Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bannwald Wettenberger Ried in Oberschwaben AW02.jpg

File:Bannwald Wettenberger Ried in Oberschwaben AW02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2016 at 23:44:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Unsorted
Info created, uploaded &nominated by AWeith -- AWeith (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC) . Yes it's me but this is no arctic scenery! I have taken this photo on a little walk from my home in spring at a distance of just 10 walking mins from my door. I enjoy going there frequently as I feel just as remote and nature-bound as in any of those famous nature monuments of the world. This is my own little monument and yes, this is Germany. I just wanted you to tell what you think about it-- AWeith (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Request+ Question why are don't support your own image? And why should we do it? ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemist-hp: I thought one can't support its own nominations. But if so, I thought the nomination might already indicate that you designate it worth a support. -- AWeith (talk) 09:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AWeith hier auf Commons ist ein eigenes Pro üblich und bereits eingerechnet! Also keine falsche Bescheidenheit ;-) Dann gibt es auch "mein" Pro dazu. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely sea of green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it since I saw it in WLE (as a jury). Such "untouched' places are the birth places of many tiny organisms. We need to conserve more such places. J e e 05:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support using a tripod would have allowed you to improve iq even more - but it's sufficient imo. The scenery is truly impressive --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wish to support, but it is too unsharp for me on the right side --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't love the sharpness, either. AWeith, if you decide to increase the sharpness, let us know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Uoaei1, Ikan Kekek: I'll try, but I cannot promise to be successful. That photo has been taken with my old equipment and the lens could have easily been replaced by a bottle base ... --AWeith (talk) 09:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I guess there is not much to do with f/4 (DOF too shallow). --Ivar (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not quite right as the focal length was 14mm. But the lens had a very bad hardware error that cannot be mended by LR or other software. I tried but it doesn't get any better. Worst case, I have to wait until next April and do it again ... --AWeith (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "There is no deadline on Wikimedia." - old community saying. I've looked at these primeval pond photos from time to time since I really like them and would have liked to nominate one myself, but unfortunately I couldn't see any of them meeting all criteria. Besides the unsharpness, this one also have CA in many places. Now I have one more reason to look forward to spring. ;) --cart-Talk 19:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination So, see you then next April in the miraculous swamps of Upper Swabia... Thanks for all your valuable comments. --AWeith (talk) 17:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 08:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]