Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dancing Girls Bath.jpg

File:Dancing Girls Bath.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2013 at 10:35:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and appeasing composition -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. An outstanding photo. The sensor seems to have been a little warm, judging from the noise, but I'm guessing that this is hard to avoid in this situation. It's also a little blurry and there seems to be some posterization in the area of the stones on the left bottom. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Benreis (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 13:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -  Richard  [®]  19:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere, very harmonic composition. But what's about the color space? Isn't sRGB better for web images? --Tuxyso (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J Kadavoor J e e 10:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture