Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camera view of a beam of lazer light.jpg
File:Camera view of a beam of lazer light.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 12:08:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info All by Target360YT (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Target360YT (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I think that to photograph a laser beam well, you'd need to use a super-short exposure. I see this one was 1/40 sec. How about 1/1000 sec or less? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Every superfast phenomenon (Shoots etc) are made with long time exposures in dark rooms. Not the exposure time of the camera is important, the flash time does it. 1/40 seems in fact very short for a camera exposure - in fact one second and longer would be normal. --Hubertl 10:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - My reaction was that the light is blown and posterized, and that with a much shorter exposure, there might be more of a fighting chance to guard against that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Every superfast phenomenon (Shoots etc) are made with long time exposures in dark rooms. Not the exposure time of the camera is important, the flash time does it. 1/40 seems in fact very short for a camera exposure - in fact one second and longer would be normal. --Hubertl 10:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. Seems more like a "this would look cool if we did it" proof-of-concept thing. If it were used as album cover art, I would think the band uninventive (if it were one I'd never heard of) and would need some persuading to buy it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Nothing of excellence IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 11:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Hubertl 17:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per above comments. Yann (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)