto van de vicepremier is de foto Vicepremier-en-minister-André-Rouvoet.jpg. Ik laat de foto hier niet zien, omdat ik niet precies weet hoe ik hem klein moet neerzetten. Alvast bedankt voor je medewerking. User:EdoDijkgraaf 22:26, 29 Jan 2010 (CET)

Beste Edo, je mag juist wel aan mijn werk zitten, dat is de bedoeling van Wikipedia en Commons. Ik zag dat de foto al is opgenomen op het artikel Balkenende IV, maar de foto heeft de juiste licentie niet. Destijds heb ik, als toenmalig voorzitter van de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland, een brief van de RVD gekregen met expliciete toestemming alle foto's onder de GFDL licentie te plaatsen. Je kan nu ook eventueel contact opnemen met de vereniging over de licentie bij deze foto, e-mail wm-nl@wikimedia.org. Het zou mooi zijn als Nederlandse informatie van de overheid (incl. afbeeldingen), net als in de VS automatisch onder het publiek domein zou vallen. Maar dat is nog een lange weg te gaan vermoed ik. Vriendelijke groeten, Elly (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

foto fietsenstalling in DelftEdit

Hi Elly,

Ik zoek mij een bult naar de leverancier van de fietsenstalling die jij hebt gefotografeerd. Weet jij toevallig ook wie de leverancier is?

NoticeEdit

This is to advise you that you are being discussed at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems Эlcobbola talk 18:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Note that I replied there too. @Elly (in Dutch): probeer rustig te blijven en laat je niet gek maken. Is nergens voor nodig. Het komt vast wel goed. Trijnsteltalk 15:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Dank je, ik heb me gek laten maken inderdaad, omdat deze persoon (wellicht nav. mijn vraag in de lokale kroeg over het auteursrecht van een foto van een disney figuur) alles is gaan nalopen wat ik ooit heb gedaan. Dat voelt bijzonder onaangenaam, maar natuurlijk maak ik ook wel eens een fout in de gecompliceerde auteursrechten situaties. Dat hij van de 100den afbeeldingen enkele weet te vinden die naar zijn mening een schending zijn, nou ja, ik zie wel hoe de stemmingen daarover verlopen. Elly (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


Saving diagramsEdit

I noticed several your uploads of diagrams in the JPEG format. It is absolutely wrong in any case, but produces particularly awful artefacts on images with a sharp colour contrast. JPEG is the worst format choice for a diagram. An image editor usually offers several formats to save an image. Save your diagrams to PNG, please, if for some reason you are unable to work with vector graphics. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, the software I have bought and use cannot handle SVG. Welcome in the real world. So I cannot improve any of the SVG images down here! With GIF I had a lot of comments as well, I remember these images were even deleted in the past, although they are better than JPG for diagrams, I know that.... A small tip for you, do not use POV words like absolutely wrong or worst format choice. These are not pleasant to read, and your message might not come through, or might be disregarded. Elly (talk) 08:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but your apparently over-irritable reaction to a critic is more your problem rather than mine. Here is not Wikipedia, and even if it were Wikipedia, we are on your user_talk page now, anyway. Me, and other users, have the right to express a PoV in conversations. Of course, the community encourages content contributions, but unlikely the people will throw flowers to a contributor reluctant to make a tiny rearrangement which could improve the quality noticeably. We are not fool enough to believe that you can save something in a lossy JPEG, but unable to export to PNG. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

LicentieEdit

Hoi Elly, Een kleine correctie is nodig bij de gebruikte licentie: zie deze diff. Maar mooi, die foto's! Groet, Lymantria (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hoi Lymantria, dank, ik hoop dat ik er volgende keer aan denk. Groeten, Elly (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: kaartenEdit

Dag Elly,

ja, leuk om elkaar ontmoet te hebben gisteren! Ik hoop dat de kaarten van pas gaan komen.

Wellicht tot morgen, of zaterdag bij de WCN

Groeten, Olaf

OTRS ticketsEdit

FYI, you can interwiki an OTRS ticket as [[:ticket:ticket#]], such as ticket:2016062910011447. It's better than using 'external links'. Reventtalk 06:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I was looking for a template, couldn't find it. Elly (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Categorization of SprangEdit

Earlier this year you categorized *Sprang* as a subtype of weaving.

My sources say that weaving requires both warp and weft threads. Sprang is distinguished from weaving because it manipulates warp threads without any use of weft. Looks more appropriate to return sprang to a top level textile arts category, unless you have sources that say differently. Would gladly quote and give full citations if you wish. Skrydstrup (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

if I remember well I grooped some images into this Category. Please feel free to change it. I do not have specific sources. With kind regards, Elly (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

© in titelEdit

Hoi Elly, blijkbaar is de foto "Anton de Goede - Foto © André Thijssen.jpg" vrijgegeven. De © in de titel spreekt dat echter tegen. Als we ervan uitgaan dat de toestemming klopt, dan lijkt het mij logisch de naam te wijzigen. Wat vind jij? Gr. Ronn (talk) 01:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, Ronn , deze vraag was mij helemaal ontschoten! Met vrijgeven onder CC-BY-SA4.0 blijft het auteursrecht wel bestaan. Als je de foto zou willen publiceren zonder naamsvermelding (en zonder het nieuwe werk te publiceren onder eveneens deze licentie) treedt volgens mij het normale auteursrecht in werking en moet je dus toestemming vragen en voldoen aan de eisen die de auteur mogelijk nog meer stelt. Maar misschien kan het wel op Commons, er zijn regels voor hernoemen van artikelen, zie Commons:File renaming. Elly (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Geeft niet. Ik weet dat het auteursrecht blijft bestaan, dat hoeft niet eens expliciet te worden ingeroepen. Misschien is mijn 'bezwaar' meer gevoelsmatig. Het ©-teken komt op mij over als een "afblijven, mag niet", terwijl ik zonder dat teken eerder zou kijken onder welke voorwaarden de foto gebruikt mag worden. We laten het maar zo. Bedankt voor het meedenken. :) Ronn (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

ErratumEdit

Hallo, Ellywa, wat wordt men verondersteld te doen in dit specifiek geval? Lotje (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Dag Lotje, ik denk als je het zeker weet dat je kan vragen om hernoemen van de afbeelding. Link staat bovenaan bij "meer". Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Luitenant L Tas of Luitenant T. Tas, wie zal het zeggen.Edit

Hallo Ellywa, enig idee waar men kan uitvissen of het luitenant T. Tas (vertegenwoordiger van de redactieraad van een pagina speciaal voor vluchtelingen uit Nederland) op de afbeelding is of luitenant L. Tas?   Lotje (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Geen idee Lotje, ik ben echt geen orakel van kennis  . Elly (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Dat is Louis of Lou Tas, zie o.a. hier en hier. Hij wordt ook genoemd op nl:Overleg:Lijst van Engelandvaarders Ronn (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Bedankt Ronn, ik heb de file accordingly aangepast.   Lotje (talk) 06:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Wie is wie?Edit

Hallo Ellywa, kan je dit even rechtzetten. Rita en Dolph Kohnstamm of Rita Kohnstamm.jpg. Alvast bedankt.   Lotje (talk) 05:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

nee want ik begrijp de achtergrond van dit verzoek niet. Elly (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, waarschijnlijk weer in raadsels gesproken, ik dacht dat jij dit misschien was. Lotje (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Presentatie(s) op WMNL verenigingswikiEdit

Beste gebruiker,

In het verleden heb je één of meerdere presentaties geüpload naar de verenigingswiki van Wikimedia Nederland. Wij zouden deze graag toevoegen aan ons presentatiearchief op Wikimedia Commons. Er is echter geen licentieinformatie opgegeven bij de oorspronkelijke upload(s) naar de verenigingswiki waardoor het niet mogelijk is de upload over te zetten met Commonshelper. Daarom zouden we je willen vragen of je de presentaties zelf alsnog zou willen uploaden naar Wikimedia Commons, en ze in Category:Wikimedia Nederland presentations zou willen plaatsen. Hartelijk dank!

Met vriendelijke groet, --AWossink (talk) 10:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Photographs_by_Jeroen_van_LelieveldEdit

Themightyquill (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Irvingly van eijma-1472554563.jpegEdit

 
File:Irvingly van eijma-1472554563.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

62.131.39.159 13:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!Edit

Dank je wel Ellywa! Groetjes, Aoechter

Aoechter (talk) 20:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bart meijers-1489238923.jpgEdit

 
File:Bart meijers-1489238923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Cramer Dutch politician kabinet Balkenende IV.jpgEdit

 
File:Cramer Dutch politician kabinet Balkenende IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

131.211.75.24 09:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Traditional costumesEdit

Dear Ellywa, You added Category:Dress and fashion on Volendam. I propose renaming this category to Dress and fashion in Volendam. Or, even better, rename all Dutch categories Dress and fashion to the more generally used Traditionals costumes of [place name]. See e.g. Category:National costumes of Sweden. Vysotsky (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vysotsky, yes I fully agree. I took this title because this term was used for Marken already. So that category can also be renamed if you would like to take the trouble. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 09:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Quintalle nix-1498904611.jpgEdit

 
File:Quintalle nix-1498904611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hansvdkruijf (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Delete requestsEdit

Dear Elly,

You have posted 3 delete requests for: Formula I Racing Horse.jpg Royal Dutch Chair.jpg Female-Driver-by-Jero-Lenssinck.png

These are my and my father's works and given to the public domain by us. It is not the first time someone tries to remove non-copyrighted material added by me, from Wiki commons. People removing or trying to remove Wiki commons material without any concrete reason is the main reason why I have stopped writing articles for Wikipedia. It is very frustrating and I find it a difficult to understand practice to try and remove files without any base or without copyright infringement complaints. These practices, together with the Wikipedia policy not to implement or to defend 'fair-use' when it comes to illustrations, is in my opinion endangering the future of this outstanding project.

I sincerely hope for Wikipedia to alter their policy towards fair-use in the near future, and to put pressure on EU law-makers to accept fair-use into copyright regulations.

Best regards,

Jeroen

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadifa25 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
To avoid deletion of these images you may email to OTRS to give permission. You will be asked to show your identity and Real name. However as far as I know the artist himself is still active so he should send his permission himself. Please ask him to write. He can do so in Dutch. It is no use to discuss general policy of Wikimedia with me. I live with it as it is. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Elly, Perhaps assume good faith? Hadifa25 identifies himself as the artist of the Female-Driver etc. -and is willing to contribute interesting pictures to Wiki. The email address of that user is available. Why propose for deletion if a coaching email to that user would have had a much more positive effect? Vysotsky (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Ik reken dat niet tot mijn taak en het zal nergens toe leiden. Toestemming moet komen van de kunstenaar zelf. Ieder kan hem mailen, zie http://www.willemlenssinck.com/lenssinck/. Graag verder bespreken bij de nominatie. Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 21:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Your deletion proposals concerned two artists: father and son Lenssinck. Vysotsky (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Het is een afweging. Assume good faith versus bescherming van de kunstenaar die van zijn werk moet leven. En bescherming van iemand die mogelijk het werk gaat hergebruiken elders en die dan met een claim te maken kan krijgen. Advocaten kunnen daarop gaan jagen. Daar heb ik zelf in heel ander verband mee te maken gehad en heb een vergoeding moeten betalen. Daarom vind ik het zo belangrijk om zorgvuldig en correct met auteursrecht om te gaan. Als wij hier te zacht zijn en teveel "aannemen " , anderen doen dat niet Elly (talk) 07:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

As the importance of the case is broader than just this incident, I keep writing in English. Distrust vs artists who are willing to share is very common on Wiki & Commons. It is clear that this Wiki user is the artist (that is: of one of the artworks -he is the son). When I contacted this user via the wiki email function, I immediately got a confirming reply. He will contact OTRS. I see this distrust on a very regular basis (last week with a French war photographer), and I don't feel comfortable when I see obvious good faith editors treated like schoolboys and copyright criminals, while one email could have clarified the case. (And trust me: I know dozens of people who have to earn their money by writing, making photographs, translations or paintings, so I really love copyright.) Vysotsky (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
I am very in favour of and love artists who share their work. But through my work on OTRS I am seeing so incredibly many copyright violations, images just picked taken from the internet. So we have to be careful. I agree that it is not pleasant to be critical to goodwilling persons. Elly (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
De toestemming voor publicatie is ontvangen en de afbeeldingen kunnen behouden blijven gelukkig. Elly (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 12:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

HelderEdit

Dear Ellywa, You nominated a picture of Lilian Helder for deletion, and said somewhere (text gone together with the deletion of the file?) that you were busy taking care of a new photograph. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) Will there be a new photograph uploaded to Commons? Vysotsky (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Dag Vysotsky, helaas heeft dat niet geleid tot een foto met de juiste toestemming. Als geheugensteun voor mijzelf, betreft ticket:2018010210002637. Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 12:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Pepijn teloh keeper-1518891501.JPGEdit

 
File:Pepijn teloh keeper-1518891501.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Pepijn teloh keeper-1518891440.JPGEdit

 
File:Pepijn teloh keeper-1518891440.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Agora (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

File rename: File:Peijs en veerman bij trein met LL blokken 23102006 klein.jpgEdit

Hallo Ellywa, meen je dat de file dient hernoemd vanwege de typo of acht je dit niet nodig? Lotje (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Lenco-logo.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi User:Mifter, thanks I added a {{PD-textlogo}} template, because I think the logo is below threshold of originality. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Mifter (talk) 04:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Peijs en veerman bij trein met LL blokken 23102006 klein.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Peijs en veerman bij trein met LL blokken 23102006 klein.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

HyperGaruda (talk) 05:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

I was present on this occasion and made this picture. I clarified in the template. Regards, Elly (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

License review for File:JRW 103 set NS401 Nara Line train at Kyoto Station 2011-11-11.jpgEdit

Looks like you misentered the template name here? I didn’t want to correct it since it’ll look like I reviewed my own upload. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes I made a mistake. It is correct now I hope. Thanks, Elly (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Review for the same fileEdit

I'm wondering: File:Floyd Mayweather jr weigh-in.jpg is already here and reviewed by you. I just uploaded the original File:Floyd Mayweather Jr. 2015.jpg.

Seems like I could just copy the permission from that other file because it is the same photo, or is that not okay? - Alexis Jazz 00:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

You could try on any file but I think it will be noted and reverted. You would need the label of "license reviewer". I just added the template on the file. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure it would be reverted.. I have seen a non-OTRS admin add OTRS to an image and that didn't get reverted until I poked another admin. Thanks for reviewing the file! - Alexis Jazz 17:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

FYEEdit

KNAW. Gouwenaar (talk) 20:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Dank je, ik ga reageren. Elly (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

UDREdit

Please, don't comment under a closing template. Reopen the section, if necessary. Ankry (talk) 13:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Thomas buitink-1518476996.jpgEdit

Hi, File:Thomas buitink-1518476996.jpg appears to have an invalid OTRS ticket number.    FDMS  4    19:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

And also: File:Ruben hein-1519824262.JPG, File:Danny hoekman-1518650931.jpeg, File:Jacques vermeire-1522707850.jpg.    FDMS  4    19:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning, small effort to correct them. Currently, the ticket# is generally added automatically. Elly (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, I'd do so myself but sadly wikiportret isn't included in the permissions queues :) . Thanks for the quick response.    FDMS  4    20:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
It is part of the NL permission queue. This is the link. Perhaps you do not have access? Elly (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Oh. You're right. It used to be separate (a subqueue of info-nl), great to see it no longer is. (And thanks for pointing that out!)    FDMS  4    21:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:GameCubeEdit

I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Luc millecamps-1537386453.jpegEdit

 
File:Luc millecamps-1537386453.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vdkdaan (talk) 11:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hey, Ooit heb ik het lemma Luc Millecamps aangemaakt. Omdat hij EW is en omdat ik als zijn buur over voldoende informatie beschikte om een neutraal lemma aan te maken. Gisteren op cafe hoorde ik mensen lachen met Wikipedia. Een van de mensen was aan het opscheppen dat hij een foto van zijn vader, die goed op Millecamps gelijkt, op wikipedia gekregen heeft. Daarom heb ik vandaag dan ook de tijd genomen om dit te controleren. We zijn bij de neus genomen. Ik kan bevestigen dat deze foto niet Luc Millecamps is. Dit valt natuurlijk onder GOO. Ik kan enkel deze foto in twijfel trekken en zeggen dat deze ook WP:GOO is en geen bewijst van echtheid levert. Daarnaast kan ik google enige vorm van "bewijsvoering" aanhalen. U kan het verschil zien als u Luc Millecamps als afbeelding invoert. Daarbij kan u de kleine verschillen zien tussen deze foto die als eerste staat en enkele volgende foto's van kranten en tv-intervieuws. Mvg Vdkdaan (talk) 11:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Ja, wat flauw. Ik heb zelf eens meegemaakt dat ik in een soortgelijke situatie hoorde dat er een artikel over een niet bestaande filosoof was aangemaakt. Ik was heel boos toen, maar ik kreeg niet te horen wie het was. Het kwam later uit, zie hier. Flauwe, nare grap, dit ook. Goed dat je het uitgezocht hebt. Veel foto's zijn trouwens OO, daar is weinig aan te doen. Gelukkig zijn verreweg de meeste mensen te vertrouwen. Elly (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Fresia cousio arias-1544262392.jpegEdit

 
File:Fresia cousio arias-1544262392.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

License reviewEdit

Kan je misschien naar deze drie foto's kijken? File:Fake flash USB drives flash memory side.jpg, File:Fake flash USB drives controller side.jpg en File:Fake flash USB drives with casings.jpg‎. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done Goedenavond @Alexis Jazz:, ik heb de door jou meegeleverde links bekeken en de toestemming van Mentalist op Tweakers lijkt mij keurig in orde. Elly (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Evert BremanEdit

Ellywa, omdat jij meer inzicht hebt wat hier gebruikelijk is het volgende. Evert Breman was de voornaamste architect van de Wereldtentoonstelling voor het Hotel- en Reiswezen, die in 1895 op het Museumplein in Amsterdam werd gehouden. Het Nationaal Archief heeft een collectie (35) foto's van de objecten die onder leiding van Breman zijn verwezenlijkt. Ze zijn hier niet in een keer geüpload. Voor deze serie had ik al wat jaren terug de categorie Wereldtentoonstelling Amsterdam 1895 Evert Breman aangemaakt. Nu is daar een doorverwijzing van gemaakt. Alle foto's van de tentoonstelling zijn bij elkaar geveegd en heeft ook de category:Evert Breman gekregen, terwijl voor mij niet duidelijk is of het allemaal gaat om werk van hem. Volgens mij moet wat duidelijk is, duidelijk blijven en het werk wat duidelijk van Breman is in een onder-categorie van Category:Amsterdam World Exposition 1895 staan. Wat vindt jij? Groetjes, Lidewij (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

je zou hierover in overleg moeten gaan met User:Bardenoki, die dit heeft doorgevoerd, om te vragen naar zijn overwegingen. Groeten van Elly (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello Lidewij, I assumed in the original category "Amsterdam World Exposition 1895 Evert Breman" that the event itself is in focus, not so much the architect. That's why I "renamed" the category and omitted the name Evert Breman. If I understood you correctly, your focus was more on the architect who designed the buildings for the exhibition. I've restored your original category and now placed it under the new category. I hope that's in your sense. But I suggest to rename your category to "Buildings by Evert Breman at the World Exposition 1895". That would make it clearer for me. Regards Bardenoki (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting to the original category. I think renaming as you suggest makes the intention of user:Lidewij C J. more clear. Elly (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Freda Kelly PhotoEdit

Hello, thank you for uploading this photo (File:Freda kelly-1547304730.jpg). Do you have info pertaining to this (date, year, event etc.) ?

Merci JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

The date is mentioned in the meta data, 26 August 2018. I added it to the file page of File:Freda kelly-1547304730.jpg. I asked the uploader if he could sent some information. If a reply is received on OTRS I will respond further. Elly (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
With the date you pointed out, I found this on Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXXwDFIlNkA). Can't really see perfectly but we can clearly see the tea pots on the table...International Beatleweek 2018 !!! Thanks.JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
How funny, great you found this. The uploader did not comment any further alas. Elly (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to you...I love internet sleuthing like this...JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Officier 1980 Carel Willink.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Officier 1980 Carel Willink.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Officier 1980 Carel Willink.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

@ Abzeronow thanks for mentioning, my mistake. The license for this document should be PD-ineligible, which I added just now. Elly (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Reinier van Lanschot 2.tifEdit

Hoi, ik kan niet volgen waarom je die naar {PermissionOTRS} hebt gezet en heb hem teruggezet naar {OTRS received}. Lijkt me een foutje? Jcb (talk) 22:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Dat is inderdaad niet te volgen... er blijken twee tickets te zijn over dezelfde foto ticket:2019051210004152 en ticket:2019051510006163. De laatste heb ik behandeld; ik had niet gezien dat de melding {OTRS received} op het andere ticket betrekking had. De toestemming is kortom in orde. Ik zal de tickets samenvoegen en de toestemming vermelden, aannemende dat je het daarmee eens zult zijn. Groeten, Elly (talk) 08:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Ah, helder. Bedankt! Jcb (talk) 21:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Jan van nerijnen-1562878426.jpg No ticket IDEdit

What is the ticket number for File:Jan van nerijnen-1562878426.jpg so I can fix the OTRS tag? MorganKevinJ(talk) 18:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Morgankevinj:, thanks for mentioning. The ticket is 2019071110007844. Usually this is added automatically when uploading, but it was missed apparently. I added the ticket# to the image page. Regards, Elly (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Paul van WeldenEdit

reply hierop dat wist ik maar die kon ik niet vinden. Maar ik zie nu ook waarom, ik zocht op Photographs by en deze cat is Images by. Vandaar dat ik hem niet kon vinden. Bij anderen ken ik ook alleen maar photographs by zoals Category:Photographs by Tom Beetz. DutchTom (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

ja is een beetje afwijkend... mensenwerk.. Elly (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Geeft niet haha, maar daarom kon ik hem niet vinden. Nu weet ik het ;-) bedankt voor je tip! DutchTom (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@DutchTom: Als je een categorie als Category:Photographs by photographer from the Netherlands bekijkt zie je dat het een beetje door elkaar loopt. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019Edit

 
Hallo Ellywa,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Dank je wel Z thomas, voor dit bericht! Ik zal eens nadenken of ik in Nederland nog een monument kan vinden waar een bijzondere foto van te maken valt. Ik plan geen verblijf in Duitsland in september. Helaas is mijn Duits echt te slecht om aan de Vorjury deel te nemen, dank je voor de uitnodiging en het vertrouwen. Succes met de organisatie van de wedstrijd! Elly (talk) 14:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Rose from my garden.jpgEdit

Hi! Do you know name of this rose cultivar? I suppose it may be Rosa 'Händel', don't you think? Regards, Salicyna (talk) 09:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Salicyna:, I'm sorry, I threw away the label after planting - I'm afraid I am a rather chaotic gardener. It is a climbing rose, "doorbloeiend" (flowering through summer). It doesn't smell. The hart is yellowish. I bought it this year in a large shop in the Netherlands, Intratuin, it is not on their website. I will email them to ask for the name (and tell 'em I am happy with the rose). Thank you so much for categorising already. Kind regards, Elly (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I got an email reply already, it is indeed Rosa 'Händel'. You are great! Elly (talk) 15:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ellywa".