Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cenotaph sketch by Lutyens.jpg

File:Cenotaph sketch by Lutyens.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2022 at 22:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others (probably? It's a little hard to classify)
Info created by Edwin Lutyens - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too simple for a feature IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historically interesting for me to make it as FP and very well restored --Kritzolina (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To me, this is a valuable VI, not a picture to feature as outstanding to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like the detail of the hand-drawn inkwork. You can disagree. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me wrong; I like it, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose We have thousands of documents like this on Commons. Not one of the best IMO. Simple sketch with nothing more. Technical drawing, far from a piece of art. Subject in itself boring in my subjective view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's by a famous architect of probably his most famous creation, and I think I did a great job restoring it. Are all architect plans invalid for FPC? Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to the original, almost no difference in my point of view, concerning the restoration. But as part as the original is concerned, it is not an exception design. Vertical and horizontal lines drawn with a ruler, then a short caption, finished. No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could imagine some complex architectural plans for some Gothic or Renaissance buildings that could merit a feature, for example, and possibly some Neo-Gothic ones. I think they would probably require a level of complexity as well as beauty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]