Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campinas, detalhe do Palácio da Justiça.jpg

File:Campinas, detalhe do Palácio da Justiça.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 13:04:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Campinas, detalhe do Palácio da Justiça.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campinas, detalhe do Palácio da Justiça.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Carlos Eduardo Ferreira, from Campinas, Brasil - uploaded and nominated by Capmo.
•  Comment Although its technical quality isn't as high as one would desire, I like very much the photo composition: the contrast between the high relief of Lady Justice on a black granite building (the Palace of Justice, in Campinas, Brazil), and a man in white suit, with vitiligo, reading some papers. —capmo (talk) 13:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support —capmo (talk) 13:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, it's my first nomination. Should I have nominated it for COM:QI or COM:VI instead? —capmo (talk) 13:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Info QI is a good place to start; if promoted there, the image will be seen to be of good technical quality. VI is a good place if you think the image is a good illustration of something specific, e.g. the best image on Commons of a specific object. Here at FP, only very good technical images that also have a certain wow factor are usually promoted.--Peulle (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! QI would be a good choice, but I just read in the QI guidelines that the image must have been created by a Commons user, which is not the case here. And VI doesn't seem to apply to this photo. That's a pity... —capmo (talk) 14:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

 Comment This is not the work of a Commoner, so it can't be a QI. I like the composition very much, however the quality is not there. Specifically, the man's clothes are overexposed, among other issues. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others; just not technically good enough. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks everyone for your comments. I'm withdrawing the nomination for lack of technical quality. —capmo (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--—capmo (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)